心理发展与教育 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 772-780.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.06.02

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

“公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点

朱娜平1, 刘雁伶1, 熊红梅2, 赵攀3   

  1. 1. 江西科技师范大学教育学部, 南昌 330038;
    2. 南昌市西湖区保育院, 南昌 330025;
    3. 豫章师范学院马克思主义学院, 南昌 330103
  • 发布日期:2023-11-11
  • 通讯作者: 刘雁伶 E-mail:lyln10365@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江西省省级研究生创新专项资金资助项目(YC2020-S573);江西省社会科学十三五规划项目“学前儿童探究因果强度的认知机制研究”(19JY23)。

Justice Comes Sooner or Later: The Development Characteristics of Children’s Fair Normative Executive Behavior in Different Resource Allocation Situations

ZHU Naping1, LIU Yanling1, XIONG Hongmei2, ZHAO Pan3   

  1. 1. Faculty of Education, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330038;
    2. Nanchang Xihu District Nursing Home, Nanchang 330025;
    3. College of Marxism, YuZhang Normal University, Nanchang 330103
  • Published:2023-11-11

摘要: 本研究根据不同属性细化资源价值,创新定义资源客观价值,探究4~9岁儿童基于数量、客观价值和主观价值的公平规范执行行为发展特点。结果发现:儿童公平规范执行行为会因资源分配情境和不公平提议存在发展差异。具体表现为:(1)儿童数量公平规范执行行为出现早于价值公平规范执行行为;(2)在基于主观价值的资源分配情境中,儿童更难以表现出公平规范执行行为;(3)儿童对绝对不公平提议更容易表现出公平规范执行行为。这些发现不但具体阐述儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点,而且为保障个体之间合作活动的持续性以及进行公平规范教育提供了既全面又具针对性的建议。

关键词: 公平规范执行, 资源分配情境, 客观价值, 不公平提议, 儿童

Abstract: This study refined the resource value according to different attributes, innovatively defined the objective value of resources, and explored the development characteristics of children aged 4 to 9 in the implementation of fair norms based on quantity, objective value and subjective value. The results showed that children's fair norm execution behavior has developmental differences due to the situation of resource allocation and unfair proposal: (1) Children's quantity-based fair norm execution behavior appears earlier than value-based fair norm execution behavior;(2) In the context of resource allocation based on subjective value, children are more difficult to show fair normative executive behavior;(3) In the face of absolute unfair proposals, children are more likely to show fair norm execution behaviors. These findings not only elaborate the developmental characteristics of children's fair norm execution behavior, but also provide comprehensive and targeted suggestions for ensuring the continuity of cooperative activities between individuals and carrying out fair norm education.

Key words: fair normative executive behavior, resource allocation situation, objective value, unfair offers, children

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Abrams, D., Palmer, S. B., Rutland, A., Cameron, L., & Vande Vyver, J.(2014). Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant in-group and out-group members: Development of the black sheep effect. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 258-270.
Blake, P. R., & McAuliffe, K.(2011). “I had so much it didn’t seem fair”: Eight-year-olds reject two forms of inequity. Cognition,120, 215-224.
Blake, P. R., & Rand, D. (2010). Currency value moderate equity preference among young children.Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 210-218.
Baumol, W. J.(1972). Economic theory and operations analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 57(297), 220-221.
Baumgartner, T., Knoch, D., Hotz, P., Eisenegger, C., & Fehr, E.(2011). Dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal cortex orchestrate normative choice. Nature Neuroscience, 14, 1468-1474.
Chernyak, N., & Sobel, D. M.(2015). Equal but not always fair: Value-laden sharing in preschool-aged children. Children Social Development, 25(2), 340-351.
Chernyak, N., Sandham, B., Harris, P. L., & Cordes, S.(2016). Numerical cognition explains age- related changes in third- party fairness. Developmental Psychology, 52, 1555-1562.
Damon, W. (2008). Moral child: Nurturing children’s natural moral growth. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 71(10), 621-623.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E.(2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241.
Feng, C. L., Luo, Y. J., & Krueger, F.(2015). Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 36(2), 591-602.
Jordan, J. J., McAuliffe, K., & Warneken, F.(2014). Development of in-group favoritism in children's third-party punishment of selfishness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35), 12710-12715.
Lynn, M.(1991). Scarcity effect on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology Marketing, 8, 43-57.
Olson, K. R., & Spelke, E. S.(2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108, 222-231.
Paulus, M., & Moore, C.(2014). The development of recipient-dependent sharing behavior and sharing expectations in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 50, 914-921.
Rizzo, M. T., Elenbaas, L., Cooley, S., & Killen, M.(2016). Children’s recognition of fairness and others'welfare in a resource allocation task: Age related changes. Developmental Psychology, 52(8),1307-1317.
Squire, S., & Bryant, P.(2002). The influence of sharing on children’s initial concept of division. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81, 1-43.
Sheskin, M., Nadal, A., Croom, A., Mayer, T., Nissel, J., & Bloom, P.(2016). Some equalities are more equal than others: Quality equality emerges later than numerical equality. Child Development, 87(5), 1520-1528.
Sheskin, M., Bloom, P., & Wynn, K.(2014). Anti-equality: Social comparison in young children. Cognition, 130(2), 152-156.
Shaw, A., & Olson, K. R.(2012). Children discard a resource to avoid inequity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 382-395.
Shaw, A., & Olson, K. R.(2013). All inequality is not equal: Children correct inequalities using resource value. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 393. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00393
龚少英, 盖笑松, 刘国雄, 方富熹. (2004). 儿童认知发展的个体差异研究. 心理科学, 27(6), 314-316.
焦小燕, 盖笑松, 郭璇. (2017). 学前儿童抑制控制的发展趋势及其对言语理解和数学认知的预测作用. 心理科学, 40(2), 373-379.
梁福成, 王心怡, 唐卫海. (2015). 提议者的意图、相对收益与绝对收益对不同年龄回应者公平行为的影响. 心理学报, 47(3), 355-362.
刘璐, 肖雪, 刘丽莎, 徐良苑, 张旭然, 李燕芳. (2019). 儿童在不同卷入情境下基于资源价值的分配行为特点:内群体偏爱的作用. 心理学报, 51(5), 584-597.
刘文, 张雪, 范琳琳. (2016). 不同利益情境下3~5岁幼儿利他惩罚行为的发展特点. 学前教育研究, (12), 35-43.
齐春辉, 张振. (2020). 诚实-谦逊性和人际亲密性对公平规范执行的影响. 心理与行为研究, 18(3), 419-425.
施芳婷, 郑晨烨, 颜秀琳, 陆露, 王静梅, 邸波, 卢英俊. (2021). 5-6岁幼儿对不同文化背景卡通面孔再认的眼动研究. 心理发展与教育, 37(3), 323-334.
文萍, 李红. (2007). 6~11岁儿童执行功能发展研究. 心理学探新, 3(27), 38-43.
王苏, 盖笑松. (2020). 3~4岁幼儿冷热自我调节的发展趋势及性别差异——一项纵向研究. 心理发展与教育, 36(6), 641-648.
张慧, 马红宇, 徐富明, 刘燕君, 史燕伟. (2017). 最后通牒博弈中的公平偏好:基于双系统理论的视角. 心理科学进展, 26(2), 319-330.
张振, 齐春辉, 王洋, 赵辉, 王小新, 高晓雷. (2020). 内群体偏爱或黑羊效应?经济博弈中公平规范执行的群体偏见. 心理科学进展, 28(2), 329-339.
[1] 王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2] 于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3] 陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[4] 吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[5] 舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[6] 韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[7] 范兴华, 靳嘉宁, 燕利飞, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪. 留守困境对初中儿童个人成长主动性发展的影响:社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 427-436.
[8] 张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[9] 袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点:基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[10] 谢宇, 贺荟中, 王磊, 戴惟熙. 孤独症儿童与典型发展儿童内隐学习物品情景线索的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 761-769.
[11] 范兴华, 燕利飞, 靳嘉宁, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪, 余思. 父母关爱对4~6年级留守儿童幸福感发展的影响:积极诠释生活的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
[12] 刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[13] 王宇轩, 刘梦连, 杨滢晖, 毕鸿燕. 学龄儿童与成人形音整合的比较研究:字形与字音的相互影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 457-464.
[14] 王彦姣, 黄家桢, 龙嘉, 王沛. 领域一般和领域特殊能力与计算障碍的内在联系及其启示——基于元分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 473-481.
[15] 冯娜, 梁峰, 王芬, 何春丽, 张慧. 基本情绪与道德情绪对不同年龄群体道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 491-499.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!