心理发展与教育 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 471-477.

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

青少年依恋环境的情绪启动和注意恢复功能

池丽萍1, 苏谦2   

  1. 1. 中华女子学院儿童发展与教育学院, 北京 100101;
    2. 北京光明小学, 北京 100061
  • 出版日期:2012-09-15 发布日期:2012-09-15
  • 通讯作者: 池丽萍,E-mail:lipingchi@sina.com E-mail:lipingchi@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目(08JCXLX009)

Function of Affective Priming and Attention Restoration in Environment Adolescents Attaching to

CHI Li-ping1, SU Qian2   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, China Women's University, Beijing 100101;
    2. Guangming Primary School, Beijing 100061
  • Online:2012-09-15 Published:2012-09-15

摘要: 以往研究发现自然环境能激发个体积极情绪,恢复集中注意。当个体对自然环境的依恋程度不同时,环境的情绪启动和注意恢复功能是否存在差异?研究以96名初一学生为被试考察地方依恋对环境的情绪和注意恢复作用是否产生影响。根据被试对某自然环境的依恋水平将其分为高依恋和低依恋组,并在被试参加情绪启动实验(实验1)和集中注意实验(实验2)时将其分为实验组和控制组以考察对环境依恋水平不同的被试观看该环境图片后情绪启动和注意恢复状况是否存在差异。实验1显示低依恋实验组对厌恶的反应时显著短于其他三组;实验2结果表明高依恋实验组被试在观看自然环境图片后在注意后测任务上的反应时显著短于低依恋实验组和控制组。

关键词: 地方依恋, 恢复性, 情绪启动, 注意, 青少年

Abstract: In the field of environmental psychology,some researches focused on the environments where people can recover from stress and mental fatigue.Kaplan and Ulrich developed theories to describe and explain the mechanism of affective priming and attention restoration in those environments.An interesting issue is whether the restoration of affect and attention in some environments are different,when people become to attach to those environments? The present study would examine the impact of place attachment on affective priming and attention restoration.Ninety-six seventh grade students were divided into two groups based on their scores on the Place Attachment Scale.One group named high place attachment group scored higher,and the other named low place attachment group scored lower.The study consisted of two experiments.In the experiment 1,whether environment participants attaching to would elicit rapid positive affection responses was examined.An affective priming paradigm with pictures of environmental scenes and facial expressions as primes and targets,respectively,was employed.In the experiment 2,pretest-posttest design in attention task was used to investigate the impact of place attachment on restore of participants' attention.The results of experiment 1 showed that: (1) after viewing natural scene pictures,participants from low attachment group responded to disgusted faces significantly faster than those from high attachment group and the other two control groups who were assigned to view geometric pictures; (2) there was no difference in response time to happy faces for the participants assigned to view natural scene pictures or geometric pictures.In the experiment 2,the results revealed that,(1) there were no differences on the accuracy and reaction times of pretest between two experiment groups and two control groups; (2) in the posttest of experiment group,participants who high attaching to the natural environment reacted to the target number faster than those who low attaching to the environment.

Key words: place attachment, restoration, affective priming, attention, adolescent

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
[1] Altman,I.,& Low,S.(1992).Human behavior and environments:advances in theory and research.In Place attachment.New York: Plenum Press.
[2] Backlund,E.A.,& Williams,D.R.(2003).A quantitative synthesis of place attachment research: Investigation past experience and place attachment.Proceedings of the 2003 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium,320-325.
[3] Bagoc,C.(2009).Place attachment in a foreign settlement.Journal of Environmental Psychology,29,267-278.
[4] Berto,R.(2005).Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity.Journal of Environmental Psychology,25,249-259.
[5] Fazio,R.H.(2001).On the automatic activation of associated evaluations: An overview.Cognition and Emotion,15,115-141.
[6] Hartig,T.(2001).Guest editor's introduction.Environment and Behavior,33,475-479.
[7] Hartig,T.,Evans,G.W.,Jammer,L.D.,Davis,D.S.,& Garling,T.(2003).Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings.Journal of Environmental Psychology,23,109-123.
[8] Hay,B.(1998).Sense of place in developmental context.Journal of Environmental Psychology,18,5-29.
[9] Hietanen,J.K.,Klemettil,T.,Kettunen,J.E.,& Korpela,K.M.(2007).What is a nice smile like that doing in a place like this? Automatic affective responses to environments influence the recognition of facial expressions.Psychological Research,71,539-552.
[10] Hietanen,J.K.,& Korpela,K.M.(2004).Do both negative and positive environmental scenes elicit rapid processing? Environment and Behavior,36,558-577.
[11] Kaplan,S.(1995).The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework.Journal of Environmental Psychology,15,169-182.
[12] Korpela,K.M.(1992).Adolescents' favorite places and environmental self-regulation.Journal of Environmental Psychology,12,249-258.
[13] Korpela,K.M.,Hartig,T.,Kaiser,F.,& Fuhrer,U.(2001).Restorative experience and self regulation in favorite places.Environment and Behavior,33,572-589.
[14] Korpela,K.M.,Klemettil,T.,& Hietanen,J.K.(2002).Evidence for rapid affective evaluation of environmental scenes.Environment and Behavior,34,634-650.
[15] Mayfield,M.(2011).A place just right: Effects of place attachment on preference for restorative environments.Unpublished Award Winning Psychology Papers,Macalester College.
[16] Morgan,P.(2010).Towards a developmental theory of place attachment.Journal of Environmental Psychology,30(1),11-22.
[17] Scannell,L.,& Gifford,R.(2010).Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework.Journal of Environmental Psychology,30,1-10.
[18] Urich,R.S.(1983).Aesthetic and affective response to natural environment.Human Behavior and Environment: Advances in Theory and Research,6,85-125.
[19] Williams,D.R.,& Vaske,J.J.(2003).The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach.Forest Science,49,831-840.
[20] 白露,马慧,黄宇霞,罗跃嘉.(2005).中国情绪图片系统的编制.中国心理卫生杂志,19,719-722.
[21] 池丽萍.(2011).从"空间"到"地方": 女性青少年依恋的社会微环境研究.首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),1,73-77.
[22] 池丽萍,苏谦.(2011).青少年的地方依恋: 测量工具及应用.中国健康心理学杂志,19(12),1523-1525.
[23] 苏谦,辛自强.(2010).恢复性环境研究: 理论、方法与进展.心理科学进展,18(1),177-184.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 陈书玲, 贾会宾, 靳璨, 张欣, 王恩国. 发展性协调障碍儿童视觉通道前注意加工的特点:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 19-28.
[5] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[6] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[7] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[8] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[9] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[10] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[11] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[12] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[13] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[14] 李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[15] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!