父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.01.12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究基于一般压力理论和冷-热双系统理论,探究父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负之间的关系,以及压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用。采用父母低头行为问卷、抑郁-焦虑-压力量表(DASS-21)中的压力分量表、网络欺负量表对912名青少年进行测查。结果发现:(1)父母低头行为、压力和网络欺负两两之间呈正相关;(2)父母低头行为正向预测网络欺负,压力在父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负之间起中介作用;(3)年龄调节了该中介路径的后半段,相较于高年龄组,压力对网络欺负的影响在低年龄组更大。本研究的结果表明,父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系是一个有调节的中介模型,这对制定青少年网络欺负的预防和干预措施具有重要意义。

关键词: 父母低头行为, 网络欺负, 压力, 年龄, 青少年

Abstract: Based on the General Strain Theory and Hot/Cool System Theory, this study explores the relationship between parents’ phubbing and adolescent cyberbullying, and the mediating effect of stress and the moderating effect of age. A sample of 912 adolescents was surveyed with Parent Phubbing Scale, Stress Scale and Cyberbullying Perpetration Scale. The results indicated that: (1) Parents’ phubbing, stress and cyberbullying were positively correlated with each other; (2) Parents’ phubbing positively predicted cyberbullying, stress mediated the relationship between parents’ phubbing and adolescent cyberbullying; (3) Age moderated the second half of this mediated pathway, with the effect of stress on cyberbullying being greater in the younger age group compared to the older age group. The present findings support the moderated mediation model underlying the relationship between parents’ phubbing and cyberbullying. This also has significant implications for formulating prevention and intervention measures on cyberbullying among adolescents.

Key words: parents’ phubbing, cyberbullying, stress, age, adolescent

中图分类号:

B844

魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.

WEI Hua, DING Huimin, CHEN Wu, HAO Xingfeng, XIONG Jie. The Relationship between Parents’ Phubbing and Adolescents’ Cyberbullying: The Mediating Effects of Stress and the Moderating Effects of Age[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.

参考文献

Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency.Criminology, 30(1), 47-88.
Agnew, R., & White, H. R. (1992). An empirical test of general strain theory.Criminology, 30(4), 475-500.
Bai, Q., Bai, S., Dan, Q., Lei, L., & Wang, P. (2020). Mother phubbing and adolescent academic burnout:The mediating role of mental health and the moderating role of agreeableness and neuroticism.Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 109622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109622
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In Six theories of child development:Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187-249). Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Dollard, J., Miller, N. E., Doob, L. W., Mowrer, O. H., & Sears, R. R. (1939).Frustration and aggression. Yale University Press.
Ellis, P. D. (2010).The essential guide to effect sizes:Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.
Fan, C. Y., Chu, X. W., Zhang, M., & Zhou, Z. K. (2019). Are narcissists more likely to be involved in cyberbullying? Examining the mediating role of self-esteem.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(15), 3127-3150.
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research:Sense and nonsense.Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156-168.
Garaigordobil, M., & Machimbarrena, J. M. (2019). Victimization and perpetration of bullying/cyberbullying:Connections with emotional and behavioral problems and childhood stress.Psychosocial Intervention, 28(2), 67-73.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
Hee, K. Y., & Song, Y. E. (2018). The mediating effect of relational aggression on the relationship between the parental overprotective perceived by adolescents and cyber-bullying. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 18(16), 527-554.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1988).The ecology of stress. Taylor & Francis.
Hobfoll, S. E., Halbesleben, J., Neveu, J.-P., & Westman, M. (2018). Conservation of resources in the organizational context:The reality of resources and their consequences.Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 5, 103-128.
Hong, F., Tarullo, A. R., Mercurio, A. E., Liu, S., Cai, Q., & Malley-Morrison, K. (2018). Childhood maltreatment and perceived stress in young adults:The role of emotion regulation strategies, self-efficacy, and resilience.Child Abuse & Neglect, 86, 136-146.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age:A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth.Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137.
Lam, L. T., & Li, Y. (2013). The validation of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) for adolescents.Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 3-7.
Landoll, R. R., La Greca, A. M., Lai, B. S., Chan, S. F., & Herge, W. M. (2015). Cyber victimization by peers:Prospective associations with adolescent social anxiety and depressive symptoms.Journal of Adolescence, 42, 77-86.
Li, Y., Li, D., Li, X., Zhou, Y., Sun, W., Wang, Y., & Li, J. (2018). Cyber victimization and adolescent depression:The mediating role of psychological insecurity and the moderating role of perceived social support.Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 10-19.
Metcalfe, J., & Mischel, W. (1999). A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification:Dynamics of willpower.Psychological Review, 106(1), 3-19.
Meter, D. J., & Bauman, S. (2018). Moral disengagement about cyberbullying and parental monitoring:Effects on traditional bullying and victimization via cyberbullying involvement.The Journal of Early Adolescence, 38(3), 303-326.
Moreno-Ruiz, D., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & García-Bacete, F. (2019). Parenting styles, cyberaggression, and cybervictimization among adolescents.Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 252-259.
Okumu, M., Kim, Y. K., Sanders, J. E., Makubuya, T., Small, E., & Hong, J. S. (2020). Gender-specific pathways between face-to-face and cyber bullying victimization, depressive symptoms, and academic performance among US adolescents.Child Indicators Research, 13, 2205-2223.
Patchin, J. W., & Hinduja, S. (2011). Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth:A test of general strain theory.Youth & Society, 43(2), 727-751.
Selye, H. (1957). The stress of life. New York:McGraw-Hill Education.
Stockdale, L. A., Coyne, S. M., & Padilla-Walker, L. M. (2018). Parent and child technoference and socioemotional behavioral outcomes:A nationally representative study of 10-to 20-year-old adolescents.Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 219-226.
Tokunaga, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school:A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization.Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287.
Wang, P., Wang, X., & Lei, L. (2019). Gender differences between student-student relationship and cyberbullying perpetration:An evolutionary perspective.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19-20), 9187-9207.
Wang, X., Gao, L., Yang, J., Zhao, F., & Wang, P. (2020). Parental phubbing and adolescents' depressive symptoms:Self-esteem and perceived social support as moderators.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49(2), 427-437.
Wang, X., Wang, W., Qiao, Y., Gao, L., Yang, J., & Wang, P. (2020). Parental phubbing and adolescents' cyberbullying perpetration:A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and online disinhibition.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(7-8),NP5344-NP5366.
Wang, X., Zhao, F., Yang, J., & Lei, L. (2019). School climate and adolescents' cyberbullying perpetration:A moderated mediation model of moral disengagement and friends' moral identity.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(17-18), 9601-9622.
Wei, H., Ding, H., Huang, F., & Zhu, L. (2022). Parents' phubbing and cyberbullying perpetration among adolescents:The mediation of anxiety and the moderation of zhong-yong thinking.International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 20(5), 2609-2622.
Weon, K. H., & Jo, H.-y. (2021). Influence of parents' abuse and neglect on the adolescents' discriminating behavior:The mediating effect of stress, depression and discrimination victim experiences.Forum For Youth Culture, 65, 37-68.
Xie, X., Chen, W., Zhu, X., & He, D. (2019). Parents' phubbing increases adolescents' mobilephone addiction:Roles of parent-child attachment, deviant peers, and gender. Children and Youth Services Review, 105,104426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.104426
Zhang, S., Zhang, Y., & Yuan, B. (2019). Mediating effect of self-esteem and empathy on the relationship between loneliness and cyber-bulling in middle and high school students in Liaoning Province. Journal of Hygiene Research, 48(3), 446-457.
柴唤友, 陈春宇, 段长英, 朱彩凤, 孙晓军. (2019). 网络亲子沟通与青少年抑郁的关系:线上社会资本的中介作用及其年龄差异. 心理发展与教育, 35(1), 112-120.
褚晓伟, 周宗奎, 范翠英. (2020). 同伴拒绝与网络欺负的关系:愤怒的中介作用和感知匿名性的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(5), 584-593.
丁倩, 孔令龙, 张永欣, 周宗奎, 胡伟. (2018). 父母"低头族"与初中生手机成瘾的交叉滞后分析. 中国临床心理学杂志, 26(5), 952-955.
段锦云, 杨静, 朱月龙. (2020). 资源保存理论:内容、理论比较及研究展望. 心理研究, 13(1), 49-57.
龚栩, 谢熹瑶, 徐蕊, 罗跃嘉. (2010). 抑郁-焦虑-压力量表简体中文版(DASS-21)在中国大学生中的测试报告. 中国临床心理学杂志, 18(4), 443-446.
何丹, 范翠英, 牛更枫, 连帅磊, 陈武. (2016). 父母教养方式与青少年网络欺负:隐性自恋的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(1), 41-44+48.
胡阳, 范翠英, 张凤娟, 周然. (2013). 初中生不同网络欺负角色行为的特点及与抑郁的关系. 中国心理卫生杂志, 27(12), 913-917.
赖燕群, 杨琪, 牛更枫, 黄宝珍, 王瑞乐. (2020). 家庭功能与青少年欺负和受欺负的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用. 心理技术与应用, 8(3), 164-171.
王素华, 陈杰, 李新影. (2013). 交往不良同伴对青少年自身问题行为的影响:性别和年龄的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(2), 281-284.
王玉龙, 张曼琪, 谭甘露, 林帆. (2020). 青少年网络受欺负与自伤的关系:友谊质量与反刍思维的调节作用. 心理科学, 43(2), 363-370.
张红英, 李新影, 王宇宸. (2016). 积极心理品质对青少年抑郁症状的影响及性别和年龄的调节作用研究. 中国全科医学, 19(1), 115-118+122.
张利萍. (2019). 13-22岁青少年压力应对及社会支持调查研究. 教育现代化, 6(83), 309-311+320.
张维娜. (2019). 压力知觉对大学生网络欺负行为的影响:自我控制的调节作用. 见第十二次全国心理卫生学术大会论文汇编(pp.5-11). 中国心理卫生协会.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	郭筱琳, 李珮瑜, 张艺凡, 罗良. 成就预测思维:青少年学业表现与成长型思维的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 536-543.
[2]	李璇, 马淑风. 合作推理对青少年同伴关系发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 315-325.
[3]	王林欣, 林靓, 寇彧. 中国民众捐赠行为的变迁:基于年龄-时期-世代效应分析(2010—2022)[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 358-369.
[4]	赵泰格, 盛靓, 高君杰, 辛素飞. 父母情感温暖与青少年亲社会行为倾向的纵向关系:上行社会比较的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 437-446.
[5]	刘洋, 闫哲, 常淑敏. 家庭社会经济地位对青少年早期社会能力发展的影响:一般自我概念的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 447-456.
[6]	王曼璐, 王智, 邵景进. 童年期忽视对青少年中期经历关系侵害的影响：自尊的纵向中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 274-284.
[7]	李丹, 陈佳宇, 刘思格, 吴德华, 尹华站. 青少年特质感恩与主观幸福感:生命意义的纵向解释作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 28-38.
[8]	向燕辉, 马丽平, 胡芸绮, 李晓军. 青少年心理适应与内外攻击的关联:基于追踪和周记法的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 85-97.
[9]	边昊天, 庄瑞雪, 王嘉宝, 边玉芳, 梁丽婵. 养育倦怠与青少年网络游戏成瘾:基本心理需要满足、意志控制及性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 110-120.
[10]	杨淑芸, 李紫涵, 任萍. 欺凌受害对早期青少年自伤的影响:孤独感与情绪调节策略的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 121-130.
[11]	鲍振宙, 杨凌青, 储怡佳, 于明申, 徐梓唯. 青少年亲欺凌旁观行为的发展轨迹:界定亚群组及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 131-141.
[12]	王玉龙, 王丹云, 蔺秀云. 早期青少年自伤与自杀意念的关系:亲子沟通的纵向调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 142-152.
[13]	陈子循, 白荣, 李金文, 徐程睿. 父母冲突与青少年手机成瘾的纵向关系:冲动性和朋友支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 892-902.
[14]	汤佳怡, 付成妤, 徐慰. 青少年家庭功能对抑郁和社交焦虑的影响:公正世界信念的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 701-709.
[15]	张凤, 黄四林, 梅刻寒, 张嘉恬, 邓祎祎. 脱贫地区乡村青少年社会流动信念与其学业坚持性:学业应对策略的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 510-517.