道德推脱对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:道德认同的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.03.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 运用问卷调查法, 通过对550名大学生的调查, 探讨了道德推脱对大学生网络偏差行为的影响及道德认同在这一影响中的调节作用。结果发现:(1)大学生的道德推脱水平在大一和大二时无明显的性别差异, 但在大三和大四时男生的道德推脱水平明显高于女生;(2)道德推脱对大学生的网络偏差行为产生显著正向影响, 道德认同对大学生的网络偏差行为产生显著负向影响, 并且道德认同在道德推脱影响大学生网络偏差行为的过程中起着显著的调节作用。在高道德认同情况下, 大学生的网络偏差行为不会随着道德推脱水平的升高而产生明显变化;在低道德认同情况下, 大学生的网络偏差行为会随着道德推脱水平的升高而显著地增多。

关键词: 大学生, 道德推脱, 道德认同, 网络偏差行为

Abstract: The present study examined the moderating effect of moral identity in the relationship between moral disengagement and deviant behavior online using a sample of 550 college students. Hierarchical multiple regression analysis was used to test the hypotheses. Results revealed that male college students had higher scores than female college students on measure of moral disengagement in grade 3 and grade 4. But no significant gender differences were found on moral disengagement in grade 1 and grade 2. Results also found that moral disengagement had a positive effect on college students' deviant behavior online. Meanwhile, moral identity had a negative effect on college students' deviant behavior online, and significantly moderated the relationship between moral disengagement and deviant behavior online.

Key words: college student, moral disengagement, moral identity, deviant behavior online

中图分类号:

B844

杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. 道德推脱对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:道德认同的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 311-318.

YANG Jiping, WANG Xingchao, GAO Ling. Moral Disengagement and College Students' Deviant Behavior Online: The Moderating Effect of Moral Identity[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(3): 311-318.

参考文献

Almeida, A., Correia, I., & Marinho, S. (2011).Virtual but not less real: A study of cyber bullying and its relations with moral disengagement and empathy. John Wiley & Sons.
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V. K. G., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123-141.
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423-1440.
Aquino, K., Reed, A., Thau, S., & Freeman, D. (2007). A grotesque and dark beauty: How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(3), 385-392.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996a). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetuation of inhumanities.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193-209.
Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Individual and collective social cognitive influences on peer aggression: Exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement, and collective efficacy.Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 107-120.
Bauman, S. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(6), 803-833.
Bauman, S., & Pero, H. (2011). Bullying and cyberbullying among deaf students and their hearing peers: An exploratory study.Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2), 236-253.
Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes.Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374-391.
Farnesea, M. L., Tramontanob, C., Fidaa, R., & Paciello, M. (2011). Cheating behaviors in academic context: Does academic moral disengagement matter?Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 356-365.
Fontaine, R. G., Fida, R., Paciello, M., Tisak, M. S., & Caprara, G. V. (2014). The mediating role of moral disengagement in the developmental course from peer rejection in adolescence to crime in early adulthood.Psychology, Crime & Law, 20(1), 1-19.
Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation.Motivation and Emotion, 30(3), 207-215.
Hardy, S. A., Walker, L. J., Rackham, D. D., & Olsen, J. A. (2012). Religiosity and adolescent empathy and aggression: The mediating role of moral identity.Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 4(3), 237-248.
He, H., & Harris, L. (2014). Moral disengagement of hotel guest negative WOM: Moral identity centrality, moral awareness, and anger.Annals of Tourism Research, 45, 132-151.
Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), 197-209.
Hymel, S., Henderson, N. R., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents.Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 1-11.
Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., Ourda, D., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2013). A process model of cyberbullying in adolescence.Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 881-887.
McAlister, A. L. (2001). Moral disengagement: Measurement and modification.Journal of Peace Research, 38(1), 87-99.
Mulder, L. B., & Aquino, K. (2013). The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 219-230.
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence.Child Development, 79(5), 1288-1309.
Perren, S., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Cyberbullying and traditional bullying in adolescence. Differential roles of moral disengagement, moral emotions, and moral values.European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 195-209.
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81-94.
Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual.Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610-1624.
Robson, C., & Witenberg, R. T. (2013). The influence of moral disengagement, morally based self-esteem, age, and gender on traditional bullying and cyberbullying.Journal of School Violence, 12(2), 211-231.
Shulman, E. P., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J. (2011). Moral disengagement among serious juvenile offenders: A longitudinal study of the relations between morally disengaged attitudes and offending.Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1619-1632.
Winterich, K. P., Aquino, K., Mittal, V., & Swartz, R. (2013). When moral identity symbolization motivates prosocial behavior: The role of recognition and moral identity internalization.Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 759-770.
Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. (2009). Donation behavior toward in-groups and out-groups: The role of gender and moral identity.Journal of Consumer Research, 36(2), 199-214.
贺金波, 李兵兵, 郭永玉, 江光荣. (2010). 青少年网络色情成瘾研究进展.中国临床心理学杂志, 18(6), 772-774.
胡阳, 范翠英. (2013). 青少年网络欺负行为研究述评与展望.中国特殊教育, 5, 83-87.
黄华. (2013). 社会认知取向的道德认同研究.心理学探新, 32(6), 483-488.
雷雳. (2010).鼠标上的青春舞蹈:青少年互联网心理学. 上海:华东师范大学出版社.
马晓辉, 雷雳. (2010). 青少年网络道德与其网络偏差行为的关系.心理学报, 42(10), 988-997.
王兴超, 杨继平. (2010). 中文版道德推脱问卷的信效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2), 177-179.
王兴超, 杨继平. (2013). 道德推脱与大学生亲社会行为:道德认同的调节效应.心理科学, 36(4), 904-909.
王兴超, 杨继平, 刘丽, 高玲, 李霞. (2012). 道德推脱对大学生攻击行为的影响:道德认同的调节作用.心理发展与教育, 28(5), 532-538.
杨继平, 王兴超. (2012). 道德推脱对青少年攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介效应.心理学报, 44(8), 1075-1085.
杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2010). 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量.心理科学进展, 18(4), 671-678.
杨继平, 王兴超, 陆丽君, 张力维. (2010). 道德推脱与大学生学术欺骗行为的关系.心理发展与教育, 26(4), 364-370.
杨继平, 王兴超, 杨力. (2014). 观点采择对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:道德推脱的中介作用.心理科学, 37(3), 633-638.
赵建华. (2011). 高校学生就业道德素养弱化成因分析及对策探索.教育研究, 3, 65-68.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	樊香麟, 崔英锦. 客体化身体意识与女大学生限制性饮食行为的关系：外貌负面评价恐惧和社会文化压力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 122-131.
[3]	张慧如, 张伟达, 傅王倩, 邓敏, 彭苏浩, 李玉. 孤独感对创造性倾向的影响：无聊倾向和焦虑情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 132-141.
[4]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[5]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.
[6]	鲍振宙, 储怡佳, 王帆, 柳希希. 校园欺凌中的“袖手旁观”:校园氛围、学校联结和道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 580-589.
[7]	杜秀芳, 武玉玺, 徐政, 袁晓倩, 陈功香. 金钱启动与道德认同对大学生道德伪善的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 342-349.
[8]	喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[9]	汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.
[10]	张林, 陈燕铃, 洪新伟, 赵明玉, 范航, 刘燊. 冷酷无情特质与初中生校园欺凌行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 266-275.
[11]	曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[12]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[13]	陈子循, 李金文, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 累积环境风险与大学生自伤的关系:情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 109-120.
[14]	郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[15]	王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed