儿童欺负/受欺负与同伴网络的关系：p*模型分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 从四所小学的10个班中挑选出高欺负-受欺负班和低欺负-受欺负班，使用p^*模型分析班内朋友关系的网络结构特点及其与欺负、受欺负的关系。结果发现：（1）低欺负-受欺负班级中的同伴关系网络倾向于形成开放性朋友关系结构，如边、2-星、3-星、4-星结构；高欺负-受欺负班级中的同伴关系网络倾向于形成闭合性朋友关系结构，如三角形、孤立者结构；（2）高、低欺负-受欺负班级中，欺负者均处于同伴关系网络的边缘化位置，且所处的关系结构位置与自身欺负水平的关联不显著；（3）受欺负者所处的关系结构位置与自身受欺负水平的关联也不显著，但是在低欺负-受欺负班中，受欺负者倾向处于同伴关系网络的边缘化位置，而高欺负-受欺负班中，部分受欺负者处于边缘化位置，部分受欺负者处于闭合性关系结构的核心位置。

关键词: 欺负, 受欺负, 同伴网络, 关系结构, p^*模型

Abstract: The development of statistical method and software based on relational data provided the necessary condition for research on the relationship between bullying/victimization and peer network. In this paper, one high bullying/victimization class and one low bullying/victimization class were selected from 10 classes among four primary schools, and p^* model was used. The results showed that the peer network of low bullying/victimization class tended to include more open peer relational structures, such as 2-star, 3-star and 4-star; however, the peer network of high bullying/victimization class tended to include much more close peer relational structures, such as triangle and isolate. For bullies, they were all in marginalized position, and there was no significant relation between bullying behavior and position in peer relational structures. For victims, there was also no significant relation between victimization experience and position in peer relational structure, however, the victims in low bullying/victimization class were all in marginalized position, and part of victims in high bullying/victimization class were in central position of close peer relational structures as part of victims in marginalized position.

Key words: bullying, victimization, peer network, relational structure, p^* model

中图分类号:

B844.1

陈光辉. 儿童欺负/受欺负与同伴网络的关系：p^*模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 474-481.

CHEN Guang-hui. The Relationship between Bullying/victimization and Peer Network among Children：based on p^* Model[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2014, 30(5): 474-481.

参考文献

Barhight, L. R., Hubbard, J. A., & Hyde, C. T. (2013). Children's physiological and emotional reactions to witnessing bullying predict bystander intervention. Child Development, 84(1), 375-390.
Bellmore, A. D., Witkow, M. R., Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2004). Beyond the individual: The impact of ethnic context and classroom behavioral norms on victims' adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 40(6), 1159-1172.
Björkqvist, K., Ekman, K., & Lagerspetz, K. (1982). Bullies and victims: Their ego picture, ideal ego picture and normative ego picture. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 23, 307-313.
Bollmer, J. M., Milich, R., Harris, J. J., & Maras, M. A. (2005). A friend in need: The role of friendship quality as a protective factor in peer victimization and bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 701-712.
Cillessen, A. H. N. (2007). New perspectives on social networks in the study of peer relations. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 118, 91-100.
Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Griesler, P. C. (1994). Peer adaptation in the development of antisocial behavior: A confluence model. In L. R. Huesmann(Eds.). Aggressive behavior: Current perspectives (pp.61-95), New York: Plenum Press.
Espelage, D. L., Green Jr, H. D., & Wasserman, S. (2007). Statistical analysis of friendship patterns and bullying behaviors among youth. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 118, 61-75.
Fox, C. L., & Boulton, M. J. (2005). The social skills problems of victims of bullying: Self, peer and teacher perceptions. The British Psychological Society, 75, 313-328.
Harris, J. R. (1995). Where is the child's environment? A group socialization theory of development. Psychological Review, 102, 458-489.
Huitsing, G., & Veenstra, R. (2012). Bullying in classrooms: Participant roles from a social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 494-509.
Kendrick, K., Jutengren, G., & Stattin, H. (2012). The protective role of supportive friends against bullying perpetration and victimization. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1069-1080.
Lubbers, M. J., & Snijders, T. A. B. (2007). A comparison of various approaches to the exponential random graph model: A reanalysis of 102 student networks in school classes. Social network, 29, 489-507.
Monahan, K. C., Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2009). Affiliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 45(6), 1520-1530.
Quzienko, V., Guo, Y., & Obradovic, Z. (2011). A decoupled exponential random graph model for prediction of structure and attributes in temporal social networks. Statistical Analysis & Data Mining, 4(5), 470-486.
Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. (2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p^*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29(2), 173-191.
Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., sterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.
Schaefer, D. R., Simpkins, S. D., Vest, A. E., & Price, C. D. (2011). The contribution of extracurricular activities to adolescent friendships: New insights through social network analysis. Development Psychology, 47(4), 1141-1152.
Skrzypiec, G., Slee, P. T., Askell-Williams, H., & Lawson, M. J. (2012). Associations between types of involvement in bullying, friendships and mental health status. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 259-272.
Thomas, S. L. (2000). Ties that bind: A social network approach to understanding students integration and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 591-615.
Urberg, K., Degirmencioglu, S. Tolson, J., & Halliday-Scher, K. (1994). 青少年同伴关系网络结构的研究. 心理发展与教育, 2, 1-7.
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81(2), 480-486.
Wang, P., Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (2006). Pnet: A program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph models. Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
Wang, P., Robins, G., & Pattison, P. (2009). PNET: Program for the simulation and estimation of exponential random graph (p^*) models. 网址:http://www.sna.unimelb.edu.au/pnet/pnet.html.
Wasserman, S., & Fsust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Wasserman, S., & Robins, G. L. (2005). An introduction to random graphs, dependence graphs, and p^*. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp.148-161). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Westaby, J. D., Pfaff, D. L., & Redding, N. (2014). Psychology and social networks: A dynamic network theory perspective. American Psychologist, 69(3), 269-284.
Wong, D. S. W., Lok, D. P. P., Lo, T. W., & Ma, S. K. (2008). School bullying among Hong Kong Chinese primary schoolchildren. Youth & Society, 40(1), 35-54.
陈光辉. (2010). 中小学生欺负/受欺负的本土化内涵、基本特点及其与同伴背景的关系. 山东师范大学博士学位论文.
纪林芹, 张文娟, 张文新. (2002). 学校欺负与同伴背景的关系. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), 5, 104-109.
罗家德. (2010). 社会网分析讲义(第二版). 北京: 社会科学文献出版社.

相关文章 15

[1]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[2]	熊婕, 范翠英, 魏华, 杨秀娟, 连帅磊. 正念对网络欺负的影响:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 752-760.
[3]	汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.
[4]	高玲, 孟文慧, 刘介地, 杨继平, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负行为:自尊和基本共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 439-448.
[5]	任萍, 魏一, 孟晓哲, 秦幸娜, 王璇. 受欺负对抑郁情绪的影响:悲伤、愤怒反刍的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 873-881.
[6]	吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.
[7]	赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.
[8]	刘晓薇, 潘斌, 李腾飞, 张文新, Christina Salmivalli. 班级环境如何影响受欺负者的适应？健康环境悖论及其发生机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 298-304.
[9]	张洁, 陈亮, 张良, 潘斌, 李腾飞, 纪林芹, 张文新. 父母心理控制与小学生的欺负行为:敌意归因和冷酷无情的作用检验[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(6): 715-724.
[10]	褚晓伟, 周宗奎, 范翠英. 同伴拒绝与网络欺负的关系:愤怒的中介作用和感知匿名性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(5): 584-593.
[11]	汪倩倩, 范翠英, 褚晓伟. 青少年网络受欺负与网络欺负的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 216-227.
[12]	郑巧, 耿丽娜, 骆方, 李凌艳. 初中生学生投入的发展特点及其与同伴欺负的关系:一项三年追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(2): 157-167.
[13]	胡兴蕾, 余思, 刘勤学, 张微. 青少年网络被欺负与自杀意念的关系:自尊和情绪应对方式的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 368-375.
[14]	胡阳, 范翠英, 张凤娟, 谢笑春, 郝恩河. 青少年网络受欺负与抑郁：压力感与网络社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 177-184.
[15]	刘璐, 方晓义, 张锦涛, 刘凤娥, 陈超, 赵会春, 申子姣. 大学生网络成瘾：背景性渴求与同伴网络过度使用行为及态度的交互作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(4): 424-433.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed