儿童、青年与老年人在知觉和高阶元认知监控上的年龄差异

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.02.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 元认知是以监测和控制为核心的动态调节活动。本研究以9岁儿童、年轻人和老年人为研究对象,分别采用选点任务和词对学习任务,在知觉元认知和高阶元认知层次考察元认知监测和控制及其关系随年龄变化的特点。结果显示:(1)儿童的知觉元认知和高阶元认知监控能力大都低于年轻人;(2)老年人的知觉元认知能力与年轻人相似,但高阶元认知能力则低于年轻人;(3)老年人和年轻人一样能够在记忆监测中利用控制线索,而9岁儿童尚未表现出这种能力。本研究从发展的角度,支持了知觉元认知与高阶元认知能力具有领域特殊性的理论假设,并对监测和控制的关系发展进行了讨论。

关键词: 知觉元认知, 高阶元认知, 监测, 控制, 发展

Abstract: Metacognition is a dynamic regulatory activity centered on monitoring and control. The current study examined the characteristics of metacognitive monitoring and control and their relationship with age at two levels: perceptual metacognition and higher-order metacognition, using a point-choice task and a word pair learning task in 9-year-old children, young adults and older adults. The results were as follows: (1) Children’s perceptual and higher-order metacognitive abilities were mostly lower than those of young adults; (2) Older adults had similar perceptual metacognitive abilities to younger adults, but lower higher-order metacognitive abilities than younger adults; (3) Older adults were as capable as younger adults of using control cues in memory monitoring, whereas 9-year-olds had not yet shown this ability. The present study supports the theoretical hypothesis that perceptual metacognition and higher-order metacognition are domain-specific from a developmental perspective. Furthermore, the development of the relationship between monitoring and control is discussed.

Key words: perceptual metacognition, higher-order metacognition, monitoring, control, development

中图分类号:

B844

董肖肖, 刘岩, 胡亚欣. 儿童、青年与老年人在知觉和高阶元认知监控上的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 153-160.

DONG Xiaoxiao, LIU Yan, HU Yaxin. Age Differences in Perceptual Metacognition and Higher-order Metacognition among Children, Youth and Older Adults[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(2): 153-160.

参考文献

Ackerman, R.(2014). The Diminishing Criterion Model for metacognitive regulation of time investment.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143(3), 1349-1368.
Cauvin, S., Moulin, C. J. A., Souchay, C., Kliegel, M.,&Schnitzspahn, K. M.(2019). Prospectivememory predictions in aging:Increased overconfidence in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 45(5), 436-459.
Daniels, K.A., Toth, J.P.,&Hertzog, C.(2009). A role for recollection in the accuracy of judgments of learning.Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 494-450.
Deroy, O., Spence, C.,&Noppeney, U.(2016). Metacognition in multisensory perception.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(10), 736-747.
Do Lam, A. T. A., Axmacher, N., Fell, J., Staresina, B. P., Gauggel, S., Wagner, T.,&Weis, S.(2012). Monitoring the mind:The neurocognitive correlates of metamemory. PLoS One, 7(1), e30009.http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030009
Ebaid, D.,&Crewther, S. G.(2020). Time for a systems biological approach to cognitive aging?A critical review. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 12, 114.http://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2020.00114
Fandakova, Y., Selmeczy, D., Leckey, S., Grimm, K. J., Wendelken, C., Bunge, S. A.,&Ghetti, S.(2017). Changes in ventromedial prefrontal and insular cortex support the development of metamemory from childhood into adolescence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(29), 7582-7587.
Flavell, J. H.(1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911.
Gouravajhala, R., Wahlheim, C. N.,&McDaniel, M. A.(2020). Individual and age differences in block-by-block dynamics of category learning strategies.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(4), 578-593.
Hertzog, C., Sinclair, S. M.,&Dunlosky, J.(2010). Age differences in the monitoring of learning:Cross-sectional evidence of spared resolution across the adult life span. Developmental Psychology, 46(4), 939-948.
Howie, P.,&Roebers, C. M.(2010). Developmental progression in the confidence-accuracy relationship in event recall:Insights provided by a calibration perspective. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(7), 871-893.
Koriat, A.(1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study:A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 126(4), 349-370.
Koriat, A., Ma'ayan, H.,&Nussinson, R.(2006). The intricate relationships betweenmonitoring and control in metacognition:Lessons for the cause-and-effect relation between subjective experience and behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 135(1), 36-69.
Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K.,&Schneider, W.(2009). The memorizing effort heuristic in judgments of learning:A developmental perspective.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102(3), 265-279.
Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Adiv, S., Lockl, K.,&Schneider, W.(2014). The effects of goal-driven and data-driven regulation on metacognitive monitoring during learning:A developmental perspective.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143(1), 386-403.
Koriat, A.,&Bjork, R. A.(2005). Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(2), 187-194.
Liu, Y., Su, Y., Xu, G.,&Pei, M.(2018). When do you know what you know?The emergence of memory monitoring.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 34-48.
McCurdy, L. Y., Maniscalco, B., Metcalfe, J., Liu, K. Y., de Lange, F. P.,&Lau, H.(2013). Anatomical coupling between distinct metacognitive systems for memory and visual perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(5), 1897-1906.
Nelson, T.O.,&Narens, L.(1990). Metamemory:A theoretical framework and new findings. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 26, 125-322.
O'Leary, A. P.,&Sloutsky, V. M.(2019). Components of metacognition can function independently across development. Developmental Psychology, 55(2), 315-328.
Price, J.,&Murray, R. G.(2012). The region of proximal learning heuristic and adult age differences in self-regulated learning.Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 1120-1129.
Redshaw, J., Vandersee, J., Bulley, A.,&Gilbert, S. J.(2018). Development of children's use of external reminders for hard-to-remember intentions.Child Development, 89(6), 2099-2108.
Roebers, C. M.,&Schneider, W.(2005). The strategic regulation of children's memory performance and suggestibility.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91(1), 24-44.
Siegel, A. L. M.,&Castel, A. D.(2019). Age-related differences in metacognition for memory capacity and selectivity.Memory, 27(9), 1236-1249.
Song, C., Kanai, R., Fleming, S. M., Weil, R. S., Schwarzkopf, D. S.,&Rees, G.(2011). Relating inter-individual differences in metacognitive performance on different perceptual tasks. Consciousness&Cognition, 20(4), 1787-1792.
Steiner, M., van Loon, M. H., Bayard, N. S.,&Roebers, C. M.(2020). Development of children's monitoring and control when learning from texts:Effects of age and test format. Metacognition and Learning, 15(1), 3-27.
Thomas, A. K., Bulevich, J. B.,&Dubois, S. J.(2011). Context affects feeling-of-knowing accuracy in younger and older adults.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 96-108.
Thomas, A. K., Lee, M.,&Balota, D. A.(2013). Metacognitive monitoring and dementia:How intrinsic and extrinsic cues influence judgments of learning in people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease.Neuropsychology, 27(4), 452-463.
Tullis, J. G.,&Benjamin, A. S.(2012). Consequences of restudy choices in younger and older learners.Psychonomic Bulletin&Review, 19(4), 743-749.
Von der Linden, N., Löffler, E.,&Schneider, W.(2016). Relation of metacognitive monitoring and control processes across the lifespan. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 7(1),1-16.
邓春婷,刘岩.(2019).元认知的领域特殊性:来自知觉和高阶层次的证据. 心理与行为研究, 17(4), 480-487.
贾宁,代景华.(2012).小学高年级学生的学习判断绝对准确性及预见偏差. 心理发展与教育, 28(1), 54-60.
刘希平,方格.(2005).小学儿童学习时间分配决策水平的发展.心理学报, 37(5), 623-631.
徐楚,黎坚,张厚粲.(2017).基于人脸记忆新任务的元认知监测准确性研究. 心理学探新, 37(2), 131-139.
周楚,刘晓明,张明.(2004).学习困难儿童的元记忆监测与控制特点. 心理学报, 36(1), 65-70.

相关文章 15

[1]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[2]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[3]	张陆, 孙山, 游志麒. 网络成瘾对大学生学业压力的影响：睡眠质量与自我控制的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 279-287.
[4]	林崇德. 需要是教育与发展的动力源[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 1-7.
[5]	陈书玲, 贾会宾, 靳璨, 张欣, 王恩国. 发展性协调障碍儿童视觉通道前注意加工的特点：来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 19-28.
[6]	田惠东, 张玉红, 孙昊翔, 李瑛, 哈尼夏. 师生关系对智力障碍学生同伴交往能力的影响：有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 44-54.
[7]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[8]	彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[9]	姚计海, 蒋雨含, 邹弘晖. 教师教学自主权与教学反思的关系:心理授权和职业承诺的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 842-849.
[10]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[11]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[12]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[13]	熊婕, 范翠英, 魏华, 杨秀娟, 连帅磊. 正念对网络欺负的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 752-760.
[14]	张文新. 欺凌的界定:文化和发展的视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 590-598.
[15]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed