心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 216-227.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.02.11

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年网络受欺负与网络欺负的关系:一个有调节的中介模型

汪倩倩1,2, 范翠英1,2, 褚晓伟1,2   

  1. 1. 青少年网络心理与行为教育部重点实验室, 武汉 430079;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079
  • 发布日期:2020-03-19
  • 通讯作者: 范翠英,E-mail:fancy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn E-mail:fancy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    中国基础教育质量监测协同创新中心重大成果培育性项目(2019-04-009-BZPK01)。

The Relationship between Adolescent Cybervictimization and Cyberbullying: A Moderated Mediated Model

WANG Qianqian1,2, FAN Cuiying1,2, CHU Xiaowei1,2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079;
    2. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Published:2020-03-19

摘要: 为探讨青少年网络受欺负对网络欺负影响的心理机制,本研究基于一般压力理论与情绪调节模型构建了一个有调节的中介模型,并采用网络欺负量表、社交焦虑量表以及情绪调节量表对武汉市某中学724名初中生进行测量,结果发现:(1)网络受欺负与社交焦虑、网络欺负显著正相关,社交焦虑与网络欺负显著正相关,认知重评与社交焦虑显著负相关,表达抑制与网络欺负显著正相关;(2)网络受欺负不仅直接预测网络欺负,还通过社交焦虑间接预测网络欺负;(3)网络受欺负对网络欺负的中介作用受到情绪调节策略的调节,对低认知重评的个体或高表达抑制的个体而言,中介作用更强。研究结果不仅解释了网络欺负是如何产生的,以及在什么条件下影响更大,也为减少网络欺负的发生提供了重要依据。

关键词: 网络受欺负, 网络欺负, 社交焦虑, 认知重评, 表达抑制, 青少年

Abstract: To explore the psychological mechanism of cyberbullying in adolescents, the present study constructed a moderated mediation model based on General Stress Theory and Emotional Regulation Model. Seven hundreds and twenty-four junior high school students from a middle school in Wuhan, China, were investigated to examine this hypothetical model. They were asked to complete cyberbullying scale, social anxiety scale and emotional regulation scale. The results showed that:(1) Cybervictimization was positively correlated with social anxiety and cyberbullying, social anxiety was positively correlated with cyberbullying, cognitive reappraisal was negatively correlated with social anxiety, and expression inhibition was positively correlated with cyberbullying; (2) Cybervictimization was not only directly predicted cyberbullying, but also indirectly predicted cyberbullying through social anxiety; (3) The mediation effects of social anxiety was moderated by emotional regulation strategies. Especially, the mediation effect is stronger for individuals with low cognitive reappraisal or high expression inhibition. The results not only explain how the vicious circle of cyberbullying occurs and under what conditions the effect is greater, but also provide an important evidence for reducing the occurrence of cyberbullying.

Key words: cybervictimization, cyberbullying, social anxiety, cognitive reappraisal, expression inhibition, adolescents

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology,30(1), 47-88.
Aldao, A., Jazaieri, H., Goldin, P. R., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Adaptive and maladaptive emotion regulation strategies:Interactive effects during CBT for social anxiety disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders,28, 382-389.
Antonella, B., Giannino, M., Annalisa, G., Luisa, G. M., Rosario, O., & Smith, P. K., et al. (2012). Self-esteem and loneliness in relation to cyberbullying in Thampson. F. three European countries. Cyberbullying in the Global Playground:Research from International Perspectives,3,32-56.
Balakrishnan, V., & Fernandez, T. (2018). Self-esteem, empathy and their impacts on cyberbullying among young adults. Telematics and Informatics,35(7), 2028-2037.
Bane, C. M., Cornish, M., Erspamer, N., & Kampman, L. (2010). Self-disclosure through weblogs and perceptions of online and "real-life" friendships among female bloggers. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking,13(2), 131-139.
Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis:Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin,106(1), 59-73.
Brochado, S., Soares, S., & Fraga, S. (2017). A scoping review on studies of cyberbullying prevalence among adolescents. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18(5), 523-531.
Buhle, J. T., Silvers, J. A., Wager, T. D., Lopez, R., Onyemekwu, C., Kober, H., et al. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal of emotion:A meta-analysis of human neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex,24(11), 2981-2990.
Bussey, K., Fitzpatrick, S., & Raman, A. (2015). The role of moral disengagement and self-efficacy in cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence,14(1), 30-46.
Butler, E. A., Egloff, B., Wlhelm, F. H., Smith, N. C., Erickson, E. A., & Gross, J. J. (2003). The social consequences of expressive suppression. Emotion,3(1), 48-67.
Campbell, M. A., Slee, P. T., Spears, B., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2013). Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies' perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. School Psychology International, 34(6), 613-629.
Chervonsky, E., & Hunt, C. (2018). Emotion suppression and reappraisal associated with bullying involvement and other social outcomes in young adults. Social Psychology of Education,21(4), 849-873.
Chu, X. W., Fan, C. Y., Liu, Q. Q., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018a). Cyberbullying victimization and symptoms of depression and anxiety among Chinese adolescents:Examining hopelessness as a mediator and self-compassion as a moderator. Computers in Human Behavior,86, 377-386.
Chu, X. W., Fan, C. Y., Liu, Q. Q., & Zhou, Z. K. (2018b). Stability and change of bullying roles in the traditional and virtual contexts:A three-wave longitudinal study in Chinese early adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,47(11), 2384-2400.
Cooley, J. L., Frazer, A. L., Fite, P. J., Brown, S., & DiPierro, M. (2017). Anxiety symptoms as a moderator of the reciprocal links between forms of aggression and peer victimization in middle childhood. Aggressive Behavior,43(5), 450-459.
Côté, S., Gyurak, A., & Levenson, R. W. (2010). The ability to regulate emotion is associated with greater well-being, income, and socioeconomic status. Emotion,10(6), 923-933.
Davidson, R. J., Putnam, K. M., & Larson, C. L. (2000). Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation-A possible prelude to violence. Science, 289(5479), 591-594.
Del Rey, R., Lazuras, L., Casas, J. A., Barkoukis, V., Ortega-Ruiz, R., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2016). Does empathy predict (cyber) bullying perpetration, and how do age, gender and nationality affect this relationship? Learning and Individual Differences,45, 275-281.
Dempsey, A. G., Sulkowski, M. L., Nichols, R., & Storch, E. A. (2009). Differences between peer victimization in cyber and physical settings and associated psychosocial adjustment in early adolescence. Psychology in the Schools, 46(10), 962-972.
Ellis, A. (1984). Expanding the abcs of ret. Journal of Rational Emotive Therapy,2(2), 20-24.
Garnefski, N., & Kraaij, V. (2006). Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms:A comparative study of five specific samples. Personality and Individual Differences,40(8), 1659-1669.
Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., & Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences,30(8), 1311-1327.
Goldin, P. R., Morrison, A. S., Jazaieri, H., Heimberg, R. G., & Gross, J. J. (2017). Trajectories of social anxiety, cognitive reappraisal, and mindfulness during an RCT of CBGT versus MBSR for social anxiety disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy,97, 1-13.
Greca, A. M. L., & Lopez, N. (1998). Social anxiety among adolescents:Linkages with peer relations and friendships. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26(2), 83-94.
Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation:An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299.
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation:Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology,39(3), 281-291.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (1995). Facets of emotional expressivity:Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personality and Individual Differences,19(4), 555-568.
Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes:Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,85(2), 348-362.
Hamer, A. H. D., & Konijn, E. A. (2016). Can emotion regulation serve as a tool in combating cyberbullying? Personality & Individual Differences,102, 1-6.
Hamer, A. H. D., & Konijn, E. A., & Keijer, M. G. (2014). Cyberbullying behavior and adolescents' use of media with antisocial content:A cyclic process model. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,17(2), 74-81.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. Journal of Educational Measurement,51(3), 335-337.
Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2015). Cyberbullying experience and gender differences among adolescents in different educational settings. Journal of Learning Disabilities,48(2), 146-155.
Henson, B., Reyns, B. W., & Fisher, B. S. (2013). Fear of crime online? Examining the effect of risk, previous victimization, and exposure on fear of online interpersonal victimization. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 29(4), 475-497.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2018). Connecting adolescent suicide to the severity of bullying and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence,18(3),333-346.
Hofmann, S. G., Heering, S., Sawyer, A. T., & Asnaani, A. (2009). How to handle anxiety:The effects of reappraisal, acceptance, and suppression strategies on anxious arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy,47(5), 389-394.
Hoge, E., Bickham, D., & Cantor, J. (2017). Digital media, anxiety, and depression in children. Pediatrics, 140(Supplement 2), S76-S80.
Jang, H., Song, J., & Kim, R. (2014). Does the offline bully-victimization influence cyberbullying behavior among youths? Application of general strain theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 31(1), 85-93.
Juvonen, J., & Graham, S. (2014). Bullying in schools:The power of bullies and the plight of victims. Annual Review of Psychology,65(1), 159-185.
Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health,78(9), 496-505.
Keith, S. (2017). How do traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization affect fear and coping among students? An application of general strain theory. American Journal of Criminal Justice,43, 67-84.
Kim, M. Y., & James, L. R. (2015). Neurological evidence for the relationship between suppression and aggressive behavior:Implications for workplace aggression. Applied Psychology, 64(2), 286-307.
Kowalski, R. M., & Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S22-S30.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age:A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin,140(4), 1073-1137.
Kowalski, R. M., Limber, S. P., & Agatston, P. W. (2008). Cyber bullying:Bullying in the digital age. Malden MA:Blackwell Publishing.
Lee, C., & Shin, N. (2017). Prevalence of cyberbullying and predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among Korean adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior,68, 352-358.
Lianos, H., & Mcgrath, A. (2017). Can the general theory of crime and general strain theory explain cyberbullying perpetration? Crime & Delinquency,64(5), 674-700.
Lonigro, A., Schneider, B. H., Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., Pallini, S., & Brunner, T. (2015). Is cyberbullying related to trait or state anger. Child Psychiatry & Human Development,46(3), 445-454.
Mehari, K. R., Farrell, A. D., & Le, A. T. H. (2014). Cyberbullying among adolescents:Measures in search of a construct. Psychology of Violence, 4(4), 399-415.
Mennin, D. S., Heimberg, R. G., Turk, C. L., & Fresco, D. M. (2002). Applying an emotion regulation framework to integrative approaches to generalized anxiety disorder. Clinical Psychology Science & Practice,9(1), 85-90.
Moore, S. A., Zoellner, L. A., & Mollenholt, N. (2008). Are expressive suppression and cognitive reappraisal associated with stress-related symptoms? Behaviour Research and Therapy,46(9), 993-1000.
Nadia, G., & Vivian, K. (2014). Bully victimization and emotional problems in adolescents:Moderation by specific cognitive coping strategies? Journal of Adolescence, 37(7), 1153-1160.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard:A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth:A test of general strain theory. Youth & Society,43(41), 727-751.
Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being:Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences,49(5), 368-373.
Sasson, H., & Mesch, G. (2017). The role of parental mediation and peer norms on the likelihood of cyberbullying. The Journal of Genetic Psychology,178(1), 15-27.
Şerife Ak, Özdemir, Y., & Kuzucu, Y. (2015). Cybervictimization and cyberbullying:The mediating role of anger, don't anger me! Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 437-443.
Shapero, B. G., Stange, J. P., McArthur, B. A., Abramson, L. Y., & Alloy, L. B. (2018). Cognitive reappraisal attenuates the association between depressive symptoms and emotional response to stress during adolescence. Cognition and Emotion,33(3),524-535.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S., & Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying:Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry & Allied Disciplines,49(4), 376-385.
Trompeter, N., Bussey, K., & Fitzpatrick, S. (2017). Cyber victimization and internalizing difficulties:The mediating roles of coping self-efficacy and emotion dysregulation. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,46(5),1129-1139.
Troy, A. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2011). Resilience in the face of stress:Emotion regulation as a protective factor. Resilience and Mental Health:Challenges Across the Lifespan, 1(2), 30-44.
Troy, A. S., Shallcross, A. J., Brunner, A., Friedman, R., & Jones, M. C. (2018). Cognitive reappraisal and acceptance:Effects on emotion, physiology, and perceived cognitive costs. Emotion,18(1), 58-74.
Troy, A. S., Shallcross, A. J., Davis, T. S., & Mauss, I. B. (2013). History of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy is associated with increased cognitive reappraisal ability. Mindfulness,4, 213-222.
Tsitsika, A., Janikian, M., Wójcik, S., Makaruk, K., Tzavela, E., Tzavara, C., et al. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization prevalence and associations with internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents in six European countries. Computers in Human Behavior,51, 1-7.
Turner, M. G., Exum, M. L., Brame, R., & Holt, T. J. (2013). Bullying victimization and adolescent mental health:General and typological effects across sex. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(1), 53-59.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2011). Online communication among adolescents:An integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 48(2), 121-127.
Vranjes, I., Baillien, E., Vandebosch, H., Erreygers, S., & De Witte, H. (2018). Kicking someone in cyberspace when they are down:Testing the role of stressor evoked emotions on exposure to workplace cyberbullying. Work & Stress,32(4),379-399.
Vranjes, I., Erreygers, S., Vandebosch, H., Baillien, E., & De Witte, H. (2018). Patterns of cybervictimization and emotion regulation in adolescents and adults. Aggressive Behavior,44(6), 647-657.
Wong, D. S., Chan, H. C. O., & Cheng, C. H. (2014). Cyberbullying perpetration and victimization among adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 36, 133-140.
Wright, M. F., & Li, Y. (2013). Normative beliefs about aggression and cyber aggression among young adults:A longitudinal investigation. Aggressive Behavior,39(3), 161-170.
Xiao, B. S., & Wong, Y. M. (2013). Cyber-bullying among university students:An empirical investigation from social cognitive perspective. The International Journal of Business and Information, 8(1), 34-69.
Yen, J. Y., Yen, C. F., Chen, C. S., Wang, P. W., Chang, Y. H., & Ko, C. H. (2012). Social anxiety in online and real-life interaction and their associated factors. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(1), 7-12.
Ziv, M., Goldin, P. R., Jazaieri, H., Hahn, K. S., & Gross, J. J. (2013). Emotion regulation in social anxiety disorder:Behavioral and neural responses to three socio-emotional tasks. Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders,3, 1-17.
Zurcher, J. D., Holmgren, H. G., Coyne, S. M., Barlett, C. P., & Yang, C. (2018). Parenting and cyberbullying across adolescence. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking,21(5), 294-303.
褚晓伟, 范翠英. (2017). 网络欺负量表修订版在中国初中生群体中的修订及信效度检验. 中国临床心理学杂志,25(6), 1031-1034.
衡书鹏. (2014). 父母情绪表达, 情绪教导对儿童攻击行为的影响-情绪调节能力的中介作用. 信阳师范学院学报:哲学社会科学版,34(5), 24-28.
金鑫, 李岩梅, 李小舒, 杨立谦, 劳煜晨. (2017). 网络社交态度、网络信任、人际信任与社交焦虑、孤独感之间的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志,25(1), 185-187.
李中权, 王力, 张厚粲, 柳恒超. (2010). 人格特质与主观幸福感:情绪调节的中介作用. 心理科学,33(1), 165-167.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 中国心理卫生杂志社,244-246.
王建平, 杨智辉, 王玉龙, 毕玉. (2006). 1506名初中生焦虑状况分析. 中国健康心理学杂志,14(6), 604-607.
吴晓薇, 黄玲, 何晓琴, 唐海波, 蒲唯丹. (2015). 大学生社交焦虑与攻击、抑郁:情绪调节自我效能感的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(5), 804-807.
熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展,20(5), 757-769.
赵绍晨, 宫火良, 张俊华, 郑希付. (2014). 情绪调节对行为抑制的影响效果研究. 心理研究, 7(3), 27-34.
[1] 郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2] 李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[3] 赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[4] 刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[5] 王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响:自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[6] 李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[7] 向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[8] 边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[9] 杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[10] 鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[11] 王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[12] 陈子循, 白荣, 李金文, 徐程睿. 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 892-902.
[13] 汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[14] 张凤, 黄四林, 梅刻寒, 张嘉恬, 邓祎祎. 脱贫地区乡村青少年社会流动信念与其学业坚持性:学业应对策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 510-517.
[15] 彭大炬, 程诚, 郭培杨, 许洋. 青少年冷酷无情特质和边缘人格特质的共同风险因素模型:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 528-538.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!