心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 230-238.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.02.13

• 心理健康与教育 • 上一篇    下一篇

初中生依恋与主观幸福感:自尊的中介作用

  

  1. 1. 北京师范大学教育学部教育心理与学校咨询研究所, 北京 100875;
    2. 北京市第一六六中学, 北京 100006
  • 出版日期:2015-03-15 发布日期:2015-03-15
  • 通讯作者: 邓林园,E-mail:09036@bnu.edu.cn E-mail:09036@bnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学规划青年基金(CBA130123):父母婚姻冲突对大学生人际冲突的影响及作用机制.

Attachment and Subjective Well-being of Junior Middle School Students: the Mediating Role of Self Esteem

DENG Linyuan, MA Bohui, WU Yongxin   

  1. 1. Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875;
    2. Beijing 166 middle school, Beijing 100006
  • Online:2015-03-15 Published:2015-03-15

摘要: 为了探讨初中生亲子依恋、同伴依恋对其主观幸福感的影响以及集体自尊和个体自尊在两者之间所起的中介作用,本研究采用问卷调查的方法对两所初中学校的857名初一至初三的学生进行了调查.主要结果如下:(1)总体而言,男生的父子依恋水平、集体自尊水平和生活满意度更高,女生的同伴依恋水平和消极情绪更高;(2)男女生表现出不同的年级发展特点,女生在亲子依恋、集体自尊和消极情绪,男生在集体自尊上表现出明显的初二现象;(3)亲子依恋、同伴依恋水平越高,初中生的集体自尊和个体自尊水平越高,其主观幸福感程度也越强;(4)母子依恋、同伴依恋、个体自尊和父子依恋依次显著正向预测初中生的生活满意度,并依次负向预测初中生的消极情绪;同伴依恋、个体自尊、母子依恋和集体自尊依次显著正向预测初中生的积极情绪;(5)亲子、同伴依恋不仅能直接影响初中生的主观幸福感,而且通过两种途径(依恋→集体自尊→主观幸福感;依恋→集体自尊→个体自尊→主观幸福感)间接对其产生影响.

关键词: 初中生, 主观幸福感, 依恋, 自尊

Abstract: This study explored the influence of parental attachment, peer attachment on the junior middle school students' subjective well-being, and the mediating effects of collective self-esteem and self-esteem between them. 857 students from Grade 7 to Grade 9 in two general junior schools participated in the survey. The results reveal that: (1) The developmental trend of girls' mother-child and father-attachment levels were like a U-curve, while Grade 8 is a turning point, boys' father-child and mother-child attachment levels had a downward trend with grade increasing, while Grade 9 was the lowest, with no significant difference between Grade 7 and Grade 8. (2) Boys' collective self-esteem level was significantly higher than girls, with U-curve developmental trend; gender and grade differences in individual self-esteem were not significant. (3) Boys' life satisfaction was significantly higher than girls', and both decreased by grade increasing; sex and grade differences of positive emotions were not significant; girls' negative emotions began to turn from Grade 8, while Grade 7 experienced the least negative emotions, but no significant differences between Grade 8 and Grade 9; boys' negative emotions were not significantly different between grades. (4) parent-child attachment and peer attachment had significantly positive relationship with collective self-esteem and individual self-esteem, as well as subjective well-being. (5)Mother-child attachment, peer attachment, individual self-esteem and father-child attachment predicted junior middle school students' life satisfaction positively, and predicted negative emotions negatively; peer attachment, self-esteem, mother-child attachment and collective self-esteem predicted their positive emotions positively. (6) Parent-child attachment, peer attachment not only could directly influence the subjective well-being of junior middle school students, but also had an indirect effect through two ways (attachment→collective self-esteem→subjective well being; attachment→collective self-esteem→individual self-esteem→subjective well being).

Key words: Junior middle school students, Subjective well-being, Attachment, Self-esteem

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Ainsworth, M. D., & Bowlby, J. (1991). An ethological Approach to Personality Development. American Psychologist, 46: 333-341.
Armsden, C. G., & Greenberg, T. M. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16( 5), 427-454.
Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger. New York: Basic Books, 55-60.
Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York:Basic Books, 27-42.
Cassidy, J., Kirsh, S. J., Scolton, K. L., & Parke, R. D. (1996). Attachment and representations of peer relationships.Developmental Psychology, 32(5), 892-904.
Crocker, J., & Major, B. ( 1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Blaine, B., & Broadnax, S. (1994). Collective self-esteem and psychological well-being among White, Black, and Asian college students. Personality and social psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 503-513.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
Freeman, H., & Brown, B. B. (2001). Primary attachment to parents and peers during adolescence: Differences by attachment style. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 30(6):653-674.
Frijns, T., Keijsers, L., Branje, S., & Meeus, W. (2010). What parents don't know and how it may affect their children: Qualifying the disclosure-adjustment link. Journal of Adolescence, 33(2), 261-270.
Furnham, A, & Cheng, H. (2000). Perceived parental behavior, self-esteem and happiness. Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 35(10), 463-470.
Greenberg, M. T., Sigel M., & Leitch, C. J. (1983). The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peer during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2 (5), 373-386.
Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial Development of the Students' Life Satisfaction Scale. School Psychology International, 12, 231-240.
Lempers, J. D., & Clark-Lempers, D. S. (1992). Young, middle, and late adolescents' comparisons of the functional importance of five significant relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21(1), 53-96.
Nickerson, A. B., & Nagle, R. J. (2004). The influence of parent and peer attachments on life satisfaction in middle childhood and early adolescence. In Quality-of-Life Research on Children and Adolescents (pp. 35-60). Springer Netherlands.
Paterson, J., Pryor, J., & Field, J. (1995). Adolescent attachment to parents and friends in relation to aspects of self-esteem. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24(3), 365-376.
Raja, S., McGee, R., & Stanton, W. (1992). Perceived attachment to parents and peers psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21(4), 471-485.
Seligman, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology. An introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
Simons, K. J., Paternite, C. E., & Shore C. (2001). Quality of parent/adolescent attachment and aggression in young adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(2), 182-203.
邓林园, 方晓义, 伍明明, 张锦涛, 刘勤学. (2013). 家庭环境、亲子依恋与青少年网络成瘾. 心理发展与教育, 29(3), 305-311.
陈文峰, 张建新. (2004). 积极/消极情感量表中文版的结构和效度. 中国心理卫生杂志, 763-765.
丁新华, 王极盛. (2004). 青少年主观幸福感研究述评究.心理科学进展, 12 (1), 59-66.
杜秋霞.(2013).中年人感戴、自尊和主观幸福感的关系. 北京教育学院学报(自然科学版), 8(3), 18-24.
方晓义. (1995). 母亲依恋、父母监控与青少年的吸烟、饮酒行为. 心理发展与教育, 3, 54-58.
郝传慧, 雷雳. (2007). 青少年心理弹性的效用与提升. 中国青年研究, 1, 72-75.
胡芳, 马迎华. (2010). 青少年主观幸福感研究进展. 中国学校卫生, 31(8), 1023-1024.
耿晓伟, 张峰. (2012). 大学生性别角色与主观幸福感的关系: 自尊的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 10(5), 384-388.
金晶. (2012). 初中生依恋、主观幸福感及自尊的关系研究. 湖南师范大学硕士学位论文.
琚晓燕, 刘宣文, 方晓义. (2011). 青少年父母、同伴依恋与社会适应性的关系.心理发展与教育, 27(2), 174-180.
李彩娜, 班兰美, 李红梅. (2010). 大学生孤独感及其与依恋、自尊的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18 (4), 514-516.
林崇德. (2005). 发展心理学. 浙江:浙江教育出版社.
李文华, 王丽萍, 苑杰. (2014). 大学生主观幸福感与家庭亲密度和适应性的关系.中国健康心理学杂志, 22(7), 1067-1069.
沈永江, 张景焕. (2011). 团体心理辅导对初二学生班级环境的影响.中国临床心理学杂志, 19(3), 410-412.
谭千保, 曾苗. (2007). 548名中学生的班级环境和生活满意度. 中国健康心理学杂志, 21(8), 544-547.
王凤姿, 产文良. (2008). 大学生个人自尊、集体自尊与自我和谐水平的关系研究. 中国健康心理学杂志, 16(11), 1224-1226.
王磊. (2008). 自尊的群体关联性及其启示. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), (4), 124-129.
王鑫强, 张大均. (2012). 初中生生活满意度的发展趋势及心理韧性的影响:2年追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 28(1), 91-98.
王玉花. (2010). 有童年期留守经历的大学生成人依恋、社会支持与主观幸福感的关系研究. 心理学探新. 30(2), 71-75.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版). 中国心理卫生杂志社, 142-149.
翁嘉英, 杨国枢, 许燕. (2009). 华人多元自尊的概念分析与量表建构. 中国人的自我:心理学的分析.重庆:重庆大学出版社, 356-398.
向明凯, 段立欣, 吴兰波. (2008). 直击“初二现象”. 中学生, 10, 14-15.
杨海燕, 蔡太生, 何影. (2010). 父母依恋和同伴依恋与高中生行为问题的关系. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(1), 106-110.
杨光艳. (2010). 不同教师群体主观幸福感探析. 和田师范专科学校学报(汉文综合版), 29(3), 47-48.
杨玲, 陆爱桃, 连松州, 张美超. (2013). 听障青少年依恋和生活满意度关系: 自尊的中介作用. 中国特殊教育, (9), 27-32.
尹天子, 黄希庭. (2012). 自尊的神经机制. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 38(2), 62-67.
张魁, 杨楠, 耿耀国. (2012). 青少年同伴依恋、世故性和行为及情绪问题的关系. 赤峰学院学报(自然科学版), 28(3), 147-149.
张力为, 梁展鹏. (2002). 运动员的生活满意感: 个人自尊与集体自尊的贡献.心理学报, 34(2), 160-167.
张林, 徐强. (2007). 自我概念和个体自尊、集体自尊对大学生主观幸福感的影响. 中国临床心理学杂志, 15 (6), 609-611.
张陆. (2007). 中小学教师教育幸福的结构及测量. 华东师范大学硕士学位论文.
张向民, 张静. (2011). 我国青少年学生主观幸福感研究综述——对1995~2011 年间287 篇学术论文的文献综述. 教育研究, 29(20), 32-34.
钟歆, 刘聚红, 陈旭. (2014). 青少年同伴依恋: 基于发展的视角. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1149-1158.
种媛, 杨俊龙, 夏小燕. (2007). 少数民族中学生生活满意度的跨文化研究. 民族教育研究, 18(30), 99-103.
[1] 陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[2] 王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响:择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[3] 秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响:同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[4] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[5] 路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”?高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[6] 唐莹莹, 蔺秀云, 殷锦绣, 何婷, 周少嘉, 曹志涛. 亲子依恋和祖孙依恋的一致与不一致和儿童主观幸福感的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 859-868.
[7] 吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[8] 陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[9] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[10] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[11] 周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[12] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[13] 冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[14] 高玲, 孟文慧, 刘介地, 杨继平, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负行为:自尊和基本共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 439-448.
[15] 楚啸原, 楚子强, 王琦, 吉舒天, 雷雳. 农村初中学生亲子依恋回避与智能手机依赖:社交焦虑的中介作用和家庭经济困难的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 192-199.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!