心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 216-227.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.11

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年网络受欺负与网络欺负的关系:一个有调节的中介模型

汪倩倩1,2, 范翠英1,2, 褚晓伟1,2   

  1. 1. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079
  • 发布日期:2020-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 范翠英,E-mail:fancy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn E-mail:fancy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心重大成果培育性项目(2019-04-009-BZPK01)。

The Relationship between Adolescent Cybervictimization and Cyberbullying: A Moderated Mediated Model

WANG Qianqian1,2, FAN Cuiying1,2, CHU Xiaowei1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
    2. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Published:2020-03-19

摘要: 为探讨青少年网络受欺负对网络欺负影响的心理机制,本研究基于一般压力理论与情绪调节模型构建了一个有调节的中介模型,并采用网络欺负量表、社交焦虑量表以及情绪调节量表对武汉市某中学724名初中生进行测量,结果发现:(1)网络受欺负与社交焦虑、网络欺负显著正相关,社交焦虑与网络欺负显著正相关,认知重评与社交焦虑显著负相关,表达抑制与网络欺负显著正相关;(2)网络受欺负不仅直接预测网络欺负,还通过社交焦虑间接预测网络欺负;(3)网络受欺负对网络欺负的中介作用受到情绪调节策略的调节,对低认知重评的个体或高表达抑制的个体而言,中介作用更强。研究结果不仅解释了网络欺负是如何产生的,以及在什么条件下影响更大,也为减少网络欺负的发生提供了重要依据。

关键词: 网络受欺负, 网络欺负, 社交焦虑, 认知重评, 表达抑制, 青少年

Abstract: To explore the psychological mechanism of cyberbullying in adolescents, the present study constructed a moderated mediation model based on General Stress Theory and Emotional Regulation Model. Seven hundreds and twenty-four junior high school students from a middle school in Wuhan, China, were investigated to examine this hypothetical model. They were asked to complete cyberbullying scale, social anxiety scale and emotional regulation scale. The results showed that:(1) Cybervictimization was positively correlated with social anxiety and cyberbullying, social anxiety was positively correlated with cyberbullying, cognitive reappraisal was negatively correlated with social anxiety, and expression inhibition was positively correlated with cyberbullying; (2) Cybervictimization was not only directly predicted cyberbullying, but also indirectly predicted cyberbullying through social anxiety; (3) The mediation effects of social anxiety was moderated by emotional regulation strategies. Especially, the mediation effect is stronger for individuals with low cognitive reappraisal or high expression inhibition. The results not only explain how the vicious circle of cyberbullying occurs and under what conditions the effect is greater, but also provide an important evidence for reducing the occurrence of cyberbullying.

Key words: cybervictimization, cyberbullying, social anxiety, cognitive reappraisal, expression inhibition, adolescents

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology,30(1), 47-88.
Aldao, A., Jazaieri, H., Goldin, P. R., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies:Interactive effects during CBT for social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders,28, 382-389.
Antonella, B., Giannino, M., Annalisa, G., Luisa, G. M., Rosario, O., & Smith, P. K., et al. (2012). Self-esteem and loneliness in relation to cyberbullying in Thampson. F. three European countries. Cyberbullying in the Global Playground:Research from International Perspectives,3,32-56.
Balakrishnan, V., & Fernandez, T. (2018). Self-esteem, empathy and their impacts on cyberbullying among young adults. Telematics and Informatics,35(7), 2028-2037.
Bane, C. M., Cornish, M., Erspamer, N., & Kampman, L. (2010). Self-disclosure through weblogs and perceptions of online and "real-life" friendships among female bloggers. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking,13(2), 131-139.
Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis:Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin,106(1), 59-73.
Brochado, S., Soares, S., & Fraga, S. (2017). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(5), 523-531.
Buhle, J. T., Silvers, J. A., Wager, T. D., Lopez, R., Onyemekwu, C., Kober, H., et al. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal of emotion:A meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex,24(11), 2981-2990.
Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Raman, A. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence,14(1), 30-46.
Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wlhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion,3(1), 48-67.
Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2013). Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies' perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34(6), 613-629.
Chervonsky, E., & Hunt, C. (2018). Emotion suppression and reappraisal associated with bullying involvement and other social outcomes in young adults. Social Psychology of Education,21(4), 849-873.
Chu, X. W., Fan, C. Y., Liu, Q. Q., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018a). Cyberbullying victimization and symptoms of depression and anxiety among Chinese adolescents:Examining hopelessness as a mediator and self-compassion as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior,86, 377-386.
Chu, X. W., Fan, C. Y., Liu, Q. Q., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018b). Stability and change of bullying roles in the traditional and virtual contexts:A three-wave longitudinal study in Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,47(11), 2384-2400.
Cooley, J. L., Frazer, A. L., Fite, P. J., Brown, S., & DiPierro, M. (2017). Anxiety symptoms as a moderator of the reciprocal links between forms of aggression and peer victimization in middle childhood. Aggressive Behavior,43(5), 450-459.
Côté, S., Gyurak, A., & Levenson, R. W. (2010). The ability to regulate emotion is associated with greater well-being, income, and socioeconomic status. Emotion,10(6), 923-933.
Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M., & Larson, C. L. (2000). Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation-A possible prelude to violence. Science, 289(5479), 591-594.
Del Rey, R., Lazuras, L., Casas, J. A., Barkoukis, V., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2016). Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship? Learning and Individual Differences,45, 275-281.
Dempsey, A. G., Sulkowski, M. L., Nichols, R., & Storch, E. A. (2009). Differences between peer victimization in cyber and physical settings and associated psychosocial adjustment in early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 962-972.
Ellis, A. (1984). Expanding the abcs of ret. Journal of Rational Emotive Therapy,2(2), 20-24.
Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms:A comparative study of five specific samples. Personality and Individual Differences,40(8), 1659-1669.
Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences,30(8), 1311-1327.
Goldin, P. R., Morrison, A. S., Jazaieri, H., Heimberg, R. G., & Gross, J. J. (2017). Trajectories of social anxiety, cognitive reappraisal, and mindfulness during an RCT of CBGT versus MBSR for social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy,97, 1-13.
Greca, A. M. L., & Lopez, N. (1998). Social anxiety among adolescents:Linkages with peer relations and friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26(2), 83-94.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation:An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299.
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation:Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology,39(3), 281-291.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1995). Facets of emotional expressivity:Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences,19(4), 555-568.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes:Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(2), 348-362.
Hamer, A. H. D., & Konijn, E. A. (2016). Can emotion regulation serve as a tool in combating cyberbullying? Personality & Individual Differences,102, 1-6.
Hamer, A. H. D., & Konijn, E. A., & Keijer, M. G. (2014). Cyberbullying behavior and adolescents' use of media with antisocial content:A cyclic process model. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,17(2), 74-81.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement,51(3), 335-337.
Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2015). Cyberbullying experience and gender differences among adolescents in different educational settings. Journal of Learning Disabilities,48(2), 146-155.
Henson, B., Reyns, B. W., & Fisher, B. S. (2013). Fear of crime online? Examining the effect of risk, previous victimization, and exposure on fear of online interpersonal victimization. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29(4), 475-497.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2018). Connecting adolescent suicide to the severity of bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence,18(3),333-346.
Hofmann, S. G., Heering, S., Sawyer, A. T., & Asnaani, A. (2009). How to handle anxiety:The effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy,47(5), 389-394.
Hoge, E., Bickham, D., & Cantor, J. (2017). Digital media, anxiety, and depression in children. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement 2), S76-S80.
Jang, H., Song, J., & Kim, R. (2014). Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 85-93.
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools:The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology,65(1), 159-185.
Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health,78(9), 496-505.
Keith, S. (2017). How do traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization affect fear and coping among students? An application of general strain theory. American Journal of Criminal Justice,43, 67-84.
Kim, M. Y., & James, L. R. (2015). Neurological evidence for the relationship between suppression and aggressive behavior:Implications for workplace aggression. Applied Psychology, 64(2), 286-307.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S22-S30.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age:A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin,140(4), 1073-1137.
Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2008). Cyber bullying:Bullying in the digital age. Malden MA:Blackwell Publishing.
Lee, C., & Shin, N. (2017). Prevalence of cyberbullying and predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among Korean adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior,68, 352-358.
Lianos, H., & Mcgrath, A. (2017). Can the general theory of crime and general strain theory explain cyberbullying perpetration? Crime & Delinquency,64(5), 674-700.
Lonigro, A., Schneider, B. H., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., Pallini, S., & Brunner, T. (2015). Is cyberbullying related to trait or state anger. Child Psychiatry & Human Development,46(3), 445-454.
Mehari, K. R., Farrell, A. D., & Le, A. T. H. (2014). Cyberbullying among adolescents:Measures in search of a construct. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 399-415.
Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2002). Applying an emotion regulation framework to integrative approaches to generalized anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Science & Practice,9(1), 85-90.
Moore, S. A., Zoellner, L. A., & Mollenholt, N. (2008). Are expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal associated with stress-related symptoms? Behaviour Research and Therapy,46(9), 993-1000.
Nadia, G., & Vivian, K. (2014). Bully victimization and emotional problems in adolescents:Moderation by specific cognitive coping strategies? Journal of Adolescence, 37(7), 1153-1160.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard:A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth:A test of general strain theory. Youth & Society,43(41), 727-751.
Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being:Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences,49(5), 368-373.
Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2017). The role of parental mediation and peer norms on the likelihood of cyberbullying. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,178(1), 15-27.
Şerife Ak, Özdemir, Y., & Kuzucu, Y. (2015). Cybervictimization and cyberbullying:The mediating role of anger, don't anger me! Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 437-443.
Shapero, B. G., Stange, J. P., McArthur, B. A., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (2018). Cognitive reappraisal attenuates the association between depressive symptoms and emotional response to stress during adolescence. Cognition and Emotion,33(3),524-535.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying:Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines,49(4), 376-385.
Trompeter, N., Bussey, K., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2017). Cyber victimization and internalizing difficulties:The mediating roles of coping self-efficacy and emotion dysregulation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,46(5),1129-1139.
Troy, A. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2011). Resilience in the face of stress:Emotion regulation as a protective factor. Resilience and Mental Health:Challenges Across the Lifespan, 1(2), 30-44.
Troy, A. S., Shallcross, A. J., Brunner, A., Friedman, R., & Jones, M. C. (2018). Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance:Effects on emotion, physiology, and perceived cognitive costs. Emotion,18(1), 58-74.
Troy, A. S., Shallcross, A. J., Davis, T. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2013). History of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy is associated with increased cognitive reappraisal ability. Mindfulness,4, 213-222.
Tsitsika, A., Janikian, M., Wójcik, S., Makaruk, K., Tzavela, E., Tzavara, C., et al. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization prevalence and associations with internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents in six European countries. Computers in Human Behavior,51, 1-7.
Turner, M. G., Exum, M. L., Brame, R., & Holt, T. J. (2013). Bullying victimization and adolescent mental health:General and typological effects across sex. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(1), 53-59.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents:An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121-127.
Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., Vandebosch, H., Erreygers, S., & De Witte, H. (2018). Kicking someone in cyberspace when they are down:Testing the role of stressor evoked emotions on exposure to workplace cyberbullying. Work & Stress,32(4),379-399.
Vranjes, I., Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018). Patterns of cybervictimization and emotion regulation in adolescents and adults. Aggressive Behavior,44(6), 647-657.
Wong, D. S., Chan, H. C. O., & Cheng, C. H. (2014). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 133-140.
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults:A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior,39(3), 161-170.
Xiao, B. S., & Wong, Y. M. (2013). Cyber-bullying among university students:An empirical investigation from social cognitive perspective. The International Journal of Business and Information, 8(1), 34-69.
Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Wang, P. W., Chang, Y. H., & Ko, C. H. (2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 7-12.
Ziv, M., Goldin, P. R., Jazaieri, H., Hahn, K. S., & Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder:Behavioral and neural responses to three socio-emotional tasks. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders,3, 1-17.
Zurcher, J. D., Holmgren, H. G., Coyne, S. M., Barlett, C. P., & Yang, C. (2018). Parenting and cyberbullying across adolescence. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,21(5), 294-303.
褚晓伟, 范翠英. (2017). 网络欺负量表修订版在中国初中生群体中的修订及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志,25(6), 1031-1034.
衡书鹏. (2014). 父母情绪表达, 情绪教导对儿童攻击行为的影响-情绪调节能力的中介作用. 信阳师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,34(5), 24-28.
金鑫, 李岩梅, 李小舒, 杨立谦, 劳煜晨. (2017). 网络社交态度、网络信任、人际信任与社交焦虑、孤独感之间的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志,25(1), 185-187.
李中权, 王力, 张厚粲, 柳恒超. (2010). 人格特质与主观幸福感:情绪调节的中介作用. 心理科学,33(1), 165-167.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 中国心理卫生杂志社,244-246.
王建平, 杨智辉, 王玉龙, 毕玉. (2006). 1506名初中生焦虑状况分析. 中国健康心理学杂志,14(6), 604-607.
吴晓薇, 黄玲, 何晓琴, 唐海波, 蒲唯丹. (2015). 大学生社交焦虑与攻击、抑郁:情绪调节自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(5), 804-807.
熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展,20(5), 757-769.
赵绍晨, 宫火良, 张俊华, 郑希付. (2014). 情绪调节对行为抑制的影响效果研究. 心理研究, 7(3), 27-34.
[1] 陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[4] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[5] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[6] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[7] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[8] 路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”?高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[9] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[10] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[11] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[12] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[13] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[14] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[15] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!