青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国高度重视教育问题，学业被家庭和社会投入了大量的关注，构成了青少年学生时代的主要旋律。学业成绩不仅可以影响青少年的社会性发展，也会被社会性发展所影响。本研究采用交叉滞后设计，通过同伴提名和标准化考试对1283名初中生（M_age=13.43岁，SD=0.65岁，47.7%为女生）进行了为期一年的追踪研究，考察学业成绩和社会性发展（受欢迎程度、攻击行为）之间的相互预测关系。结果表明：（1）T1~T2时间段，学业成绩显著正向预测受欢迎程度；（2）T1~T3时间段，男生学业成绩均显著负向预测随后的攻击行为，但这一关系对于女生而言仅在T1~T2时间段显著，并且在该时间段男生的预测作用强于女生；（3）T1~T2时间段，受欢迎程度显著正向预测学业成绩，但预测强度弱于同时期学业成绩对于受欢迎程度的预测。本研究结果表明，青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度之间存在着复杂的相互作用，并且这一作用随着性别以及时间的变化有所不同。研究结果对于促进青少年个体发展具有重要的意义。

关键词: 青少年, 受欢迎程度, 学业成绩, 攻击行为, 交叉滞后

Abstract: China attaches great importance to the education of teenagers, and their studies have been paid a lot of attention by the family and the society, which has formed the main melody of their life. Academic achievement not only influences social development, but is also influenced by them. The current study aimed to explore the relationship of academic achievement, popularity, and aggressive behavior among 1283 junior high school students (M_age=13.43 years old, SD=0.65 years old, 47.7% were girls). Peer nomination and standardized test were used through the cross-lagged design of one-year longitudinal survey. The results showed that:(1) T1~T2, academic achievement mutually positively predicted popularity; (2) T1~T3, academic achievement negatively predicted later aggressive behavior among boys, but only significant among girls from T1 to T2, and during that time, boys had a stronger predictive effect than girls; (3) T1~T2, there were positive bidirectional relationships between academic achievement and popularity, but the coefficient was smaller when popularity predicted academic achievement. The results of this study revealed that there was a complex interaction between adolescents' academic achievement, popularity and aggressive behavior, and this effect varied with gender and time. The results show important significance for the promotion of individual development of adolescents.

Key words: adolescents, popularity, academic achievement, aggressive behavior, cross-lagged analysis

中图分类号:

B844

任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.

REN Ping, SONG Zijing, MENG Xiaozhe, QIN Xingna, ZHANG Yunyun. The Relationship between Academic Achievement, Popularity and Aggressive Behavior of Adolescents: A Cross-lagged Analysis[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.

参考文献

Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis:Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59-73.
Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2010). Aggression. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 833-863). John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, X., & French, D. C. (2008). Children's social competence in cultural context.Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 591-616.
Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement:Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status.Child Development, 75(1), 147-163.
Cillessen, A. H., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102-105.
Dishion, T. J., Piehler, T. F., & Myers, M. W. (2008). Dynamics and ecology of adolescent peer influence. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.),Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 72-93). The Guilford Press.
Dishion, T. J., Véronneau, M. H., & Myers, M. W. (2010). Cascading peer dynamics underlying the progression from problem behavior to violence in early to late adolescence.Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 603-619.
Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2003). A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence.Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 349-371.
Halonen, A., Aunola, K., Ahonen, T., & Nurmi, J. E. (2006). The role of learning to read in the development of problem behaviour:A cross-lagged longitudinal study.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 517-534.
Hinshaw, S. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence:Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 127-155.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling:Guidelines for determining model fit.Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Juvonen, J., & Cadigan, R. J. (2002). Social Determinants of Public Behavior of Middle SchoolYouth:Perceived Peer Norms and Need to Be Accepted. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and Education:Vol. 2:Academic motivation of adolescents (pp.277-297). Greenwich, CT:Information Age Publishing.
Kiefer, S. M., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Associations of coolness and social goals with aggression and engagement during adolescence.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 52-62.
Li, Y., Wang, M., Wang, C., & Shi, J. (2010). Individualism, collectivism, and Chinese adolescents' aggression:Intracultural variations.Aggressive Behavior:Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 36(3), 187-194.
Li, Y., & Hu, Y. (2018). How to attain a popularity goal? Examining the mediation effects of popularity determinants and behaviors.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(9), 1842-1852.
Li, Y., Xie, H., & Shi, J. (2012). Chinese and American children's perceptions of popularity determinants:Cultural differences and behavioral correlates.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36(6), 420-429.
Lu, T., Li, L., Niu, L., Jin, S., & French, D. C. (2018). Relations between popularity and prosocial behavior in middle school and high school Chinese adolescents.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(2), 175-181.
Masten, A. S., & Powell, L. (2003). A Resilience Framework for Research, Policy, and Practice. In S. Luthar (Ed.),Resilience and vulnerability:Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities(pp.1-26).Cambridge Universing Press.
Meijs, N., Cillessen, A. H., Scholte, R. H., Segers, E., & Spijkerman, R. (2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 62-72.
Metsäpelto, R. L., Pakarinen, E., Kiuru, N., Poikkeus, A. M., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2015). Developmental dynamics between children's externalizing problems, task-avoidant behavior, and academic performance in early school years:A 4-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 246-257.
Mihaly, K. (2009).Do More Friends Mean Better Grades? Student Popularity and Academic Achievement (No. WR-678). RAND Corporation.
Moilanen, K. L., Shaw, D. S., & Maxwell, K. L. (2010). Developmental cascades:Externalizing, internalizing, and academic competence from middle childhood to early adolescence.Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 635-653.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables:User's Guide, Version 7.Los Angeles.
Niu, L., Jin, S., Li, L., & French, D. C. (2016). Popularity and Social Preference in C hinese Adolescents:Associations with Social and Behavioral Adjustment. Social Development, 25(4), 828-845.
Ostrov, J. M., & Godleski, S. A. (2010). Toward an integrated gender-linked model of aggression subtypes in early and middle childhood.Psychological Review, 117(1), 233-242.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity:Two distinct dimensions of peer status.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125-144.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys:Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 142-163.
Phillipson, S., & Phillipson, S. N. (2007). Academic expectations, belief of ability, and involvement by parents as predictors of child achievement:A cross-cultural comparison.Educational Psychology, 27(3), 329-348.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 310-342.
Roisman, G. I., Masten, A. S., Coatsworth, J. D., & Tellegen, A. (2004). Salient and emerging developmental tasks in the transition to adulthood.Child Development, 75(1), 123-133.
Savage, J., Ferguson, C. J., & Flores, L. (2017). The effect of academic achievement on aggression and violent behavior:A meta-analysis.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 91-101.
Savage, J., & Wozniak, K. H. (Eds.).(2016).Thugs and thieves:The differential etiology of violence. Oxford University Press.
Scheff, T. J., & Retzinger, S. M. (2001).Emotions and violence:Shame and rage in destructive conflicts. Americon Journal of Sociology, 98(3),664-666.
Sentse, M., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status:Age-related and gender differences.Social Development, 24(3), 659-677.
Stipek, D., & Miles, S. (2008). Effects of aggression on achievement:Does conflict with the teacher make it worse? Child Development, 79(6), 1721-1735.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015). Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence, 48, 137-151.
Suldo, S. M., Gormley, M. J., DuPaul, G. J., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2014). The impact of school mental health on student and school-level academic outcomes:Current status of the research and future directions.School Mental Health, 6(2), 84-98.
Troop-Gordon, W., Visconti, K. J., & Kuntz, K. J. (2011). Perceived popularity during early adolescence:Links to declining school adjustment among aggressive youth.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 125-151.
van Lier, P. A., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Brendgen, M., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2012). Peer victimization, poor academic achievement, and the link between childhood externalizing and internalizing problems.Child Development, 83(5), 1775-1788.
Wentzel, K. R. (2017).Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation:Theory and application (pp. 586-603). The Guilford Press.
Yao, X. (Ed.).(2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge University Press.
Yang, F., Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2014). Relations between aggression and adjustment in Chinese children:Moderating effects of academic achievement.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(4), 656-669.
刘国雄. (2016). 职校生、普高生的同伴接受性及其与学业成绩的关系. 中国特殊教育,(8), 82-89.
温忠麟, 黄彬彬, 汤丹丹. (2018). 问卷数据建模前传. 心理科学, 41(1), 204-210.
张良. (2018). 青少年早中期学习成绩与内外化症状的动态关系及同伴背景的作用(博士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
张野, 卢笳. (2012). 初中生人际交往能力、学业成绩及其发展背景系统间的关系. 心理科学, 35(02), 391-395.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[8]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[9]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[10]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[11]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[12]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[13]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[14]	纪林芹, 邹小慧, 张露露, 张良. 儿童青少年欺凌行为与冷酷无情、共情的关系:交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 532-541.
[15]	胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.