心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 590-598.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.04.15

• 理论探讨与进展 • 上一篇    下一篇

欺凌的界定:文化和发展的视角

张文新   

  1. 山东师范大学心理学院, 济南 250014
  • 发布日期:2023-07-19
  • 通讯作者: 张文新 E-mail:zhangwenxin@sdnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部哲学社会科学重大课题攻关项目(17JZD058)。

The Definition of Bullying: From Cross-cultural and Developmental Perspectives

ZHANG Wenxin   

  1. School of Psychology, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014
  • Published:2023-07-19

摘要: 欺凌是个常见却复杂的现象,在不同文化背景下欺凌的内涵存在差异,不同年龄个体对欺凌的认识和理解也存在差异。本研究基于文化和发展的视角,系统梳理了国内外关于欺凌界定的研究,重点探讨了中国文化背景下欺凌的特征以及儿童青少年和成人对于欺凌的理解。总体上,“欺凌”一词与西方文化背景中的“bullying”一词的涵义基本一致。中文语境中,欺凌更强调蓄意伤害性和双方力量的不均衡性特征,不含重复发生性特征。相比儿童,青少年、成人对欺凌的认识更接近欺凌的科学定义。蓄意伤害性、力量不均衡性特征是青少年、成人判断欺凌事件的关键要素;重复发生性不是欺凌的关键特征,但却是儿童青少年和成人界定欺凌事件的重要线索,重复发生的伤害性事件更可能被认定为欺凌。最后,本文提出了明确欺凌界定对校园欺凌研究和防治实践的启示。

关键词: 欺凌, 界定, 文化, 发展

Abstract: Bullying is a complex phenomenon. Clarifying the definition of bullying is a challenging but essential task. The connotation of the word “bullying” varies across cultures, and peoples' perceptions and understandings of bullying differed as a function of developmental stages. Based on cross-cultural and developmental perspectives, the current study reviewed the studies on the definition of bullying, discussed the nature of bullying in the context of Chinese culture as well as children and adolescents' understanding of bullying. Generally, the nature of “Qiling” in Chinese culture is comparable with “bullying” in Western cultures. Among three definitive characteristics (intention to harm, repetition, and power imbalance), the word “Qiling” highlights the intention to harm and power imbalance. Compared to children, adolescents' and adults' understandings of bullying are more precise and comprehensive and more agreed with the scientific definition. Intention to harm and power imbalance are the key elements when adolescents and adults distinguish bullying from other peer conflicts. Repetition is not one of key elements of bullying, but is an essential cue to identify bullying—the repetitive harmful incidents are more likely to be perceived as bullying. Finally, we proposed the implications of illuminating the definition of bullying on antibullying interventions.

Key words: bullying, definition, culture, development

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Athanasiades, C., & Deliyanni-Kouimtzis, V. (2010). The experience of bullying among secondary school students. Psychology in the Schools, 47(4), 328-341.
Baldry, A. C. (2004). The impact of direct and indirect bullying on the mental and physical health of Italian youngsters.Aggressive Behavior, 30(5), 343-355.
Boulton, M. J. (1997). Teachers' views on bullying: Definitions, attitudes and ability to cope. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), 223-233.
Boulton, M. J., Trueman, M., & Flemington, I. (2002). Associations between secondary school pupils' definitions of bullying, attitudes towards bullying, and tendencies to engage in bullying: Age and sex differences. Educational Studies, 28(4), 353-370.
Camodeca, M., & Goossens, F. A. (2005). Aggression, social cognitions, anger and sadness in bullies and victims.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46(2), 186-197.
Cuadrado-Gordillo, I. (2012). Repetition, power imbalance, and intentionality: Do these criteria conform to teenagers' perception of bullying? A role-based analysis. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27(10), 1889-1910.
DeLara, E. W. (2012). Why adolescents don't disclose incidents of bullying and harassment. Journal of School Violence, 11(4), 288-305.
DePaolis, K., & Williford, A. (2015). The nature and prevalence of cyber victimization among elementary school children.Child & Youth Care Forum, 44(3), 377-393.
Erling, A., & Hwang, C. P. (2004). Swedish 10-year-old children's perceptions and experiences of bullying. Journal of School Violence, 3(1), 33-43.
Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2017). Developmental continuity and change in physical, verbal, and relational aggression and peer victimization from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 53(9), 1709-1721.
Frisén, A., Holmqvist, K., & Oscarsson, D. (2008). 13-year-olds' perception of bullying: Definitions, reasons for victimisation and experience of adults' response. Educational Studies, 34(2), 105-117.
Guerin, S., & Hennessy, E. (2002). Pupils' definitions of bullying. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 17(3), 249-261.
Heinemann, P. P. (1969). Apartheid. Liberal Debatt, 2, 3-14.
Hunter, S. C., Boyle, J. M. E., & Warden, D. (2007). Perceptions and correlates of peer-victimization and bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 797-810.
Jeffrey, J., & Stuart, J. (2020). Do research definitions of bullying capture the experiences and understandings of young people? A qualitative investigation into the characteristics of bullying behaviour.International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 2(3), 180-189.
Kowalski, R. M., Toth, A., & Morgan, M. (2018). Bullying and cyberbullying in adulthood and the workplace.The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(1), 64-81.
Malecki, C. K., Demaray, M. K., Coyle, S., Geosling, R., Rueger, S. Y., & Becker, L. D. (2015). Frequency, power differential, and intentionality and the relationship to anxiety, depression, and self-esteem for victims of bullying. Child and Youth Care Forum, 44(1), 115-131.
Merriam-Webster (2022). Bullying. In Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/bullying
Mishna, F., Pepler, D., & Wiener, J. (2006). Factors associated with perceptions and responses to bullying situations by children, parents, teachers, and principals.Victims and Offenders, 1(3), 255-288.
Mishna, F., Saini, M., & Solomon, S. (2009). Ongoing and online: Children and youth's perceptions of cyber bullying. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(12), 1222-1228.
Naylor, P., Cowie, H., Cossin, F., de Bettencourt, R., & Lemme, F. (2006). Teachers' and pupils' definitions of bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 553-576.
Olweus, D. (1978).Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press.
Olweus, D. (1993).Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. New York: Blackwell.
Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751-780.
Slonje, R., & Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 147-154.
Smith, P. K., & Levan, S. (1995). Perceptions and experiences of bullying in younger pupils.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(4), 489-500.
Smith, P. K., Cowie, H., Olafsson, R. F., & Liefooghe, A. P. (2002). Definitions of bullying: A comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a Fourteen-Country international comparison. Child Development, 73(4), 1119-1133.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.
Tenenbaum, L. S., Varjas, K., Meyers, J., & Parris, L. (2011). Coping strategies and perceived effectiveness in fourth through eighth grade victims of bullying.School Psychology International, 32(3), 263-287.
Thomas, H. J., Connor, J. P., Baguley, C. M., & Scott, J. G. (2017). Two sides to the story: Adolescent and parent views on harmful intention in defining school bullying.Aggressive Behavior, 43(4), 352-363
Vaillancourt, T., McDougall, P., Hymel, S., Krygsman, A., Miller, J., Stiver, K., & Davis, C. (2008). Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing?International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(6), 486-495.
Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition.Developmental Review, 34(4), 327-343.
Volk, A. A., Veenstra, R., & Espelage, D. L. (2017). So you want to study bullying? Recommendations to enhance the validity, transparency, and compatibility of bullying research.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 34-43.
陈光辉. (2014a). 跨文化心理现象的词源学考证: 以欺负现象为例. 华东师范大学学报 (教育科学版), 32(3), 93-98.
陈光辉. (2014b). 中小学生对欺负现象本质内涵的感知. 心理与行为研究, 12(5), 639-644.
辞海编辑委员会. (1980). 辞海 (1979年版). 上海: 上海辞书出版社.
段玉裁. (1735-1815). 说文解字注 (1981年版). 上海: 上海古籍出版社.
国家语委现代汉语语料库. (2012a). 欺负. 引自http://corpus.zhonghuayuwen.org/CnCindex.aspx
国家语委现代汉语语料库. (2012b). 欺凌. 引自http://corpus.zhonghuayuwen.org/CnCindex.aspx
国务院教育督导委员会办公室. (2016). 国务院教育督导委员会办公室关于开展校园欺凌专项治理的通知. 引自http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A11/moe_1789/201605/t20160509_242576.html
阮元. (1645—1911). 经籍籑诂并补遗百六卷. 江苏: 扬州阮氏琅嬛仙馆刊本.
张文新. (2022). 中国校园欺凌防治: 原理与方案. 出版中.
[1] 李书琴, 向燕辉. 初中生宽恕的发展趋势与异质轨迹:大五人格的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 502-511.
[2] 甘严, 柏霁容, 罗明玥, 范奕敏, 刘苗苗, 闫梦格, 苏永强, 李虹. 小学新生朗读流畅性的发展轨迹及其对三年级阅读理解的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 544-552.
[3] 吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[4] 李利平, 罗丽, 伍新春. 汉字识别和快速命名对阅读流畅的作用:基于成份观和发展观视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 391-399.
[5] 何震, 詹林, 曾子豪, 胡义秋. 羞耻心对青少年主观幸福感的影响——亲社会行为和人际关系的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 172-181.
[6] 袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点:基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[7] 李泱巾, 陆增颜, 郭俊俏, 赵必华. 高年级小学生师生关系、学校归属感与校园受欺凌的关系:一项交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 245-253.
[8] 李蓓蕾, 林彤, 赖梅艳, 车猛, 邓林园. 初中生欺凌、受害与亲社会行为的关系:基于发展级联理论的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 264-273.
[9] 罗良, 林崇德. 建设中国特色心理学自主知识体系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 1-8.
[10] 杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[11] 鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[12] 戴琳, 任筱宇, 赵婧, 毕鸿燕. 视觉大细胞-背侧通路干预下阅读障碍儿童的应答机制研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 830-839.
[13] 李赛男, 王亚丽, 袁小源, 刘妮娜, 赵淑萍, 闫国利. 2~5年级小学生汉语阅读知觉广度的发展轨迹[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 305-312.
[14] 李莉, 李倩倩, 阮世芳, 张云运. 师幼互动质量与儿童发展的领域内和跨领域关联——基于国内外45项实证研究的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 332-347.
[15] 谭德琴, 丁菀, 宋省成, 吴伟, 蔺秀云. 代际间的暴力传递——父母虐待对儿童欺负行为的影响:基于潜变量增长模型的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 410-419.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!