负性生活事件与初中生网络成瘾的关系: 社交焦虑和无聊倾向的作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2025.01.12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究调查3880名初中生,探讨负性生活事件与初中生网络成瘾的关系,并检验社交焦虑和无聊倾向的链式中介作用。结果表明:(1)负性生活事件能够显著正向预测初中生网络成瘾;(2)社交焦虑和无聊倾向分别在负性生活事件和网络成瘾间起部分中介作用;(3)负性生活事件还能通过社交焦虑和无聊倾向的链式中介间接预测网络成瘾。结合上述结果,本研究依据修正后的个人-情绪-认知-执行交互模型(I-PACE)和初中生的群体特征揭示了负性环境因素作用于初中生网络成瘾的内在机制及对实践干预工作的重要启示。

关键词: 负性生活事件, 网络成瘾, 社交焦虑, 无聊倾向, 初中生

Abstract: This study investigated the relationship between negative life events and Internet addiction among 3880 junior middle school students and examined the chain mediating effect of social anxiety and boredom proneness. The results showed that: (1) Negative life events can significantly and positively predict Internet addiction among junior middle school students; (2) Social anxiety and boredom proneness partially mediated the relationship between negative life events and Internet addiction, respectively; (3) Negative life events can also indirectly predict Internet addiction through the chain mediating effect of social anxiety and boredom proneness. Combined with the above findings and based on the modified Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model of Internet addicton and the group characteristics of junior middle school students, the present study revealed the internal mechanism of negative environmental factors on junior middle school students’ Internet addiction and important practical implications for intervention work.

Key words: negative life events, Internet addiction, social anxiety, boredom proneness, junior middle school students

中图分类号:

B844

周姿言, 胡潇, 张一林, 苏瑞琳, 辛素飞, 盛靓. 负性生活事件与初中生网络成瘾的关系: 社交焦虑和无聊倾向的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 109-116.

ZHOU Ziyan, HU Xiao, ZHANG Yilin, SU Ruilin, XIN Sufei, SHENG Liang. The Relationship between Negative Life Events and Internet Addiction in Junior Middle School Students: The Roles of Social Anxiety and Boredom Proneness[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2025, 41(1): 109-116.

参考文献

Brand, M., Young, K. S., Laier, C., Wölfling, K., & Potenza, M. N. (2016). Integrating psychological and neurobiological considerations regarding the development and maintenance of specific Internet-use disorders: An Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 252-266.
Chi, X., Hong, X., & Chen, X. (2020). Profiles and sociodemographic correlates of Internet addiction in early adolescents in southern China.Addictive Behaviors, 106, 106385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106385
Davis, R. A. (2001). A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological interact use.Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 187-195.
Guo, L., Luo, M., Wang, W. X., Huang, G. L., Xu, Y., Gao, X., … Zhang, W. H. (2018). Association between problematic Internet use, sleep disturbance, and suicidal behavior in Chinese adolescents.Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 7(4), 965-975.
Huber, F. A., Kell, P. A., Kuhn, B. L., Lannon, E. W., Palit, S., Payne, M. F., … Rhudy, J. L.(2022). The association between adverse life events, psychological stress, and pain-promoting affect and cognitions in native Americans: Results from the Oklahoma study of native American pain risk. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities, 9(1), 215-226.
Jia, J., Li, D., Li, X., Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., Sun, W., & Zhao, L. (2018). Peer victimization and adolescent internet addiction: The mediating role of psychological security and the moderating role of teacher-student relationships.Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 116-124.
Kardefelt-Winther, D. (2014). A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use.Computers in Human Behavior, 31(2014), 351-354.
Leary, M. R. (1983). Social anxiousness: The construct and its measurement.Journal of Personality Assessment, 47, 66-75.
Lee, F. K., & Zelman, D. C. (2019). Boredom proneness as a predictor of depression, anxiety and stress: The moderating effects of dispositional mindfulness.Personality and Individual Differences, 146, 68-75.
Li, D., Zhang, W., Li, X., Zhen, S., & Wang, Y. (2010). Stressful life events and problematic Internet use by adolescent females and males: A mediated moderation model.Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1199-1207.
Li, D., Zhang, W., Li, X., Zhou, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, Y. (2016). Stressful life events and adolescent Internet addiction: The mediating role of psychological needs satisfaction and the moderating role of coping style.Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 408-415.
Li, J., Chen, Y., Lu, J., Li, W., & Yu, C. (2021). Self-control, consideration of future consequences, and Internet addiction among Chinese adolescents: The moderating effect of deviant peer affiliation.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(17), 9026. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18179026
Li, S., Zhang, H., Cheng, L., Wang, X., & Sitahong, R. (2020). Negative life events and Internet addiction among Mainland Chinese teenagers and young adults: A meta-analysis.Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(10), 1-10.
Morrison, A. S., & Heimberg, R. G. (2013). Social anxiety and social anxiety disorder.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 249-274.
Rokeach, B., & Sandra, J. (1998). A theory of media power and a theory of media use: Different stories, questions, and ways of thinking. Mass Communication and Society, 1(1-2), 5-40.
Schwartze, M. M., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, T., Pekrun, R., Reck, C., Marx, A. K. G., & Fiedler, D. (2021). Boredom makes me sick: Adolescents’ boredom trajectories and their health-related quality of life.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(12), 6308. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126308
Sommers, J., & Vodanovich, S. J. (2000). Boredom proneness: Its relationship to psychological- and physical-health symptoms.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(1), 149-155.
Stankovic, M., Nešic, M., Cicevic, S., & Shi, Z. (2021). Association of smartphone use with depression, anxiety, stress, sleep quality, and internet addiction. Empirical evidence from a smartphone application.Personality and Individual Differences, 168(5), 110342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110342
Struk, A. A., Carriere, J. S., Cheyne, J. A., & Danckert, J. A. (2017). Shortboredom proneness scale. Assessment, 24(3), 346-359.
Tam, K. Y. Y., van Tilburg, W. A. P., Chan, C. S., Igou, E. R., & Lau, H. (2021). Attention drifting in and out: The boredom feedback model.Personality and Social Psychology Review, 25(3), 251-272.
Vodanovich, S. J., Wallace, J. C., & Kass, S. J. (2005). A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: Evidence for a two-factor short form.Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 295-303.
Wang, Z., Yang, X., & Zhang, X. (2020). Relationships among boredom proneness, sensation seeking and smartphone addiction among Chinese college students: Mediating roles of pastime, flow experience and self-regulation.Technology in Society, 62, 101319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101319
Wegmann, E., Ostendorf, S., & Brand, M. (2018). Is it beneficial to use Internet-communication for escaping from boredom? Boredom proneness interacts with cue-induced craving and avoidance expectancies in explaining symptoms of Internet-communication disorder. PLoS ONE, 12, e0195742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195742
Weidman, A. C., Fernandez, K. C., Levinson, C. A., Augustine, A. A., Larsen, R. J., & Rodebaugh, T. L. (2012). Compensatory internet use among individuals higher in social anxiety and its implications for well-being.Personality and Individual Differences, 53(3), 191-195.
Weinstein, A., Dorani, D., Elhadif, R., Bukovza, Y., Yarmulnik, A., & Dannon, P. (2015). Internet addiction is associated with social anxiety in young adults. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry, 27(1), 4-9.
Xiao, W., Zhou, H., Li, X., & Lin, X. (2021). Why are individuals with alexithymia symptoms more likely to have mobile phone addiction? The multiple mediating roles of social interaction anxiousness and boredom proneness.Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 1631-1641.
Young, K. S. (1998). Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder.Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1(3), 237-244.
楚啸原, 龙杰, 雷雳. (2020). 社交焦虑与网络游戏过度使用: 自我补偿动机的中介作用和外倾性的调节作用. 心理科学, 43(4), 943-949.
冯廷勇, 王雪珂, 苏缇. (2021). 拖延行为的发展认知机制及神经基础. 心理科学进展, 29(4), 586-596.
高文斌, 陈祉妍. (2006). 网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究. 心理科学进展, 14(4), 596-603.
雷雳. (2012). 青少年“网络成瘾”干预的实证基础. 心理科学进展, 20(6), 791-797.
李大林, 黄梅, 陈维, 吴文峰. (2019). 生活事件对初中生抑郁的影响: 自尊和反刍思维的链式中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(3), 352-359.
李晓敏, 辛铁钢, 尚文晶, 刘勇, 杜玉凤, 吕丽霞, 李宝芬. (2016). 简版无聊倾向量表在大学生群体中的试用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(6), 1029-1033.
林杰才, 巫颖, 党彩萍. (2020). 反刍思维在大学生负性生活事件与社交焦虑之间的中介作用. 心理月刊, 15(23), 4-5+13.
刘超, 刘丽, 张绣蕊. (2022). 后疫情时代高校学生心理健康现状研究. 西部素质教育, 8(4), 95-97.
孙翠翠. (2022). 一“网”打尽的学习?——初中生网络成瘾对学业成绩的影响. 中小学心理健康教育, (28), 24-27.
田志鹏, 刘勇, 滕召军. (2014). 中学生无聊倾向特点及其与自恋、主观幸福感的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 22(6), 1062-1067.
童媛添, 连帅磊, 孙晓军, 邱晓雯. (2019). 无聊倾向对手机成瘾的影响: 有调节的中介效应分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 27(6), 1115-1120.
王建平, 李董平, 张卫. (2010). 家庭经济困难与青少年社会适应的关系: 应对效能的补偿、中介和调节效应. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 22-32.
温忠麟, 范息涛, 叶宝娟, 陈宇帅. (2016). 从效应量应有的性质看中介效应量的合理性. 心理学报, 48(4), 435-443.
尤清秀, 秦亚平. (2020). 青少年羞怯对社交焦虑的影响: 自我接纳和评价恐惧的多重中介作用. 心理技术与应用, 8(12), 755-762.
俞国良, 张亚利. (2021). 青少年无聊的心理效应与应对——心理健康视角. 山西师大学报(社会科学版), 48(4), 95-101.
张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2020). 述情障碍与青少年攻击行为: 无聊倾向的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 28(2), 383-386.
张一林, 周姿言, 刘雨佳, 辛素飞. (2022). 无聊倾向对青少年网络成瘾的影响: 一个有调节的中介模型, 心理与行为研究, 20(3), 419-425.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王恩娜, 夏梦雅, 屈笛扬, 张俊杰, 梁凯欣, 肖嘉林, 迟新丽. 家庭功能发展轨迹类型对初中阶段青少年网络成瘾的影响:心理韧性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(6): 853-864.
[2]	向燕辉, 马丽平. 初中生认知与情感幸福感发展趋势及影响因素: 基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 645-657.
[3]	李文辉, 王迦乐, 祖静, 李婵. 小学生自我控制、孤独感与社交焦虑的关系: 一项交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(5): 687-694.
[4]	张野, 张珊珊, 白冬梅, 刘致宏. 校园人际排斥与青少年自杀意念的关系:负面评价恐惧与社交焦虑的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(4): 563-571.
[5]	张陆, 孙山, 游志麒. 网络成瘾对大学生学业压力的影响：睡眠质量与自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 279-287.
[6]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[7]	路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”？高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[8]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[9]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[10]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[11]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[12]	辛素飞, 王金睿, 彭海云, 徐柳青, 张一林, 盛靓. 负性生活事件对青少年焦虑的影响:基于认知行为疗法的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 710-717.
[13]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[14]	陈必忠, 郑雪, 孙晓军. 问题性社交媒体使用与线上社交焦虑:社交媒体认知超载和特质正念的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 743-751.
[15]	何安明, 张钰睿, 惠秋平. 大学生感恩与社会幸福感的关系:手机冷落行为的中介作用和负性生活事件的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 505-512.