心理发展与教育 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 361-367.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年道德推脱与攻击行为：道德判断调节作用的性别差异

杨继平1,2, 王兴超2   

  1. 1. 山西大学教育科学学院, 太原 030006;
    2. 山西大学商务学院, 太原 030031
  • 出版日期:2013-07-15 发布日期:2013-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 杨继平,E-mail: jpyang@sxu.edu.cn E-mail:jpyang@sxu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(10YJAXLX021);山西大学商务学院科研基金(2012058).

Adolescents’ Moral Disengagement and Aggressive Behavior：Moderating Effect of Moral Judgment and Its Gender Difference

YANG Ji-ping1,2, WANG Xing-chao2   

  1. 1. School of Educational Science, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006;
    2. Business College of Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030031
  • Online:2013-07-15 Published:2013-07-15

PDF (PC)

摘要： 通过对756名青少年的问卷调查,考察了道德判断在青少年道德推脱与攻击行为之间调节作用的性别差异。结果发现:(1)道德推脱会对青少年的攻击行为产生显著的正向影响,道德判断不会对青少年的攻击行为产生显著的影响,但是道德判断可以显著地调节道德推脱与攻击行为之间的关系;(2)道德判断在调节道德推脱与攻击行为之间的关系时存在明显的性别差异,较高的道德判断能力难以削弱道德推脱对男生攻击行为的正向影响,但可以明显地削弱道德推脱对女生攻击行为的正向影响。

关键词: 青少年, 道德推脱, 道德判断, 攻击行为

Abstract: The current study aimed to explore the impact of moral disengagement and moral judgment on adolescents' aggressive behavior, and whether or how these two factors interact in influencing adolescent's aggressive behavior. Moral Disengagement Scale, Moral Reasoning about Aggression Scale and Aggression Questionnaire were finished by 756 adolescents (332 boys and 424 girls) from junior and senior high school in Taiyuan City, Shanxi Province. SPSS16.0 and lisrel8.70 were adopted to perform a series of statistical analyses, including reliability, correlation analysis as well as Structural Equation Model Analysis. Results showed: (1) Moral disengagement had a positive effect on the aggressive behavior (r=0.52, p<0.001). Moral judgment could not significantly predict adolescents' aggressive behavior (r=-0.03, p>0.05). However, moral judgment could significantly moderate the relationship between moral disengagement and aggressive behavior. Moreover, further analysis demonstrated that the moldering effect of moral judgment was only significant in the female sample, but not for males.

Key words: moral disengagement, moral judgment, adolescent aggressive behavior

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1990). Mechanisms of moral disengagement, in W. Reich (ed.), Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, states of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetuation of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193-209.
Bandura, A. (2002). Selective moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Moral Education, 31(2), 101-119.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364-374.
Barriga, A. Q., Morrison, E. M., Liau, A. K., & Gibbs, J. C. (2001). Moral cognition: Explaining the gender difference in antisocial behavior. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(4), 532-562.
Barsky, A. J., Islam, G., & Zyphur, M. J. (2006). Investigating the effects of moral disengagement and participation on unethical work behavior. Ibmec Working Paper, wpe14. Retrieved July 3, 2009, from http://www.ibmecsp.edu.br/pesquisa/download.php?recid=3071
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452-459.
Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Tramontano, C., & Barbaranelli, C. (2009). Assessing civic moral disengagement: Dimensionality and construct validity. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 504-509.
Carlo, G., Mestre, M. V., Samper, P., Tur, A., & Armenta, B. E. (2010). Feelings or cognitions? Moral cognitions and emotions as longitudinal predictors of prosocial and aggressive behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 872-877.
Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374-391.
Fumagalli, M., Ferrucci, R., Mameli, F., Marceglia, S., Mrakic-Sposta, S., Zago, S., et al., (2010). Gender-related differences in moral judgments. Cognitive Processing, 11(3), 219-226.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Greene, J. D. (2003). From neural 'is' to moral 'ought': What are the moral implications of neuroscientific moral psychology? Nature Reviews, 4, 847-850.
Hodgdon, H. B. (2009). Child maltreatment and aggression: The mediating role of moral disengagement, emotion regulation, and emotional callousness among juvenile offenders. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation. Temple University.
Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(2), 197-209.
Hymel, S., Henderson, N. R., & Bonanno, R. A. (2005). Moral disengagement: A framework for understanding bullying among adolescents. Journal of Social Sciences, 8, 1-11.
Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 703-726.
MacDorman, K. F., Coram, J. A., Ho, C. C., & Patel, H. (2010). Gender differences in the impact of presentational factors in human character animation on decisions in ethical dilemmas. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19(3), 213-229.
Malti, T., Gasser, L., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Aggressive and prosocial children's emotion attributions and moral reasoning. Aggressive Behavior, 35(1), 90-102.
McCreary, G. R. (2012). The impact of moral judgment and moral disengagement on hazing attitudes and bystander behavior in college males. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation. University of Alabama.
Murray-Close, D., & Crick, N. R. (2006). Children's moral reasoning regarding physical and relational aggression. Social Development, 15(3), 345-372.
Obermann, M. L. (2011). Moral disengagement in self-reported and peer-nominated school bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 133-144.
Paciello, M., Fida, R., Tramontano, C., Lupinetti, C., & Caprara, G. V. (2008). Stability and change of moral disengagement and its impact on aggression and violence in late adolescence. Child Development, 79(5), 1288-1309.
Pornari, C. D., & Wood, J. (2010). Peer and cyber aggression in secondary school students: The role of moral disengagement, hostile attribution bias, and outcome expectancies. Aggressive Behavior, 36(2), 81-94.
Reynolds, S. J., & Ceranic, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1610-1624.
Richmond, J., & Wilson, J. C. (2008). Are graphic media violence, aggression and moral disengagement related? Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 15(2), 350-357.
Shulman, E. P., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J. (2011). Moral disengagement among serious juvenile offenders: A longitudinal study of the relations between morally disengaged attitudes and offending. Developmental Psychology, 47(6), 1619-1632.
Thevathasan, T. J. (2009). Moral disengagement, aggression and bullying among incarcerated young male offenders in Singapore. Unpublished Doctorial Dissertation. Nanyang Technological University.
侯杰泰, 温忠麟, 成子娟. (2004). 结构方程模型及其影响. 北京:教育科学出版社.
王美芳, 闫秀梅, 姚利. (2010). 儿童青少年对身体攻击和关系攻击的道德判断. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(4), 523-525.
王兴超, 杨继平. (2010). 中文版道德推脱问卷的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(2),177-179.
王兴超, 杨继平, 刘丽, 高玲, 李霞. (2012). 道德推脱对大学生攻击行为的影响:道德认同的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 28(5), 532-538.
吴艳, 温忠麟, 林冠群. (2009). 潜变量交互效应建模:告别均值结构. 心理学报, 41(12), 1252-1259.
杨继平, 王兴超. (2011). 父母冲突与初中生攻击行为:道德推脱的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(5), 498-505.
杨继平, 王兴超. (2012). 道德推脱对青少年攻击行为的影响:有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 44(8), 1075-1085.
杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2010). 道德推脱的概念、测量及相关变量. 心理科学进展, 18(4), 671-678.
杨继平, 王兴超, 陆丽君, 张力维. (2010). 道德推脱与大学生学术欺骗行为的关系. 心理发展与教育, 26(4), 364-370.
杨韶刚. (2007). 西方道德心理学的新发展. 上海:上海教育出版社.
姚利. (2009). 儿童青少年价值观、道德判断与攻击行为的关系. 硕士论文. 山东师范大学.
赵冬梅, 周宗奎. (2010). 儿童同伴交往中的攻击行为:文化和性别特征. 心理科学, 33(1), 144-146.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15] 鲍振宙, 储怡佳, 王帆, 柳希希. 校园欺凌中的“袖手旁观”:校园氛围、学校联结和道德推脱的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 580-589.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发