社会距离与合作指数对不同年龄青少年合作行为影响的差异

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.04.04

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用重复囚徒困境实验范式，考察了社会距离和合作指数对不同年龄青少年（初中生、高中生和大学生，且每个年龄段的被试数为40名）在博弈决策中的合作行为的影响。结果发现：（1）随着年龄的增加，青少年合作行为的总体趋势表现为下降；（2）社会距离对大学生的合作行为的正向作用显著，而中学生的合作行为却不受其影响；（3）个体合作率会受到合作指数的促进作用，但这种促进作用在大学生中表现的更为显著。即随年龄增长，个体会更少的采取合作行为，并且个体是否采取合作在更大程度上基于当前博弈中的收支情况和与博弈对象之间的社会距离。

关键词: 青少年, 囚徒困境, 合作行为, 社会距离, 合作指数

Abstract: The Prisoner's Dilemma paradigm was employed to discover the development characteristics of teenagers' cooperative behaviors. Participants were directed to play Prisoner's Dilemma Game with same-gender friend and stranger respectively. In the procedure, different payoff matrix was randomly presented based on 9 levels of CI (0.1~0.9). The reward entirely depended on outcome of the game. Cooperative rate was computed from frequency of cooperation as a measurement in each conditions. The results of the REGRESSION and ANOVA revealed that:(1)teenagers' cooperative behaviors was showed a increasing tendency with an increasing age;(2) Social Distance had a large influence on college students' cooperative behaviors, but little on middle school students;(3)The individual cooperate would be promoted by CI, which was more obvious for college students than middle school students. The stage differences appeared during the teenager's cooperative behavior development.

Key words: teenager, prisoner's dilemma, cooperative behaviors, social distance, cooperation index

中图分类号:

B844

张磊, 徐碧波, 丁璐. 社会距离与合作指数对不同年龄青少年合作行为影响的差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 410-416.

ZHANG Lei, XU Bibo, DING Lu. The Different Effects on Cooperative Behavior among Teenagers by the Social Distance and the Cooperation Index[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(4): 410-416.

参考文献

Akerlof, G. A. (1997). Social distance and social decisions. Econometrica:Journal of the Econometric Society, 65(5), 1005-1027.

Angerer, S., ATZLE-Rutzler, D., Lergetporer, P., & Sutter, M. (2013). Childrens Cooperation and Discrimination in a Bilingual Province:Working Paper.

Balliet, D., Wu J., & De Dreu, C. K. (2014). Ingroup favoritism in cooperation:A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1556.

Byrnes J P(1988). The nature and development of decision-making:a self-regulation model. Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.

Binzel, C., & Fehr, D. (2013). Social distance and trust:Experimental evidence from a slum in Cairo. Journal of Development Economics, 103, 99-106.

Bohnet, I., & Frey, B. S. (1999). Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games:Comment. The American Economic Review, 89(1), 335-339.

Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., (1979).Prospect Theory:A analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2),263-292

Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenberg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners don't punish. Nature, 452(7185), 348-351.

Engelmann, J. M., Over, H., Herrmann, E., & Tomasello, M. (2013). Young children care more about their reputation with ingroup members and potential reciprocators. Developmental Science, 16(6), 952-958.

Fan, C. P. (2000). Teaching children cooperation-An application of experimental game theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 41(3), 191-209.

Fitzgerald, M. A., & Frankie, G. H. (1982). The effects of Age and Communication on Cooperation and Competition in Children and Adolescents. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 141(2), 295-296.

García, C., Rivera, N., & Greenfield, P. M. (2015). The decline of cooperation, the rise of competition:developmental effects of long-term social change in Mexico. International Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 6-11.

Geletkanycz, M. A. (1997). The salience of 'culture's consequences':The effects of cultural values on top executive commitment to the status quo. Strategic Management Journal, 18(8), 615-634.

Gutierrez-Roig, M., Gracia-Lazaro, C., Perello, J., Moreno, Y., & Sanchez, A. (2014). Transition from reciprocal cooperation to persistent behaviour in social dilemmas at the end of adolescence. Nat Commun, 5, 4362.

Hammerstein, P. (2003). Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation:MIT press.

Jackson, M., & Tisak, M. S. (2001). Is prosocial behaviour a good thing? Developmental changes in children's evaluations of helping, sharing, cooperating, and comforting. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19(3), 349-367.

Klaczynski, P. A. (2000). Motivated scientific reasoning biases, epistemological beliefs, and theory polarization:A two-process approach to adolescent cognition. Child Development, 71(5), 1347-1366.

Murphy, S., & Faulkner, D. (2000). Learning to collaborate:Can young children develop better communication strategies through collaboration with a more popular peer. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(4), 389-404.

Rapoport, A., & Chammah, A. M. (1965). Prisoner's dilemma:A study in conflict and cooperation (Vol. 165):University of Michigan press.

Piaget. J.(1999). Judgment and reasoning in the child. London:Routledge, (First published in 1928 by Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd)

Schelling, T. C. (1968). The life you save may be your own.

Smith, A., & Nicholson, J. S. (1887). An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.T. Nelson and Sons.

Wedekind, C. (1998). Give and ye shall be recognized. Science, 280(5372), 2070.

陈单枝, 朱莉琪. (2005). 儿童的决策行为. 心理科学进展,13(05), 606-613.

陈璟, 孙昕怡, 李红. (2012). 儿童完全信息最后通牒博弈决策的发展. 心理与行为研究,10(02), 104-114.

陈欣, 叶浩生. (2007). 两难中合作行为研究的回顾和展望. 心理科学进展,15(05), 743-748.

李晶, 朱莉琪. (2014). 高功能孤独症儿童的合作行为. 心理学报,46(09), 1301-1316.

李艾丽莎, 张庆林.(2006).决策的选择偏好研究述评.心理科学进展,4,618-624.

卢洋, 张磊, 徐碧波.(2016)合作指数与社会距离对合作行为的影响.心理科学, 2,435-440.

韩振华, 乐国安. (2008). 囚徒选择和中国人的义. 应用心理学,14(1), 3-7.

庞维国, 程学超. (2001). 9~16岁儿童的合作倾向与合作意图的发展研究. 心理发展与教育,1, 31-35.

孙昕怡, 陈璟, 李红, 李秀丽. (2009). 合作指数与描述方式对儿童囚徒困境博弈中合作行为的影响. 心理发展与教育,1, 27-33.

赵俊茹, 李幼穗. (2003). 交流方式对儿童青少年合作行为影响的发展研究. 心理科学,26(03), 545-546.

朱琳, 张庆林. (2014). 决策的发展性研究进展. 西南师范大学学报,30(04),60-64.

相关文章 15

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14]	辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15]	郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed