心理发展与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 83-92.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.01.09

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

经济收入和父亲受教育程度对农村初中生学习投入的影响：家庭义务感和依赖教育性未来身份的作用

杨宝琰1,2, 马熙凤1, 臧鸿瑜1, 毛海燕1   

  1. 1. 西北师范大学心理学院, 兰州 730070;
    2. 西北师范大学西北少数民族教育发展研究中心, 兰州 730070
  • 发布日期:2024-02-20
  • 通讯作者: 杨宝琰 E-mail:yangby2005@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金一般项目“民汉合校学生跨民族互助的影响因素及其促进策略研究”(17BSH099)。

The Influence of Family Economic Income and Father’s Education Level on Academic Engagement among Rural Junior Middle School Students:The Mechanisms of Family Obligation and Education-dependence Future Identity

YANG Baoyan1,2, MA Xifeng1, ZANG Hongyu1, MAO Haiyan1   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070;
    2. Research Center for Education of Northwest Ethnic Minorities, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070
  • Published:2024-02-20

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

摘要： 以G省L县某农村初中185名初三学生为研究对象,采用实验法考察了家庭经济收入和父亲受教育程度对农村初中生学习投入的影响以及家庭义务感和依赖教育性未来身份在其中的作用。结果表明:(1)家庭经济收入、父亲受教育程度对学习投入具有直接正向预测作用;(2)当前对家庭支持、对家人的尊敬、未来对家庭支持在家庭经济收入与学习投入之间起部分中介作用;(3)依赖教育性未来身份正向调节当前对家庭支持和未来对家庭支持在家庭经济收入与学习投入之间的中介效应,即在未来身份依赖教育的情况下,家庭经济收入通过未来对家庭支持和当前对家庭支持对学习投入的间接影响更显著。

关键词: 家庭经济收入, 家庭义务感, 依赖教育性未来身份, 学习投入

Abstract: This study was conducted among 185 third-grade students at a rural junior middle school in L county, G province.The experimental method was adopted to explore the impact of family income and father’s education level on the academic engagement of rural junior middle school students, and investigate the effect on the role of family obligation and education-dependence future identity. The results indicated that: (1) Family economic income and father’s education level had a direct and positive predictive effect on academic engagement; (2) Current support for family, respect for family, and future support for family played a partial mediating role between family economic income and academic engagement; (3) Education-dependence future identity positively moderated the mediating effect of current support for family and future support for family between family economic income and academic engagement, which meant in the case of future identity dependence on education, the indirect effect of family economic income on ACADEMIC ENGAGEMENT through future support for family and current support for family was more significant.

Key words: family economic income, family obligation, education-dependence future identity, academic engagemnt

中图分类号: 

  • G442
Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967).The American occupational structure. New York:The Free Press.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399.
Chao,R., & Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting:Social conditions and applied parenting(Vol. 4, pp. 148-180). Mahwah, NJ, US:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Conger, R. D., & Donnellan, M. B. (2007). An interactionist perspective on the socioeconomic context of human development. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 175-199.
Crespo, C., Jose, P. E., Kielpikowski, M., & Pryor, J. (2013). "On solid ground":Family and school connectedness promotes adolescents' future orientation. Journal of Adolescence, 36(5), 993-1002.
Destin,M., & Oyserman, D. (2010). Incentivizing education:Seeing schoolwork as an investment, not a chore. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(5), 846-849.
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement:A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 763-782). Boston, MA:Springer.
Frye, M. (2012). Bright futures in Malawi' s new dawn:Educational aspirations as assertions of identity. American Journal of Sociology, 117(6), 1565-1624.
Fuligni,A. J., & Zhang, W. X. (2004). Attitudes toward family obligation among adolescents in contemporary urban and rural China. Child Development, 75(1), 180-192.
Fuligni, A. J., Eccles, J. S., Barber, B. L., & Clements, P. (2001). Early Adolescent peer orientation and adjustment during high school. Developmental Psychology, 37(1), 28-36.
Fuligni,A. J., Tseng, V., & Lam, M. (1999). Attitudes toward family obligations among American adolescents with Asian, Latin American, and European backgrounds. Child Development, 70(4), 1030-1044.
Fuligni, A. J., & Tseng, V. (2008). A Measure of adolescents' attitudes toward family obligation. Los Angeles:California Center for Population Research, University of California-Los Angeles.
Hayes, A. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis.Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
Kuhn, G. D. (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE:Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change:The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24-32.
Matthews, K. A.,& Gallo, L. C. (2011). Psychological perspectives on pathways linking socioeconomic status and physical health. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 501-530.
Oyserman, D. (2013). Not just any path:Implications of identity-based motivation for disparities in school outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 33, 179-190.
Oyserman, D., & Dawson, A. (2021). Successful learning environments support and harness students' identity-based motivation:A primer. The Journal of Experimental Education, 89(3), 508-522.
Oyserman, D., Smith, G. C., & Elmore, K. (2014). Identity-based motivation:Implications for health and health disparities. Journal of Social Issues, 70(2), 206-225.
Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students.Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout:A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
Suárez-Orozco, M. (1995). Transformations:Immigration, family life, and achievement motivation among Latino adolescents. Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
Wößmann, L. (2005). Educational production in East Asia:The impact of family background and schooling policies on student performance. German Economic Review, 6(3), 331-353.
Yeung, W. J., Linver, M. R, & Brooks-gunn, J. (2002). How money matters for young children's development:Parental investment and family processes. Child Development, 73(6), 1861-1879.
布津迈尔, A. (1994). 裴斯泰洛齐选集(第1卷,尹德新 译). 北京:教育科学出版社.
方长春, 风笑天. (2008). 家庭背景与学业成就——义务教育中的阶层差异研究. 浙江社会科学, (8), 47-55.
郭丛斌, 闵维方. (2006). 家庭经济和文化资本对子女教育机会获得的影响. 高等教育研究, 27(11), 24-31.
李春玲. (2003). 社会政治变迁与教育机会不平等——家庭背景及制度因素对教育获得的影响(1940-2001). 中国社会科学, 24(3), 86-98.
乔娜, 张景焕, 刘桂荣, 林崇德. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位、父母参与对初中生学业成绩的影响:教师支持的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 507-514.
师保国, 申继亮. (2007). 家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系. 心理发展与教育, 23(1), 30-34.
石雷山, 陈英敏, 侯秀, 高峰强. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能的中介作用.心理发展与教育, 29(1), 71-78.
王美萍, 张坤, 张文新, Fulignl, A. J. (2001). 青少年家庭义务感的研究. 心理发展与教育, 17(3), 28-32.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 22(5), 714-726.
许嘉猷. (1986). 社会阶层化与社会流动. 台北:三民书局.
杨宝琰. (2017). 教育选择与阶层再生产:县域内高中教育机会分配的阶层化机制研究. 北京:中国社会科学出版社.
杨宝琰, 万明钢. (2015). 父亲受教育程度和经济资本如何影响学业成绩——基于中介效应和调节效应的分析. 北京大学教育评论, 13(2), 127-145.
张文新. (1999). 儿童社会性发展. 北京:北京师范大学出版社.
张玲玲, 张文新.(2008). 中晚期青少年的个人规划及其与亲子、朋友沟通的关系. 心理学报, 40(5), 583-592.
[1] 高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入：网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[3] 李其容, 杨艳宇, 李春萱. 父母冲突、青少年日常自我效能和学习投入:日常消极情绪与日常沉思在父母冲突调节效应中的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 236-246.
[4] 郎悦茹, 龚少英, 曹阳, 吴亚男. 网络学习中师生交互与大学生学习投入的关系：自主动机与学业情绪的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 530-537.
[5] 陈奕荣, 吴忠良. 特殊教育师范生感知班级氛围对学习投入的影响:专业认同的中介作用与未来取向的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 244-253.
[6] 周爱保, 胡砚冰, 刘锦涛, 鲁小勇, 王有丽, 周滢鑫. 青少年社交焦虑与学习投入的关系:意向性自我调节的解释作用及其年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 54-63.
[7] 高斌, 朱穗京, 吴晶玲. 大学生手机成瘾与学习投入的关系:自我控制的中介作用和核心自我评价的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 400-406.
[8] 贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德. 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 700-707.
[9] 蒋舒阳, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 洪伟, 金芳凯. 高中生数学能力实体观对数学学习投入的影响:学业自我效能感和消极学业情绪的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(1): 48-56.
[10] 李永占. 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
[11] 洪伟, 刘儒德, 甄瑞, 蒋舒阳, 金芳凯. 成就目标定向与小学生数学学习投入的关系:学业拖延和数学焦虑的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 191-199.
[12] 陈继文, 郭永玉, 胡小勇. 教师自主支持与初中生的学习投入:家庭社会阶层与学生自主动机的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(2): 180-187.
[13] 石雷山, 陈英敏, 侯秀, 高峰强. 家庭社会经济地位与学习投入的关系：学业自我 效能的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(1): 71-78.
[14] 文超, 张卫, 李董平, 喻承甫, 代维祝. 初中生感恩与学业成就的关系:学习投入的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(6): 598-605.
[15] 王美萍, 张坤, 张文新, Andrew J Fuligni. 青少年家庭义务感的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2001, 17(3): 28-32,39.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发