学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应？

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.04.02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用潜变量增长模型,旨在探究学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹,并揭示自然联结的初始水平和发展速度作用于创造力倾向的模式。采用自然联结指数量表和威廉斯创造力倾向测量表,对山东省的3所公立小学共281名学龄儿童(140名男孩; T3平均年龄为11.10 ± 0.02岁)进行为期2年的3次追踪测查。结果发现:(1)学龄儿童的自然联结水平呈现线性递减趋势,且随时间个体差异没有变化,为稳定差异模式;(2)自然联结的初始水平和下降速度作用于学龄儿童创造力倾向时存在交互效应。具体而言,当自然联结下降速度较快时,初始水平较低的儿童创造力倾向水平显著更低,且初始水平的负面作用被进一步放大。这一发现从动态视角揭示了自然联结在学龄儿童创造力倾向形成中的关键作用,在理论层面为个体发展情景理论提供了纵向证据,实践层面为小学低年级阶段加强自然教育课程设计、减缓自然联结下降对创造力倾向的负面影响提供了科学依据。

关键词: 创造力倾向, 交互效应, 学龄儿童, 自然联结

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to explore the development trajectory of school-age children’s nature connectedness and its dynamic correlation with creative tendency, exploring whether the initial level and growth rate of nature connectedness contribute to creative tendencies in a cumulative or interactive way. Using the Connection to Nature Index and the Williams Creativity Scale, this study conducted a three-wave longitudinal survey over two years among 281 third-grade students from three public elementary schools in Shandong Province (140 boys; M_age=11.10±0.02). The results revealed that: (1) Nature connectedness in school-aged children exhibited a linear decline over time, with stable inter-individual differences; (2) The interaction between initial level and the rate of decline in nature connectedness influenced children’s creative tendencies. Specifically, when the nature connectedness declines rapidly, the creative tendency level of children with lower initial level is significantly lower, and the negative impact of the initial level is further amplified. This discovery reveals the key role of natural connection in the formation of school-age children’s creative tendency from a dynamic perspective. The theoretical level provides longitudinal evidence for the theory of developmental contextualisms, and the practical level provides scientific basis for strengthening the curriculum design of nature education in the lower grades of primary schools and slowing down the negative impact of the decline of natural connection on creative tendency.

Key words: creative tendency, interactive effect, school-aged children, nature connectedness

中图分类号:

B844

于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.

YU Xiao, ZHANG Yaxin, QI Yue, CHANG Shangcheng, HE Wenxing, CHEN Yinghe. Nature Connectedness Trajectory and Their Relationship with Creative Tendency in School-age Children: Cumulative or Interactive Effects?[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.

参考文献

Arbuthnott, K. D., & Sutter, G. C. (2019). Songwriting for nature: Increasing nature connection andwell-being through musical creativity. Environmental Education Research,25(9), 1300-1318.
Atakaya, M. A., Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2022). A Study on psychometric properties of creativity indices. Creativity Research Journal,36(2), 348-364.
Atchley, R. A., Strayer, D. L., & Atchley, P. (2012). Creativity in the wild: Improving creative reasoning through immersion in natural settings. PLoS ONE,7(12), e51474. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051474
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chahal, R., Weissman, D. G., Marek, S., Rhoads, S. A., Hipwell, A. E., Forbes, E. E.,… Guyer, A. E. (2020). Girls’ brain structural connectivity in late adolescence relates to history of depression symptoms. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines,61(11), 1224-1233.
Chang, C.-W., Yuan, R., & Chen, J.-K. (2018). Social support and depression among Chinese adolescents: The mediating roles of self-esteem and self-efficacy.Children and Youth Services Review,88, 128-134.
Chen, P.-Z., Chang, T.-C., & Wu, C.-L. (2020). Effects of gamified classroom management on the divergent thinking and creative tendency of elementary students.Thinking Skills and Creativity,36, 100664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100664
Chen, X., Yu, X., Lu, L., Zhang, T., & Yang, Z. (2024). Parental nature orientation and children’s interpersonal relationships and behavioral problems: The mediating role of children’s nature connectedness. Current Psychology,43(15), 13598-13607.
Cheng, J. C., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature.Environment and Behavior,44(1), 31-49.
Dadvand, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Esnaola, M., Forns, J., Basagaña, X., Alvarez-Pedrerol, M.,… Sunyer, J. (2015). Green spaces and cognitive development in primary school children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,112(26), 17937-17942.
Dai, D. Y., & Shen, J. (2008). Cultivating creative potential during adolescence: A developmental and educational perspective.Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving,18(1), 83-92.
Dvilansky, A. S., Zadok, H., Shoshani, A., Samra, N. N., Verbeke, W., Vrticka, P., & Ein-Dor, T. (2025). The long-term associations of childhood parental loss with attachment, creativity, and epigenetic regulation. Scientific Reports,15(1), 4859. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-89467-2
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.(2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods,41(4), 1149-1160.
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology,109(2), 269-299.
García De Jalón, S., Chiabai, A., Mc Tague, A., Artaza, N., De Ayala, A., Quiroga, S., … Taylor, T. (2020). Providing access to urban green spaces: A participatory benefit-cost analysis in Spain. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,17(8), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082818
Gardner, P., & Kuzich, S. (2018). Green writing: The influence of natural spaces on primary students’ poetic writing in the UK and Australia. Cambridge Journal of Education,48(4), 427-443.
Giancola, M., Palmiero, M., & D’Amico, S. (2022). Exploring the interplay between fluid intelligence and creativity: The mediating role of the field-dependent-independent cognitive style. Thinking Skills and Creativity,45, 101047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101047
Gill, D., & Prowse, V. (2024). The creativity premium: Exploring the link between childhood creativity and life outcomes. Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, 2(3), 495-526.
Grimm, K. J., Ram, N., & Estabrook, R. (2017). Growth modeling: Structural equation and multilevel modeling approaches. The Guilford Press.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior,1(1), 3-14.
Harman, H. H. (1976). Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. The Guilford Press.
He, J., Wang, Z., Zhang,Y., Feng, S., Han, J., Quan, H., & Li, C. (2024). The influence of mindful parenting on children’s creative tendencies: The chain mediating effect of parent-child intimacy and connectedness to nature. Behavioral Sciences,14(3), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030223
Hoffmann, J., & Russ, S. (2012). Pretend play, creativity, and emotion regulation in children.Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,6(2), 175-184.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hughes, J., Richardson, M., & Lumber, R. (2018). Evaluating connection to nature and the relationship with conservation behaviour in children. Journal for Nature Conservation,45, 11-19.
Hughes, J., Rogerson, M., Barton, J., & Bragg, R. (2019). Age and connection to nature: When is engagement critical? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,17(5), 265-269.
Johnson, L. E., Parra, L. A., Ugarte, E., Weissman, D. G., Han, S. G., Robins, R. W., & Hastings, P. D. (2021). Patterns of poverty across adolescence predict salivary cortisol stress responses in Mexican-origin youths. Psychoneuroendocrinology,132, 105340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105340
Kang, S., & Park, H.S. (2024). Correlates of creativity and elementary school students’ perceptions of individual and sociocultural factors. European Journal of Psychology of Education,39, 4365-4391.
Kaplan, R. S., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press
Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework.Journal of Environmental Psychology,15, 169-182.
Kong, J., Liu, Y., Goldberg, J., & Almeida, D. M. (2021). Adverse childhood experiences amplify the longitudinal associations of adult daily stress and health.Child Abuse & Neglect,122, 105337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105337
Krettenauer, T., Lefebvre, J. P., & Goddeeris, H. (2024). Pro-environmental behaviour, connectedness with nature, and the endorsement of pro-environmental norms in youth: Longitudinal relations. Journal of Environmental Psychology,94, 102256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102256
Lane, S. T. (2014). Evaluating the interaction of growth factors in the univariate latent curve model (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Leong, L. Y. C., Fischer, R., & McClure, J. (2014). Are nature lovers more innovative? The relationship between connectedness with nature and cognitive styles. Journal of Environmental Psychology,40, 57-63.
Lerner, R.M. (2007). Developmental science, developmental systems, and contemporary theories of human development. American Cancer Society.
Li, Z., & Li, Q. (2025). The impact of family environment, optimism, and empathy on students’ creativity. Personality and Individual Differences,236, 113019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2024.11 3019
Maes, M., Pirani, M., Booth, E. R., Shen, C., Milligan, B., Jones, K., & Toledano, M. (2021). Benefit of woodland and other natural environments for adolescents’ cognition and mental health. Nature Sustainability,4(10), 851-858.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Grayson, D. (2005). Goodness of ft evaluation in structural equation modeling. In A. Maydeu-Olivares & J. McArdle (Eds.), Contemporary Psychometrics. A Festschrift for Roderick P. McDonald (pp. 275-340). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
Maslowsky, J., Jager, J., & Hemken, D. (2015). Estimating and interpreting latent variable interactions: A tutorial for applying the latent moderated structural equations method. International Journal of Behavioral Development,39(1), 87-96.
Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology,24(4), 503-515.
McAnally, H. M., Robertson, L. A., & Hancox, R. J. (2018). Effects of an outdoor education programme on creative thinking and well-being in adolescent boys.New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies,53(2), 241-255.
McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity.Creativity Research Journal,14(3-4), 409-426.
Mochizuki-Kawai, H., Matsuda, I., & Mochizuki, S. (2020). Viewing a flower image provides automatic recovery effects after psychological stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology,70, 101445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101445
Myers, H. F., Wyatt, G. E., Ullman, J. B., Loeb, T. B., Chin, D., Prause, N., … Liu, H. (2015). Cumulative burden of lifetime adversities: Trauma and mental health in low-SES African Americans and Latino/as. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice and Policy,7(3), 243-251.
Nikkola, T., Kangas, J., & Reunamo, J. (2024). Children’s creative participation as a precursor of 21st century skills in Finnish early childhood education and care context. Learning and Individual Differences,111, 102437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102437
Okello, J., De Schryver, M., Musisi, S., Broekaert, E., & Derluyn, I. (2014). Differential roles of childhood adversities and stressful war experiences in the development of mental health symptoms in post-war adolescents in northern Uganda.BMC Psychiatry,14, 260. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0260-5
Pfost, M., Hattie, J., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2014). Individual differences in reading development: A review of 25 years of empirical research on Matthew effects in reading.Review of Educational Research,84(2), 203-244.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist,39(2), 83-96.
Price, E., Maguire, S., Firth, C., Lumber, R., Richardson, M., & Young, R. (2022). Factors associated with nature connectedness in school-aged children.Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology,3, 100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2022.1000 37
Pritchard, A., Richardson, M., Sheffield, D., & McEwan, K. (2020). The relationship between nature connectedness and eudaimonic well-being: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies,21(3), 1145-1167.
Qian, M., Plucker, J. A., & Yang, X. (2019). Is creativity domain specific or domain general? Evidence from multilevel explanatory item response theory models.Thinking Skills and Creativity,33, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100571
Rawlings, B. S., & Cutting, S. J. (2024). Linking disparate strands: A critical review of the relationship between creativity and education.Educational Psychology Review,36(4), 135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09973-z
Reuben, A., Arseneault, L., Belsky, D. W., Caspi, A., Fisher, H. L., Houts, R. M.,… Odgers, C. (2019). Residential neighborhood greenery and children’s cognitive development. Social Science & Medicine,230, 271-279.
Richardson, M., Hunt, A., Hinds, J., Bragg, R., Fido, D., Petronzi, D.,… White, M. (2019). A measure of nature connectedness for children and adults: Validation, performance, and insights. Sustainability,11(12), 3250. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123250
Ruckelshaus, M., McKenzie, E., Tallis, H., Guerry, A., Daily, G., Kareiva,P., … Bernhardt, J. (2015). Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions. Ecological Economics,115, 11-21.
Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., & Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology,24(1), 31-42.
Sorell, G. T., Sorelle-Miner, D. A., & Pause, C. J. (2007). Moving on: The challenges of dynamic systems perspectives. Human Development,50(2-3), 160-164.
Spano, G., Theodorou, A., Reese, G., Carrus, G., Sanesi, G., & Panno, A. (2023). Virtual nature and psychological and psychophysiological outcomes: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology,89, Article 102044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102044
Staal, M. A. (2004). Stress, cognition, and human performance: A literature review and conceptual framework. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Sun, J., Chen, Y., Liu, J., Ying, Z., & Xin, T. (2016). Latent variable selection for multidimensional item response theory models viaL₁ regularization. Psychometrika,81(4), 921-939.
Ulrich, R. S. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.),Human behaviour and environment: Behaviour and the natural environment (v.6, pp. 85-125). Plenum.
Van Dijk-Wesselius, J. E., Maas, J., Hovinga, D., van Vugt, M., & van den Berg, A. E. (2018). The impact of greening schoolyards on the appreciation,and physical, cognitive and social-emotional well-being of schoolchildren: A prospective intervention study. Landscape and Urban Planning,180, 15-26.
Van Rompay, T. J. L., & Jol, T. (2016). Wild and free: Unpredictability and spaciousness as predictors of creative performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology,48, 140-148.
Vrijheid, M. (2014). Theexposome: A new paradigm to study the impact of environment on health. Thorax,69, 876-878.
Webb, M. E., Little, D. R., Cropper, S. J., & Roze, K. (2017). The contributions of convergent thinking, divergent thinking, and schizotypy to solving insight and non-insight problems. Thinking & Reasoning,23(3), 235-258.
Williams, K. J., Lee, K. E., Hartig, T., Sargent, L. D., Williams, N. S., & Johnson, K. A. (2018). Conceptualising creativity benefits of nature experience: Attention restoration and mind wandering as complementary processes. Journal of Environmental Psychology,59, 36-45.
Wood, C., Flynn, M., Law, R., Naufahu, J., & Smyth, N. (2020). The effect of the visual exercise environment on the response to psychological stress: A pilot study.Anxiety, Stress, and Coping,33(6), 716-729.
Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity.The Academy of Management Review,18(2), 293-321.
Zahn-Waxler, C., Shirtcliff, E. A., & Marceau, K. (2008). Disorders of childhood and adolescence: Gender and psychopathology.Annual Review of Clinical Psychology,4, 275-303.
陈子循,白荣,李金文, 徐程睿.(2025). 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用.心理发展与教育,41(6),892-902.
程亚华, 冯瑶, 李宜逊, 马嘉琪, 沈岚岚, 张文建,… 冯秋迪.(2023). 小学儿童口语词汇知识的发展轨迹及其对阅读能力的预测:一个潜变量增长模型.心理学报,55(07),1074-1086.
范燕燕, 章乐. (2018). 儿童的自然缺失症及其教育对策. 教育科学研究, (05), 67-71.
高健, 王小禹, 刘娟. (2021). 母子亲密度与幼儿创造性人格特质的关系: 自然联结与亲社会性的链式中介作用. 学前教育研究, (06), 17-30.
胡俊. (2023). 小学高年级学生父母心理控制与创造力的关系:学习动机的中介作用及其干预(硕士学位论文). 华中师范大学, 武汉.
胡卫平, 韩葵葵. (2015). 青少年科学创造力的理论研究与实践探索. 心理发展与教育,31(1), 44-50.
林崇德. (2024). 探索创新心智规律促进创新人才发展. 教育研究,45 (08), 4-14.
林幸台, 王木荣. (1999). 修订威廉斯创造性思考活动手册. 中国台湾: 心理出版社.
刘红云, 张雷. (2005). 追踪数据分析方法及其应用. 北京: 教育科学出版社.
刘啸莳, 李静雯, 张蕾, 项珵, 吴芸. (2023). 主观社会经济地位与心理幸福感的关系: 创造力的中介和安全感的调节作用. 心理与行为研究,21(01), 138-144.
彭红松, 韩娅, 虞虎, 章锦河, 钟士恩, 候梦娇. (2022). 日常和旅游两种情景的自然接触对儿童亲环境行为意愿的影响差异——兼论自然联结的中介效应. 地理研究,41(02), 358-372.
申继亮, 王鑫, 师保国. (2005). 青少年创造性倾向的结构与发展特征研究.心理发展与教育,21(4), 28-33.
沈科娜, 高海艳, 薛纯. (2025). 自然缺失症背景下自然体验类校本课程的开发与实施. 生物学教学,50(04), 69-71.
舒曾, 贺琼, 李晓敏, 张晶, 张月寒, 方晓义. (2016). 母亲养育压力对幼儿创造性人格的影响:教养方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育,32(3), 276-284.
谭利华, 冯士季. (2024). 教师自主支持与小学生的科学学习无畏: 学习兴趣和创造力效能感的中介作用. 心理发展与教育,40(3), 375-383.
田平, 邢惠子, 夏炜妍, 翟春晓. (2024). 信阳市小学4～6年级儿童心理健康状况与校园欺凌、学业压力的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志,32(03), 455-460.
卫萍, 许成武, 刘燕, 郭缨. (2017). 中小学生心理健康状况的调查分析与教育策略. 教育研究与实验, (02), 91-96.
吴蓓蓓. (2024). 基于自然教育理念的儿童友好城市建设——以温州市鹿城区大南中心城区为例. 城市建筑,21(04), 150-153.
相硕琪, 李亚丹, 叶超群, 杨伟星, 郭习佩, 张玲玲, 胡卫平. (2025). 创造焦虑与日常创造力的关系:认知灵活性和创造性参与过程的链式中介作用. 心理发展与教育,41(1), 32-41.
肖家乐, 申子姣, 李晓燕, 林丹华. (2023). 同伴侵害变化轨迹及其与抑郁情绪和外化问题的关系:共同增强还是风险易感. 心理学报,55(06), 978-993.
谢明珺, 孙佳宁, 肖家乐, 弓鑫钰, 林丹华. (2024). 从累加到类型视角:儿童期逆境对个体神经生理发展的影响. 心理发展与教育,40(5), 737-749.
闫保华. (2017). 城市儿童与自然亲密度调查. 取自https://max.book118.com/html/2017/0620/116898564.shtm
曾子豪, 胡义秋, 彭丽仪, 刘秀茹, 何震, 赵丽莉, 姚星星. (2024). 挫败感对青少年心理健康的影响:压力知觉与人际关系的作用. 心理发展与教育,40(6), 865-876.
张环, 谢忠珖, 王亚丽, 秦锡权, 刘拓. (2024). 学龄中期儿童团体创造力的发展特点及其与个体创造力的关系. 心理发展与教育,40(4), 468-478.
张叶, 陈嘉慧, 任萍, 王泉泉. (2024). 受欺负对青少年自伤行为的影响: 孤独感的中介作用和教师公正的调节作用. 心理发展与教育,40(6), 877-885.
赵力燕, 李董平, 徐小燕, 王艳辉, 孙文强. (2016). 教育价值观和逆境信念在家庭经济压力与初中生学业成就之间的作用. 心理发展与教育,32(4), 409-417.
赵文睿. (2020). 城市儿童户外游戏空间设计评价研究(硕士学位论文). 华中科技大学, 武汉.
朱莉, 彭倩, 陈佩, 郭源源, 赵蕊, 张星铷, … 谢敏. (2024). 乡村儿童自然联结调查研究——三个不同地区、学校的对比分析. 环境教育,30(Z1), 69-73.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	李君, 王悦, 陈夏妮, 李莹. 二语学习对汉语学龄儿童认知控制与词汇通达的作用——年龄和二语熟练程度的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 219-227.
[2]	朱黎君, 杨强, 叶宝娟, 陈智楠, 张丽. 自然联结对大学生抑郁的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 886-893.
[3]	王财玉, 雷雳, 乔雪. 愉悦追求在自我调节疲劳与大学生智能手机成瘾之间的中介作用:自然联结的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 601-608.
[4]	李庆功, 张雯雨, 孙捷元, 马凤玲. 8~12岁儿童同伴信任的发展:特质可信度和面孔可信度的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 38-44.
[5]	李一茗, 黎坚, 伍芳辉. 自然联结的概念、功能与促进[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2018, 34(1): 120-127.
[6]	吴文峰, 卢永彪, 陈世英. 学龄儿童失调态度在应激与抑郁间的作用：一项多波段追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(2): 183-191.
[7]	王艳辉, 张卫, 李董平, 李丹黎, 张晓丽. 青少年的气质与烟酒使用:交互效应检验[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(3): 292-300.
[8]	杜丹, 苏彦捷. 7～11岁儿童失言理解及与母亲教养方式的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(1): 14-20.