不同自我评价方式对高中生写作的影响

心理发展与教育 ›› 2006, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (1): 74-79.

不同自我评价方式对高中生写作的影响

姚梅林¹, 徐守森², 杨永宁¹

1. 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京, 100875;
2. 首都体育学院, 北京, 100088

出版日期:2006-01-15 发布日期:2006-01-15
作者简介:姚梅林(1963- ),女,北京师范大学心理学院教授;E-mail:mlyao@263.net.
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学研究“十五”规划项目“整合课程内容,促进学生迁移的教学研究”(项目号01JAXLX008)的成果之一

Effects of Different Self-evaluation Forms on High School Students Writing

YAO Mei-lin¹, XU Shou-sen², YANG Yong-ning¹

1. School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 1000875;
2. Capital College of Physical Education, Beijing 100088

Online:2006-01-15 Published:2006-01-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究考察了三种不同的自我评价方式对高中二年级学生写作活动的影响。结果表明,自我评价对写作成绩有一定改善,但短期内对一般性的学习动机与效能感无显著影响。写作结果自我评价方式有助于写作结果自我评价准确性的提高,单独的写作过程自我评价方式短期内对写作活动无显著促进作用,写作结果与写作过程的综合自我评价方式显著改善了写作活动。

关键词: 写作, 过程评价, 结果评价, 自我评价

Abstract: The study explored the effects of 3 different kinds of Self-evaluation on writing of senior high school students. The results showed that Self-evaluation improved the writing performance to some extent.However,it had no obvious positive effects on the motivation and Self-efficacy of learning in short period.Product Self-evaluation enhanced the accuracy of Self-evaluation on writing,while Process Self-evaluation made little improvements on writing.The integration of Product and Process Self-evaluation facilitated the writing activities significantly.

Key words: writing, process evaluation, product evaluation, self-evaluation

中图分类号:

G442

姚梅林, 徐守森, 杨永宁. 不同自我评价方式对高中生写作的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2006, 22(1): 74-79.

YAO Mei-lin, XU Shou-sen, YANG Yong-ning. Effects of Different Self-evaluation Forms on High School Students Writing[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2006, 22(1): 74-79.

参考文献

[1] Belfiore P J,Homyak R S.Operant theory and application to selfmonitoring in adolescents.In D H Schunk,B J Zimmerman (Eds).Selfregulated learning; from teaching to self-reflective practice,New York:The Guilford Press,1998,184-202.
[2] Zimmerman B J,Schunk D H (Eds).Self-regulated learning and academic achievement:Theoretical perspectives,2nd,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.2001.
[3] Fitzgerald J.Research on revision in writing.Review of Educational Research,1987,57:481-506.
[4] Mayer R E.The promise of educational psychology:learning in the content areas,NJ:Prentice Hall,Inc.1999.
[5] Hillocks G Jr.Research on written composition:New directions for teaching.Urbana,1986.
[6] Englert C S et al.Making strategies and self-talk visible:Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms.American Educational Research Journal,1991,28:337-372.
[7] Hayes J R,Flower L S.Writing research and the writer.American psychologist,1986,41:1106-1113.
[8] Deshler D D,Ferrell W R,Kass C E.Error monitoring of schoolwork by learning disabled adolescents.Journal of Learning Disabilities,1978,11(7):10-23.
[9] Zimmerman B J,Risemberg R.Becoming A Self-Regulated Writer:A Social Cognitive Perspective.Contemporary Educational Psychology,1997,22:73-101.
[10] Schunk D H,Schwartz C W.Goals and progress feedback:Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement.Contemporary Educational Psychology,1993,18(3):337-354.
[11] Levy C M,Ransdell S (Eds).The science of writing.Mahwah,NH:Erlbaum,1996.
[12] Kellogg R T.The psychology of writing.NY:Oxford University Press,1994.
[13] Schunk D H,Zimmerman B J.Self-regulated learning:From teaching to self-reflective practice.Ny:Guilford Press,1998.
[14] Pintrich P R,Smith D A F,Garcia T,McKeachie W J.Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).Educational and Psychological Measurement,1993,53:801-813.
[15] Zimmerman B J,Bandura A.Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment.American Educational Research Journal,1994,31:845-862.
[16] Pajares F,Valiante G.Gender Differences in Writing Motivation and Achievement of Middle School Students:A Function of Gender Orientation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,2001,26:366-381.
[17] 祝新华.《语文能力发展心理学》.杭州:杭州大学出版社,1993:261-266.
[18] Zimmerman B J,Risemberg R.Becoming A Self-regulated writer:A Social Cognitive Perspective.Contemporary Educational Psychology,1997,22:73-101.
[19] Boekaerts M.Bringing about change in the classroom:strengths and weaknesses of the self-regulated learning approach.Learning and Instruction,2002,12:589-604.

相关文章 15

[1]	曹瑞琳, 梅松丽, 梁磊磊, 李传恩, 张莹. 感恩与大学生网络成瘾的关系:核心自我评价和生命意义感的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 286-294.
[2]	高斌, 朱穗京, 吴晶玲. 大学生手机成瘾与学习投入的关系:自我控制的中介作用和核心自我评价的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 400-406.
[3]	祁迪, 林悦, 刘勤学. “打”出来的手机成瘾？父母粗暴养育对青少年智能手机成瘾的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 677-685.
[4]	王凯, 张野. 校园排斥对初中生内外化问题的影响:同伴关系与核心自我评价的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 594-604.
[5]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 邓林园, 陈珏君, 倪虹. 初中生核心自我评价在班级环境和学业压力之间的中介作用——性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 192-202.
[6]	陈春宇, 连帅磊, 孙晓军, 柴唤友, 周宗奎. 社交网站成瘾与青少年抑郁的关系:认知负载和核心自我评价的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(2): 210-218.
[7]	谢其利, 宛蓉, 张睿, 江光荣. 歧视知觉与农村贫困大学生孤独感:核心自我评价、朋友支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(5): 614-622.
[8]	胡春梅, 岳彩镇, 何华敏, 杨丹丹. 师范生对教学能力的自我评价、他人评价和反射性评价的关系研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 520-526.
[9]	李航, 刘儒德, 刘源. 大学生外语写作自我效能感在写作焦虑对写作成绩影响中的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(4): 385-390.
[10]	尧国靖, 张锋. 自尊水平、事件效价与时距对过去事件时距估计的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(1): 18-22.
[11]	岳彩镇, 黄希庭, 岳童. 青少年反思自我评价的记忆效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(3): 225-230.
[12]	田澜, 张大均. 构思策略教学改善小学写困生故事文质量的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(3): 282-288.
[13]	孙配贞, 郑雪, 许庆平, 余祖伟. 小学教师核心自我评价、应对方式与工作倦怠的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(2): 188-194.
[14]	马利军, 黎建斌. 大学生核心自我评价、学业倦怠对厌学现象的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 101-106.
[15]	王可, 林崇德. 中学生写作中思维品质的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2007, 23(2): 100-105.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed