教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.06.09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 采用学生感知教师支持行为问卷和中学生心理素质问卷，对西南地区两所中学7~12年级的824名在校中学生进行调查研究，探讨教师整体支持和不同类型支持与中学生学业成绩的关系及心理素质在其中的中介作用。结果发现：（1）教师整体支持与中学生心理素质、学业成绩间存在显著正相关；教师情感支持与中学生心理素质、学业成绩间存在显著正相关，教师学习支持、能力支持与中学生心理素质存在显著正相关，但与学业成绩相关均不显著；（2）控制性别和年龄后，心理素质在教师整体支持与学业成绩的关系中起完全中介作用；心理素质在教师情感支持与学业成绩关系中起部分中介作用，在教师学习支持与学业成绩、教师能力支持与学业成绩关系中均起完全中介作用。

关键词: 教师支持, 心理素质, 学业成绩, 中学生

Abstract: The current study aimed to explore the relationships among overall and different types of teacher support with the middle school students' academic achievement, and the effects of psychological suzhi in these relationships. We selected 824 middle school students(grade 7 to 12) from southwest China to participate in the study and used questionnaires to test the interested variables. Results of correlation found that there were significant positive correlations among teachers'support, psychological suzhi with middle school students'academic achievement. Teacher's emotional support was significant positive correlated with both psychological suzhi and academic achievement. What's more, teacher's learning support and ability support were significant positive correlate with psychological suzhi, but they were no significant correlation with academic achievement. Regression analysis indicated that after controlling gender and age, psychological suzhi played a complete mediating role in the relationship between teacher's overall support and academic achievement, and it also played a full mediating role in the relationship among teacher's learning support, ability support with students'academic achievement. However, pshchological suzhi partly mediated the relationship between teacher's emotional support and academic achievement.

Key words: teacher support, academic achievement, psychological suzhi, middle school students

中图分类号:

G442

陈旭, 张大均, 程刚, 胡天强, 刘广增. 教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.

CHEN Xu, ZHANG Dajun, CHEGN Gang, HU Tianqiang, LIU Guangzeng. The Effects of Teacher Support and Psychological Suzhi on Middle School Students' Academic Achievement[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.

参考文献

Berkman, L. F., & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resisttance and mortality:A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda Countyresidents. American Journal of Epidenmiology, 109, 186-204.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Toward an ecology of human development. American Psychologist, 32, 515-531.
Chen, J. L. (2008). Grade-level differences:relations of parental, teacher and peer support to academic engagement and achievement among hong kong students. School Psychology International, 29(2), 183-198.
Clifton, R. A. (1981). The effect of student ethnicity and sex on the expectation of teachers. Interchange, 12(1), 31-38.
Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research.Educational Psychologist, 31(3), 175-190.
Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K. (2010). The relationship between perceived social support and maladjustment for students at risk. Psychology in the Schools, 39(3), 305-316.
Devries. R. (1999). Implications of piaget's constructivist theory for character education. Action in Teacher Education, 20(4), 39-47.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76(5), 949-967.
Helgeson, V., & Lopez, L. (2010). Social Support and Growth Following Adversity. Handbook of Adult Resilience. New York:Guilford Publications, 309-330.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter:linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273.
Konishi, C.,Hymel, S.,Zumbo, B. D.,& Li, Z. (2010). Do school bullying and student-teacher relationships matter for academic achievement? a multilevel analysis. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25(1), 19-39.
Košir, K., & Tement, S. (2014). Teacher-student relationship and academic achievement:a cross-lagged longitudinal study on three different age groups. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 409-428.
Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2003). What type of support do they need? investigating student adjustment as related to emotional, informational, appraisal, and instrumental support. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(3), 231-252.
Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57(1), 487.
Pianta, R. C., & Steinberg, M. (2010). Teacher-child relationships and the process of adjusting to school. New Directions for Child & Adolescent Development, 1992(57), 61-80.
Reddy, R., Rhodes, J. E., & Mulhall, P. (2003). The influence of teacher support on student adjustment in the middle school years:a latent growth curve study. Development & Psychopathology, 15(1), 119-138.
Rosenfeld, L. B., Richman, J. M., & Bowen, G. L. (2000). Social support networks and school outcomes:the centrality of the teacher. Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 17(3), 205-226.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. F. (1968). Teacher expectations for the disadvantaged. Scientific American, 218(4), 19-23.
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2010). Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence:comparisons across gender. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 39(1), 47-61.
Sharma, G. (2016). Teacher support as determinant of academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 2(7), 1-9.
Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom:reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. J. Educ. Psychol. 85, 571-581.
Steffe, L. P., & Gale, J. E. (1998). Constructivism in education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 21(1), 121-140.
Tennant, J. E., Demaray, M. K., Malecki, C. K., Terry, M. N., Clary, M., & Elzinga, N. (2014). Students' ratings of teacher support and academic and social-emotional well-being. School Psychology Quarterly the Official Journal of the Division of School Psychology American Psychological Association, 30(4), 494-512.
Wu, L., Zhang, D., Cheng, G., Hu, T., & Rost, D. H. (2015). Parental emotional warmth and psychological suzhi, as mediators between socioeconomic status and problem behaviours in chinese children. Children & Youth Services Review, 59, 132-138.
陈彦垒, 郭少阳. (2016). 初中生感知教师支持行为对学业成就的影响:有中介的调节效应. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(2),332-337.
程晓堂. (2004). 任务的定义和类型. 中小学外语教学:中学, 27(6), 1-6.
崔伟, 徐夫真, 陈佩佩, 刘宇鹏, 孙浩. (2017). 留守初中生教师支持与学业适应:人格的调节作用. 中国特殊教育, (2), 54-58.
范丽恒, 金盛华. (2008). 教师期望对初中生心理特点的影响. 心理发展与教育, 24(3), 48-52.
傅维利. (1985). 论学生学业成绩考核的改革. 教育科学, (2), 39-43.
高丙成, 刘儒德. (2011). 初中生社会支持的类型及其对学习的影响. 心理科学, 34(3), 608-612.
郜佳慧. (2009). 中学生学校投入感、感知到的教师支持与学业成绩的关系(硕士学位论文), 济南大学.
龚林泉. (2016). 基于教学质量监控平台的学业成绩提升成长点分析. 教育科学论坛, (22), 24-27.
苟婷婷. (2008). 两种情感教学策略对学生学业成绩和爱国主义情感发展影响的实验研究(硕士学位论文), 四川师范大学,成都.
管林. (1986). 浅谈学生学业成绩的检查与评定. 教育评论, (3), 41-44.
胡天强, 张大均, 程刚. (2017). 中学生心理素质问卷(简化版)的修编及信效度检验. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 43(2), 120-126.
贾娟. (2012). 教师情感支持及其对中学生自尊、学业自我效能感的影响研究(硕士毕业论文), 西南大学,重庆.
李悦. (2016). 家庭教养方式与学业成绩的关系:心理素质、学业行为的中介作用(硕士学位论文), 西南大学,重庆.
刘加霞, 辛涛, 黄高庆, 申继亮. (2000). 中学生学习动机、学习策略与学业成绩的关系研究. 教育理论与实践, (9), 54-58.
吕培瑶. (2010). 关于社会支持理论研究的综述. 时代教育, (4), 109-109.
欧阳丹. (2005). 教师期望、学业自我概念、学生感知教师支持行为与学业成绩之间的关系研究(硕士学位论文), 广西师范大学,桂林.
乔娜, 张景焕, 刘桂荣, 林崇德. (2013). 家庭社会经济地位、父母参与对初中生学业成绩的影响:教师支持的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 29(5), 78-78.
任萍, 张云运, 秦幸娜, 郭筱琳, 赵茜. (2017). 初中生公正世界信念对其学业成就的影响:感知的教师支持和班级公正的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 191-197.
申继亮. (1988). 中学生学习兴趣的评估. 心理发展与教育, (4), 11-16.
孙袁华. (2002). "研究性学习"课程与教师教学策略探析. 教育理论与实践, (6), 58-62.
滕秀芹, 刘桂荣, 宋广文. (2017). 教师支持对流动儿童学业成绩的影响:自尊的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (10), 69-75.
王瞻. (2017). 教师期望与学习效能感、学业成就的相关研究(硕士学位论文) 西南大学,重庆.
杨桂琴. (2006). 试论"任务型"教学法产生的理论背景及其现实意义. 甘肃高师学报, 11(4), 94-96.
于倩, 刘金兰, 赵远. (2017). 教师支持对学生学习动机及学业成就的影响机制研究.天津大学学报(社会科学版), 19(6), 542-547.
张大均, 李晓辉, 龚玲. (2013). 关于心理素质及其形成机制的理论思考(一)——基于文化历史活动理论的探讨. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 39(2), 71-76.
张大均, 刘衍玲. (2001). 高中生心理素质与学业成绩的相关研究. 心理科学, 24(1), 110-111.
张大均. (2012). 青少年心理健康与心理素质培养的整合研究. 心理科学, 35(3), 530-536.
赵慧, 张大均. (2004). 中小学生心理素质对其学业成就的影响及启示. 现代中小学教育, (3), 31-33.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-942.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[3]	李腾飞, 马玉鑫, 宋瑞君, 陈亮. 青少年早期身体侵害、关系侵害与学业成绩的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 559-567.
[4]	王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响：特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[5]	谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[6]	王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[7]	程可心, 游雅媛, 叶宝娟, 陈志忠. 家庭功能与中学生自杀态度的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 272-278.
[8]	吴甲旺, 李红霞, 司继伟. 小学低年级儿童的计算流畅性与数学焦虑:基于变量为中心与个体为中心的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 72-80.
[9]	任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[10]	潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.
[11]	罗世兰, 张大均, 刘云艳. 家庭社会经济地位对幼儿良好行为习惯的影响:父母教养方式与幼儿心理素质的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 26-33.
[12]	程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
[13]	薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
[14]	彭自芳, 傅纳, 张新杰. 父母冲突与中学生应对方式的关系:教养方式和情绪安全感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 668-676.
[15]	贾绪计, 蔡林, 林琳, 林崇德. 高中生感知教师支持与学习投入的关系:学业自我效能感和成就目标定向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 700-707.