心理发展与教育 ›› 2004, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (3): 56-61.

• 教与学心理 • 上一篇    下一篇

大学生外语焦虑、自我效能感与外语成绩关系的研究

张日昇1, 袁莉敏2   

  1. 1. 北京师范大学发展心理研究所, 北京, 100875;
    2. 河北大学教育学院, 保定, 071002
  • 出版日期:2004-07-15 发布日期:2004-07-15
  • 作者简介:张日昇(1962- ),男,北京师范大学发展心理研究所教授.

Research on the Relationship between Foreign Language Anxiety, Self-efficacy and English Performance

ZHANG Ri-sheng1, YUAN Li-min2   

  1. 1. Developmental Psychology Institute, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China 100875;
    2. College of Education, Hebei University, Baoding, China 071002
  • Online:2004-07-15 Published:2004-07-15

摘要: 以315名大学生为研究对象,采用t检验、相关分析、方差分析和回归分析技术探讨了不同成绩水平、不同性别、不同专业学生的外语焦虑、自我效能感和外语成绩的差异及三者之间的关系。结果表明:(1)外语成绩及格组学生的外语焦虑水平显著低于不及格组学生,自我效能感显著高于不及格组学生;女大学生的外语成绩、自我效能感及能力因子和挫折因子上的自我效能感显著高于男大学生,男女大学生的外语焦虑水平无显著性差异;文科大学生的外语焦虑水平和外语成绩显著高于理科大学生,文、理科学生的自我效能感无显著性差异;(2)外语焦虑与外语成绩呈显著负相关,与自我效能感呈显著负相关,自我效能感与外语成绩呈显著正相关,性别、专业、外语焦虑、自我效能感、效能感的能力和挫折两个因子是外语成绩的显著预测变量。

关键词: 外语焦虑, 外语自我效能感, 外语成绩

Abstract: The present study examined the relationship between English performance,foreign language anxiety and self-efficacy level of 315 college students.The results indicated:¥Foreign language anxiety level of CET4 passed students were significant lower than CET4 failed students,and their self-efficacy level were significant higher than failures;The English performance and self-efficacy of female were higher than male.Female's performance was better than male's in capacity and frustration of self-efficacy,No gender difference was found in students foreign language anxiety level;Foreign language anxiety level and English performance of students of liberal arts were higher than students of science,and there were not significant differences on self-efficacy between tham.(2)Theere was significant negative correlation between English performance and anxiety,and between foreign language anxiety and self-efficacy,while significant positive correlation between English performance and self-efficacy.Results by regression analysis showed that gender,subject,foreign language anxiety,self-efficacy,capacity and frustration of self-efficacy were predictors of English performance.

Key words: foreign language anxiety, self-efficacy, English performance

中图分类号: 

  • G442
[1] Ehrman M E, Leaver B L, Oxford R L. A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 2003, 31:313-330.
[2] Midori Kimura. Affective Factors of Japanese EFL Learners at Junior College in the Oral Communication Tasks.
[3] Horwitz E K, Horwitz M B, Cope J. Foreign Language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 1986, 70:125-132.
[4] Aida Y. Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope's construct of foreign language anxiety: The case of students of Japanese. Modem Language Journal, 1994,78:155-168.
[5] Clement R, Dornyei Z, Noels K A. Second language proficiency and acculturation: An investigation of the effects of language status and individual characteristics. Language Learning, 1994,44:417-448.
[6] Sanchez-Herrero S A, Sanchez M P. The predictive validation of an instrument designed to measure strdent anxiety in learning a foreign language. Educational and Psychological Measruement, 1992, 52: 961-966.
[7] Oxford Rebecca L. Ehrman Madeline E. Adults'Language Learning Strategies in an Intensive Foreign Language Program in the United States. System, 1995, 359-386.
[8] 王凯荣,辛涛,李琼.中学生自我效能感、归因与学习成绩关系的研究.心理发展与教育,1999,4:22-25.
[9] Truitt S N. Anxiety and beliefs about language learning: A study of Korean university students learning English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin. 1995. In Horwitz, E. K. Student affective reactions and the teaching and learning of foreign language,International Journal of educational Research, 1995,7:573-579.
[10] Garcia T, Pintrich T R. Assessing students'motivation and learning strategies in the classroom context: The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. In Brenbaum T. Doocby Filip JRC eds. Alternative in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge.London: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1996,319-339.
[11] Gibson S,Dembo M H.Teacher efficacy:A construct validation.Journal of Educational Psychology,1984,76(4):569-582.
[12] 王才康中学生一般自我效能感的发展特点研究.中国行为医学科学,2002,2:214
[13] Bailey P, Onwuegbuzie A J. Anxiety about foreign language among students in French, Spanish, and German classes. Psychological Reports, 1998,82:1007-1010.
[14] Maclntyre P D, Gardner R C. Anxiety and second language learning:Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 1989,39:251-275.
[15] Horwitz E K. Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign language anxiety scale. In E.K. Horwitz and D. J. Young(eds)Language Anxiety From Theory and Research to Classroom Implications,Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall,1991.
[16] Phillips E M.The effects of language anxiety on students'oral test,Modern Language Journal,1992,76:14-26.
[17] 刘惠军.当代学习动机的理论和应用研究进展.首都师范大学学报,2002,5:111-116
[18] Horwitz E K. Student affective reactions and the teaching and learning of foreign language, International Journal of Educational Research, 1995,7:573-579.
[19] Andrew Finch, Ph. D. The non-threatening learning environment, The Korea TESOL Journal, 2001, 4(1): 133-145.
[1] 李妍, 梁丽婵, 周欣然, 边玉芳. 家师关系与小学生学校态度:师生关系的中介作用及父母差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 74-82.
[2] 杨宝琰, 马熙凤, 臧鸿瑜, 毛海燕. 经济收入和父亲受教育程度对农村初中生学习投入的影响:家庭义务感和依赖教育性未来身份的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 83-92.
[3] 王淏蘭, 陈红君, 伍新春, 赵英, 孙鹏. 阅读模式对汉语儿童阅读理解的影响:有中介的调节模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 369-378.
[4] 程阳春, 黄瑾. 近似数量系统与数学能力的关系:一项元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 379-390.
[5] 喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[6] 陈旭, 张大均, 程刚, 胡天强, 刘广增. 教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.
[7] 聂倩, 张大均, 滕召军, 陆星月, 郭成. 学生感知的学校氛围与主客观学业成绩:心理素质及其分维度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 715-723.
[8] 程刚, 唐昕怡, 牛娟, 李佳佳, 张大均. 中学生家庭社会经济地位与学业成绩的关系:心理素质各维度的多重中介作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.
[9] 陈朝阳, 刘志方, 苏永强, 程亚华. 高低阅读技能聋生词汇加工的语境预测性效应特点:眼动证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 692-699.
[10] 邹雨晨, 丁颖, 张旭然, 李燕芳. 不同类型反馈对儿童学习效果的影响及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 567-575.
[11] 李永占. 父母教养方式对高中生学习投入的影响:一个链式中介效应模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(5): 576-585.
[12] 高瑞彦, 牛美心, 杨涛, 周新林. 4~8年级学生分数数量表征的准确性及形式[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 443-452.
[13] 张婕, 黄碧娟, 司继伟, 官冬晓. 乡镇小学生的数学焦虑与数学成绩:数学自我效能感和数学元认知的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 453-460.
[14] 王明忠, 王梦然, 王静. 父母冲突损害青少年学业成绩:努力控制与课堂参与的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(4): 434-442.
[15] 池丽萍, 宗正, 辛自强, 陈英和. 建构主义教学与元思维的关系:认知压力的解释[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 181-190.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!