心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 45-53.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.01.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年线上积极自我呈现与幸福感的关系:线上积极反馈与自尊的作用

姜永志1,2, 白晓丽3, 张璐1,4, 赵思琦5   

  1. 1. 内蒙古民族大学教育科学学院, 通辽 028000;
    2. 内蒙古民族教育与心理发展研究基地, 通辽 028000;
    3. 内蒙古师范大学心理学院, 呼和浩特 010022;
    4. 天津师范大学心理学部, 天津 300387;
    5. 哈尔滨师范大学教育科学学院, 哈尔滨 150025
  • 发布日期:2022-02-17
  • 通讯作者: 张璐 E-mail:zhanglu@imun.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学基金项目(20XJC190001);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(2019M660994);内蒙古自治区高等学校青年科技英才支持计划(NJYT-19-B20);内蒙古民族大学博士科研启动基金(BS-478)。

The Relationship between Adolescents' Online Positive Self-presentation and Well-being: The Role of Online Positive Feedback and Self-esteem

JIANG Yongzhi1,2, BAI Xiaoli3, ZHANG Lu1,4, ZHAO Siqi5   

  1. 1. School of Education Science, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao 028000;
    2. Research Base of Inner Mongolia Education and Psychological Development, Tongliao 028000;
    3. School of Psychology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022;
    4. Faculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    5. School of Education Science, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025
  • Published:2022-02-17

摘要: 采用社交网站自我呈现问卷、社交网站积极反馈问卷、牛津幸福感问卷和整体自尊量表对1804名中学生进行调查,探讨了社交网络使用中的积极自我呈现与幸福感的关系,以及线上积极反馈在二者关系间的中介作用和自尊对这一中介模型的调节作用。结果发现:(1)线上积极自我呈现、线上积极反馈、自尊与幸福感两两均呈显著正相关;(2)线上积极自我呈现不仅能直接正向预测青少年的幸福感,还能通过线上积极反馈的中介作用对幸福感产生作用;(3)自尊不仅能调节线上积极自我呈现对幸福感的直接效应,还能调节线上积极自我呈现经由线上积极反馈预测幸福感的中介作用的前半路径。研究揭示了青少年线上积极自我呈现与幸福感关系的作用机制,有助于引导青少年通过社交网络使用促进积极心理品质的发展。

关键词: 青少年, 线上积极自我呈现, 线上积极反馈, 幸福感, 自尊

Abstract: In order to investigate the relationship between online positive self-presentation and well-being, and the mediating role of online positive feedback in the relationship between them and the moderating role of self-esteem on this mediating model. A survey research method was adopted in which the social networking self-presentation questionnaire, social networking positive feedback questionnaire, oxford well-being questionnaire as well as the self-esteem Scales were administered to 1804 middle and high school students. The results indicated that:(1)The relationships between online positive self-presentation, online positive feedback, self-esteem and well-being were significantly positive correlation; (2)Online positive self-presentation not only had a direct negative predictive effect on well-being, but also affects well-being through the mediating role of online positive feedback; (3)Self-esteem not only moderate the direct effect of online positive self-presentation on well-being, but also moderate the first half of the mediating effect of online positive self-presentation on well-being through online positive feedback. The research reveals the mechanism of the relationship between online positive self-presentation and well-being of adolescents, which helps to guide adolescents to promote the development of positive psychological quality through the use of social networks.

Key words: adolescents, online positive self-presentation, online positive feedback, well-being, self-esteem

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Akpan, U., Akwaowo, E., & Senam, N. (2013). Uses and gratifications of social networking websites among youths in uyonigeria.International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(2), 353-369.
Bareket-Bojmel, L., Moran, S., & Shahar, G. (2016). Strategic self-presentation on Facebook:Personal motives and audience response to online behavior.Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 788-795.
Basilisco, R., & Jin, K. (2015). Uses and gratification motivation for using facebook and the impact of facebook usage on social capital and life satisfaction among filipino users. International Journal of Software Engineering & Its Applications, 9(4), 181-194.
Britt, R. K. (2015). Effects of self-presentation and social media use in attainment of beauty ideals.Studies in Media and Communication, 3(1), 79-88.
Bunge, E. L., Beard, C. L., Stephens, T. N., Yan, L., & Muñoz, R. F. (2017). Mood management effects of a brief behavioral activation internet intervention.Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, (1), 1-8.
Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 47(5), 1105-17.
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being:Three decades of progress.Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302.
Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., & Steinfield, C. (2007). Social network sites and society:Current trends and future possibilities.Interactions, 16(1), 6-9.
Fardouly, J., Diedrichs, P. C., Vartanian, L. R., & Halliwell, E. (2015). Social comparisons on social media:The impact of facebook on young women's body image concerns and mood.Body Image, 13, 38-45.
Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). "Harder, better, faster, stronger":Negative comparison on Facebook and adolescents' life satisfaction are reciprocally related.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 19(3), 158-164.
Ford, M. B., & Collins, N. L. (2010). Self-esteem moderates neuroendocrine and psychological responses to interpersonal rejection.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 98(3), 405-419.
Greitemeyer, T., Mügge, D. O., & Bollermann, I. (2014). Having responsive Facebook friends affects the satisfaction of psychological needs more than having many Facebook friends.Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 36(3), 252-258.
Griffiths, L. J., Parsons, T. J., & Hill, A. J. (2011). Self-esteem and quality of life in obese children and adolescents:A systematic review. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 5(4), 282-304.
Grieve, R., Kemp, N., Norris, K., & Padgett, C. R. (2017). Push or pull? Unpacking the social compensation hypothesis of internet use in an educational context.Computers & Education, 109, 1-10.
Gonzales, A. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2011). Mirror, mirror on my Facebook wall:Effects of exposure to Facebook on self-esteem. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 14(1-2), 79-83.
Haferkamp, N., Eimler, S. C., Papadakis, A. M., & Kruck, J. V. (2012). Men are from mars, women are from venus? Examining gender differences in self-presentation on social networking sites.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 15(2), 91-98.
Harter, S. (2006).Self-Processes and Developmental Psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental Psychopathology:Theory and method(pp.370-418). John Wiley & Sons.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach.Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
Hills, P., & Argyle, M. (2002). The Oxford Happiness Questionnaire:A compact scale for the measurement of psychological well-being.Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1073-1082.
Huang, C. (2017). Time spent on social network sites and psychological well-being:A meta-analysis.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 20(6), 346-354.
Indian, M., & Grieve, R. (2014). When Facebook is easier than face-to-face:Social support derived from Facebook in socially anxious individuals.Personality & Individual Differences, 59(2), 102-106.
Joseph, R. P., Pekmezi, D. W., Lewis, T., Dutton, G., Turner, L. W., & Durant, N. H. (2013). Physical activity and social cognitive theory outcomes of an internet-enhanced physical activity intervention for African American female college students.Journal of Health Disparities Research & Practice, 6(2), 1-18.
Kim, J., & Lee, J. (2011). The facebook paths to happiness:Effects of the number of facebook friends and self-presentation on subjective well-being. Cyber Psychology Behavior and Social Networking, 14(6), 359-364.
Lee, K. T., Noh, M. J., & Koo, D. M. (2013). Lonely people are no longer lonely on social networking sites:The mediating role of self-disclosure and social support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(6), 413-418.
Lee, G., Lee, J., & Kwon, S. (2011). Use of social-networking sites and subjective well-being:A study in south Korea.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 14(3), 151-155.
Lee, M. R., Yen, D. C., & Hsiao, C. Y. (2014). Understanding the perceived community value of Facebook users.Computers in Human Behavior, 35(2), 350-358.
Lin, H., Tov, W., & Qiu, L. (2014). Emotional disclosure on social networking sites:The role of network structure and psychological needs.Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 342-350.
Lin, X., Su, W., & Potenza, M. N. (2018). Development of an online and offline integration hypothesis for healthy internet use:Theory and preliminary evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 492.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00492.
Liu, D., & Brown, B. B. (2014). Self-disclosure on social networking sites, positive feedback, and social capital among Chinese college students.Computers in Human Behavior, 38(3), 213-219.
Malik, A., Dhir, A., & Nieminen, M. (2016). Uses and gratifications of digital photo sharing on facebook.Telematics & Informatics, 33(1), 129-138.
Park, N., Kee, K. F., & Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment:Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 12(6), 729-733.
Park, L. E., & Maner, J. K. (2009). Does self-threat promote social connection? The role of self-esteem and contingencies of self-worth.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 96(1), 203-217.
Pittman, M., & Reich, B. (2016). Social media and loneliness:Why an instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand twitter words. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 155-167.
Swickert, R. J., Hittner, J. B., Harris, J. L., & Herring, J. A. (2002). Relationship among internet use, personality, and social support.Computers in Human Behavior, 18(4), 437-451.
Toothaker, L. E. (1994). Multiple regression:Testing and interpreting interactions.Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(1), 119-120.
Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2013). Self-affirmation underliesfacebook use. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(3), 321-331.
Usborne, E., & Taylor, D. M. (2010). The role of cultural identity clarity for self-concept clarity, self-esteem, and subjective well-being.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 883-897.
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem.Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 9(5), 584-590.
Veronese, G., Natour, M., & Said, M. (2012). Positive emotions and life satisfaction in palestinian children growing up amid political and military violence:A pilot study. The Lancet, 380(1), S16.
Wang, J. L., Jackson, L. A., Gaskin, J., & Wang, H. Z. (2014). The effects of social networking site (SNS) use on college students' friendship and well-being.Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 229-236.
Zeigler-Hill, V., Dahlen, E. R., & Madson, M. B. (2017). Self-esteem and alcohol use:Implications for aggressive behavior. International Journal of Mental Health & Addiction, 15(5), 1-15.
陈必忠. (2018). 社交网站积极自我呈现与主观幸福感:多重中介模型.心理技术与应用, 6(9), 528-536.
陈建文, 陈莎. (2009). 极端应激情境下寻求健康和幸福的新视点——认知适应理论(CAT).华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 48(1), 137-140.
何晓丽, 王振宏, 王克静. (2011). 积极情绪对人际信任影响的线索效应.心理学报, 43(12), 1408-1417.
雷雳.(2016). 互联网心理学:新心理与行为研究的兴起. 北京师范大学版社.
李海江, 杨娟, 袁祥勇, 覃义贵, 张庆林.(2012). 低自尊个体对拒绝性信息的注意偏向. 心理科学进展, 20(10), 1604-1613.
牛更枫, 鲍娜, 周宗奎, 范翠英, 孔繁昌, 孙晓军. (2015). 社交网站中的自我呈现对生活满意度的影响:积极情绪和社会支持的作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(5), 563-570.
彭先桃, 陈颖娇, 朱晓伟. (2017). 社交网站体像比较与抑郁的关系:体像满意度与自尊的链式中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(5), 959-962.
邱林, 郑雪. (2013). 人格特质影响主观幸福感的研究述评.自然辩证法通讯, 35(5), 109-114.
肖崇好, 黄希庭. (2010). 自我呈现个体差异的实验研究.西南大学学报(社会科学版), 36(2), 21-26.
孙晓军, 柴唤友, 牛更枫, 崔曦曦, 连帅磊, 田媛. (2017). 社交网站中的自我表露对青少年孤独感的影响:一个有调节的中介模型.心理发展与教育, 33(4), 477-486.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999).心理卫生评定量表手册. 北京:中国心理卫生杂志社.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟.(2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
杨秀娟, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 刘庆奇, 连帅磊. (2017). 社交网站积极自我呈现与青少年抑郁:链式中介效应分析.中国临床心理学杂志, 25(3), 489-493.
张林, 李元元. (2009). 自尊社会计量器理论的研究述评.心理科学进展, 17(4), 852-856.
郑显亮, 王亚芹. (2017). 青少年网络利他行为与主观幸福感的关系——一个有中介的调节模型.心理科学, 40(1), 70-75.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法.心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.
[1] 郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2] 李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[3] 赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[4] 刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[5] 何震, 詹林, 曾子豪, 胡义秋. 羞耻心对青少年主观幸福感的影响——亲社会行为和人际关系的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 172-181.
[6] 黎钰林, 吴德华, 卿亿承, 李丹, 尹华站. 童年期虐待对初中生主观幸福感的影响:同伴依恋的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 254-263.
[7] 王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响:自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[8] 李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[9] 丁越, 刘力嘉, 寇彧. 互联网时代的大学生人际关系满意度:线上积极反馈与感知社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 39-49.
[10] 向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[11] 边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[12] 杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[13] 鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[14] 王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[15] 范兴华, 燕利飞, 靳嘉宁, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪, 余思. 父母关爱对4~6年级留守儿童幸福感发展的影响:积极诠释生活的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!