班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.04.11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以46个班级的1725名5~8年级学生为被试(男生940人,年龄12.78±1.14岁),采用多水平模型考察学生反欺凌态度对个体欺凌行为的影响,以及个体感知的、班级整体的师生关系在其中的调节作用。结果发现,学生反欺凌态度能显著负向预测学生的欺凌行为;个体感知的师生关系能显著负向预测学生的欺凌行为;班级水平的师生关系在学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为之间起调节作用,具体而言,在整体师生关系较好(温暖、信任)的班级中,学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为间存在显著负向关联,而在整体师生关系较差的班级中,学生的反欺凌态度与欺凌行为无显著关联。结果启示,校园欺凌的有效防治不仅需要提升学生的反欺凌态度,而且需要教师注重从班级整体上营造良好的师生关系。

关键词: 反欺凌态度, 欺凌行为, 师生关系, 多水平模型

Abstract: In a sample of 1725 students in 46 classes from fifth to eighth grade (940 boys and 785 girls, M_age= 12.78, SD_age = 1.14), multilevel model was used to explore the association between students' anti-bullying attitudes and bullying behavior, as well as the moderating effects of individual-level and classroom-level teacher-student relationship. The multilevel models revealed that students' anti-bullying attitudes were negatively associated with peer-reported bullying behavior; perceived teacher-student relationship was negatively associated with peer-reported bullying behavior; and classroom-level teacher-student relationship moderated the association between students' anti-bullying attitudes and bullying behavior. Specifically, the negative association between students' anti-bullying attitudes and bullying was stronger in the classrooms where teachers had better relationship (warm and trustworthy) with students. In the classrooms where teachers had bad relationship with students, however, there were no significant association between students' anti-bullying attitudes and bullying. These results indicated that the effectiveness of bullying prevention and intervention should not only aim to improve anti-bullying attitudes of students, but also for teachers to create positive teacher-student relationship with whole classes.

Key words: anti-bullying attitudes, bullying behavior, teacher-student relationship, multilevel models

中图分类号:

B844

余易达, 潘斌, 苗新煜, 陈光辉. 班级师生关系调节学生反欺凌态度与欺凌行为的关系:一项多水平分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.

YU Yida, PAN Bin, MIAO Xinyu, CHEN Guanghui. Teacher-student Relationship on Class Level Moderated the Relation between Students' Anti-bullying Attitudes and Bullying Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(4): 550-558.

参考文献

Abrams, D., Rutland, A., Ferrell, J. M., & Pelletier, J. (2008). Children's judgments of disloyal and immoral peer behavior: Subjective group dynamics in minimal intergroup contexts.Child Development, 79(2), 444-461.
Ajzen, I. (2012). The theory of planned behavior. In Van Lange, P. A. M., Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (Eds.),Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 438-459). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Aldrup, K., Klusmann, U., Lüdtke, O., Göllner, R., & Trautwein, U. (2018). Social support and classroom management are related to secondary students' general school adjustment: A multilevel structural equation model using student and teacher ratings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(8), 1066-1083.
Babad, E. Y. (2009).The social psychology of the classroom. New York: Routledge.
Chen, G., Zhang, W., Zhang, W., & Deater-Deckard, K. (2020). A “defender protective effect” in multiple-role combinations of bullying among Chinese adolescents.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(7-8), 1587-1609.
Chen, G., Zhao, Q. L., Dishion, T. & Deater-Deckard, K. (2018). The association between peer network centrality and aggression is moderated by moral disengagement.Aggressive Behavior. 44(6), 571-580.
Farmer, T. W., Lines, M. M., & Hamm, J. V. (2011). Revealing the invisible hand: The role of teachers in children's peer experiences.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 247-256.
Gest, S. D., & Rodkin, P. C. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 288-296.
Golmaryami, F. N., Frick, P. J., Hemphill, S. A., Kahn, R. E., Crapanzano, A. M., & Terranova, A. M. (2016). The social, behavioral, and emotional correlates of bullying and victimization in a school-based sample.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44(2), 381-391.
Hendrickx, M. M. H. G., Mainhard, M. T., Boor-Klip, H. J., Cillessen, A. H. M., & Brekelmans, M. (2016). Social dynamics in the classroom: Teacher support and conflict and the peer ecology.Teaching and Teacher Education, 53, 30-40.
Jansen, P. W., Verlinden, M., Dommisse-van Berkel, A., Mieloo, C., van der Ende, J., Veenstra, R., ··· Tiemeier, H. (2012). Prevalence of bullying and victimization among children in early elementary school: Do family and school neighbourhood socioeconomic status matter?BMC Public Health, 12(1), 1-10.
Longobardi, C., Iotti, N. O., Jungert, T., & Settanni, M. (2018). Student-teacher relationships and bullying: The role of student social status.Journal of Adolescence, 63, 1-10.
McCuddy, T., & Esbensen, F-A. (2017). After the bell and into the night: The link between delinquency and traditional, cyber-, and dual-bullying victimization.Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54(3), 409-441.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012).Mplus statistical modeling software. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Norwalk, K. E., Dawes, M., Hamm, J. V., & Farmer, T. W. (2021). Improvingmiddle school teachers'self-reported use of social dynamics management practices. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 37(2), 109-126.
Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 134(4), 565-584.
Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying:Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 751-780.
Ortega, R., & Mora-Merchan, J., (1999). Spain. In P. K. Smith, Y. Morita, J. Junger-Tas, D. Olweus, R. Catalano & P. Slee (Eds.),The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (pp. 166-169). London: Routledge.
Pan, B., Li, T., Ji, L., Malamut, S., Zhang, W., & Salmivalli, C. (2021). Whydoes classroom-level victimization moderate the association between victimization and depressive symptoms? The “Healthy Context Paradox” and two explanations. Child Development, 92(5), 1836-1854.
Pan, B., Zhang, L., Ji, L., Garandeau, C. F., Salmivalli, C., & Zhang, W. (2020). Classroom status hierarchy moderates the association between social dominance goals and bullying behavior in middle childhood and early adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(11), 2285-2297.
Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling.Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 85-112.
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(4), 244-252.
Rodkin, P. C., & Ryan, A. M. (2012). Child and adolescent peer relations in educational context. In K. R. Harris, S. Graham, T. Urdan, S. Graham, J. M. Royer, & M. Zeidner (Eds.),APA educational psychology handbook, Vol 2: Individual differences and cultural and contextual factors (pp. 363-389). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Roorda, D. L., & Koomen, H. M. (2021). Student-teacher relationships and students' externalizing and internalizing behaviors: A cross-lagged study in secondary education. Child Development, 92(1), 174-188.
Rudasill, K. M., Reio, T. G., Stipanovic, N., & Taylor, J. E. (2010). A longitudinal study of student-teacher relationship quality, difficult temperament, and risky behavior from childhood to early adolescence.Journal of School Psychology, 48(5), 389-412.
Saarento, S., Boulton, A. J., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). Reducing bullying and victimization: Student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(1), 61-76.
Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher-child relationships.Attachment and Human Development, 14(3), 213-231.
Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15(2), 112-120.
Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviors associated with bullying in schools.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(3), 246-258.
Scholte, R., Sentse, M., & Granic, I. (2010). Do actions speak louder than words?Classroom attitudes and behavior in relation to bullying in early adolescence. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 39(6), 789-799.
Sentse, M., Veenstra, R., Kiuru, N., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). A longitudinal multilevel study of individual characteristics and classroom norms in explaining bullying behaviors.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43(5), 943-955.
Sjögren, B., Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Gini, G. (2020). Bystander behaviour in peer victimisation: Moral disengagement, defender self-efficacy and student-teacher relationship quality.Research Papers in Education, 36(5), 588-610.
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., & Pozzoli, T. (2017). Peer victimization and its relation to class relational climate and class moral disengagement among school children. Educational Psychology, 37(5), 524-536.
Thornberg, R., Wänström, L., Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2018). Victim prevalence in bullying and its association with teacher-student and student-student relationships and class moral disengagement: A class-level path analysis. Research Papers in Education, 33(3), 320-335.
Troop-Gordon, W., & Kopp, J. (2011). Teacher-child relationship quality and children's peer victimization and aggressive behavior in late childhood.Social Development, 20(3), 536-561.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2019) Behind the numbers: Ending school violence and bullying. Retrieved from https://en.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en.
van Goethem, A. A., Scholte, R. H., & Wiers, R. W. (2010). Explicit-and implicit bullying attitudes in relation to bullying behavior.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(6), 829-842.
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: The relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying.Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(4), 1135-1143.
Yun, H. Y. (2020). New approaches to defender and outsider roles in school bullying.Child Development, 91(4), 814-832.
Zhang, W., Chen, L., & Chen, G. (2016). Research on bullying in mainland China. In P. Smith, K. Kwak, & Y. Toda. (Eds.),School bullying in different cultures: Eastern and western perspectives (pp. 113-132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
纪林芹, 张文新, Jones, K., Smith, N. (2003). 中国与英国儿童对待欺凌问题态度的比较研究. 心理与行为研究, 1(2), 122-127.
江光荣. (2004). 中小学班级环境: 结构与测量. 心理科学, 27(4), 839-843.
刘晓薇, 潘斌, 陈亮, 李腾飞, 纪林芹, 张文新. (2021). 受欺负与青少年外化问题关系的 “健康环境悖论”: 敌意性归因的中介作用. 心理学报, 53(2), 170-181.
张文新, 王丽萍, 宫秀丽, 武建芬, 张坤. (2002). 儿童对待欺凌问题态度的研究. 心理科学, 25(2), 226-227.
张文新, 武建芬. (1999). Olweus儿童欺凌问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7-11.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[2]	李妍, 梁丽婵, 周欣然, 边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度：师生关系的中介作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[3]	辛钊阳, 王庆林, 王明辉, 杜静, 赵国祥. 师生关系与硕士研究生学习适应:科研自我效能和专业承诺的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 825-832.
[4]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[5]	罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[6]	楚啸原, 理原, 黄志华, 雷雳, 俞明延. 师生关系对研究生自我效能感的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 174-181.
[7]	吴晗, 魏昶, 陆惠诗, 赖伟平, 邢锦涛, 喻承甫, 甄霜菊, 张卫. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁:社会退缩的中介作用与师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 249-256.
[8]	张兴旭, 郭海英, 林丹华. 亲子、同伴、师生关系与青少年主观幸福感关系的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 458-466.
[9]	师保国, 王黎静, 徐丽, 刘霞. 师生关系对小学生创造性的作用:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 175-182.
[10]	张晓, 陈会昌. 关系因素与个体因素在儿童早期社会能力中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(4): 19-24.
[11]	邹泓, 屈智勇, 叶苑. 中小学生的师生关系与其学校适应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(4): 77-82.
[12]	杨阿丽, 方晓义, 李辉, 蔺秀云, 刘倩倩. 云南省中小学生师生关系发展特点及对学校适应的预测[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 49-56.
[13]	王晓华, 王耘. 3～6年级学生及其教师对师生关系知觉的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(3): 23-29.
[14]	张晓, 陈会昌. 儿童早期师生关系的研究概述[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(2): 120-124.
[15]	刘桂珍, 辛自强, 池丽萍. 师生人际行为的影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(4): 68-72.