中学生家庭社会经济地位与学业成绩的关系:心理素质各维度的多重中介作用分析

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2018.06.08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究用方便抽样的方法调查了1570名中学生，通过中学生心理素质问卷来测量其心理素质，并对被试进行家庭社会经济地位（Socioeconomic Status，SES）评估和学业成绩考察。结果表明：（1）除中学生家庭SES与学业成绩相关不显著外，其余变量呈两两正相关；（2）整体心理素质在中学生家庭SES和学业成绩间中介作用显著。（3）认知特性和适应能力在家庭SES和学业成绩间存在多重中介作用，但两者存在抵消抑制作用。据此得出结论，高家庭SES对中学生学业成绩的积极影响，主要是通过对其认知特性的提升来实现的，而同时适应能力的增强则对学业成绩的上升有抑制作用。这一发现不仅拓展了对家庭投资理论和家庭压力模型的认识，还为进一步深化心理素质研究提供了新的思路；同时，该结论表明应为低家庭SES的学生提供补偿性教育，重视其认知特性的培养和提高，从而有助于提升其学业成绩水平。

关键词: 家庭社会经济地位, 心理素质, 学业成绩, 中学生

Abstract: This study investigated 1570 middle school students with convenient sampling. We measured psychological suzhi of middle school students by the Psychological Suzhi Questionnaire for Adolescents and also assessed their Socioeconomic Status (SES) and academic performance. The results showed that:(1) Except SES was not significant correlated with academic performance, the remaining variables showed a positive correlation with each other. (2) The overall psychological suzhi had a significant mediating effect between secondary school students' family SES and academic performance. (3) Cognitive quality and adaptability had multiple mediating effects between family SES and academic performance, but they suppressed each other. According to the results, we concluded that high family SES have a positive effect on middle school students' academic performance by improving their cognitive quality, but at the same time, the improve of adaptability have a suppression effect on the rise of academic performance. This finding not only expands the understanding of family investment theory and family stress model, but also provides new ideas for further deepening psychological suzhi research. At the same time, this conclusion shows that we should provide compensatory education for low-family SES students and attach importance to the cultivation and improvement of their cognitive ability, which consequently help to improve their academic performance.

Key words: family socioeconomic status, psychological suzhi, academic achievement, middle school students

中图分类号:

G442

程刚, 唐昕怡, 牛娟, 李佳佳, 张大均. 中学生家庭社会经济地位与学业成绩的关系:心理素质各维度的多重中介作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.

CHENG Gang, TANG Xinyi, NIU Juan, LI Jiajia, ZHANG Dajun. The Relationship between Middle School Students' Family Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: Multiple Mediating Effects of Different Dimensions of Psychological Suzhi[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.

参考文献

Bae, D., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2014). Family Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement Among Korean Adolescents:Linking Mechanisms of Family Processes and Adolescents' Time Use. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(7), 1014-1038.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental Science in the 21st Century:Emerging Questions, Theoretical Models, Research Designs and Empirical Findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115-125.
Burhan, N. A. S., Yunus, M. M., Tovar, M. E. L., & Burhan, N. M. G. (2017). Why are Cognitive Abilities of Children so Different Across Countries? The Link Between Major Socioeconomic Factors and PISA Test Scores. Personality and Individual Differences, 105, 95-106.
Cheng, G., Zhang, D., & Ding, F. (2015). Self-esteem and Fear of Negative Evaluation as Mediators Between Family Socioeconomic Status and Social Anxiety in Chinese Emerging Adults. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 61(6), 569-576.
Dong, Z., & Zhang, D. (2015). The Relationship between Family's Social Economic Status and Psychological Suzhi of Middle School Students:The Intermediary Effect of Parenting Style. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 03(12), 93-99.
Gerbino, M., Zuffianò, A., Eisenberg, N., Castellani, V., Luengo Kanacri, B. P., Pastorelli, C.,et al. (2017). Adolescents' Prosocial Behavior Predicts Good Grades Beyond Intelligence and Personality Traits. Journal of Personality, 86(2), 247-260.
Hayes, A. F., & Preacher, K. J. (2014). Statistical Mediation Analysis with a Multicategorical Independent Variable. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451-470.
Hood, W., Bradley, G. L., & Ferguson, S. (2017). Mediated Effects of Perceived Discrimination on Adolescent Academic Achievement:A Test of Four Models. Journal of Adolescence, 54, 82-93.
Kapfhammer, H. P. (1993). Psychosocial Development and Complexof Problems in Early Adulthood-Developmental-Psychology Characterizing a Significant Life Period. Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie, 61(10), 338-353.
Lawson, G. M., & Farah, M. J. (2017). Executive Function as a Mediator Between SES and Academic Achievement Throughout Childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(1), 94-104.
Lerner, J. V., Phelps, E., Forman, Y. E., & Bowers, E. P. (2009). Positive Youth Development Handbook of Adolescent Psychology:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Levpušček, M. P., Zupančič, M., & Sočan, G. (2012). Predicting Achievement in Mathematics in Adolescent Students:The Role of Individual and Social Factors. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 33(4), 523-551.
Marioni, R. E., Davies, G., Hayward, C., Liewald, D., Kerr, S. M., Campbell, A., et al.. (2014). Molecular Genetic Contributions to Socioeconomic Status and Intelligence. Intelligence, 44, 26-32.
Matthews, K. A., & Gallo, L. C. (2011). Psychological Perspectives on Pathways Linking Socioeconomic Status and Physical Health. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 501-530.
McCormick, M. P., O'Connor, E. E., & Parham Horn, E. (2017). Can Teacher-Child Relationships Alter the Effects of Early Socioeconomic Status on Achievement in Middle Childhood? Journal of School Psychology, 64, 76-92.
OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 Technical Report. Paris, OECD Publishing.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and Resampling Strategies for Assessing and Comparing Indirect Effects in Multiple Mediator Models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
Sebastian, J., & Huang, H. (2016). Examining the Relationship of a Survey Based Measure of Math Creativity with Math Achievement:Cross-National Evidence from PISA 2012. International Journal of Educational Research, 80, 74-92.
Selcuk, E. A. (2017). Personality, Motivation, and Math Achievement Among Turkish Students:Evidence from PISA Data. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 124(2), 514-530.
Stumm, S. V. (2017). Socioeconomic Status Amplifies the Achievement Gap Throughout Compulsory Education Independent of Intelligence. Intelligence, 60, 57-62.
Wu, L., Zhang, D., Cheng, G., Hu, T., & Rost, D. H. (2015). Parental Emotional Warmth and Psychological Suzhi as Mediators between Socioeconomic Status and Problem Behaviours in Chinese Children. Children and Youth Services Review, 59, 132-138.
Yuan, C., Wei, C., Wang, J., Qian, H., Ye, X., Liu, Y., & Hinds, P. S. (2014). Self-Efficacy Difference Among Patients with Cancer with Different Socioeconomic Status:Application of Latent Class Analysis and Standardization and Decomposition Analysis. Cancer Epidemiology, 38(3), 298-306.
陈良, 张大均. (2009). 近20年我国青少年心理健康研究的进展与走向. 高等教育研究, 30(11), 74-79.
陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. (2014). 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(6), 594-600.
杜刚, 吕厚超. (2017). 青少年未来时间洞察力和学业成绩的关系:时间管理倾向的中介作用. 心理科学, 40(1), 96-102.
胡天强, 张大均, 程刚. (2017). 中学生心理素质问卷(简化版)的修编及信效度检验. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 43(2), 120-126.
江琦, 张大均. (2005). 中学生考试心理素质及其发展. 心理科学, 28(4), 841-844.
江琦, 张大均. (2008). 考试心理素质在考试心理问题与考试绩效间的中介效应分析. 中国健康心理学杂志, 16(3), 327-328.
李春玲. (2005). 当代中国社会的声望分层-职业声望与社会经济地位指数测量. 社会学研究,(2), 74-102.
刘衍玲, 张大均, 郭成. (2006). 小学生心理素质对学业成绩影响研究. 中国特殊教育,(9), 68-72.
王晓辰, 李清, 高翔, 郑日昌. (2008). 小学生同伴接纳、教师接纳、学业成绩与心理健康的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22(10), 749-754.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 中介效应分析:方法和模型发展. 心理科学进展, 22(5), 731-745.
熊红星, 张璟, 郑雪. (2013). 方法影响结果?方法变异的本质、影响及控制. 心理学探新, 33(3), 195-199.
易芳, 郭雅洁, 俞宗火, 徐霜雪. (2017). 中小学生学业成绩主要影响因素的元分析. 心理学探新, 37(2), 140-148.
张大均, 冯正直, 郭成, 陈旭. (2000). 关于学生心理素质研究的几个问题. 西南师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 26(3), 56-62.
张大均, 李晓辉, 龚玲. (2013). 关于心理素质及其形成机制的理论思(一)——基于文化历史活动理论的探讨. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 39(2), 71-76.
张大均, 刘衍玲. (2001). 高中生心理素质与学业成绩的相关研究. 心理科学, 24(1), 110-111.
张大均, 苏志强, 王鑫强. (2017). 儿童青少年心理素质研究30年:回顾与展望. 心理与行为研究, 15, 3-11.
邹容, 周宗奎, 田媛, 张凤娟, 魏华. (2016). 稳定性与可变性:西方儿童青少年"大五"人格的发展. 心理科学,39 (4), 914-920.

相关文章 15

[1]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[3]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[4]	李腾飞, 马玉鑫, 宋瑞君, 陈亮. 青少年早期身体侵害、关系侵害与学业成绩的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 559-567.
[5]	张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[6]	王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响：特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[7]	谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.
[8]	王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[9]	程可心, 游雅媛, 叶宝娟, 陈志忠. 家庭功能与中学生自杀态度的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 272-278.
[10]	任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.
[11]	潘彦谷, 张大均, 李知洋. 亲子和同伴依恋对初中生心理素质发展的影响:个人中心分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 558-567.
[12]	罗海风, 刘坚, 周达. 家长参与在家庭社会经济地位和高中生学习品质之间的中介作用——师生关系的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 199-210.
[13]	罗世兰, 张大均, 刘云艳. 家庭社会经济地位对幼儿良好行为习惯的影响:父母教养方式与幼儿心理素质的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 26-33.
[14]	程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
[15]	薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed