心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 45-53.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.01.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年线上积极自我呈现与幸福感的关系:线上积极反馈与自尊的作用

姜永志1,2, 白晓丽3, 张璐1,4, 赵思琦5   

  1. 1. 内蒙古民族大学教育科学学院, 通辽 028000;
    2. 内蒙古民族教育与心理发展研究基地, 通辽 028000;
    3. 内蒙古师范大学心理学院, 呼和浩特 010022;
    4. 天津师范大学心理学部, 天津 300387;
    5. 哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院, 哈尔滨 150025
  • 发布日期:2022-02-17
  • 通讯作者: 张璐 E-mail:zhanglu@imun.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学基金项目(20XJC190001);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2019M660994);内蒙古自治区高等学校青年科技英才支持计划(NJYT-19-B20);内蒙古民族大学博士科研启动基金(BS-478)。

The Relationship between Adolescents' Online Positive Self-presentation and Well-being: The Role of Online Positive Feedback and Self-esteem

JIANG Yongzhi1,2, BAI Xiaoli3, ZHANG Lu1,4, ZHAO Siqi5   

  1. 1. School of Education Science, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao 028000;
    2. Research Base of Inner Mongolia Education and Psychological Development, Tongliao 028000;
    3. School of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022;
    4. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    5. School of Education Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025
  • Published:2022-02-17

摘要: 采用社交网站自我呈现问卷、社交网站积极反馈问卷、牛津幸福感问卷和整体自尊量表对1804名中学生进行调查,探讨了社交网络使用中的积极自我呈现与幸福感的关系,以及线上积极反馈在二者关系间的中介作用和自尊对这一中介模型的调节作用。结果发现:(1)线上积极自我呈现、线上积极反馈、自尊与幸福感两两均呈显著正相关;(2)线上积极自我呈现不仅能直接正向预测青少年的幸福感,还能通过线上积极反馈的中介作用对幸福感产生作用;(3)自尊不仅能调节线上积极自我呈现对幸福感的直接效应,还能调节线上积极自我呈现经由线上积极反馈预测幸福感的中介作用的前半路径。研究揭示了青少年线上积极自我呈现与幸福感关系的作用机制,有助于引导青少年通过社交网络使用促进积极心理品质的发展。

关键词: 青少年, 线上积极自我呈现, 线上积极反馈, 幸福感, 自尊

Abstract: In order to investigate the relationship between online positive self-presentation and well-being, and the mediating role of online positive feedback in the relationship between them and the moderating role of self-esteem on this mediating model. A survey research method was adopted in which the social networking self-presentation questionnaire, social networking positive feedback questionnaire, oxford well-being questionnaire as well as the self-esteem Scales were administered to 1804 middle and high school students. The results indicated that:(1)The relationships between online positive self-presentation, online positive feedback, self-esteem and well-being were significantly positive correlation; (2)Online positive self-presentation not only had a direct negative predictive effect on well-being, but also affects well-being through the mediating role of online positive feedback; (3)Self-esteem not only moderate the direct effect of online positive self-presentation on well-being, but also moderate the first half of the mediating effect of online positive self-presentation on well-being through online positive feedback. The research reveals the mechanism of the relationship between online positive self-presentation and well-being of adolescents, which helps to guide adolescents to promote the development of positive psychological quality through the use of social networks.

Key words: adolescents, online positive self-presentation, online positive feedback, well-being, self-esteem

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Akpan, U., Akwaowo, E., & Senam, N. (2013). Uses and gratifications of social networking websites among youths in uyonigeria.International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(2), 353-369.
Bareket-Bojmel, L., Moran, S., & Shahar, G. (2016). Strategic self-presentation on Facebook:Personal motives and audience response to online behavior.Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 788-795.
Basilisco, R., & Jin, K. (2015). Uses and gratification motivation for using facebook and the impact of facebook usage on social capital and life satisfaction among filipino users. International Journal of Software Engineering & Its Applications, 9(4), 181-194.
Britt, R. K. (2015). Effects of self-presentation and social media use in attainment of beauty ideals.Studies in Media and Communication, 3(1), 79-88.
Bunge, E. L., Beard, C. L., Stephens, T. N., Yan, L., & Muñoz, R. F. (2017). Mood management effects of a brief behavioral activation internet intervention.Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, (1), 1-8.
Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 47(5), 1105-17.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being:Three decades of progress.Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Steinfield, C. (2007). Social network sites and society:Current trends and future possibilities.Interactions, 16(1), 6-9.
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media:The impact of facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood.Body Image, 13, 38-45.
Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). "Harder, better, faster, stronger":Negative comparison on Facebook and adolescents' life satisfaction are reciprocally related.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 19(3), 158-164.
Ford, M. B., & Collins, N. L. (2010). Self-esteem moderates neuroendocrine and psychological responses to interpersonal rejection.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 98(3), 405-419.
Greitemeyer, T., Mügge, D. O., & Bollermann, I. (2014). Having responsive Facebook friends affects the satisfaction of psychological needs more than having many Facebook friends.Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 252-258.
Griffiths, L. J., Parsons, T. J., & Hill, A. J. (2011). Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents:A systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 5(4), 282-304.
Grieve, R., Kemp, N., Norris, K., & Padgett, C. R. (2017). Push or pull? Unpacking the social compensation hypothesis of internet use in an educational context.Computers & Education, 109, 1-10.
Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall:Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 14(1-2), 79-83.
Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A. M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from mars, women are from venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 15(2), 91-98.
Harter, S. (2006).Self-Processes and Developmental Psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology:Theory and method(pp.370-418). John Wiley & Sons.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach.Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire:A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being.Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1073-1082.
Huang, C. (2017). Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being:A meta-analysis.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 20(6), 346-354.
Indian, M., & Grieve, R. (2014). When Facebook is easier than face-to-face:Social support derived from Facebook in socially anxious individuals.Personality & Individual Differences, 59(2), 102-106.
Joseph, R. P., Pekmezi, D. W., Lewis, T., Dutton, G., Turner, L. W., & Durant, N. H. (2013). Physical activity and social cognitive theory outcomes of an internet-enhanced physical activity intervention for African American female college students.Journal of Health Disparities Research & Practice, 6(2), 1-18.
Kim, J., & Lee, J. (2011). The facebook paths to happiness:Effects of the number of facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyber Psychology Behavior and Social Networking, 14(6), 359-364.
Lee, K. T., Noh, M. J., & Koo, D. M. (2013). Lonely people are no longer lonely on social networking sites:The mediating role of self-disclosure and social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(6), 413-418.
Lee, G., Lee, J., & Kwon, S. (2011). Use of social-networking sites and subjective well-being:A study in south Korea.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 14(3), 151-155.
Lee, M. R., Yen, D. C., & Hsiao, C. Y. (2014). Understanding the perceived community value of Facebook users.Computers in Human Behavior, 35(2), 350-358.
Lin, H., Tov, W., & Qiu, L. (2014). Emotional disclosure on social networking sites:The role of network structure and psychological needs.Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 342-350.
Lin, X., Su, W., & Potenza, M. N. (2018). Development of an online and offline integration hypothesis for healthy internet use:Theory and preliminary evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 492.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00492.
Liu, D., & Brown, B. B. (2014). Self-disclosure on social networking sites, positive feedback, and social capital among Chinese college students.Computers in Human Behavior, 38(3), 213-219.
Malik, A., Dhir, A., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on facebook.Telematics & Informatics, 33(1), 129-138.
Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment:Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 12(6), 729-733.
Park, L. E., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 96(1), 203-217.
Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness:Why an instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 155-167.
Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., Harris, J. L., & Herring, J. A. (2002). Relationship among internet use, personality, and social support.Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 437-451.
Toothaker, L. E. (1994). Multiple regression:Testing and interpreting interactions.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(1), 119-120.
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-affirmation underliesfacebook use. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 321-331.
Usborne, E., & Taylor, D. M. (2010). The role of cultural identity clarity for self-concept clarity, self-esteem, and subjective well-being.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 883-897.
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 9(5), 584-590.
Veronese, G., Natour, M., & Said, M. (2012). Positive emotions and life satisfaction in palestinian children growing up amid political and military violence:A pilot study. The Lancet, 380(1), S16.
Wang, J. L., Jackson, L. A., Gaskin, J., & Wang, H. Z. (2014). The effects of social networking site (SNS) use on college students' friendship and well-being.Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 229-236.
Zeigler-Hill, V., Dahlen, E. R., & Madson, M. B. (2017). Self-esteem and alcohol use:Implications for aggressive behavior. International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, 15(5), 1-15.
陈必忠. (2018). 社交网站积极自我呈现与主观幸福感:多重中介模型.心理技术与应用, 6(9), 528-536.
陈建文, 陈莎. (2009). 极端应激情境下寻求健康和幸福的新视点——认知适应理论(CAT).华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 48(1), 137-140.
何晓丽, 王振宏, 王克静. (2011). 积极情绪对人际信任影响的线索效应.心理学报, 43(12), 1408-1417.
雷雳.(2016). 互联网心理学:新心理与行为研究的兴起. 北京师范大学版社.
李海江, 杨娟, 袁祥勇, 覃义贵, 张庆林.(2012). 低自尊个体对拒绝性信息的注意偏向. 心理科学进展, 20(10), 1604-1613.
牛更枫, 鲍娜, 周宗奎, 范翠英, 孔繁昌, 孙晓军. (2015). 社交网站中的自我呈现对生活满意度的影响:积极情绪和社会支持的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(5), 563-570.
彭先桃, 陈颖娇, 朱晓伟. (2017). 社交网站体像比较与抑郁的关系:体像满意度与自尊的链式中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 959-962.
邱林, 郑雪. (2013). 人格特质影响主观幸福感的研究述评.自然辩证法通讯, 35(5), 109-114.
肖崇好, 黄希庭. (2010). 自我呈现个体差异的实验研究.西南大学学报(社会科学版), 36(2), 21-26.
孙晓军, 柴唤友, 牛更枫, 崔曦曦, 连帅磊, 田媛. (2017). 社交网站中的自我表露对青少年孤独感的影响:一个有调节的中介模型.心理发展与教育, 33(4), 477-486.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999).心理卫生评定量表手册. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟.(2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
杨秀娟, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 刘庆奇, 连帅磊. (2017). 社交网站积极自我呈现与青少年抑郁:链式中介效应分析.中国临床心理学杂志, 25(3), 489-493.
张林, 李元元. (2009). 自尊社会计量器理论的研究述评.心理科学进展, 17(4), 852-856.
郑显亮, 王亚芹. (2017). 青少年网络利他行为与主观幸福感的关系——一个有中介的调节模型.心理科学, 40(1), 70-75.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法.心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响:择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[5] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[6] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[7] 路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”?高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[8] 唐莹莹, 蔺秀云, 殷锦绣, 何婷, 周少嘉, 曹志涛. 亲子依恋和祖孙依恋的一致与不一致和儿童主观幸福感的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 859-868.
[9] 吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[10] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[11] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[12] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[13] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[14] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[15] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!