心理发展与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 224-230.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.02.09

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入:网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用

高斌1, 张丹丹2, 朱根2, 蔡艳香3, 郭羽希4   

  1. 1. 上海师范大学教育学院, 上海 200234;
    2. 湖北医药学院, 十堰 442000;
    3. 莆田第五中学, 莆田 351100;
    4. 武汉市第三中学, 武汉 430050
  • 发布日期:2024-03-18
  • 通讯作者: 朱根 E-mail:857091854@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省教育厅人文社科项目(20Q110);新高考背景下普通高中生涯规划教育模式初探(PTJYK22290)。

Proactive Personality and Online Learning Engagement in High School Students: The Sequential Mediation Effects of Online Learning Self-efficacy and Academic Expectation

GAO Bin1, ZHANG Dandan2, ZHU Gen2, CAI Yanxiang3, GUO Yuxi4   

  1. 1. College of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234;
    2. Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000;
    3. Putian NO.5 Middle School, Putian 351100;
    4. Wuhan No.3 Middle School, Wuhan 430050
  • Published:2024-03-18

摘要: 基于社会认知生涯理论考察高中生主动性人格对网络学习投入的影响,以及网络学习自我效能感和学业期望在其中的中介作用。本研究使用主动性人格量表、网络学习自我效能感量表、学业期望量表和网络学习投入量表,对湖北和福建两所中学高一至高二的477名高中生(高一274人,高二203人)进行问卷调查。结果发现:(1)主动性人格、网络学习自我效能感、学业期望与网络学习投入四个变量相互之间存在显著正相关;(2)主动性人格可以通过三条间接路径对网络学习投入产生影响,即网络学习自我效能的单独中介作用、学业期望的单独中介作用以及网络学习自我效能和学业期望的链式中介作用。研究有助于揭示高中生主动性人格对网络学习投入的作用机制,这为提升其线上学习投入有启示意义。

关键词: 高中生, 主动性人格, 网络学习自我效能, 学业期望, 网络学习投入

Abstract: Based on the social cognitive career theory, the current study aimed to examine whether online learning self-efficacy and academic expectation would have mediating effects on the relationship between proactive personality and online learning engagement. A sample of 477 high school students in China was recruited in this study to complete Proactive Personality Scale, Online Learning Self-efficacy Scale, Academic Expectation Scale and Online Learning Engagement Scale.The results showed that: (1) There was a significant positive correlation between the four variables of proactive personality, online learning self-efficacy, academic expectation and online learning engagement; (2) Proactive personality could affect online learning engagement through three indirect paths, namely, the independent mediation of online learning self-efficacy, academic expectation and the chain mediation of online learning self-efficacy and academic expectation. The research was helpful to understand the mechanism of high school students’ proactive personality on online learning engagement, and had practical implications for high school students’ online education and learning.

Key words: high school students, proactive personality, online learning self-efficacy, academic expectations, online learning engagement

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Anderson, C. B., Lee, H. Y., Byars-Winston, A., Baldwin, C. D., Cameron, C., & Chang, S. (2016). Assessment ofscientific communication self-efficacy, interest, and outcome expectations for career development in academic medicine. Journal of Career Assessment, 24(1), 182-196.
Bassi, M., Steca, P., Fave, A.D., & Caprara, G.V. (2007). Academic self-efficacy beliefs and quality of experience in learning. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 301-312.
Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior:A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118.
Chen, P., Bao, C., & Gao, Q. (2021). Proactive personality and academic engagement:The mediating effects of teacher-student relationships and academic self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 52994.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652994
Chen, P. S. D., Lambert, A. D., & Guidry, K. R. (2010). Engaging online learners:The impact of Web-based learning technology on college student engagement.Computers and Education, 54(4), 1222-1232.
Chen, H., & Lan, W. (1998). Adolescents' perceptions of their parents' academic expectations:Comparison of American, Chinese-American, and Chinese high school students. Adolescence, 33(130), 385-390.
Diegelman, N.M., & Subich, L. M. (2001). Academic and vocational interests as a function of outcome expectancies in social cognitive career theory. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 394-405.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor:The structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(3), 215-225.
Fredricks, J.A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls' and boys' engagement in math and science learning:A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271-298.
Gao, H., Ou, Y., Zhang, Z., Ni, M., Zhou, X., & Liao, L. (2021). The relationship between family support and e-Learning engagement in college students:The mediating role of e-Learning normative consciousness and behaviors and self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 573779. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.573779
Hong, Jon-Chao., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., & Zhao, L. (2021).High school students' online learning ineffectiveness in experimental courses during the COVID-19 pandemic, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 738695. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738695
Hua, J., Zhang, G., Coco, C., Zhao, T., & Hou, N.(2020). Proactive personality and cross-cultural adjustment:The mediating role of adjustment self-efficacy. Journal of International Students, 10(4), 817-835.
Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2019). Social cognitive career theory at 25:Empirical status of the interest, choice, and performance models.Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.06.004
Lin, S.H., Lu, W.C., Chen, M.Y., & Chen, L.H. (2014). Association between proactive personality and academic self-efficacy. Current Psychology, 33(4), 600-609.
Lopez, F. G., Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A. (1997). Role of social-cognitive expectations in high school students' mathematics-related interest and performance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(1), 44-52.
Martin, A.J., Collie, R.J., & Nagy, R.P. (2021). Adaptability and high school students' online learning during COVID-19:A job demands-resources perspective, Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 702163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702163
Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen:A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36(4), 827-856.
Rodriguez, C. M. (2009). The impact of academic self-concept, expectations and the choice of learning strategy on academic achievement:The case of business students. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(5), 523-539.
Suárez-Álvarez, J., Fernández-Alonso, R., & Muñiz, J. (2014). Self-concept, motivation, expectations, and socioeconomic level as predictors of academic performance in mathematics. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 118-123.
Vignoli, M., & Depolo, M. (2019). Transfer of training process:When proactive personality matters? A three-wave investigation of proactive personality as a trigger of the transfer of training process.Personality and Individual Differences, 141, 62-67.
Wigfield, A.(1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation:A developmental perspective.Educational Psychology Review, 6(1),49-78.
Wu, H.Q., Chen, Y.W., & Liu, R. (2020). College education outcome expectation and proactive personality as predictors of Chinese college students' learning motivation, career adaptability as a mediator. In 2020 International Conference on Modern Education and Information Management (ICMEIM, pp.716-721).
Yan, L., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Guan, Q., Wen, G., Gaševic, D., & Chen, G. (2021). Students' experience of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic:A province-wide survey study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 2038-2057.
Yates, A., Starkey, L., Egerton, B., & Flueggen, F. (2020). High school students' experience of online learning during Covid-19:The influence of technology and pedagogy. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 59-73.
Zhang, K., Wu, S., Xu, Y., Cao, W., Goetz, T., & Parks-Stamm, E.J. (2021). Adaptability promotes student engagement under COVID-19:The multiple mediating effects of academic emotion. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 633265. https://doi.org/10.338 9/fpsyg.2020.633265
Zheng, F., Khan, N.A., & Hussain, S. (2020). The COVID 19 pandemic and digital higher education:Exploring the impact of proactive personality on social capital through internet self-efficacy and online interaction quality. Children and Youth Services Review, 119, 105694.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105694
柏宏权, 韩庆年, 万曼.(2019). 学业自我效能感对大学生在线同伴互评行为的影响研究. 现代远距离教育, (6), 45-52.
陈奕荣, 吴忠良.(2022). 特殊教育师范生感知班级氛围对学习投入的影响:专业认同的中介作用与未来取向的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 38(2), 244-253.
段朝辉, 洪建中. (2019). 网络视频课程中师生交互与大学生网络学习绩效的关系:学习自我效能感与学习动机的序列中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 35(2), 58-65.
邓璐. (2015). 高中生网络学习自我效能感量表的编制以及与时间管理、网络动机之间的关系(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
方杰, 温忠麟, 张敏强, 孙配贞. (2014). 基于结构方程模型的多重中介效应分析.心理科学, 37(3), 735-741.
方来坛, 时勘, 张风华. (2008). 中文版学习投入量表的信效度研究.中国临床心理学杂志, 16(6), 618-621.
高欣峰, 喻忱, 李爽.(2020). 大学生网络通识课学习投入调查研究——以青岛农业大学为例. 中国远程教育, (5), 38-45.
高洁, 李明军, 张文兰. (2015). 主动性人格与网络学习投入的关系——自我决定动机理论的视角.电化教育研究, (8), 18-22.
姜甜甜, 曹阳, 龚少英.(2021). 教师自主支持对高中生网络学习投入的影响:自主动机与主动性人格的作用[摘要].见第二十三届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(下)(pp.566-567).中国心理学会.
蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. (2018). 小学生能力观对数学学习投入的影响:学业控制感和期望的中介作用.心理与行为研究, 16(4), 490-496.
郎悦茹, 龚少英, 曹阳, 吴亚男.(2022). 网络学习中师生交互与大学生学习投入的关系:自主动机与学业情绪的序列中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 38(4), 530-537.
罗杰, 陈维, 杨桂芳, 吴丹萍, 刘拓.(2019). 大学生主动性人格对其拖延行为的影响:核心自我评价的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 17(5), 692-698.
罗杰, 崔汉卿, 戴晓阳, 赵守盈. (2014). 高中生学业期望与应对方式的关系:自我效能感的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (10), 92-96.
廖秀红.(2019). 大学生网络学习行为与时间管理倾向的关系:主动性人格的中介作用. 教育现代化, (96), 223-227.
马星杨, 赵玉芳, 李元方, 姚菲, 龚宁馨. (2021). 学习效能感,自我决定动机对学业期望的作用:基于统合模型的分析.心理技术与应用, 9(1), 12-19.
师亚, 刘永兵, 刘婷婷, 石江林, 周静欣, 嫣然.(2021). 医学生在线学习投入与网络学习自我效能感的相关性及影响因素研究. 护理管理杂志, 21 (5), 334-339.
宋乃庆, 赵秋红, 罗士琰.(2020). 重大疫情下中学生学习毅力现状、问题及对策研究. 教育发展研究,40(8), 32-37.
汤丹丹, 温忠麟.(2020). 共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议. 心理科学, 43(1), 215-223.
王伟, 雷雳, 王兴超.(2016).大学生主动性人格对学业成绩的影响:学业自我效能感和学习适应的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 32(5), 579-586.
吴艳, 温忠麟. (2011). 结构方程建模中的题目打包策略.心理科学进展, 19(12), 522-523.
文芳. (2014). 中学生主动性人格的特点及其与学习适应性、学习成绩之间的相关研究.教育测量与评价, (11), 41-46.
尹睿,谢幼如.(2010). 网络学习自我效能感研究引论:涵义、课题与启示. 中国电化教育, (2), 26-30.
张思, 刘清堂, 雷诗捷, 王亚如.(2017). 网络学习空间中学习者学习投入的研究——网络学习行为的大数据分析. 中国电化教育, (4), 24-30.
朱彩凤, 柴唤友, 周雪, 孙晓军.(2019). 混合学习环境中主动性人格和人际交互与学习绩效的关系研究. 中国远程教育, (8), 68-78.
张颖, 杨付.(2017). 主动性人格:机制与未来走向. 心理科学进展, 25(9),1544-1551.
中国互联网络信息中心.(2020). 第45次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》.2020-04-28 取自http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/202004/t20200428_70974.htm
中国互联网络信息中心.(2021).《2020年全国未成年人互联网使用情况研究报告》.2021-07-20 取自 http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/qsnbg/202107/t20210720_71505.htm
[1] 杨宝琰, 柳玉姣. 元刻板印象威胁对县城农村高中生学校归属感的影响:身份认同整合和自我肯定的作用机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 645-653.
[2] 黄杰, 朱丹, 杨澳. 实习初期教师职业认同的发展轨迹及其与主动性人格的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 40-47.
[3] 郑爽, 刘红瑞, 李静, 席雨, 姚梅林. 主动性人格与大学生创业准备行为的关系:创业意向的中介效应与创业社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 813-821.
[4] 张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.
[5] 张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[6] 徐鑫锫, 莫玲菲, 刘明, 邓赐平. 高一学生成就目标特征模式及学业适应:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 81-89.
[7] 罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[8] 叶宝娟, 孙原, 高良, 夏扉, 杨强. 主动性人格与大学生职业成熟度的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 304-310.
[9] 林颐宣. 主动性人格对小学教师工作满意度的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 103-112.
[10] 楚啸原, 理原, 王兴超, 王玉慧, 雷雳. 家庭收入与高中生幸福感:社会支持与性别因素的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(4): 478-485.
[11] 蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响:学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 48-56.
[12] 顾婷玉, 盖笑松, 王国霞, 刘芳晴. 高中生价值观对学校投入的影响:未来目标和动机内化程度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 68-75.
[13] 李永占. 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
[14] 陈英敏, 刘忠花, 李亮, 曲艺, 韩磊, 高峰强. 高中生羞怯与学业适应的关系:学业求助的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 322-329.
[15] 赵改, 孔繁昌, 刘诏君, 冯雅萌, 黄声普, 王亚丹, 周宗奎. 父母情感温暖对青少年感恩的影响:责任心与公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(3): 257-263.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!