心理发展与教育 ›› 2013, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 657-663.

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

情绪性人格对青少年创伤后成长的影响：应对方式的中介作用和社会支持的调节作用

安媛媛1,2, 伍新春1, 刘春晖1, 林崇德1   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学心理学院, 发展心理研究所, 北京 100875;
    2. 南京师范大学心理学院, 南京 210097
  • 出版日期:2013-11-15 发布日期:2013-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 伍新春，E-mail：xcwu@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:xcwu@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目（08JZD0026）；教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目（11JJD190006）.

Neuroticism Personality and Posttraumatic Growth in Adolescent：The Moderating Effect of Coping Style and Mediating Effect of Social Support

AN Yuan-yuan1,2, WU Xin-chun1, LIU Chun-hui1, LIN Chong-de1   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097
  • Online:2013-11-15 Published:2013-11-15

PDF (PC)

摘要： 汶川地震两年后，采用小五人格问卷、应对方式问卷、社会支持问卷和创伤后成长问卷对497名中学生进行调查，探讨青少年创伤后成长与情绪性人格、应对方式和社会支持的关系。结果显示：（1）青少年创伤后成长的年龄、性别差异不显著；青少年创伤后成长的三个维度之间存在显著差异：人际体验的改变分值最高，其次是自我觉知的改变，得分最低的为生命价值的改变；（2）积极应对方式在情绪性人格与创伤后成长之间起完全中介作用，消极应对方式则不发挥直接的中介作用；（3）情绪性人格与创伤后成长之间的中介效应受到社会支持的调节，低社会支持组的个体情绪性人格越高，越容易采取积极认知、寻求支持等积极的应对方式，从而产生更高的创伤后成长。

关键词: 青少年, 创伤后成长(PTG), 情绪性人格, 应对方式, 社会支持

Abstract: In order to explore the relationships among adolescents' post-trauma growth, neuroticism personality, coping style and social support, 497 middle school students were investigated by questionnaires at 2 year after Wenchuan earthquake. The structural equation modeling results revealed that: (1) there was no significant difference between adolescents' posttraumatic growth on age and gender, and the three dimensions of children posttraumatic growth had significant differences, the experience of relationships with others had changed most, followed by the changes in the perception of self, and the changes in general philosophy of life the least; (2) positive coping (positive cognition and seeking support) had fully mediated the relationship between the neuroticism personality and posttraumatic growth, while negative coping (avoidant coping and negative vent) had not; (3) the mediating effect of positive coping between neuroticism personality and posttraumatic growth was moderated by social support, that is when the social support is low, individuals high in neuroticism personality are more likely to seek positive coping, and result in increasing PTG.

Key words: adolescent, posttraumatic growth, neuroticism personality, coping style, social support

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
Aldwin, C. M. (1994). Stress, coping, and development: An integrative perspective. NewYork: Guilford.
Bellizzi, K. M., & Blank, T. O. (2006). Predicting posttraumatic growth in breast cancer survivors. Health Psychology, 25(1), 47-56.
Borja, S. E., Callahan, J. L., & Long, P. J. (2006). Positive and negative adjustment and social support of sexual assault survivors. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 19(6), 905-914.
Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (1998). Posttraumatic growth: Future directions. In R. G. Tedeschi, C. L. Park, & L. G. Calhoun (Eds.), Posttraumatic growth: Positive change in the aftermath of crisis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 215-238.
Calhoun, L. G., Cann, A., Tedeschi, R. G., & McMillian, J. (2000). A correlational test of the relationship between posttraumatic growth, religion, and cognitive processing. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 13, 521-527.
Casella, L., & Motta, R. (1990). Comparison of characteristics of Vietnam veterans with and without posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychological Reports, 67, 595-605.
Connor-Smith, J. K., & Flachsbart, C. (2007). Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 93(6), 1080-1107.
Cryder, C. H., Kilmer, R. P., Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2006). An exploratory study of posttraumatic growth in children following a natural disaster. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 76(1), 65-69.
Davis, C. G., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Larson, J. (1998). Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: Two construals of meaning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 561-574.
Evers, A. W. M., Kraaimaat, F. W., van Lankveld, W., Jongen, P. J. H., Jacobs, J. W. G., & Bijlsma, J. W. J. (2001). Beyond unfavorable thinking: The Illness Cognition Questionnaire for chronic diseases. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 69(6), 1026-1036.
Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., Schroevers, M. J., & Somsen, G. A. (2008). Posttraumatic growth after a myocardial infarction: A matter of personality, psychological health, or cognitive coping? Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings. 15(4), 270-277.
Helgeson, V. S., Reynolds, K. A., & Tomich, P. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of benefit finding and growth. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(5), 797-816.
Ho, S. M. Y., Chan, C. L. W., & Ho, R. T. H. (2004). Posttraumatic growth in Chinese cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology, 13(6), 377-389.
Janoff-Bulman, R. (1992). Shattered assumptions. New York: The Free Press.
Jayde, P. (2005). Positive growth following a traumatic life event: An analysis of cognitive responses, coping, and social support. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66(2), 1183.
Karanci, A. N., & Erkam, A. (2007). Variables related to stress-related growth among Turkish breast cancer patients. Stress and Health, 23(5), 315-322.
Lechner, S. C., & Antoni, M. H. (2004). Posttraumatic growth and group-based interventions for persons dealing with cancer: What have we learned so far? Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 35-41.
McMillen, J. C., Smith, E. M., & Fisher, R. H. (1997). Perceived benefit and mental health after three types of disaster. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 733-739.
Park, C. L. (1998). Stress-related growth and thriving through coping: The roles of personality and cognitive processes. Journal of Social Issues, 54(2), 267-277.
Salter, E., & Stallard, P. (2004). Posttraumatic growth in child survivors of a road traffic accident. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 17(4), 335-340.
Schnurr, P. P., Rosenberg, S. D., & Friedman, M. J. (1993). Change in MMPI scores from college to adulthood as a function of military service. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102(2), 288-296.
Shakespeare-Finch, J., Gow, K., & Smith, S. (2005). Personality, coping and posttraumatic growth in emergency ambulance personnel. Traumatology, 11(4), 325-334.
Tang, S. K. (2007). Posttraumatic growth of Southeast Asian survivors with physical injuries: Six months after the 2004 southeast Asian Earthquake-Tsunami Australasian.Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, 2007-1.http://trauma.massey.ac.nz/issues/2007-1/tang.htm.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The posttraumatic growth inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455-471.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1-18.
Vishnevsky, T., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., & Demakis, G. J. (2010). Gender differences in self-reported posttraumatic growth: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 110-120.
Watson, D., & Hubbard, B. (1996). Adaptational style and dispositional structure: Coping in the context of the five-factor model. Journal of Personality, 64(4), 737-774.
Zoellner, T., Rabe, S., Karl, A., & Maercker, A. (2008). Posttraumatic growth in accident survivors: Openness and optimism as predictors of its constructive or illusory sides. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 64(3), 245-263.
庞智辉, 游志麒, 周宗奎, 范翠英, 李晓军. (2010). 大学生社会支持与学习倦怠的关系:应对方式的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(5), 654-657.
温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36(5), 614-620.
温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 马什赫伯特. (2003). 潜变量交互效应分析方法. 心理科学进展, 11(5), 593-599.
萧丽玲. (2001). 儿童创伤事后压力症候之研究——九二一地震的冲击. 硕士学位论文.国立屏东师范学院.
臧伟伟. (2010). 汶川地震青少年创伤后成长与创伤后应激障碍的对比研究. 博士学位论文. 北京师范大学.
周晖, 钮丽丽, 邹泓. (2000). 中学生人格五因素问卷的编制. 心理发展与教育, 16(1), 48-54.
邹泓. (1999). 中学生的社会支持系统与同伴关系. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (1), 34-42.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6] 苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[7] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[8] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[9] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[10] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[11] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[12] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[13] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[14] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[15] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发