心理发展与教育 ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 753-760.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2016.06.14

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学新生主观社会地位与抑郁的变化轨迹:一项多元潜变量增长模型分析

程刚1,2, 张大均2, 肖友琴3, 关雨生2, 陈艳红2   

  1. 1. 贵州师范大学, 教育科学学院, 贵阳 550001;
    2. 西南大学, 心理学部, 重庆 400715;
    3. 贵阳市防震减灾服务中心, 贵阳 550001
  • 出版日期:2016-11-15 发布日期:2016-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 张大均,E-mail:zhangdj@swu.edu.cn E-mail:zhangdj@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(13YJC190003)。

The Longitudinal Effects of Subjective Social Status on Depression in Chinese College Freshmen Transition: A Multivariate Latent Growth Approach

CHENG Gang1,2, ZHANG Dajun2, XIAO Youqin3, GUAN Yusheng2, CHEN Yanhong2   

  1. 1. School of Educational Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001;
    2. Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715;
    3. Earthquake prevention and disaster relief service center of Guiyang City, Guiyang 550001
  • Online:2016-11-15 Published:2016-11-15

摘要: 采用整群取样的方法在全国按东部、中部和西部共抽取了7所高校的1983名新生,进行了历时四个月的四次追踪测试。使用潜变量增长模型建模,分别考察了新生主观社会地位和抑郁的变化轨迹,并就两者间的变化关系进行了分析。结果发现新生入学后四个月内:(1)主观社会地位呈阶段化线性增长,其起始水平和第一阶段的增长速度存在显著个体间差异;(2)抑郁呈二次方增长,其起始水平和增长速度存在显著个体间差异;(3)入学后主观社会地位的下滑速度能有效预测新生抑郁水平的上升速度。研究基于情绪压制理论,对主观社会地位与抑郁间的变化关系进行了分析。

关键词: 大学新生, 主观社会地位, 抑郁, 过渡期, 多元潜变量增长模型

Abstract: In this study, 1983 college freshmen were recruited by cluster sampling from 7 universities in China. The subjective social status and depression of the freshmen were evaluated by the Subjective Social Status Index System of College Students and the Self-Rating Depression Scale for four times. Latent growth modeling was used to examine the growth trajectories of subjective social status and depression, and the longitudinal effects of subjective social status on depression were analyzed by using multivariate latent growth modeling. The findings were as followed:(1) the growth trajectory of freshmen's subjective social status is piecewise linear, and the first month is the predetermined knot, where there was a significant decline in subjective social status, then it began to rise slowly; (2) the depression level of freshmen increased in a quadratic linear trajectory, and it also found that there existed significant variation among individuals in the initial level and growth rate, but the initial levels of depression and its growth rate were not related; (3) the multivariate latent growth model suggested that the initial level of subjective social status can effectively predicted the initial level of depression (β=-0.37,p<0.001), and the decline slope of subjective social status in the first month had significant effects on the slope (β=-0.38,p<0.001) and quadratic slope (β=0.37,p<0.01) of depression. Those findings suggest that not only subjective social status will affect the individuals' depression in the long term, but also directly affect the individuals' depression in the short term. The negative contrast effects on subjective social status of college freshmen are important reasons for the decline in their mental health.

Key words: college freshmen, subjective social status, depression, life transition, multivariate latent growth modeling

中图分类号: 

  • B844

Adlaf, E. M., Gliksman, L., Demers, A., & Newton-Taylor, B. (2001). The prevalence of elevated psychological distress among Canadian undergraduates:findings from the 1998 Canadian campus survey. Journal of American College Health, 50(2), 67-72.

Anderson, C., John, O. P., Keltner, D., & Kring, A. M. (2001). Who attains social status? Effects of personality and physical attractiveness in social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 116.

Bayram, N., & Bilgel, N. (2008). The prevalence and socio-demographic correlations of depression, anxiety and stress among a group of university students. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 43(8), 667-672.

Besser, A., & Zeigler-Hill, Z. (2014). Positive personality features and stress among first-year university students:implications for psychological distress, functional impairment, and self-esteem. Self and Identity, 13(1), 24-44.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16.

Dawson, M., & Pooley, J. A. (2013). Resilience:the role of optimism, perceived parental autonomy support and perceived social support in first year University Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 1(2), 38-49.

Destin, M., Richman, S., Varner, F., & Mandara, J. (2012). "Feeling" hierarchy:The pathway from subjective social status to achievement. Journal of Adolescence, 35(6), 1571-1579.

Dixon, S. K., & Kurpius, S. E. R. (2008). Depression and college stress among university undergraduates:Do mattering and self-esteem make a difference? Journal of College Student Development, 49(5), 412-424.

Dyson, R., & Renk, K. (2006). Freshmen adaptation to university life:Depressive symptoms, stress, and coping. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(10), 1231-1244.

Frank, J. B., & Thomas, C. D. (2003). Externalized self-perceptions, self-silencing, and the prediction of eating pathology. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 35(3), 219.

Furr, S. R., Westefeld, J. S., McConnell, G. N., & Jenkins, J. M. (2001). Suicide and depression among college students:A decade later. Professional Psychology:Research and Practice, 32(1), 97.

Goodman, E., Huang, B., Schafer-Kalkhoff, T., & Adler, N. E. (2007). Perceived socioeconomic status:A new type of identity that influences adolescents' self-rated health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(5), 479-487.

Jac km an, M. R., & Jac km an, R. W. (1973). An interpretation of the relation between objective and subjective social status. American Sociological Review, 38(5), 569-582.

Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110(2), 265.

Kraus, M. W., Adler, N., & Chen, T. D. (2013). Is the association of subjective SES and self-rated health confounded by negative mood? An experimental approach. Health Psychology, 32(2):138-145.

Langner, C. A., Epel, E. S., Matthews, K. A., Moskowitz, J. T., & Adler, N. E. (2012). Social hierarchy and depression:The role of emotion suppression. Journal of Psychology, 146(4), 417-436.

Marsh, H. W., Seaton, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Hau, K., O'Mara, A. J., & Craven, R. G. (2008). The big-fish-little-pond-effect stands up to critical scrutiny:Implications for theory, methodology, and future research. Educational Psychology Review, 20(3), 319-350.

Pittman, L. D., & Richmond, A. (2008). University belonging, friendship quality and psychological adjustment duiring the transition to college. Journal of Experimental Education, 76(4), 343-361.

Tiedens, L., Ellsworth, P., & Mesquita, B. (2002). Stereotypes about sentiments and status:Expectation about high and low status group members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 560-574.

Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves:complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 558.

陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. (2014). 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(06), 594-600.

程刚, 陈艳红, 关雨生, 张大均. (2015). 大学生主观社会地位的指标构成及特点. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 37(06), 156-162.

何心展, 张林, 尤海燕, 刁娟. (2006). 7763名大学新生心理症状调查研究. 中国康复理论与实践, 12(01), 81-83.

李永鑫, 周广亚. (2008). 大学新生应激、倦怠和抑郁的关系:来自纵向研究的证据. 心理科学, 31(02), 471-474.

刘晓芸,李雪松. (2013). 在校大学生焦虑与抑郁状况的调查分析. 东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版), (15)S1, 171-173.

舒良. (1999). 自评抑郁量表和抑郁状态问卷. 中国心理卫生杂志, (增刊), 194-197.

王济川, 王小倩. (2010). 结构方程模型:Mplus与应用(英文版). 北京:高等教育出版社.

吴洪辉, 廖友国. (2013). 近十年大学生自评抑郁量表(SDS)调查结果的元分析. 宁波大学学报(教育科学版), (35) 06, 9-12.

吴明隆. (2010). 结构方程模型:AMOS的操作与应用. 重庆:重庆大学出版社.

杨钋, 毛丹. (2013). "适应"大学新生发展的关键词——基于首都高校学生发展调查的实证分析. 中国高教研究, (03), 16-24.

杨槐,陈奕,仇宇. (2013). 大学新生抑郁症状的流行病学调查. 现代预防医学, (40)18, 3340-3342.

周春燕,郭永玉. (2013). 家庭社会阶层对大学生心理健康的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(04), 636-640.
[1] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[2] 刘欢, 李于凡. 大学新生学习适应、社交适应、情绪适应间的动态联系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 270-278.
[3] 苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[4] 何灿, 魏华, 丁倩, 桂勇. 父母工作性通信工具使用对粗暴养育的影响:焦虑抑郁的中介作用与主管支持感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 903-912.
[5] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[6] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[7] 李金文, 白荣, 王雨萌, 刘霞. 青少年抑郁与自伤行为的发展轨迹及其关系:基于两年的追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 429-438.
[8] 曾子豪, 彭丽仪, 詹林, 刘双金, 欧阳晓优, 丁道群, 黎志华, 胡义秋, 方晓义. 儿童期受虐对大学生抑郁症状的影响:主观幸福感的中介和基因的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 276-285.
[9] 蒋索, 丁金琦, 刘艳, 陆元圆, 李小青, 陈静. 青少年早期网络欺凌/受欺凌对睡眠质量的影响:社交焦虑和抑郁情绪的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 85-96.
[10] 邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 121-131.
[11] 王浩, 俞国良. 大学生依恋焦虑与抑郁的关系:恋爱中关系攻击和关系质量的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 879-885.
[12] 朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[13] 殷锦绣, 蔺秀云, 刘伟, 王玉龙, 彭勃. 教养方式的母子感知差异与儿童抑郁的关系:母子依恋的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 556-565.
[14] 谢韵梓, 吴继霞, 王诗成, 阳泽. 儿童期情感忽视对大学生抑郁的影响:控制感与情绪调节自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 407-417.
[15] 马小凤, 文美琪, 史凯, 杜青青, 姚贝, 穆缘, 霍小宁. 记忆编码策略对心境一致性记忆的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 161-170.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!