校园欺凌的跨文化差异问题:特征与干预

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.04.16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 校园欺凌是全世界关注的重要公共健康问题,会给所有的卷入者造成消极影响。早期校园欺凌研究主要集中在欧洲,此后逐步拓展到北美和日本。进入21世纪,校园欺凌研究遍布世界各国,尤其是中国校园欺凌研究的增速非常快。许多大型调查项目,如HBSC、GSHS、TIMSS、PISA和EUKO等先后报告了不同国家校园欺凌的发生率、严重程度与基本特征。不同的文化中,“欺凌”内涵与特征存在许多相似之处,同时也存在一些值得关注的差异。本文依据Bronfenbrenner的社会生态模型和EU Kids Online的五因素模型作为框架,总结了校园欺凌在不同国家的异同之处,梳理了跨国比较研究和比较不同国家欺凌发生率时所面临的挑战,如何解释跨国比较时出现的差异,以及对于欺凌干预的启示。

关键词: 欺凌, 跨文化差异, 特征, 干预

Abstract: The issue of school bullying is one of international concern, given the harmful effects for all involved. Much early research was in Europe and then North America, and also in Japan. In this century the research program has become truly international, with research in China growing very rapidly in recent years. Some large-scale surveys such as HBSC, GSHS, TIMSS, PISA and EUKO have assessed the extent and nature of school bullying across different countries. It is clear that while there are broad similarities in the concept of 'bullying' across different cultures, there are also some noticeable differences, at various levels. In this paper I summarise some of these similarities and differences, and consider the challenges in making comparisons and comparing rates of bullying in different countries, and how such differences might be explained. Helpful frameworks here are the socio-ecological model based on Bronfenbrenner, and the expansion of the country level analysis in the EU Kids Online five factors model of Cultural values, Education system, Technological infrastructure, Regulatory framework and Socio-economic stratification. Finally, some implications for the nature and success of intervention work will be considered.

Key words: bullying, cross-cultural variations, nature, intervention

中图分类号:

B844

Peter K. Smith. 校园欺凌的跨文化差异问题:特征与干预[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 599-608.

Peter K. Smith. Issues of Cross-cultural Variations in School Bullying: Nature and Intervention[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 599-608.

参考文献

Bradshaw, J., Crous, G., Rees, G., & Turner, T. (2017). Comparing children's experiences of schools-based bullying across countries.Children and Youth Services Review, 80, 171-180.
Campbell, M., Kettle, M., & Sunduram, S. (2018).Societal and cultural considerations in understanding peer bullying in India. In P.K. Smith, S. Sundaram, B. Spears, B. Blaya, M. Schäfer, & D. Sandhu (Eds.), Bullying, cyberbullying and pupil well-being in schools: Comparing European, Australian and Indian Perspectives(pp.26-44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chan, H.C.O., & Wong, D.S.W. (2015). Traditional school bullying and cyberbullying in Chinese societies: Prevalence and a review of the whole-school intervention approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 98-198.
Chaux, E., Molano, A., & Podlesky, P. (2009). Socio-economic, socio-political and socio-emotional variables explaining school bullying: A country-wide multilevel analysis.Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 35(6), 520-529.
Cornell, D., & Huang, F. (2016). Authoritative school climate and high school student risk behavior: A cross-sectional multi-level analysis of student self-reports.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(11), 2246-2259.
Cowie, H., & James, A. (2016). Peer support in England, Japan and South Korea. In P.K. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda (Eds.),School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp.189-207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Craig, W., Boniel-Nissim, M., King, N., Walsh, S. D., Boer, M., Donnelly, P. D., ··· Pickett, W. (2020). Social media use and cyber-bullying: A cross-national analysis of young people in 42 countries.Journal of Adolescent Health, 66(6), S100-S108.
Currie, C., Inchley, J., Molcho, M., Lenzi, M., Veselska, Z. & Wild, F. (Eds.) (2014).Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Study Protocol: Background, Methodology and Mandatory items for the 2013/14 Survey. St Andrews: CAHRU.
Elgar, F. J., Craig, W., Boyce, W., Morgan, A. & Vella-Zarb, R. (2009). Income inequality and school bullying: Multilevel study of adolescents in 37 countries.Journal of Adolescent Health, 45(4), 351-359.
Elgar, F.J., McKinnon, B., Walsh, S.D., Freeman, J., Donnelly, P.D., de Matos, M.G., ··· Currie, C.(2015). Structural determinants of youth bullying and fighting in 79 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 57(6), 643-650.
Eslea, M., & Rees, J. (2001). At what age are children most likely to be bullied at school?Aggressive Behavior, 27, 419-429.
Fraguas, D., Díaz-Caneja, C.M., Ayora, M., Durán-Cutilla, M., Abregú-Crespo, R., Iciar Ezquiaga-Bravo, I., ··· Arango, C. (2021). Assessment of school anti-bullying interventions: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.JAMA Pediatrics, 175(1), 44-55.
Gaffney, H., Farrington, D.P., & Ttofi, M.M. (2019). Examining the effectiveness of school-bullying intervention programs globally: A meta-analysis.International Journal of Bullying, 1(1), 14-31.
Gaffney, H., & Farrington, D.P. (2021). A review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the effectiveness of school-based anti-bullying programs.In P.K. Smith, & J. O'Higgins Norman (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention (Volume 2, pp.676-706). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Gelfand, M. J., Raver, J. L., Nishii, L., Leslie, L. M., Lun, J., Lim, B. C., ··· Yamaguchi, S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332(6033), 1100-1104.
Görzig, A. (2012). Methodological framework: the EU Kids Online project. In S. Livingstone, L. Haddon & A. Görzig (Eds.),Children, risk and safety online: Research and policy challenges in comparative perspective (pp.15-32). Bristol: Policy Press.
Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2013). What makes a bully a cyberbully? Unravelling the characteristics of cyberbullies across twenty-five European countries.Journal of Children and Media, 7(1), 9-27.
Görzig, A., Wachs, S., & Wright, M. (2021). In P.K. Smith, & J. O'Higgins Norman (Eds.),The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention (Volume 1, pp.519-537). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Guillaume, E., & Funder, D. (2016). Theoretical and methodological issues in making cross-national and cross-cultural comparisons.In P. K. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda (Eds.), School Bullying in Different Cultures: Eastern and Western Perspectives (pp.211-228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guzman-Holst, C., & Bowes, L. (2021). Bullying and internalizing symptoms. In P.K. Smith, & J. O'Higgins Norman (Eds.),The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention (Volume 1, pp.561-579). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hall, W. (2017). The effectiveness of policy interventions for school Bullying: A systematic review.Journal of the Society for Social Work & Research, 8(1), 45-69.
Hamer, A. den, Konijn, E.A., & Keijer, M.G. (2014). Cyberbullying behavior and adolescents' use of medias with antisocial content: A cyclic process model.Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17, 74-81.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010).Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 311-322.
Inchley, J., Currie, D., Young, T., Samdal, O., Torsheim, T., Augustson, L., ··· Barnekow, V. (Eds.) (2016).Growing up unequal: gender and socioeconomic differences in young people's health and well-being: Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2013/2014 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Inchley, J., Currie, D., Budisavljevic, S., Torsheim, T., Jåstad, A., Cosma, A., ··· Samdal, O. (2020).Spotlight on adolescent health and well-being. Findings from the 2017/2018 Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) survey in Europe and Canada. International report. Volume 2. Key data. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.
Jessel, J. (2016). Educational systems: A basis for some comparative perspectives. In P.K. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda (Eds.),School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp.229-258). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ji, L., Zhang, W., & Jones, K. (2016). Children's experience of and attitudes towards bullying and victimization: A cross-cultural comparison between China and England. In P.K. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.),School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp.170-188). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jin, Y. C., Li, J. Y., An, J. X., Wu, J., & He, M. C. (2019). The differential victimization associated with depression and anxiety in cross-cultural perspective: A meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 20(4), 560-573.
Kanetsuna, T. (2016). Comparisons between Englishbullying and Japanese ijime. In P.K. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.), School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives(pp.153-169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kljakovic, M., & Hunt, C. (2016). A meta-analysis of predictors of bullying and victimisation in adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 49, 134-145.
Kwak, K., & Lee, S-H. (2016). The Korean research tradition onwang-ta. In P.K. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.), School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives(pp.93-112). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lian, Q., Yu, C., Tu, X., Deng, M., Wang, T., Su, Q. & Zuo, X. (2021). Grade repetition and bullying victimization in adolescents: A global cross-sectional study of the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) data from 2018.PLoS Medicine, 18(11),e1003846. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.100384
Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Görzig, A., & Ólafsson, K. (2011).Risks and safety on the internet: The perspective of European children: Full findings. London, UK: EU Kids Online.
Menesini, E. (Ed.) (2000).Bullismo: Che fare? Florence: Giunti.
Migliaccio, T. & Rauskauskas, J. (2015).Bullying as a social experience: Social factors, prevention and intervention. London: Routledge.
Nikolaou, D. (2017). Do anti-bullying policies deter in-school bullying victimization?International Review of Law and Economics, 50, 1-6.
Olweus, D. (1999). Sweden. In P.K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano, & P. Slee (Eds.),The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective(pp. 7-27).London & New York: Routledge.
Salmivalli, C., Laninga-Wijnen, L., Malamut, S.T., & Garandeau, C.F. (2021). Bullying prevention in adolescence: Solutions and new challenges from the past decade.Journal of Research on Adolescence, 31(4), 1023-1045.
Schwarz, N., & Oyserman, D. (2001). Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction.American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 127-160.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva. (Eds.),Measuring attitudes cross-nationally-lessons from the European Social Survey(pp.161-193). London: Sage.
Smahel, D., Machackova, H., Mascheroni, G., Dedkova, L., Staksrud, E., Ólafsson, K., ··· Hasebrink, U. (2020).EU Kids Online 2020: Survey results from 19 countries. EU Kids Online. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.21953/lse.47fdeqj01ofo
Sigurdson, J.F., Kaasbøll, J. & Sund, A.M. (2021). Bullying and externalizing problems.In P.K. Smith, & J. O'Higgins Norman (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention(Volume 1, pp.580-599). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., & Frisén, A. (2013). The nature of cyberbullying, and strategies for prevention.Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 26-32.
Smith, P.K. (Ed.) (2019). Making an Impact on School Bullying: Interventions and Recommendations. London: Routledge.
Smith, P.K. & Berkkun, F. (2017). How research on cyberbullying has developed. In C. McGuckin, & L. Corcoran (Eds.) Bullying and cyberbullying: Prevalence, psychological impacts and intervention strategies(pp.11-27). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. & Liefooghe, A. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and sex differences, in a 14-country international comparison.Child Development, 73(4), 1119-1133.
Smith, P.K.,Görzig, A., & Robinson, S. (2019). Cyberbullying in schools: Cross-cultural issues. In G.W. Giumetti, & R.M. Kowalski. (Eds.), Cyberbullying in schools, workplaces, and romantic relationships(pp.49-68). New York: Routledge.
Smith, P.K., Kwak, K. & Toda, Y. (2016).Reflections on bullying in eastern and western perspectives. In P.K. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.), School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp. 399-419). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, P.K. & López-Castro, L. (2017). Cross-national data on victims of bullying: How does PISA measure up with other surveys? International Journal of Developmental Science, 11 (3-4), 87-92.
Smith, P. K., López-Castro, L., Robinson, S., & Görzig, A. (2019). Consistency of gender differences in bullying in cross-cultural surveys. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 33-40.
Smith, P.K. & O'Higgins Norman, J. (Eds.) (2021).The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention(Volumes 1 and 2). Chichester: Wiley.
Smith, P.K. & Robinson, S. (2019). How does individualism-collectivism relate to bullying victimization? International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1(1), 3-13.
Smith, P.K., Robinson, S. & Marchi, B. (2016). Cross-national data on victims of bullying: What is really being measured?International Journal of Developmental Science, 10(1-2), 9-19.
Smith, P.K., Robinson, S. & Slonje, R. (2021). The school bullying research program: Why and how it has developed. In P. K., Smith, & O'Higgins Norman, J. (Eds.),The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Bullying: A Comprehensive and International Review of Research and Intervention(Volume 1, pp. 42-59). Chichester: Wiley.
Solberg, M., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire.Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 29(3), 239-268.
Spears, B., Taddeo, C., & Ey, L-A. (2021). Using participatory design to inform cyber/bullying prevention and intervention practices: Evidence-Informed insights and strategies.Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 31(2), 159-171.
UNESCO (2019).Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. UNESCO Education Centre, Paris.
Viner, R. M., Ozer, E. M., Denny, S., Marmot, M., Resnick, M., Fatusi, A., & Currie, C. (2012). Adolescence and the social determinants of health.The Lancet, 379(9826), 1641-1652.
Waasdorp, T.E., Pas, E.T., Zablotsky, B. & Bradshaw, C.P. (2017). Ten-year trends in bullying and related attitudes among 4th- to 12th-graders.Pediatrics, 139(6), e20162615.https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2615
Zych, I., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & del Rey, R. (2015). Scientific research on bullying and cyberbullying: Where have we been and where are we going. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 1-21.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王伊萌, 王振东, 汪凤炎. “当局者迷”破解之道：智慧的正念干预研究——个人成长主动性与反思的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 142-152.
[2]	纪林芹, 邹小慧, 张露露, 张良. 儿童青少年欺凌行为与冷酷无情、共情的关系:交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 532-541.
[3]	余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.
[4]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[5]	张文新. 欺凌的界定:文化和发展的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 590-598.
[6]	李小青, 刘银章, 汪玥, 蒋索. 暴力暴露对不同性别青少年早期校园欺凌的影响:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 255-265.
[7]	张林, 陈燕铃, 洪新伟, 赵明玉, 范航, 刘燊. 冷酷无情特质与初中生校园欺凌行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 266-275.
[8]	蒋索, 丁金琦, 刘艳, 陆元圆, 李小青, 陈静. 青少年早期网络欺凌/受欺凌对睡眠质量的影响:社交焦虑和抑郁情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 85-96.
[9]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[10]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[11]	王博晨, 金灿灿, 赵宝宝. 青少年家庭功能、人际适应和网络欺凌的关系:一个有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 469-476.
[12]	吴文春, 陈嘉倩, 刘昌. 客体和空间工作记忆中三维图形的特征加工时程[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 513-521.
[13]	刘星泽, 陈明慧, 崔佳伟, 赵光. 真实场景视觉搜索中的背景线索效应特点与机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 504-512.
[14]	谢家树, 魏宇民, ZHU Zhuorong. 当代中国青少年校园欺凌受害模式探索:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 95-102.
[15]	王翠翠, 徐琴芳, 陶沙. 干预-应答模式鉴别学习障碍的有效性及其调节因素:20年研究的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(6): 706-716.