青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国高度重视教育问题，学业被家庭和社会投入了大量的关注，构成了青少年学生时代的主要旋律。学业成绩不仅可以影响青少年的社会性发展，也会被社会性发展所影响。本研究采用交叉滞后设计，通过同伴提名和标准化考试对1283名初中生（M_age=13.43岁，SD=0.65岁，47.7%为女生）进行了为期一年的追踪研究，考察学业成绩和社会性发展（受欢迎程度、攻击行为）之间的相互预测关系。结果表明：（1）T1~T2时间段，学业成绩显著正向预测受欢迎程度；（2）T1~T3时间段，男生学业成绩均显著负向预测随后的攻击行为，但这一关系对于女生而言仅在T1~T2时间段显著，并且在该时间段男生的预测作用强于女生；（3）T1~T2时间段，受欢迎程度显著正向预测学业成绩，但预测强度弱于同时期学业成绩对于受欢迎程度的预测。本研究结果表明，青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度之间存在着复杂的相互作用，并且这一作用随着性别以及时间的变化有所不同。研究结果对于促进青少年个体发展具有重要的意义。

关键词: 青少年, 受欢迎程度, 学业成绩, 攻击行为, 交叉滞后

Abstract: China attaches great importance to the education of teenagers, and their studies have been paid a lot of attention by the family and the society, which has formed the main melody of their life. Academic achievement not only influences social development, but is also influenced by them. The current study aimed to explore the relationship of academic achievement, popularity, and aggressive behavior among 1283 junior high school students (M_age=13.43 years old, SD=0.65 years old, 47.7% were girls). Peer nomination and standardized test were used through the cross-lagged design of one-year longitudinal survey. The results showed that:(1) T1~T2, academic achievement mutually positively predicted popularity; (2) T1~T3, academic achievement negatively predicted later aggressive behavior among boys, but only significant among girls from T1 to T2, and during that time, boys had a stronger predictive effect than girls; (3) T1~T2, there were positive bidirectional relationships between academic achievement and popularity, but the coefficient was smaller when popularity predicted academic achievement. The results of this study revealed that there was a complex interaction between adolescents' academic achievement, popularity and aggressive behavior, and this effect varied with gender and time. The results show important significance for the promotion of individual development of adolescents.

Key words: adolescents, popularity, academic achievement, aggressive behavior, cross-lagged analysis

中图分类号:

B844

任萍, 宋子婧, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 张云运. 青少年学业成绩、攻击行为与受欢迎程度的关系:一项交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.

REN Ping, SONG Zijing, MENG Xiaozhe, QIN Xingna, ZHANG Yunyun. The Relationship between Academic Achievement, Popularity and Aggressive Behavior of Adolescents: A Cross-lagged Analysis[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 710-718.

参考文献

Berkowitz, L. (1989). Frustration-aggression hypothesis:Examination and reformulation. Psychological Bulletin, 106(1), 59-73.
Bushman, B. J., & Huesmann, L. R. (2010). Aggression. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 833-863). John Wiley & Sons.
Chen, X., & French, D. C. (2008). Children's social competence in cultural context.Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 591-616.
Cillessen, A. H., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement:Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status.Child Development, 75(1), 147-163.
Cillessen, A. H., & Rose, A. J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system.Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 102-105.
Dishion, T. J., Piehler, T. F., & Myers, M. W. (2008). Dynamics and ecology of adolescent peer influence. In M. J. Prinstein & K. A. Dodge (Eds.),Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 72-93). The Guilford Press.
Dishion, T. J., Véronneau, M. H., & Myers, M. W. (2010). Cascading peer dynamics underlying the progression from problem behavior to violence in early to late adolescence.Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 603-619.
Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2003). A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence.Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 349-371.
Halonen, A., Aunola, K., Ahonen, T., & Nurmi, J. E. (2006). The role of learning to read in the development of problem behaviour:A cross-lagged longitudinal study.British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 517-534.
Hinshaw, S. P. (1992). Externalizing behavior problems and academic underachievement in childhood and adolescence:Causal relationships and underlying mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 127-155.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling:Guidelines for determining model fit.Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60.
Juvonen, J., & Cadigan, R. J. (2002). Social Determinants of Public Behavior of Middle SchoolYouth:Perceived Peer Norms and Need to Be Accepted. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and Education:Vol. 2:Academic motivation of adolescents (pp.277-297). Greenwich, CT:Information Age Publishing.
Kiefer, S. M., & Wang, J. H. (2016). Associations of coolness and social goals with aggression and engagement during adolescence.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44, 52-62.
Li, Y., Wang, M., Wang, C., & Shi, J. (2010). Individualism, collectivism, and Chinese adolescents' aggression:Intracultural variations.Aggressive Behavior:Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 36(3), 187-194.
Li, Y., & Hu, Y. (2018). How to attain a popularity goal? Examining the mediation effects of popularity determinants and behaviors.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(9), 1842-1852.
Li, Y., Xie, H., & Shi, J. (2012). Chinese and American children's perceptions of popularity determinants:Cultural differences and behavioral correlates.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 36(6), 420-429.
Lu, T., Li, L., Niu, L., Jin, S., & French, D. C. (2018). Relations between popularity and prosocial behavior in middle school and high school Chinese adolescents.International Journal of Behavioral Development, 42(2), 175-181.
Masten, A. S., & Powell, L. (2003). A Resilience Framework for Research, Policy, and Practice. In S. Luthar (Ed.),Resilience and vulnerability:Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities(pp.1-26).Cambridge Universing Press.
Meijs, N., Cillessen, A. H., Scholte, R. H., Segers, E., & Spijkerman, R. (2010). Social intelligence and academic achievement as predictors of adolescent popularity.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 62-72.
Metsäpelto, R. L., Pakarinen, E., Kiuru, N., Poikkeus, A. M., Lerkkanen, M. K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2015). Developmental dynamics between children's externalizing problems, task-avoidant behavior, and academic performance in early school years:A 4-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(1), 246-257.
Mihaly, K. (2009).Do More Friends Mean Better Grades? Student Popularity and Academic Achievement (No. WR-678). RAND Corporation.
Moilanen, K. L., Shaw, D. S., & Maxwell, K. L. (2010). Developmental cascades:Externalizing, internalizing, and academic competence from middle childhood to early adolescence.Development and Psychopathology, 22(3), 635-653.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus. Statistical analysis with latent variables:User's Guide, Version 7.Los Angeles.
Niu, L., Jin, S., Li, L., & French, D. C. (2016). Popularity and Social Preference in C hinese Adolescents:Associations with Social and Behavioral Adjustment. Social Development, 25(4), 828-845.
Ostrov, J. M., & Godleski, S. A. (2010). Toward an integrated gender-linked model of aggression subtypes in early and middle childhood.Psychological Review, 117(1), 233-242.
Parkhurst, J. T., & Hopmeyer, A. (1998). Sociometric popularity and peer-perceived popularity:Two distinct dimensions of peer status.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(2), 125-144.
Pellegrini, A. D., & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in early adolescent boys:Affiliative and aggressive dimensions and possible functions.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47(1), 142-163.
Phillipson, S., & Phillipson, S. N. (2007). Academic expectations, belief of ability, and involvement by parents as predictors of child achievement:A cross-cultural comparison.Educational Psychology, 27(3), 329-348.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research:A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status.Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 310-342.
Roisman, G. I., Masten, A. S., Coatsworth, J. D., & Tellegen, A. (2004). Salient and emerging developmental tasks in the transition to adulthood.Child Development, 75(1), 123-133.
Savage, J., Ferguson, C. J., & Flores, L. (2017). The effect of academic achievement on aggression and violent behavior:A meta-analysis.Aggression and Violent Behavior, 37, 91-101.
Savage, J., & Wozniak, K. H. (Eds.).(2016).Thugs and thieves:The differential etiology of violence. Oxford University Press.
Scheff, T. J., & Retzinger, S. M. (2001).Emotions and violence:Shame and rage in destructive conflicts. Americon Journal of Sociology, 98(3),664-666.
Sentse, M., Kretschmer, T., & Salmivalli, C. (2015). The longitudinal interplay between bullying, victimization, and social status:Age-related and gender differences.Social Development, 24(3), 659-677.
Stipek, D., & Miles, S. (2008). Effects of aggression on achievement:Does conflict with the teacher make it worse? Child Development, 79(6), 1721-1735.
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2015). Sex differences in academic achievement are not related to political, economic, or social equality. Intelligence, 48, 137-151.
Suldo, S. M., Gormley, M. J., DuPaul, G. J., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2014). The impact of school mental health on student and school-level academic outcomes:Current status of the research and future directions.School Mental Health, 6(2), 84-98.
Troop-Gordon, W., Visconti, K. J., & Kuntz, K. J. (2011). Perceived popularity during early adolescence:Links to declining school adjustment among aggressive youth.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(1), 125-151.
van Lier, P. A., Vitaro, F., Barker, E. D., Brendgen, M., Tremblay, R. E., & Boivin, M. (2012). Peer victimization, poor academic achievement, and the link between childhood externalizing and internalizing problems.Child Development, 83(5), 1775-1788.
Wentzel, K. R. (2017).Peer relationships, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation:Theory and application (pp. 586-603). The Guilford Press.
Yao, X. (Ed.).(2000). An introduction to Confucianism. Cambridge University Press.
Yang, F., Chen, X., & Wang, L. (2014). Relations between aggression and adjustment in Chinese children:Moderating effects of academic achievement.Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 43(4), 656-669.
刘国雄. (2016). 职校生、普高生的同伴接受性及其与学业成绩的关系. 中国特殊教育,(8), 82-89.
温忠麟, 黄彬彬, 汤丹丹. (2018). 问卷数据建模前传. 心理科学, 41(1), 204-210.
张良. (2018). 青少年早中期学习成绩与内外化症状的动态关系及同伴背景的作用(博士学位论文). 山东师范大学, 济南.
张野, 卢笳. (2012). 初中生人际交往能力、学业成绩及其发展背景系统间的关系. 心理科学, 35(02), 391-395.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2]	刘媛, 曹文锦, 王美芳, 权思翔. 父母体罚和青少年攻击行为的双向动态关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 577-585.
[3]	李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[4]	赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[5]	刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[6]	李泱巾, 陆增颜, 郭俊俏, 赵必华. 高年级小学生师生关系、学校归属感与校园受欺凌的关系：一项交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 245-253.
[7]	李蓓蕾, 林彤, 赖梅艳, 车猛, 邓林园. 初中生欺凌、受害与亲社会行为的关系：基于发展级联理论的交叉滞后分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 264-273.
[8]	王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响：自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[9]	李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[10]	向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[11]	边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[12]	杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[13]	鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[14]	王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[15]	郑天鹏, 周欣然, 梁丽婵, 袁柯曼, 边玉芳. 父母温暖教养的亲子感知差异与儿童抑郁和攻击行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 869-880.