类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.06.17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，研究者利用眼动技术具有高时间精度的优势，探明不同年龄群体完成类比推理过程的眼动模式特点并得出其在进行类比推理时所使用的策略。基于类比推理的眼动研究发现了三种典型的类比推理策略——项目优先策略、结构匹配策略和语义限制策略。成人更多表现为项目优先策略，儿童更多表现为语义限制策略。未来研究可以优化类比推理眼动指标，尤其是全局扫视路径的计算方法，并重点关注特殊群体的类比推理眼动模式以及关注类比推理策略与其他认知能力的交互作用。

关键词: 类比推理, 眼动, 儿童, 类比推理策略

Abstract: As the "core of cognition", analogical reasoning refers the process of generating inferences based on relational correspondences between two domains. In the recent years, researchers have begun to explore analogical reasoning using eye-movement technology. An advantage of using eye tracking on analogical reasoning is that it provides a real-time metric of the strategies that individual is engaging in while solving the task. By analyzing the order and amount of time that individual spend fixating on the various items in the analogy problem,researchers can gain insight that how individual is integrating information over the course of a trial before arriving at a solution. Recent studies have found three analogical strategies based on eye movement pattern.-project-first strategy, structure-mapping strategy and semantic-constrain strategy. Previous results showed that adults used more project-first strategy, while children used more semantic-constraint strategy. Future study can optimize the eye movement on analogy, especially the global saccade path. Furthermore, study would also focus special group's eye pattern on analogical reasoning and its relationship with behavior prediction.

Key words: analogical reasoning, eye movement, children, analogical reasoning strategy

中图分类号:

B844

于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.

YU Xiao, ZHANG Han, CHEN Yinghe, QI Yue, LIU Aifang, LIU Lili. Eye Movement Research of Analogical Reasoning: An Effective Way to Reveal the Developing Analogical Reasoning Strategies[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.

参考文献

Andrews, G., & Bohadana, G. R. (2017). Does solving distant analogies facilitate relational integration? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 1-11.
Chiu, S., & Alexander, P. A. (2014). Young children's analogical reasoning:The role of immediate feedback.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(5), 417-428.
Cho, S., Holyoak, K. J., & Cannon, T. D. (2007). Analogical reasoning in working memory:Resources shared among relational integration, interference resolution, and maintenance.Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 1445-1455.
Chuderska, A., & Chuderski, A. (2014). Two facets of cognitive control in analogical mapping:The role of semantic interference resolution and goal-driven structure selection.Thinking & Reasoning, 20(3), 352-371.
French, R. M., Glady, Y., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2016). An evaluation of scanpath-comparison and machine-learning classification algorithms used to study the dynamics of analogy making. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1291-1302.
French, R. M., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2014). Using eye-tracking to predict children's success or failure on analogy tasks. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B.Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual meeting of the cognitive science society Austin. TX:Cognitive Science Society.
Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping:The relational shift.Child Development, 59(1), 47-59.
Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping children's learning:Analogical processes and symbol systems.Cognitive Science, 34, 752-775.
Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules.Cognition, 65(2), 263-297.
Glady, Y., French, R., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2014). Adults' eye tracking search profiles and analogy difficulty. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Meeting(pp.535-540). Austin, TX
Gordon, P. C., & Moser, S. (2007). Insight into analogies:Evidence from eye movements.Visual Cognition, 15(1), 20-35.
Hofstadter, D. R. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition.The analogical mind:Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 499-538). Cambridge:MIT Press.
Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp.234-259). New-York:Oxford University Press.
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure:A theory of analogical access and mapping.Psychological Review, 104(3), 427-466.
Jarodzka, H., Holmqvist, K., & Nyström, M. (2010). A vector-based, multidimensional scanpath similarity measure.In C. Morimoto, & H. Instance(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications ETRA'10(pp. 211-218). New York, NY:ACM.
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance:Can one construct predict them all.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 148-161.
Leech, R., Mareschal, D., & Cooper, R. (2008). Analogy as relational priming:A developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 357-414.
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similaritycomparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467.
Rattermann, M. J., & Gentner, D. (1998). More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy:Children's performance on a causal-mapping task.Cognitive Development, 13(4), 453-478.
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye movements and cognitive psychology:On-line computer approaches to studying visual information processing.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 11(2), 164-171.
Richland, L. E., & Burchinal, M. R. (2013). Early executive function predicts reasoning development.Psychological Science, 24(1), 87-92.
Richland, L. E., & Mcdonough, I. M. (2010). Learning by analogy:Discriminating between potential analogs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 28-43.
Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning:Insights from scene analogy problems.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(3), 249-273.
Simms, N. K., Frausel, R. R., & Richland, L. E. (2018). Working memory predicts children's analogical reasoning.Journal of Experiment Child Psychology, 166, 160-177.
Starr, A., Vendetti, M. S., & Bunge, S. A. (2018). Eye movements provide insight into individual differences in children's analogical reasoning strategies.Acta Psychologica, 186, 18-26.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4), 353-378.
Tan, E., Wu, X., Nishida, T., Huang, D., Chen, Z., & Yi, L. (2018).Analogical reasoning in children with autism spectrum disorder:Evidence from an eye-tracking approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 847.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00847
Thibaut, J.-P, & French, R. M. (2016).Analogical reasoning, control and executive functions:A developmental investigation with eye-tracking. Cognitive Development, 38, 10-26.
Thibaut, J.-P., French, R. M., Missault, A., Gérard, Y., & Glady, Y. (2011). In the Eyes of the Beholder:What Eye-Tracking Reveals About Analogy-Making Strategies in Children and Adults. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, 453-458.
Vendetti, M. S., Starr, A., Johnson, E. L., Modavi, K., & Bunge, S. A. (2017). Eye movements reveal optimal strategies for analogical reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 932. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00932
Vendetti, M. S., Wu, A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2014). Far-out thinking:Generating solutions to distant analogies promotes relational thinking. Psychological Science, 25(4), 928-933.
Whitaker, K. J., Vendetti, M. S., Wendelken, C., & Bunge, S. A. (2017).Neuroscientific insights into the development of analogical reasoning. Developmental Science, 21(2), Article e12531.http://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12531
Yannick, G., French, R. M., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2017). Children's failure in analogical reasoning tasks:A problem of focus of attention and information integration? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 707.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg,2017.00707
Zheng, R. Z., Yang, W., Garcia, D., & Mccadden, E. P. (2008). Effects of multimedia and schema induced analogical reasoning on science learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 474-482.
陈逸群,于晓,陈英和,党茜茜,韩敏,侯江文. (2020). 儿童类比推理的影响因素及干预促进. 心理科学, 43(2), 386-392.
李红, 冯廷勇. (2002). 4~5岁儿童单双维类比推理能力的发展水平和特点. 心理学报, 34(4), 395-399
马晓清, 冯廷勇, 李宇, 李红. (2008). 从知觉分心任务看儿童类比推理能力的发展. 心理学报, 40(9), 987-993.
汪夏, 陈向阳. (2012). 大学生工作记忆容量对图形推理影响的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 10(1), 18-24.
张莉, 辛自强, 古丽扎伯克力. (2010). 5~9岁儿童在不同复杂性任务上类比推理的发展特点. 心理发展与教育, 26(6), 584-591.

相关文章 15

[1]	王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2]	于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3]	陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[4]	吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[5]	舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[6]	韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[7]	范兴华, 靳嘉宁, 燕利飞, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪. 留守困境对初中儿童个人成长主动性发展的影响:社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 427-436.
[8]	张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[9]	袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点：基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[10]	谢宇, 贺荟中, 王磊, 戴惟熙. 孤独症儿童与典型发展儿童内隐学习物品情景线索的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 761-769.
[11]	范兴华, 燕利飞, 靳嘉宁, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪, 余思. 父母关爱对4~6年级留守儿童幸福感发展的影响:积极诠释生活的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
[12]	刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[13]	王宇轩, 刘梦连, 杨滢晖, 毕鸿燕. 学龄儿童与成人形音整合的比较研究:字形与字音的相互影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 457-464.
[14]	王彦姣, 黄家桢, 龙嘉, 王沛. 领域一般和领域特殊能力与计算障碍的内在联系及其启示——基于元分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 473-481.
[15]	冯娜, 梁峰, 王芬, 何春丽, 张慧. 基本情绪与道德情绪对不同年龄群体道德判断的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 491-499.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed