心理发展与教育 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 303-311.

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

父母控制与青少年问题性网络使用:越轨同伴交往的中介效应

宋静静1,2, 李董平1,2, 谷传华1,2, 赵力燕3, 鲍振宙4, 王艳辉5   

  1. 1. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079;
    3. 四川师范大学文理学院教育学院, 成都 610101;
    4. 华南师范大学心理学院, 广州 510631;
    5. 嘉应学院教育科学学院, 梅州 514015
  • 出版日期:2014-05-15 发布日期:2014-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 李董平,E-mail:lidongping83@126.com E-mail:lidongping83@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    华中师范大学中央高校基本科研业务费重大培育项目(CCNU11C01005)

Parental Control and Adolescents’ Problematic Internet Use:The Mediating Effect of Deviant Peer Affiliation

SONG Jing-jing1,2, LI Dong-ping1,2, GU Chuan-hua1,2, ZHAO Li-yan3, BAO Zhen-zhou4, WANG Yan-hui5   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior CCNU, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
    2. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
    3. School of Education, Arts and Sciences College of Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101;
    4. School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631;
    5. School of Education Science, Jiaying University, Meizhou 514015
  • Online:2014-05-15 Published:2014-05-15

摘要: 以往研究探讨了父母控制与青少年问题性网络使用(PIU)的关系,但它们在父母控制的操作定义、独特效应检验、函数形式分析等方面不够完善,且较少对中介机制进行探讨。本研究考察了不同形式的父母控制(行为控制 vs. 心理控制)与青少年PIU的直接联系,以及越轨同伴交往在其中的中介效应。选取703名初中生作为被试,匿名填写人口学问卷、父母控制问卷、越轨同伴交往问卷和青少年PIU量表。回归分析表明:(1)在控制了性别、年龄和家庭社会经济地位后,父母行为控制和心理控制对青少年PIU分别具有线性的抑制效应和促进效应;(2)父母行为控制和心理控制对越轨同伴交往分别具有线性的抑制和促进效应,进而作用于青少年PIU。因此,父母行为控制和心理控制与青少年PIU具有密切的联系,且越轨同伴交往在其中具有中介效应。

关键词: 行为控制, 心理控制, 问题性网络使用, 越轨同伴交往, 青少年

Abstract: An increasing body of research had investigated the relationship between parental control and adolescents' problematic Internet use (PIU). However, there were several limitations in prior studies: the operational definition of parental control was flawed;the unique effect of different forms of parental control [behavioral control (BC) vs. psychological control (PC)] had rarely been examined;the functional form (linear vs. curvilinear) of the relationship had not been formally tested;and the mediating mechanism was still poorly understood. Our purpose was to examine the direct associations between BC, PC, and adolescent PIU, and to investigate whether affiliation with deviant peers will mediate the relationship between parental control and adolescent PIU. Participants were 703 middle school students. In school, participants anonymously completed demographic information questionnaire, parental behavioral and psychological control scale, deviant peer affiliation questionnaire, and PIU scale. After adjusting for age, gender, and socioeconomic status, BC had negative and linear effect on adolescent PIU, whereas PC had positive and linear effect on adolescent PIU. The non-linear effects of BC and PC were not significant. Moreover, deviant peer affiliation mediated the relationship between the two forms of parental control and adolescent PIU. Specifically, BC was negatively and linearly associated with deviant peer affiliation, which in turn was associated with PIU. In addition, PC was positively and linearly associated with deviant peer affiliation, which in turn was positively associated with PIU.

Key words: behavioral control, psychological control, problematic Internet use, deviant peer affiliation, adolescents

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
Ahmad, I., Vansteenkiste, M.,& Soenens, B. (2013). The relations of Arab Jordanian adolescents' perceived maternal parenting to teacher-rated adjustment and problems: The intervening role of perceived need satisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 49, 177-183.
Aunola, K., Tolvanen, A., Viljaranta,J., & Nurmi,J. (2013). Psychological control in daily parent-child interactions increases children's negative emotions. Journal of Family Psychology, 27, 453-462.
Barber, B. K. (1996). Parental psychological control: Revisiting a neglected construct. Child Development, 67, 3296-3319.
Barber, B. K., Stolz, H. E., & Olsen,J. A. (2005). Parental support, behavioral control, and psychological control: Assessing relevance across time, method, and culture. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 70(4), 1-147.
Barber, B. K., Olsen,J. E., & Shagle, S. C. (1994). Associations between parental psychological and behavioral control and youth internalized and externalized behaviors. Child Development, 65, 1120-1136.
Barber, B. K., & Xia, M. (2013). The centrality of control to parenting and its effects. In R. E. Larzelere, A. S. Morris, & A. W. Harrist (Eds.), Authoritative parenting: Synthesizing nurturance and discipline for optimal child development (pp. 61-87). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Beard, K. W. (2011). Working with adolescents addicted to the Internet. In K. S. Young & C. N. de Abreu (Eds.), Internet addiction: A handbook and guide to evaluation and treatment (pp. 173-189). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cohen,J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gentile, D. A., Choo, H., Liau, A., Sim, T., Li, D., Fung, D., et al. (2011). Pathological video game use among youths: A two-year longitudinal study. Pediatrics, 127, e319-e329.
Giles, G., & Price, I. R. (2008). Adolescent computer use: Approach, avoidance, and parental control. Australian Journal of Psychology, 60, 63-71.
Hawkins,J. D., & Weis,J. G. (1985). The social development model: An integrated approach to delinquency prevention. Journal of Primary Prevention, 6, 73-97.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.
Holmes, E. K., Dunn, K. C., Harper,J., Dyer, W.J., & Day, R. D. (2012). Mother knows best? Inhibitory maternal gatekeeping, psychological control, and the mother-adolescent relationship.Journal of Adolescence, 36, 91-101.
Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Burk, W.J. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 39-64.
Kins, E., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2012). Parental psychological control and dysfunctional separation-individuation: A tale of two different dynamics. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1099-1109.
Ko, C. H., Yen,J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Weng, C. C., & Chen, C. C. (2008). The association between Internet addiction and problematic alcohol use in adolescents: The problem behavior model. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 571-576.
Li, D., Li, X., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., Bao, Z., & Wen, F. (2013). School connectedness and problematic Internet use in adolescents: A moderated mediation model of deviant peer affiliation and self-control. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1231-1242.
Li, D., Zhang, W., Li, X., Zhen, S., & Wang, Y. (2010). Stressful life events and problematic Internet use by adolescent females and males: A mediated moderation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1199-1207.
Li, X., Li, D., & Newman,J. (2013). Parental behavioral and psychological control and problematic Internet use among Chinese adolescents: The mediating role of self-control. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 442-447.
Lin, C. H., Lin, S. L., & Wu, C. P. (2009). The effects of parental monitoring and leisure boredom on adolescents' Internet addiction. Adolescence, 44, 993-1004.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee,J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
Pomerantz, E. M., & Wang, Q. (2009). The role of parental control in children's development in western and east Asian countries. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 285-289.
Prinstein, M.J., & Dodge, K. A. (2008). Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. New York: The Guilford Press.
Silk,J. S., Morris, A. S., Kanaya, T., & Steinberg, L. (2003). Psychological control and autonomy granting: Opposite ends of a continuum or distinct constructs? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 113-128.
Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). A theoretical upgrade of the concept of parental psychological control: Proposing new insights on the basis of self-determination theory. Developmental Review, 30, 74-99.
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., & Luyten, P. (2010). Toward a domain-specific approach to the study of parental psychological control: Distinguishing between dependency-oriented and achievement-oriented psychological control. Journal of Personality, 78, 217-256.
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Luyckx, K., & Goossens, L. (2006). Parenting and adolescent problem behavior: An integrated model with adolescent self-disclosure and perceived parental knowledge as intervening variables. Developmental Psychology, 42, 305-318.
Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Smits, I., Lowet, K., & Goossens, L. (2007). The role of intrusive parenting in the relationship between peer management strategies and peer affiliation. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 28, 239-249.
Suler,J. R. (1999). To get what you need: Healthy and pathological Internet use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 2, 385-393.
Sun, P., Unger,J. B., Palmer, P. H., Gallaher, P., Chou, C. P., Baezconde-Garbanati, L., et al. (2005). Internet accessibility and usage among urban adolescents in Southern California: Implications for web-based health research. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 441-453.
Van Den Eijnden, R.J., Spijkerman, R., Vermulst, A. A., van Rooij, T.J., & Engels, R. C. (2010). Compulsive Internet use among adolescents: Bidirectional parent-child relationships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 77-89.
Wang, H., Zhou, X., Lu, C., Wu,J., Deng, X., & Hong, L. (2011). Problematic internet use in high school students in Guangdong province, China. PLoS One, 6, e19660.
Wang, Q., Pomerantz, E. M., & Chen, H. (2007). The role of parents' control in early adolescents' psychological functioning: A longitudinal investigation in the United States and China. Child Development, 78, 1592-1610.
Warner, R. M. (2012). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
Xiuqin, H., Huimin, Z., Mengchen, L., Jinan, W., Ying, Z., & Ran, T. (2010). Mental health, personality, and parental rearing styles of adolescents with Internet addiction disorder.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13, 401-406.
Yen, C. F., Ko, C. H., Yen,J. Y., Chang, Y. P., & Cheng, C. P. (2009). Multi‐dimensional discriminative factors for Internet addiction among adolescents regarding gender and age. Psychiatry and Clinical Nneurosciences, 63, 357-364.
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder.CyberPsychology & Behavior, 1, 237-244.
邓林园, 方晓义, 伍明明, 张锦涛, 刘勤学. (2013). 家庭环境、亲子依恋与青少年网络成瘾.心理发展与教育, 29, 305-311.
房超, 方晓义, 申子姣. (2012). 心理控制、行为控制与青少年网络成瘾的关系.中国特殊教育, (12), 70-74.
雷雳. (2010). 青少年“网络成瘾”探析.心理发展与教育, 26, 554-560.
李丹黎, 张卫, 李董平, 王艳辉. (2012). 父母行为控制、心理控制与青少年早期攻击和社会退缩的关系.心理发展与教育, 28, 201-209.
李丹黎, 张卫, 王艳辉, 李董平. (2013). 母亲心理控制与青少年问题性网络使用: 非适应性认知的中介作用.心理科学, 36, 411-416.
任春荣. (2010). 学生家庭社会经济地位(SES)的测量技术.教育学报,6 (5), 77-82.
申子姣, 房超, 张锦涛, 方晓义. (2012). 父母行为心理控制与青少年网络成瘾的关系.中国临床心理学杂志, 20, 652-655.
王建平, 李董平, 张卫. (2010). 家庭经济困难与青少年社会适应的关系:应对效能的补偿、中介和调节效应. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 22-32.
王莉, 邹泓, 么娆. (2011). 青少年网络成瘾、父母监控与其社会适应的关系.中国特殊教育, (5), 62-68.
杨励, 陈显元, 汪洋, 王宏. (2008). 4~6年级城市小学生沉溺电脑游戏倾向的相关因素分析.现代预防医学, 35, 4435-4436.
张卫, 李董平, 谢志杰. (2007). 低社会经济地位与儿童发展.华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (6), 104-112 & 118.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[5] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[6] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[7] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[8] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[9] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[10] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[11] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[12] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[13] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[14] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[15] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!