心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 54-63.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.01.07

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年社交焦虑与学习投入的关系:意向性自我调节的解释作用及其年龄差异

周爱保1, 胡砚冰1, 刘锦涛1,2, 鲁小勇1, 王有丽1, 周滢鑫1   

  1. 1. 西北师范大学心理学院, 兰州 730070;
    2. 兰州城市学院教育学院, 兰州 730070
  • 发布日期:2022-02-17
  • 通讯作者: 胡砚冰 E-mail:hybpsy2018@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区项目“基于自我相关加工的抑郁症语音声学建模研究”(31660281);国家自然科学基金地区项目“基于深度学习的多模态抑郁症辅诊识别建模研究”(31860285);西北师范大学研究生科研资助项目(2019KYZZ012016)。

Relationship between Social Anxiety and Academic Engagement among Adolescence: The Mediating Role of Intentional Self-regulation and the Age Difference

ZHOU Aibao1, HU Yanbing1, LIU Jingtao1,2, LU Xiaoyong1, WANG Youli1, ZHOU Yingxin1   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070;
    2. School of Education, Lanzhou City University, Lanzhou 730070
  • Published:2022-02-17

摘要: 本研究以6所初中、高中和大学1597名青少年为被试,一方面考察了社交焦虑、意向性自我调节和学习投入在青少年发展中的特点;另一方面考察了青少年社交焦虑与学习投入之间的关系,以及意向性自我调节在两者关系的中介作用及其不同青少年期之间的差异。结果发现:(1)随着青少年年龄增长其社交焦虑水平降低,相对于青少年中晚期,青少年中期学习投入水平较低;(2)社交焦虑可以显著负向预测青少年的学习投入;(3)意向性自我调节在社交焦虑与青少年学习投入之间起中介作用;(4)青少年中晚期群体意向性自我调节的中介作用显著,但是青少年早期意向性自我调节的中介作用不显著。结果表明:首先,青少年随着年龄的增长可以减缓社交焦虑水平;其次,青少年中期面临复杂的发展任务,这样不利于其学习投入;最后,社交焦虑可以显著预测青少年学习投入,并且在青少年中晚期意向性自我调节是两者关系的中介桥梁。

关键词: 社交焦虑, 学习投入, 意向性自我调节, 青少年期, 多群组分析

Abstract: In this study, 1597 adolescents were recruited from 6 middle schools, high schools and universities. On the one hand, the characteristics of social anxiety, intentional self-regulation and academic engagement in the development of adolescents were investigated; On the other hand, the study was investigated to examine the mediating effect of intentional self-regulation and the moderating of puberty between social anxiety and academic engagement. The results showed:(1) As adolescence age, their levels of social anxiety decrease; Compared to middle and late adolescence, the level of academic engagement is low in middle adolescence; (2)The social anxiety can significantly negative predictor of the academic engagement of adolescents; (3)The intentional self-regulation plays a completely mediating role between social anxiety and academic engagement; (4)The mediating effect of intentional self-regulation in middle and late adolescence was significant, but the mediating effect of intentionality self-regulation is not significant in early adolescence. It means:(1)Adolescence can reduce their levels of social anxiety as they age; (2)Middle adolescence is faced with complex developmental tasks, which are not conducive to their academic engagement; (3)Social anxiety can significantly predict adolescents academic engagement, and intentional self-regulation is the intermediary bridge between middle and late adolescence.

Key words: social anxiety, academic engagement, intentional self-regulation, puberty, multigroup analysis

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Alfano, C. A., Beidel, D. C., & Turner, S. M. (2006). Cognitive correlates of social phobia among children and adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34(2), 182-194.
Bruch, M. A. (2007). Cognitive bias in men's processing of negative social information:The role of social anxiety, toughness as a masculine role norm, and their interaction.Cognitive Therapy & Research, 31(3), 273-289.
Carmona-Halty, M. A., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2019). Linking positive emotions and academic performance:The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement.Current Psychology, 40, 2938-2947.
Carmona-Halty, M. A., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2019). The utrecht work engagement scale for students (UWES-9S):Factorial validity, reliability, and measurement invariance in a chilean sample of undergraduate university students.Frontiers in Psychology, 10,1017.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01017
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance.Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
Duckworth, A. L., Grant, H., Loew, B., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Self-regulation strategies improve self-discipline in adolescents:Benefits of mental contrasting and implementation intentions. Educational Psychology, 31(1), 17-26.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology:Individual bases of adolescent development (pp. 404-434). John Wiley & Sons.
Erath, S. A., Flanagan, K. S., & Bierman, K. L. (2007). Social anxiety and peer relations in early adolescence:Behavioral and cognitive factors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 35(3), 405-416.
Geldhof, G. J., Gestsdottir, S., Stefansson, K., Johnson, S. K., Bowers, E. P., & Lerner, R. M. (2015). Selection, optimization, and compensation:The structure, reliability, and validity of forced-choice versus Likert-type measures in a sample of late adolescents.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 39(2), 171-185.
Gestsdóttir, S., & Lerner, R. M. (2007). Intentional self-regulation and positive youth development in early adolescence:Findings from the 4-h study of positive youth development.Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 508-521.
Gestsdottir, S., Bowers, E., von Eye, A., Napolitano, C. M., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Intentional self regulation in middle adolescence:The emerging role of loss-based selection in positive youth development.Journal Youth Adolescence, 39(7), 764-782.
Gestsdottir, S., Geldhof, G. J., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2017). What drives positive youth development? Assessing intentional self-regulation as a central adolescent asset.International Journal of Developmental Science, 11(3-4), 69-79.
Gregory, B., & Peters, L. (2017). Changes in the self during cognitive behavioural therapy for social anxiety disorder:A systematic review.Clinical Psychology Review, 52, 1-18.
Heeren, A., Jones, P. J., & Mcnally, R. J. (2018). Mapping network connectivity among symptoms of social anxiety and comorbiddepression in people with social anxiety disorder. Journal of Affective Disorders, 228, 75-82.
Jin, G., & Wang, Y. (2019). The influence of gratitude on learning engagement among adolescents:The multiple mediating effects of teachers' emotional support and students' basic psychological needs.Journal of Adolescence, 77, 21-31.
Klein, A. M., Salemink, E., de Hullu, E., Houtkamp, E., Papa, M., & van der Molen, M. (2018). Cognitive bias modification reduces social anxiety symptoms in socially anxious adolescents with mild intellectual disabilities:A randomized controlled trial.Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders, 48(9), 3116-3126.
Koyuncu, A., Ince, E., Ertekin, E., & Tükel, R. (2019). Comorbidity in social anxiety disorder:Diagnostic and therapeutic challenges.Drugs Context, 8, 212573.https://doi.org/10.7513/dic.212573
Lerner, R. M. (2019). Frontiers in Theory-Predicated Research in Youth Development:A Commentary.Journal of Youth Development, 14(1), 1-23.
Lerner, R. M., Geldhof, J. G., & Bowers, E. P. (2019). The science of learning and development:Entering a new frontier of human development theory, research, and application.Applied Developmental Science, 23(4), 305-306.
Lerner, R. M., & Steinberg, L.(Eds.). (2009). Handbook of adolescent psychology:Individual bases of adolescent development. John Wiley & Sons.
Mancini, C., Ameringen, M. V., Bennett, M., Patterson, B., & Watson, C. (2005). Emerging treatments for child and adolescent social phobia:A review.Journal of Child & Adolescent Psychopharmacology, 15(4), 589-607.
Mcarthur, B. A., Burke, T. A., Connolly, S. L., Olino, T. M., Lumley, M. N., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (2019). A longitudinal investigation of cognitive self-schemas across adolescent development.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48(3), 635-647.
Nuckols, C. C. (2013). The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5).Philadelphia:American Psychiatric Association.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Ruscio, A. M., Brown, T. A., Chiu, W. T., Sareen, J., Stein, M. B., & Kessler, R. C. (2008). Social fears and social phobia in the USA:Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.Psychological Medicine, 38(1), 15-28.
Rytwinski, N. K., Fresco, D. M., Heimberg, R. G., Coles, M. E., Liebowitz, M. R., Cissell, S.,… Hofmann, S. G. (2009). Screening for social anxiety disorder with the self-report version of the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. Depression and Anxiety, 26(1), 34-38.
Schaufeli, W. B., Martinez, I. M., Pinto, A. M., Salanova, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). Burnout and engagement in university students:A cross-national study.Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 33(5), 464-481.
Smetana, J. G., Campionebarr, N., & Metzger, A. (2006). Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts.Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 255-284.
Stefansson, K. K., Gestsdottir, S., Birgisdottir, F., & Lerner, R. M. (2018). School engagement and intentional self-regulation:A reciprocal relation in adolescence.Journal of Adolescence, 64, 23-33.
Steinunn, G., Brown, U. J., Bowers, E. P., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Intentional self-regulation, ecological assets, and thriving in adolescence:A developmental systems model.New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(133), 61-76.
Tayama, J., Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Tanaka, M., & Takahama, A. (2019). Validation of a Japanese version of the work engagement scale for students.Japanese Psychological Research, 61(4), 262-272.
Vollet, J. W., Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2017). In peer matters, teachers matter:Peer group influences on students' engagement depend on teacher involvement.Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(1), 635-652.
Yu, H., Li, S., Qian, M., Yang, P., Wang, X., Lin, M., & Yao, N. (2013). Time-course of attentional bias for positive social words in individuals with high and low social anxiety.Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 42(4), 1-12.
代维祝, 张卫, 李董平, 喻承甫, 文超. (2010). 压力性生活事件与青少年问题行为:感恩与意向性自我调节的作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(06), 796-798.
方来坛, 时勘, 张风华. (2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(06), 618-620.
郭建鹏, 计国君. (2019). 大学生学习体验与学习结果的关系:学生投入的中介作用. 心理科学,42(04), 868-875.
黄海雁, 许国成, 付莹. (2017). 大学生成就目标定向与学习投入的关系:时间管理倾向的中介作用. 心理学探新, 37(04), 375-379.
李永占. (2018). 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型. 心理发展与教育, 34(05), 576-585.
彭顺, 汪夏, 牛更枫, 张红坡, 胡祥恩. (2019). 负面评价恐惧对社交焦虑的影响:基于社交焦虑的认知行为模型. 心理发展与教育, 35(01), 121-128.
斯滕伯格, L. (2007). 青春期:青少年的心理发展和健康成长(第7版) (戴俊毅, 译). 上海:上海社会科学院.
田录梅, 陈光辉, 王姝琼, 刘海娇, 张文新. (2012). 父母支持、友谊支持对早中期青少年孤独感和抑郁的影响. 心理学报, 44(07), 944-956.
王国霞,盖笑松. (2011). 青少年期的意向性自我调节. 心理科学进展, 19(08), 1158-1165.
温忠麟, 张雷, 侯杰泰, 刘红云. (2004). 中介效应检验程序及其应用. 心理学报, 36(05), 614-620.
熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展, 20(05), 757-769.
燕良轼, 王小凤, 李桃, 郑红, 徐琳琳. (2018). 中学生人际关系对学习投入的影响机制研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(01), 127-132.
[1] 高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入:网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2] 杨宝琰, 马熙凤, 臧鸿瑜, 毛海燕. 经济收入和父亲受教育程度对农村初中生学习投入的影响:家庭义务感和依赖教育性未来身份的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 83-92.
[3] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[4] 路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”?高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[5] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[6] 陈必忠, 郑雪, 孙晓军. 问题性社交媒体使用与线上社交焦虑:社交媒体认知超载和特质正念的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 743-751.
[7] 楚啸原, 楚子强, 王琦, 吉舒天, 雷雳. 农村初中学生亲子依恋回避与智能手机依赖:社交焦虑的中介作用和家庭经济困难的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 192-199.
[8] 李其容, 杨艳宇, 李春萱. 父母冲突、青少年日常自我效能和学习投入:日常消极情绪与日常沉思在父母冲突调节效应中的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 236-246.
[9] 蒋索, 丁金琦, 刘艳, 陆元圆, 李小青, 陈静. 青少年早期网络欺凌/受欺凌对睡眠质量的影响:社交焦虑和抑郁情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 85-96.
[10] 李松, 陈旭, 冉光明, 张琪. 被动性社交网站使用与社交焦虑:反刍思维和自我建构的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 720-728.
[11] 郎悦茹, 龚少英, 曹阳, 吴亚男. 网络学习中师生交互与大学生学习投入的关系:自主动机与学业情绪的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 530-537.
[12] 陈奕荣, 吴忠良. 特殊教育师范生感知班级氛围对学习投入的影响:专业认同的中介作用与未来取向的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 244-253.
[13] 高斌, 朱穗京, 吴晶玲. 大学生手机成瘾与学习投入的关系:自我控制的中介作用和核心自我评价的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 400-406.
[14] 王英杰, 李燕, 吴凡. 家庭功能与学前儿童行为问题的关系:依恋回避和社交焦虑的多重中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 76-83.
[15] 薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!