心理发展与教育 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 353-360.

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

同伴拒绝与早期青少年学业成绩的关系:同伴接纳、友谊支持的调节作用

张静, 田录梅, 张文新   

  1. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250014
  • 出版日期:2013-07-15 发布日期:2013-07-15
  • 通讯作者: 张文新,E-mail: zhangwenxin@sdnu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangwenxin@sdnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    山东省“十二五”优势特色学科(发展与教育心理学);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC190022);山东省高等学校人文社会科学研究项目(J12WH15).

Relations between Peer Rejection and Early Adolescents’ Academic Achievement:the Moderating Effects of Peer Acceptance and Friendship Support

ZHANG Jing, TIAN Lu-mei, ZHANG Wen-xin   

  1. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China
  • Online:2013-07-15 Published:2013-07-15

摘要: 采用同伴提名法获得215名早期青少年(5年级、7年级)的同伴地位(同伴拒绝、同伴接纳)分数,采用关系网络问卷(NRI)获得友谊支持分数,以学生期中考试的语文、数学、英语成绩的班内标准分的三科平均分作为个体学业成绩的指标,分析同伴拒绝与学业成绩的关系,以及同伴接纳和友谊支持对二者关系的调节作用及其年级和性别差异。结果发现:(1)女生的学业成绩高于男生,同伴拒绝、同伴接纳、友谊支持水平均不存在性别差异;(2)同伴拒绝均显著负向预测5、7年级学生的学业成绩,且这种预测作用不存在显著的性别差异;(3)在7年级,学生的同伴接纳可以调节同伴拒绝与学业成绩的关系,尽管高同伴接纳并不能补偿高同伴拒绝给学业成绩带来的消极影响,但它也是个体获得良好学业成绩的必要条件;在5年级和7年级,友谊支持都不能调节同伴拒绝与学业成绩的关系。

关键词: 学业成绩, 同伴拒绝, 同伴接纳, 友谊支持, 早期青少年

Abstract: Experiences with peers constitute an important developmental context for early adolescence. Adolescents' peer relation can be understood by referring to two levels—in groups (peer rejection and peer acceptance) and in dyadic (friendship). Prior emphases on the main effects of different peer relation indicators on adolescent adjustments have been replaced by emphases on models that emphasize how sets of variables function together via moderation to affect outcome. But no clear and consistent conclusion about these interaction patterns between different peer relation indicators (peer rejection, peer acceptance and friendship) on academic achievement.So this study adopted peer nomination measure, the Chinese modified versions of the Network of Relationships Inventory and midsemester test score on 215 early adolescents from grade 5 and 7, analyzed the relation between peer rejection and academic achievement among early adolescents, and whether the relation can be moderated by peer acceptance and friendship support. The main findings were as follows: (1) Girls received higher academic achievement, and there is no other significant difference was observed between genders; (2) Peer rejection predicted academic achievement significantly for adolescents from grade 5 and 7, and the influence was no significant difference between genders; (3) In grade 7, peer acceptance moderated the relation between peer rejection and academic achievement: higher level of peer acceptance didn't compensate the negative effect of higher level of peer rejection on academic achievement , but the prerequisite for high academic achievement; friendship support can't moderated the relation between peer rejection and academic achievement for early adolescence.

Key words: academic achievement, peer rejection, peer acceptance, friendship support, early adolescence

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
Bellmorea, A. (2011). Peer rejection and unpopularity: Associations with GPAs across the transition to middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 282-295.
Buhs, E. S., Ladd, G. W., & Herald, S. L. (2006). Peer exclusion and victimization: Processes that mediate the relation between peer group rejection and children's classroom engagement and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 1-13.
Burt, K. B., Obradovi, J., Long, J. D., & Masten, A. S. (2008). The interplay of social competence and psychopathology over 20 years: Testing transactional and cascade models. Child Development, 79(2), 359-374.
Chen, X. Y., & French, D. C. (2008). Child's social competence in cultural context. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 591-616.
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
Criss, M. M., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Lapp, A. L. (2002). Family adversity, positive peer relationships, and children's externalizing behavior: A longitudinal perspective on risk and resilience. Child Development, 73(4), 1220-1237.
Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation to succeed. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 3 Social, emotional, and personality development(5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1985). Children's perception of the personal relationships in their social networks. Developmental Psychology, 21, 1016-1024.
Gutman, L. M., Sameroff, A. J., & Cole, R. (2003). Academic growth curve trajectories from 1st grade to 12th grade: Effects of multiple social risk factors and preschool child factors. Development Psychology, 39(4), 777-790.
Hyde, J. S., Mezulis, A. H., & Abramson, L. Y. (2008). The ABCs of depression: Integrating affective, biological, and cognitive models to explain the emergence of the gender difference in depression. Psychology Review, 115(2), 291-313.
LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2010). Developmental changes in the priority of perceived status in childhood and adolescence. Social Development, 19(1), 130-147.
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(3), 437-448.
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed). New York, NY: Wiley, (pp. 571-645)
Rubin, K. H., Dwyer, K. M., Kim, A. H., & Burgess, K. B. (2004). Attachment, friendship, and psychosocial functioning in ealy adolessence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24(4), 326-356.
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98-131.
Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42(6), 1116-1127.
Véronneaua, M. H., Vitarob, F., Brendgenc, M., Dishione, T. J., & Tremblayf, R. E. (2010). Transactional analysis of the reciprocal links between peer experiences and academic achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 773-790.
Waldrip, A.M., Malcolm, K. T., & Jensen-Campbell, L.A. (2008). With a little help from your friends: The importance of high-quality friendships on early adolescent adjustment. Social Development, 17(4), 832-852.
Wentzel, K. R. (2005). Peer relationships motivation and academic performance at school. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York, NY: Guiford, (pp. 279-296).
Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 193-202.
Wentzel, K. R., & Caldwell, K. (1997). Friendships, peer acceptance, and group membership: relations to academic achievement in middle school. Child Development, 68, 1198-1209.
Welsh, M., Parke, R. D., Widaman, K., & O'Neil, R. (2001). Linkages between children's social and academic competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of School Psychology. 39(6), 463-481.
陈斌斌,李丹, 陈欣银, 陈峰. (2011). 作为社会和文化情境的同伴圈子对儿童社会能力发展的影响. 心理学报, 43(1), 74-91.
陈会昌, 王秋虎, 陈欣银. (2001). 对学生学习成绩与社会行为的交叉滞后分析. 心理学报, 33(6), 532-536.
陈红禹. (2012). 青少年对未来的规划和评价与不同来源社会支持的关系. 硕士学位论文. 山东师范大学.
纪林芹, 张莹莹, 陈亮, 陈光辉, 曾玉, 张文新. (2011). 童年中期对抗行为的发展及其与同伴拒绝同伴接纳的关系. 心理与行为研究, 9(4), 304-309.
金灿灿, 邹泓, 李晓巍. (2011). 青少年的社会适应: 保护性和危险性因素及其累积效应. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 1, 12-20.
穆岩, 苏彦捷. (2005). 10-12岁儿童的同伴接纳类型与社会策略. 心理发展与教育, 2, 23-29.
孙晓军, 周宗奎, 范翠英, 柯善玉. (2009). 童年中期不同水平的同伴交往变量与孤独感的关系. 心理科学, 32(3), 567-570.
斯滕伯格. (2007). 青春期 (第7版) (戴俊毅 译). 上海: 上海社会科学院.
田录梅, 陈光辉, 王姝琼, 刘海娇, 张文新. (2012). 父母支持、友谊支持对早中期青少年孤独感和抑郁的影响. 心理学报, 44(7), 944-956.
辛自强, 池丽萍. (2008). 社会变迁中的青少年. 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.
周宗奎, 李萌, 赵冬梅. (2006). 童年中期儿童社会能力与学业成就的交叉滞后研究. 心理科学, 29(5), 1071-1075.
赵冬梅, 周宗奎. (2003). 童年期同伴关系与后期适应的研究述评. 内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 32(3), 101-105.
张文新, 陈亮, 纪林芹, 张玲玲, 陈光辉, 王姝琼. (2009).童年中期身体侵害、关系侵害与儿童的情绪适应. 心理学报, 41(5), 433-443.
[1] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2] 牛湘, 冉光明. 同伴关系与幼儿问题行为关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 473-487.
[3] 李腾飞, 马玉鑫, 宋瑞君, 陈亮. 青少年早期身体侵害、关系侵害与学业成绩的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 559-567.
[4] 雷晓玲, 赵冬梅, 杨文娇, 田晓红. 青少年家庭功能与亲社会行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 786-792.
[5] 谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[6] 王靖民, 郭明宇, 常淑敏. 儿童父母拒绝与同伴拒绝的关系:问题行为的中介作用和家庭环境纷杂度的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 845-853.
[7] 任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[8] 褚晓伟, 周宗奎, 范翠英. 同伴拒绝与网络欺负的关系:愤怒的中介作用和感知匿名性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 584-593.
[9] 梁兴丽, 何津, 周佶俊, 刘萍萍. 认知能力对学业成绩的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 449-461.
[10] 王明忠, 王静, 王保英, 曲西茜, 辛福康. 粗暴养育与青少年学业成绩:有调节的中介分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 67-76.
[11] 郭筱琳, 何苏日那, 秦欢, 刘春晖, 罗良. 亲子间教育期望差异对小学生情感幸福感的影响:学业成绩和学业自我效能感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 467-477.
[12] 陈旭, 张大均, 程刚, 胡天强, 刘广增. 教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.
[13] 聂倩, 张大均, 滕召军, 陆星月, 郭成. 学生感知的学校氛围与主客观学业成绩:心理素质及其分维度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 715-723.
[14] 程刚, 唐昕怡, 牛娟, 李佳佳, 张大均. 中学生家庭社会经济地位与学业成绩的关系:心理素质各维度的多重中介作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.
[15] 王明忠, 王梦然, 王静. 父母冲突损害青少年学业成绩:努力控制与课堂参与的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 434-442.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!