家庭社会经济地位与青少年未来规划的关系:外向性的调节作用及其性别差异

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.04.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以山东省济南市、莱州市的935名初二和高一学生为被试, 进行为期一年半的追踪研究, 考察了家庭社会经济地位与青少年的教育规划和职业规划之间的关系, 检验了外向性在其中的调节作用及其性别差异。结果表明:(1)家庭社会经济地位能够显著正向地预测青少年T1和T2时的教育规划以及T1时的职业规划;(2)外向性水平越高, 青少年教育规划和职业规划水平越高, 但是这种预测作用不存在长期性;(3)外向性能够调节家庭社会经济地位与青少年教育规划之间关系, 且这种调节作用存在显著的性别差异;但在家庭社会经济地位与青少年职业规划之间不存调节作用。这表明, 外向性不仅能够直接保护青少年的未来规划, 而且能够抵抗低家庭社会经济地位对个体未来规划的不良影响, 但是这种压力抵抗效应在不同性别、不同未来规划的领域之中存在差异。

关键词: 青少年, 家庭社会经济地位, 外向性, 未来规划

Abstract: Based on a longitudinal design, 935 adolescents of Grades 8 and 10 from Shandong province were recruited to explore the relationship between family socioeconomic status and adolescents' future planning, and also test the moderating effects by extroversion on the link between family socioeconomic status and future planning for boys and girls. Results indicated that family socioeconomic status positively predicted adolescents' educational planning at Time 1 and Time 2 and occupational planning at Time 1. Extroversion positively predicted adolescents' educational planning and occupational planning at Time 1. In addition, extroversion moderated the link between family socioeconomic status and adolescents' educational planning, and there were significant gender differences in the moderating effect, while no moderating effect was observed between family socioeconomic status and adolescents' occupational planning. The results demonstrated that extroversion can not only protect adolescents' future planning directly but also buffer the negative influence of low family socioeconomic status, but the buffering effect is different for boys and girls and also different in domains of future planning.

Key words: adolescents, family socioeconomic status, extroversion, future planning

中图分类号:

B844

陈曦, 陈光辉, 赵景欣. 家庭社会经济地位与青少年未来规划的关系:外向性的调节作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(4): 420-427.

CHEN Xi, CHEN Guanghui, ZHAO Jingxin. The Relationships between Family Socioeconomic Status and Adolescents' Future Planning: The Moderating Effect of Extroversion and the Gender Differences[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(4): 420-427.

参考文献

Ashby, J. S., & Schoon, I. (2010). Career success: The role of teenage career aspirations, ambition value and gender in predicting adult social status and earnings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 350-360.
Barnett, E., Spruijt-Metz, D., Unger, J. B., Rohrbach, L.A., Sun, P., & Sussman, S. (2013). Bidirectional associations between future time perspective and substance use among continuation high-school students. Substance Use & Misuse, 48(8), 574-580.
Bokhorst, C. L., Sumter, S. R., & Westenberg, P. M. (2010). Social support from parents, friends, classmates, and teachers in children and adolescents aged 9 to 18 years: Who is perceived as most supportive? Social Development, 19(2), 417-426.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399.
Cameron, P., Desai, K. G., Bahador, D., & Dremel, G. (1977). Temporality across the life-span. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 8(3), 229-259.
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 58, 175-199.
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R.(1985). The NEO Personality Inventory Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Eagly, A. J., & Crowley, M. (1986). Gender and helping behavior: A meta-analytic review of the social psychological literature. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 283-308.
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54(6), 408-423.
Flagnagan, C. (1990). Change in family work status: Effects on parent-adolescent decision making. Child Development, 61(1), 163-177.
Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B., & Colditz, G. A. (2001). Adolescents' perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), e31-e31.
Griskevicius, V., Tybur, J. M., Delton, A. W., & Robertson, T. E. (2011). The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on risk and delayed rewards: A life history theory approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 1015-1026.
Lamm, H., Schmidt, R. W., & Trommsdorff, G. (1976). Sex and social class as determinants of future orientation (time perspective) in adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(3), 317-326.
McKay, M. T., Percy, A., & Cole, J. C. (2013). Present orientation, future orientation and alcohol use in Northern Irish adolescents. Addiction Research & Theory, 21(1), 43-51.
Nurmi, J. (1991). How do adolescents see their future? A review of the development of future orientation and planning. Developmental Review, 11(1), 1-59.
Nurmi, J., Poole, M. E., & Kalakoski, V. (1996). Age differences in adolescent identity exploration and commitment in urban and rural environments. Journal of Adolescence, 19(5), 443-452.
Poole, M. E., & Cooney, G. H. (1987). Orientation to the future: A comparison of adolescents in Australia and Singapore. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16(2), 129-151.
Rantanen, J., MetsöPelto, R. L., Feldt, T., Pulkkinen, L., & Kokko, K. (2007). Long-term stability in the Big Five personality traits in adulthood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48(6), 511-518.
Rogers, M. E., & Creed, P. A. (2011). A longitudinal examination of adolescent career planning and exploration using a social cognitive career theory framework. Journal of Adolescence, 34(1), 163-172.
Rogers, M. E., Creed, P. A., & Ian Glendon, A. (2008). The role of personality in adolescent career planning and exploration: A social cognitive perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73(1), 132-142.
Schröder, E., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., & Arnaud, N. (2011). Career choice intentions of adolescents with a family business background. Family Business Review, 24(4), 305-321.
Seginer, R. (2009). Future orientation: Developmental and Ecological Perspectives. New York: Springer.
Timothy, A. J., Remus I. (2002). Relationship of personality to performance motivation: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 797-807.
珀文, L. A. (2001). 人格科学(周榕等译).上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
蔡重. (2014). 高考制度的现状与改革设想. 教学月刊·中学版, (4), 14-16.
黎建斌, 马利军, 陶惠斯, 池思晓. (2012). 成败反馈对大学生核心自我评价的影响: 任务重要性、外向性的调节作用. 心理科学, 35(2), 364-368.
李文道, 邹泓, 赵霞. (2005). 初中生的社会支持与人格的关系. 心理科学, 28(4), 868-871.
曲可佳, 邹泓. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位, 父母教养行为与大学生职业生涯探索的关系. 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 500-506.
申正付, 杨秀木, 孙雪芹, 贺庆功, 韩布新.(2013). 人格特征、一般自我效能感对大学生主观幸福感的影响.中国临床心理学杂志, 21(2), 303-305.
师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位, 智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30-34.
王萍萍, 许燕, 陈咏媛, 李佳慧. (2010). 地震灾区高中生外向性对主观幸福感的影响:社会期望的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, 120(6), 65-68.
温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报, 37(2), 268-274.
闫守轩, 韩玲玲. (2011). 从高考改革新方案透视高中文理分科. 教育学术月刊, (2), 66-69.
于凤杰, 赵景欣, 张文新. (2013). 早中期青少年未来规划的发展及其与父母教养行为的关系:行为自主的中介效应. 心理学报, 45(6), 658-671.
桑特洛克, J. W. (2013). 青少年心理学(第11版)(寇彧等译). 北京: 人民邮电出版社.
张玲玲. (2008). 青少年未来取向的发展与家庭、同伴因素的关系. 博士学位论文. 山东师范大学.
张玲玲, 张文新. (2008). 中晚期青少年的个人规划及其与亲子、朋友沟通的关系. 心理学报, 40(5), 583-592.

相关文章 15

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[5]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[6]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[7]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[8]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[9]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[10]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[11]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[12]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[13]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[14]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[15]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed