中学生个人认识论的理论构建与测量

心理发展与教育 ›› 2009, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 115-121.

中学生个人认识论的理论构建与测量

杨小洋¹, 申继亮²

1. 中山大学教育学院心理学系, 广州 510275;
2. 北京师范大学心理学院, 北京 10875

出版日期:2009-10-15 发布日期:2009-10-15
通讯作者: 杨小洋,中山大学心理学系讲师.E-mail:yangxiaoyang@126.com E-mail:yangxiaoyang@126.com
基金资助:
教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目:032JZD0034

Middle School Student’s Personal Epistemology:Theoretical Construct and Preliminary Development of Questionnaire

YANG Xiao-yang¹, SHEN Ji-liang²

1. Department of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275;
2. School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 10875

Online:2009-10-15 Published:2009-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于个人认识论理论中较为成熟的反省判断模型,本研究构建了中学生个人认识论的理论框架,并进一步编制了中学生个人认识论问卷,随后调查了459名中学生,结果发现:(1)初测问卷具有良好的项目区分度、结构效度和内部一致性信度。(2)个人认识论的结构由五个一阶因素、两个二阶因素构成:一阶因素分别包括知识的确定性、知识的简单性、知识的来源、求知的论证性、表征多元;二阶因素包括知识的本质和求知的本质。

关键词: 个人认识论, 反省判断模型, 中学生

Abstract: Based on the well-structured Reflective Judgement Model(RJM),a theoretical framework about middle school students'personal epistemology was discussed firstly.Secondly,an instrument about middle school students' epistemological beliefs was develped upon the discussion.Then 459 middle school students at grade 7,8,10 completed the instrument.Results include:(1)good item differential validity,construct validity and internal consistency reliability were found;(2)A statistical model with five first rank dimensions and two second rank dimensions was chosen.Which include:certainty,complexity,source,justification of knowing,and multi-presentation were included at first rank, nature of knowledge and nature of knowing were included at second rank.

Key words: personal epistemology, reflective judgement model, middle school student

中图分类号:

B844.2

杨小洋, 申继亮. 中学生个人认识论的理论构建与测量[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(4): 115-121.

YANG Xiao-yang, SHEN Ji-liang. Middle School Student’s Personal Epistemology:Theoretical Construct and Preliminary Development of Questionnaire[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(4): 115-121.

参考文献

[1] Perry W G.Cognitive and ethical growth:The Making of meaning. In A.Chickering(Ed.),The modern American college.San Francisco: Jossey 2Bass,1981:76-116.
[2] Ryan M P.Monitoring text comprehension:Individual differences in epistemological standards.Journal of Educational Psychology.1984,76:249-58.
[3] Schommer M.An emerging conceptualization of epistemological beliefs and their role in learning.In R.Garner&P.A.Alexander(Eds.), Beliefs about text and instruction with text.Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Inc.1994:25-40.
[4] Buehl M M,Alexander P A,Murphy P K.Beliefs about schooled knowledge:Domain specific of domain general?Contemporary Educational Psychology.2002,27:415-449.
[5] Schommer-Aikins M,Duell O K&Hutter R.Epistemological beliefs,mathematical problem 2solving,and academic performance of middle school students.Elementary School Journal,2005,105(3):289-304.
[6] Schommer-Aikins M,Easter M.Epistemological Beliefs' Contributions to Study Strategies of Asian Americans and European Americans.2008,100(4):920-929.
[7] Hofer B K.Introduction:Paradigmatic Approaches to personal Epistemology.Educational Psychologist,2004,39(1):1-3.
[8] Hofer B K.Dimenionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology.Contemporary Educational Psychology.2000,25:378-405.
[9] King P M,Kitchener K S.Developing Reflective judgment: Understanding and promoting intellectual growth and critical thinking in adolescents and adults.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,1994.
[10] Hofer B K,Pintrich P R.The development of epistemological theories:Beliefs about knowledge and Knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research.1997,67:88-140.
[11] 鲁志鲲.表征脚手架对问题解决的影响.博士论文.北京: 北京师范大学,2004.
[12] 朱永祥.认知的内隐理论及其分析方法.心理发展与教育, 1991,8(4):32-37.
[13] 侯杰泰,温忠麟,成子娟.结构方程模型及其应用.北京:教育科学出版社,2004.
[14] 黄芳铭.结构方程模式理论与应用.北京:中国税务出版社,2005.
[15] Louca L,Elby A,Hammer D,Kagey T.Epistemological Resources:Applying a New Epistemological Framework to Science Instruction.Educational Psychologist,2004,39(1):57-68.
[16] Magolda B.Knowing and reasoning in college:Gender-related patterns in students'intellectual development.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass. 1992.
[17] Moore W S.The "Learning Environment Preferences":Exploring the construct validity of an objective measure of the Perry Scheme of intellectual development.Journal of College Student Development,1989,30: 504-514.
[18] Schommer M.Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology.1990,82:498-504.

相关文章 15

[1]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2]	苑媛, 梁周健, 张丽. 结构性校园氛围与中学生抑郁:社会支持的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 869-876.
[3]	王小凤, 燕良轼, 丁道群. 童年期不良经历对中学生良心的影响：特质自我控制和自我损耗的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 566-575.
[4]	王旭, 刘衍玲, 林杰, 刘传星, 魏灵真, 邱涵宇. 亲子关系对中学生心理健康的影响:社会支持和心理素质的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 263-271.
[5]	程可心, 游雅媛, 叶宝娟, 陈志忠. 家庭功能与中学生自杀态度的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 272-278.
[6]	程翠萍, 黄希庭. 个人取向勇气对中学生学业成就的影响:问题解决和求助应对方式的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 60-67.
[7]	薛璐璐, 姜媛, 方平. 述情障碍与中学生人际关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(1): 92-100.
[8]	彭自芳, 傅纳, 张新杰. 父母冲突与中学生应对方式的关系:教养方式和情绪安全感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 668-676.
[9]	李大林, 黄梅, 陈维, 吴文峰. 生活事件对初中生抑郁的影响:自尊和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 352-359.
[10]	陈旭, 张大均, 程刚, 胡天强, 刘广增. 教师支持与心理素质对中学生学业成绩的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 707-714.
[11]	程刚, 唐昕怡, 牛娟, 李佳佳, 张大均. 中学生家庭社会经济地位与学业成绩的关系:心理素质各维度的多重中介作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(6): 700-706.
[12]	王琦, 俞国良. 刻板印象威胁对学习困难中学生成就动机的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(4): 425-432.
[13]	张一波, 张卫, 朱键军, 喻承甫, 陈圆圆, 卢镇辉. 社区暴力暴露与初中生外化问题行为的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(2): 228-239.
[14]	罗云, 陈爱红, 王振宏. 父母教养方式与中学生学业倦怠的关系:自我概念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(1): 65-72.
[15]	李仁莉, 戴艳, 林崇德, 伍新春. 中学生创伤后成长、创伤后应激障碍的发展趋势:心理复原力的预测效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(6): 728-737.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed