心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 752-760.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.05.17

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    

正念对网络欺负的影响:一个有调节的中介模型

熊婕1,2, 范翠英1, 魏华3, 杨秀娟1, 连帅磊4   

  1. 1. 华中师范大学心理学院, 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
    2. 武汉理工大学心理健康教育中心, 武汉 430070;
    3. 青岛大学师范学院, 青岛 266071;
    4. 长江大学教育与体育学院, 荆州 434023
  • 发布日期:2023-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 范翠英 E-mail:fancy@ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    北京师范大学中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心课题(2021-04-009-BZPK01); 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室(华中师范大学)开放课题(2019B05)。

The Effect of Mindfulness on Cyberbullying: A Moderated Mediation Model

XIONG Jie1,2, FAN Cuiying1, WEI Hua3, YANG Xiujuan1, LIAN Shuailei4   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior(CCNU), Ministry of Education, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
    2. Center of Mental Health Education, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070;
    3. Normal College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071;
    4. College of Education and Sports Sciences, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434023
  • Published:2023-09-11
  • Supported by:
    The project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2019YFC1905301);National Natural Science Foundation of China (22078115,21776108,21690083,22008078).

摘要: 为探讨正念对网络欺负的影响及其作用机制,本研究基于有限自制力理论和个体-环境交互作用模型构建了一个有调节的中介模型,重点考察自我控制的中介作用及网络社交拒斥的调节作用。以629名高中生为被试,采用儿童青少年正念量表、自我控制量表、网络社交拒斥量表和网络欺负量表进行调查,结果发现:(1)正念和自我控制呈显著正相关,与网络欺负呈显著负相关;自我控制与网络欺负呈显著负相关;(2)正念不仅能够直接负向预测网络欺负,还能够通过自我控制的中介作用对网络欺负产生影响;(3)“正念→自我控制→网络欺负”这一中介效应的前半段会受到网络社交拒斥的调节,与网络社交拒斥程度较高的个体相比,正念对自我控制的影响在网络社交拒斥程度较低的个体中作用更强。研究结果表明正念会通过增强自我控制来减少网络欺负的发生,但是网络社交拒斥会削弱正念对自我控制的促进作用,进而影响网络欺负。

关键词: 正念, 自我控制, 网络社交拒斥, 网络欺负

Abstract: In order to explore the influence of mindfulness on cyberbullying and its mechanism, this study constructed a moderated mediation model based on the theory of limited resource of self-control and the model of individual-environment interaction, focusing on the mediating role of self-control and the moderating role of cyberostracism. A sample of 629 high school students was recruited in the study to complete the questionnaires about mindfulness, self-control, cyberostracism, and cyberbullying. The results showed that: (1) Mindfulness was positively correlated with self-control and negatively correlated with cyberbullying. Self-control was negatively correlated with cyberbullying; (2) Mindfulness can not only predict cyberbullying directly, but also influence cyberbullying through the mediation of self-control; (3) The first stage of the mediation pathway was moderated by cyberostracism. Compared with individuals with higher cyberostracism, the influence of mindfulness on self-control was stronger in individuals with lower cyberostracism. The results show that mindfulness can reduce the occurrence of cyberbullying by enhancing self-control, however, cyberostracism can weaken the effect of mindfulness on self-control, and then increase cyberbullying.

Key words: mindfulness, self-control, cyberostracism, cyberbullying

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students.Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341-350.
Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351-355.
Bowlin, S. L., & Baer, R. A. (2012).Relationships between mindfulness, self-control, and psychological functioning. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(3), 411-415.
Bowen, S., Chawla, N., Collins, S. E., Witkiewitz, K., Hsu, S., Grow, J., … Larimer, M. E. (2009). Mindfulness-based relapse prevention for substance use disorders: A pilot efficacy trial. Substance Abuse, 30(4), 295-305.
Borders, A., Earleywine, M., & Jajodia, A. (2010). Could mindfulness decrease anger, hostility, and aggression by decreasing rumination?Aggressive Behavior, 36(1), 28-44.
Broderick, P. C., & Jennings, P. A. (2013). Mindfulness for adolescents: A promising approach to supporting emotion regulation and preventing risky behavior.New Directions for Student Leadership, (136), 111-126.
Bajaj, B., & Pande, N. (2016). Mediating role of resilience in the impact of mindfulness on life satisfaction and affect as indices of subjective well-being.Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 63-67.
Charoensukmongkol, P. (2016). Mindful facebooking: The moderating role of mindfulness on the relationship between social media use intensity at work and burnout.Journal of Health Psychology, 21(9), 1966-1980.
Dewall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Stillman, T. F., & Gailliot, M. T. (2007). Violence restrained: Effects of self-regulation and its depletion on aggression.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(1), 62-76.
Emirtekin, E., Balta, S., Kircaburun, K., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Childhood emotional abuse and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents: The mediating role of trait mindfulness. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 18(6),1548-1559.
Friese, M., Messner, C., & Schaffner, Y. (2012). Mindfulness meditation counteracts self-control depletion.Consciousness & Cognition, 21(2), 1016-1022.
Greco, L. A., Baer, R. A., & Smith, G. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: Development and validation of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 606-614.
Guo, S. (2016). A meta-analysis of predictors of cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Psychology in the Schools, 53(4), 432-453.
Gardner, T. W., Dishion, T. J., & Connell, A. M. (2008). Adolescent self-regulation as resilience: Resistance to antisocial behavior within the deviant peer context.Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36(2), 273-284.
Holt, T. J., Turner, M. G., & Exum, M. L. (2014). The impact of self control and neighborhood disorder on bullying victimization.Journal of Criminal Justice, 42(4), 347-355.
Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Retrieved March 25, 2019, from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.
Heppner, W. L., Kernis, M. H., Lakey, C. E., Campbell, W. K., & Cascio, E. V. (2010). Mindfulness as a means of reducing aggressive behavior: Dispositional and situational evidence. Aggressive Behavior, 34(5), 486-496.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2012). Bullying in the digital age:A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1173.
Lam, L. T., & Li, Y. (2013). The validation of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) for adolescent. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 3-7.
Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J., & Theokas, C. (2006). Dynamics of individual-context relations in human Development: A developmental systems perspective. In J. Thomas & D. Siegel (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology (pp.23-43). John Wiley.
Li, C., Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., & May, D. C. (2015). Examining the mediating effects of social learning on the low self-control——cyberbullying relationship in a youth sample. Deviant Behavior, 37(2), 126-138.
Liu, C., Wang, L. Liu, Z., Li, Y., & Yuan, G. (2020). Mindfulness and cyberbullying among Chinese adolescents:The mediating roles of perceived social support and empathy. Violence and Victims, 35(6), 815-827.
Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 42-55.
Muller, R. D., Skues, J. L., & Wise, L. Z. (2017). Cyberbullying in Australian primary schools: How victims differ in attachment, locus of control, self-esteem, and coping styles compared to non-victims.Journal of Psychologists and Counsellors in Schools, 27(1), 85-104.
Nezlek, J. B., Wesselmann, E. D., Wheeler, L., & Williams, K. D. (2015). Ostracism in everyday life: The effects of ostracism on those who ostracize.The Journal of Social Psychology, 155(5), 432-451.
Niu, G. F., Zhou, Z. K., Sun, X. J., Yu, F., Xie, X. C., Liu, Q. Q., & Lian, S. L. (2018). Cyber-ostracism and its relation to depression among Chinese adolescents: The moderating role of optimism.Personality and Individual Differences, 123, 105-109.
Pfeiffer, S., & In-Albon, T. (2016). Virtualsocial ostracism: The influence of paradigm settings in the cyberball paradigm in adolescents considering the role of emotion regulation and Depression-Anxiety-Stress symptoms. Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie, 45(3), 198-206.
Pratscher, S. D., Rose, A. J., Markovitz, L., & Bettencourt, A. (2017).Interpersonal Mindfulness: Investigating Mindfulness in Interpersonal Interactions, co-Rumination, and Friendship Quality. Mindfulness, 9(4), 1206-1215.
Royuela-Colomer, E., E. C., Gamez-Guadix, M., & Orue, I. (2018). The protective role of dispositional mindfulness against the perpetuation of cyberbullying victimization and perpetration among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(11), 703-710.
Runions, K. C. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 42(5), 751-771.
Schneider, F. M., Zwillich, B., Bindl, M. J., Hopp, F. R., Reich, S., & Vorderer, P. (2017). Social media ostracism: The effects of being excluded online. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 385-393.
Sowislo, J. F., & Orth, U. (2013). Does low self-esteem predict depression and anxiety?A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 139(1), 213-240.
Stucke, T. S., & Baumeister, R. F. (2010). Ego depletion and aggressive behavior: Is the inhibition of aggression a limited resource?European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 1-13.
Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness.Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 373-386.
Smith, R., Morgan, J., & Monks, C. (2017). Students’ perceptions of the effect of social media ostracism on wellbeing. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 276-285.
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., & Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success.Journal of Personality, 72(2), 271-324.
Tao, S., Li, J., Zhang, M., Zheng, P., & Zhu, Y. (2021). The effects of mindfulness-based interventions on child and adolescent aggression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 12(6),1301-1315.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization.Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287.
Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 9(5), 584-590.
Wei, H., Wu, N., Wang, T., Zhou, Z., Cui, N., Xu, L., & Yang, X. (2017). Be loyal but not addicted:Effect of online game social migration on game loyalty and addiction. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 16(4), 343-351.
段文杰. (2014). 正念研究的分歧: 概念与测量. 心理科学进展, 22(10), 1616-1627.
胡阳, 范翠英, 张凤娟, 周然. (2013). 初中生不同网络欺负角色行为的特点及与抑郁的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 27(12), 913-917.
金盛华, 于全磊, 郭亚飞, 张林, 朱一杰, 吴恭安. (2017). 青少年网络社交使用频率对网络成瘾的影响: 家庭经济地位的调节作用. 心理科学, 40(4), 885-891.
刘庆奇, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 范翠英. (2017). 手机成瘾与青少年睡眠质量: 中介与调节作用分析. 心理学报, 49(12), 1524-1536.
廖红, 陈会昌. (2000). 中学生对同伴群体和家庭影响力的判断. 心理发展与教育, (4), 51-55.
雷玉菊, 张晨艳, 牛更枫, 童媛添, 田媛, 周宗奎. (2018). 网络社会排斥对抑郁的影响: 一个有调节的中介效应模型. 心理科学, 41(1), 98-104.
宋明华, 陈晨, 刘燊, 李俊萱, 侯怡如, 张林. (2017). 父母教养方式对初中生攻击行为的影响:越轨同伴交往和自我控制的作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(6), 675-682.
孙晓军, 童媛添, 范翠英.(2017). 现实及网络社会排斥与大学生抑郁的关系:自我控制的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 15(2), 169-174.
谭树华, 郭永玉. (2008). 大学生自我控制量表的修订. 中国临床心理学杂志, 16(5), 468-470.
王艳辉, 李董平, 孙文强, 赵力燕, 赖雪芬, 周月月. (2017). 亲子依恋与初中生亲社会行为:有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 49(5), 663-679.
王辰, 陈刚, 刘跃宁, 牛更枫, 殷华敏. (2020). 社会排斥对网络偏差行为的影响:自我控制的中介作用和道德同一性的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(2), 208-215.
叶宝娟, 杨强, 胡竹菁. (2012). 父母控制、不良同伴和感觉寻求对工读生毒品使用的影响机制. 心理发展与教育, 28(6), 641-650.
杨秀娟, 范翠英, 周宗奎, 刘庆奇, 连帅磊. (2021). 正念与手机成瘾倾向的关系: 无聊倾向和未来时间洞察力的作用. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 419-428.
朱黎君, 叶宝娟, 倪林英. (2020). 社会排斥对大学生网络偏差行为的影响: 社交焦虑的中介作用与网络消极情绪体验的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, (1), 79-83+96.
詹鋆, 任俊. (2012). 自我控制与自我控制资源. 心理科学进展, 20(9), 1457-1466.
[1] 张陆, 孙山, 游志麒. 网络成瘾对大学生学业压力的影响:睡眠质量与自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 279-287.
[2] 田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[3] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[4] 王伊萌, 王振东, 汪凤炎. “当局者迷”破解之道:智慧的正念干预研究——个人成长主动性与反思的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 142-152.
[5] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[6] 王英杰, 栾金鑫, 李燕. 母亲养育压力与幼儿焦虑的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和母亲正念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[7] 陈必忠, 郑雪, 孙晓军. 问题性社交媒体使用与线上社交焦虑:社交媒体认知超载和特质正念的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 743-751.
[8] 高玲, 孟文慧, 刘介地, 杨继平, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负行为:自尊和基本共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 439-448.
[9] 王英杰, 张刈, 张美霞, 李燕. 母亲正念与幼儿问题行为的关系:正念养育和亲子关系的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 184-191.
[10] 汪玥, 张豹, 周晖. 中小学生正念注意觉知与心理健康:情绪调节和积极重评的跨时间中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 692-702.
[11] 余思, 张春阳, 徐慰. 特质正念与大学生焦虑和攻击性的纵向关系:心理弹性的中介和留守经历的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 711-719.
[12] 蔡雪斌, 桂守才, 唐易齐, 张硕, 许明星. 父母教养方式对青少年心理复原力的影响:自我控制与调节聚焦的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 505-512.
[13] 王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响:特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[14] 丁倩, 王兆琪, 张永欣, 周宗奎. 越“八卦”越沉迷:人际好奇与大学生社交网站成瘾倾向的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 118-125.
[15] 张光珍, 梁淼, 梁宗保. 父母教养方式影响学前儿童社会适应的追踪研究:自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 800-807.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!