心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 208-215.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.10

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

社会排斥对网络偏差行为的影响:自我控制的中介作用和道德同一性的调节作用

王辰1, 陈刚1, 刘跃宁1, 牛更枫2,3, 殷华敏1   

  1. 1. 青岛科技大学, 青岛 266100;
    2. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
    3. 西安交通大学人文社会科学学院, 西安 710049
  • 发布日期:2020-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 牛更枫,E-mail:niugf123@163.com E-mail:niugf123@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    本研究得到教育部人文社会科学研究专项任务项目(高校思想政治工作)(17JDSZ3026);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(19YJC190019);山东省高等学校学生教育与管理研究项目(2017B014);中国博士后科学基金项目(2018M631131)。

The Influence of Social Ostracism on Online Deviant Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Self-control and the Moderating Role of Moral Identity

WANG Chen1, CHEN Gang1, LIU Yuening1, NIU Gengfeng2,3, YIN Huamin1   

  1. 1. Qingdao University of Science&Technology, Qingdao 266100;
    2. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior(CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
    3. School of Humanities and Social Science, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 266061
  • Published:2020-03-19

摘要: 本研究拟探讨社会排斥对大学生网络偏差行为的影响及其作用机制——自我控制的中介作用和道德同一性的调节作用。对769名大学生问卷调查的结果表明:(1)社会排斥与网络偏差行为呈显著正相关,与自我控制呈显著负相关;自我控制和道德同一性均与网络偏差行为呈显著负相关;(2)社会排斥对网络偏差行为具有显著的正向预测作用,且自我控制在这一关系中具有显著的中介作用;(3)社会排斥对网络偏差行为的直接预测作用以及自我控制的中介作用均受到道德同一性的调节,且这两种效应在道德同一性水平较低的群体中都更为显著。本研究不仅有助于进一步明晰网络偏差行为的影响因素及其发生机制,而且对大学生网络偏差行为的预防和干预还具有一定的实践指导价值。

关键词: 社会排斥, 网络偏差行为, 自我控制, 道德同一性

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the influence of social ostracism on undergraduate students' online deviant behaviors, as well as its inner mechanism-the mediating role of social control and the moderating role of moral identity. A sample of 769 undergraduate students was recruited to complete the questionnaires, and the results showed that:(1) Social ostracism was positively correlated with online deviant behaviors, while negatively correlated with self-control and moral identity; both self-control and moral identity were negatively correlated with online deviant behaviors. (2) Self-control could significantly mediate the positive association between social ostracism and online deviant behaviors. (3) Moral identity could moderate the direct effect of social ostracism on online deviant behaviors and the mediating effect of self-control, specifically both these two effects were more significant for individuals with lower moral identity. This not only deepens our understanding on influencing factors of online deviant behaviors and its underlying mechanism, but also has important practical values for the prevention and intervention of undergraduate students' online deviant behaviors.

Key words: social ostracism, online deviant behaviors, self-control, moral identity

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Baumeister, R. F. (2003). Ego depletion and self-regulation failure:a resource model of self-control. Alcoholism Clinical & Experimental Research, 27(2), 281-284.
Baek, H., Roberts, A. M., & Higgins, G. E. (2018). The impact of family indifference on delinquency among american indian youth:a test of general strain theory. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 16(1), 00-00.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong:Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
Boegershausen, J., Aquino, K., & Americus Reed, I. I. (2015). Moral identity. Current Opinion in Psychology, 6, 162-166.
Boman, J. H., & Mowen, T. J. (2018). Unpacking the role of conflict in peer relationships:Implications for peer deviance and crime. Deviant Behavior, 1-14.
Cho, S., Hong, J. S., Sterzing, P. R., & Woo, Y. (2017). Parental attachment and bullying in south korean adolescents:Mediating effects of low self-control, deviant peer associations, and delinquency. Crime & Delinquency, 63(9), 1168-1188.
Decamp, W., & Newby, B. (2015). From bullied to deviant:The victim-offender overlap among bullying victims. Youth Violence & Juvenile Justice, 13(1), 3-17.
Dewall, C. N., Gilman, R., & Sharif, V. (2012). Left out, sluggardly, and blue:low self-control mediates the relationship between ostracism and depression. Personality & Individual Differences, 53(7), 832-837.
Gabbiadini, A., & Riva, P. (2017). The lone gamer:Social exclusion predicts violent video game preferences and fuels aggressive inclinations in adolescent players. Aggressive Behavior, 44(2), 113-124.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Jr, R. J. B., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of gottfredson and hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency, 30(1), 5-29.
Hardy, S. A., Bean, D. S., & Olsen, J. A. (2015). Moral identity and adolescent prosocial and antisocial behaviors:interactions with moral disengagement and self-regulation. Journal of Youth & Adolescence,44(8), 1542-1554.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:a regression-based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 51(3), 335-337.
Hertz, S. G., & Krettenauer, T. (2016). Does moral identity effectively predict moral behavior?:A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 129-140.
Internet World Stats. (2018). World Internet Users and 2018 Population Stats. Retrived from https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
Joinson, A. N. (2005). Deviance and the internet:New challenges for social science. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 5-7.
Kholmogorova, A. B., & Smirnova, N. S. (2009). A comprehensive model of interpersonal relations as a theoretical basis for their study in adolescents with deviant behavior. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 4, 94-99.
Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., Asdre, A., & Voulgaridou, K. (2016). Parenting and internet behavior predictors of cyber-bullying and cyber-victimization among preadolescents. Deviant Behavior, 37(4), 439-455.
Li, S. D. (2004). The impacts of self-control and social bonds on juvenile delinquency in a national sample of midadolescents. Deviant Behavior,25(4), 351-373.
Michael D. Reisig, & Travis C. Pratt. (2011). Low self-control and imprudent behavior revisited. Deviant Behavior, 32(7), 589-625.
Mulder, L. B., & Aquino, K. (2013). The role of moral identity in the aftermath of dishonesty. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 121(2), 219-230.
Muraven, M., Tice, D. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (1998). Self-control as limited resource:regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 74(3), 774.
Nigg, J. T. (2017). Annual research review:On the relations among self-regulation, self-control, executive functioning, effortful control, cognitive control, impulsivity, risk-taking, and inhibition for developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 58(4), 384-402.
Niu, G. F., Sun, X. J., Tian, Y., Fan, C. Y., & Zhou, Z. K. (2016). Resilience moderates the relationship between ostracism and depression among Chinese adolescents. Personality & Individual Differences, 99, 77-80.
Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol, 88(5), 879-903.
Rich, G., Adrienne, C. S., Nathan, D. C., Adams, R. E., & Inga, C. (2012). Validation of the ostracism experience scale for adolescents. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 319-330.
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324.
Udris, R. (2017). Psychological and social factors as predictors of online and offline deviant behavior among Japanese adolescents. Deviant Behavior, 1-18.
Williams, K. D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology,58(1), 425-452.
Yang, J., & Treadway, D. C. (2018). A social influence interpretation of workplace ostracism and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 879-891.
Zhang, H., Chen, S., Wang, R., Jiang, J., Xu, Y., & Zhao, H. (2017). How upward moral comparison influences pro-social behavioral intention:Examining the mediating role of guilt and the moderating role of moral identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1554. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01554.
Zhu, J., Yu, C., Zhang, W., Bao, Z., Jiang, Y., & Chen, Y., et al. (2016). Peer victimization, deviant peer affiliation and impulsivity:predicting adolescent problem behaviors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 58, 39-50.
程苏, 刘璐, 郑涌. (2011). 社会排斥的研究范式与理论模型. 心理科学进展, 19(6), 905-915.
江艳平, 张卫, 喻承甫, 鲍振宙, 刘莎. (2015). 同伴排斥与青少年早期饮酒行为:同伴侵害和不良同伴的中介效应. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 738-745.
金童林, 陆桂芝, 张璐, 闫萌智, 刘艳丽. (2016). 人际需求对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:社交焦虑的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, 195(9), 84-89.
李冬梅, 雷雳,邹泓. (2008). 青少年网上偏差行为的特点与研究展望. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(1), 95-97.
李相南, 李志勇, 张丽. (2017). 青少年社会支持与攻击的关系:自尊、自我控制的链式中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 240-248.
马晓辉, 雷雳. (2010). 青少年网络道德与其网络偏差行为的关系. 心理学报, 42(10), 988-997.
牛更枫, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 范翠英. (2015). 网络匿名性和同伴网络偏差行为对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:自我控制的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, 185(11), 73-78.
屈智勇, 邹泓. (2009). 家庭环境、父母监控、自我控制与青少年犯罪. 心理科学(2), 360-363.
孙晓军, 童媛添, 范翠英. (2017). 现实及网络社会排斥与大学生抑郁的关系:自我控制的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 15(2), 169-174.
王兴超, 杨继平. (2013). 道德推脱与大学生亲社会行为:道德认同的调节效应. 心理科学(4), 904-909.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
吴鹏, 刘华山. (2015). 高中生社会责任心与网络不道德行为的关系研究——道德同一性的调节作用. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版)(1), 84-90.
杨继平, 王兴超, 高玲. (2015). 道德推脱对大学生网络偏差行为的影响:道德认同的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 31(3), 311-318.
张野, 张珊珊, 王佳名. (2016). 社会排斥对自我损耗的影响:自我觉知的克服作用. 心理科学(5), 1210-1215.
中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC). (2018). 《第41次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》. 来自http://www.cnnic.net.cn/hlwfzyj/hlwxzbg/hlwtjbg/201803/P020180305409870339136.pdf
Agnew, R. (1985). A revised strain theory of delinquency. Social Forces,64(1), 151-167.
[1] 张陆, 孙山, 游志麒. 网络成瘾对大学生学业压力的影响:睡眠质量与自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 279-287.
[2] 田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[3] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4] 熊婕, 范翠英, 魏华, 杨秀娟, 连帅磊. 正念对网络欺负的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 752-760.
[5] 蔡雪斌, 桂守才, 唐易齐, 张硕, 许明星. 父母教养方式对青少年心理复原力的影响:自我控制与调节聚焦的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 505-512.
[6] 王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响:特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[7] 丁倩, 王兆琪, 张永欣, 周宗奎. 越“八卦”越沉迷:人际好奇与大学生社交网站成瘾倾向的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 118-125.
[8] 张光珍, 梁淼, 梁宗保. 父母教养方式影响学前儿童社会适应的追踪研究:自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 800-807.
[9] 陈必忠, 郑雪, 孙晓军. 社交媒体自我控制失败影响硕士生主观幸福感的心理机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 882-888.
[10] 李文福, 贾旭卿, 李功迎, 张庆林. 父母教养方式与大学生手机依赖:自我控制和感觉寻求的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 660-667.
[11] 刘聪慧, 董妍, 王鸿飞, 张登浩. 农村老年人的社会排斥体验与健康状况:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 752-760.
[12] 高斌, 朱穗京, 吴晶玲. 大学生手机成瘾与学习投入的关系:自我控制的中介作用和核心自我评价的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 400-406.
[13] 张秀慧, 王美芳, 刘莉. 父母严厉管教与儿童问题行为的关系:儿童自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 725-733.
[14] 刘啸莳, 刘世宏, 莫碧波, 李丹, 傅锐. 幼儿外倾性与攻击行为的关系:自我控制和母亲温暖教养的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 538-544.
[15] 魏华, 段海岑, 周宗奎, 平凡, 丁倩. 童年期虐待对网络成瘾的影响:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 77-83.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!