类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.06.17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，研究者利用眼动技术具有高时间精度的优势，探明不同年龄群体完成类比推理过程的眼动模式特点并得出其在进行类比推理时所使用的策略。基于类比推理的眼动研究发现了三种典型的类比推理策略——项目优先策略、结构匹配策略和语义限制策略。成人更多表现为项目优先策略，儿童更多表现为语义限制策略。未来研究可以优化类比推理眼动指标，尤其是全局扫视路径的计算方法，并重点关注特殊群体的类比推理眼动模式以及关注类比推理策略与其他认知能力的交互作用。

关键词: 类比推理, 眼动, 儿童, 类比推理策略

Abstract: As the "core of cognition", analogical reasoning refers the process of generating inferences based on relational correspondences between two domains. In the recent years, researchers have begun to explore analogical reasoning using eye-movement technology. An advantage of using eye tracking on analogical reasoning is that it provides a real-time metric of the strategies that individual is engaging in while solving the task. By analyzing the order and amount of time that individual spend fixating on the various items in the analogy problem,researchers can gain insight that how individual is integrating information over the course of a trial before arriving at a solution. Recent studies have found three analogical strategies based on eye movement pattern.-project-first strategy, structure-mapping strategy and semantic-constrain strategy. Previous results showed that adults used more project-first strategy, while children used more semantic-constraint strategy. Future study can optimize the eye movement on analogy, especially the global saccade path. Furthermore, study would also focus special group's eye pattern on analogical reasoning and its relationship with behavior prediction.

Key words: analogical reasoning, eye movement, children, analogical reasoning strategy

中图分类号:

B844

于晓, 张涵, 陈英和, 戚玥, 刘爱芳, 刘丽丽. 类比推理的眼动研究:揭示个体类比推理策略发展的有效手段[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.

YU Xiao, ZHANG Han, CHEN Yinghe, QI Yue, LIU Aifang, LIU Lili. Eye Movement Research of Analogical Reasoning: An Effective Way to Reveal the Developing Analogical Reasoning Strategies[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(6): 897-903.

参考文献

Andrews, G., & Bohadana, G. R. (2017). Does solving distant analogies facilitate relational integration? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 1-11.
Chiu, S., & Alexander, P. A. (2014). Young children's analogical reasoning:The role of immediate feedback.Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 32(5), 417-428.
Cho, S., Holyoak, K. J., & Cannon, T. D. (2007). Analogical reasoning in working memory:Resources shared among relational integration, interference resolution, and maintenance.Memory & Cognition, 35(6), 1445-1455.
Chuderska, A., & Chuderski, A. (2014). Two facets of cognitive control in analogical mapping:The role of semantic interference resolution and goal-driven structure selection.Thinking & Reasoning, 20(3), 352-371.
French, R. M., Glady, Y., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2016). An evaluation of scanpath-comparison and machine-learning classification algorithms used to study the dynamics of analogy making. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1291-1302.
French, R. M., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2014). Using eye-tracking to predict children's success or failure on analogy tasks. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B.Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual meeting of the cognitive science society Austin. TX:Cognitive Science Society.
Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping:The relational shift.Child Development, 59(1), 47-59.
Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping children's learning:Analogical processes and symbol systems.Cognitive Science, 34, 752-775.
Gentner, D., & Medina, J. (1998). Similarity and the development of rules.Cognition, 65(2), 263-297.
Glady, Y., French, R., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2014). Adults' eye tracking search profiles and analogy difficulty. Proceedings of the Thirty-Sixth Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Meeting(pp.535-540). Austin, TX
Gordon, P. C., & Moser, S. (2007). Insight into analogies:Evidence from eye movements.Visual Cognition, 15(1), 20-35.
Hofstadter, D. R. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition.The analogical mind:Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 499-538). Cambridge:MIT Press.
Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak, & R. G. Morrison (Eds.),The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp.234-259). New-York:Oxford University Press.
Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure:A theory of analogical access and mapping.Psychological Review, 104(3), 427-466.
Jarodzka, H., Holmqvist, K., & Nyström, M. (2010). A vector-based, multidimensional scanpath similarity measure.In C. Morimoto, & H. Instance(Eds.), Proceedings of the 2010 Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications ETRA'10(pp. 211-218). New York, NY:ACM.
Kuncel, N. R., Hezlett, S. A., & Ones, D. S. (2004). Academic performance, career potential, creativity, and job performance:Can one construct predict them all.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(1), 148-161.
Leech, R., Mareschal, D., & Cooper, R. (2008). Analogy as relational priming:A developmental and computational perspective on the origins of a complex cognitive skill. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 357-414.
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (1993). Structural alignment during similaritycomparisons. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 431-467.
Rattermann, M. J., & Gentner, D. (1998). More evidence for a relational shift in the development of analogy:Children's performance on a causal-mapping task.Cognitive Development, 13(4), 453-478.
Rayner, K. (1979). Eye movements and cognitive psychology:On-line computer approaches to studying visual information processing.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 11(2), 164-171.
Richland, L. E., & Burchinal, M. R. (2013). Early executive function predicts reasoning development.Psychological Science, 24(1), 87-92.
Richland, L. E., & Mcdonough, I. M. (2010). Learning by analogy:Discriminating between potential analogs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(1), 28-43.
Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning:Insights from scene analogy problems.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(3), 249-273.
Simms, N. K., Frausel, R. R., & Richland, L. E. (2018). Working memory predicts children's analogical reasoning.Journal of Experiment Child Psychology, 166, 160-177.
Starr, A., Vendetti, M. S., & Bunge, S. A. (2018). Eye movements provide insight into individual differences in children's analogical reasoning strategies.Acta Psychologica, 186, 18-26.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977). Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4), 353-378.
Tan, E., Wu, X., Nishida, T., Huang, D., Chen, Z., & Yi, L. (2018).Analogical reasoning in children with autism spectrum disorder:Evidence from an eye-tracking approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 847.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00847
Thibaut, J.-P, & French, R. M. (2016).Analogical reasoning, control and executive functions:A developmental investigation with eye-tracking. Cognitive Development, 38, 10-26.
Thibaut, J.-P., French, R. M., Missault, A., Gérard, Y., & Glady, Y. (2011). In the Eyes of the Beholder:What Eye-Tracking Reveals About Analogy-Making Strategies in Children and Adults. Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, 453-458.
Vendetti, M. S., Starr, A., Johnson, E. L., Modavi, K., & Bunge, S. A. (2017). Eye movements reveal optimal strategies for analogical reasoning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 932. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00932
Vendetti, M. S., Wu, A., & Holyoak, K. J. (2014). Far-out thinking:Generating solutions to distant analogies promotes relational thinking. Psychological Science, 25(4), 928-933.
Whitaker, K. J., Vendetti, M. S., Wendelken, C., & Bunge, S. A. (2017).Neuroscientific insights into the development of analogical reasoning. Developmental Science, 21(2), Article e12531.http://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12531
Yannick, G., French, R. M., & Thibaut, J.-P. (2017). Children's failure in analogical reasoning tasks:A problem of focus of attention and information integration? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 707.http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg,2017.00707
Zheng, R. Z., Yang, W., Garcia, D., & Mccadden, E. P. (2008). Effects of multimedia and schema induced analogical reasoning on science learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 474-482.
陈逸群,于晓,陈英和,党茜茜,韩敏,侯江文. (2020). 儿童类比推理的影响因素及干预促进. 心理科学, 43(2), 386-392.
李红, 冯廷勇. (2002). 4~5岁儿童单双维类比推理能力的发展水平和特点. 心理学报, 34(4), 395-399
马晓清, 冯廷勇, 李宇, 李红. (2008). 从知觉分心任务看儿童类比推理能力的发展. 心理学报, 40(9), 987-993.
汪夏, 陈向阳. (2012). 大学生工作记忆容量对图形推理影响的眼动研究. 心理与行为研究, 10(1), 18-24.
张莉, 辛自强, 古丽扎伯克力. (2010). 5~9岁儿童在不同复杂性任务上类比推理的发展特点. 心理发展与教育, 26(6), 584-591.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为：心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3]	梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4]	史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5]	冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[6]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[7]	彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[8]	朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[9]	王敬欣, 赵赛男, 徐倩倩. 字间空格与词频对青年人和老年人阅读的影响:眼动研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 781-787.
[10]	颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[11]	高子惠, 焦雨, 王曦, 刘肖岑. 电子绘本文字的动静态呈现方式对幼儿阅读体验和学习效果的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 817-824.
[12]	任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
[13]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[14]	银小兰, 周路军, 朱翠英. 学校环境对农村留守儿童亲社会行为的影响:心理资本与生活满意度的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 497-504.
[15]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed