心理发展与教育 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (5): 466-473.
李小平1, 闫鸿磊1, 云祥2, 陈陈1
LI Xiao-ping1, YAN Hong-lei1, YUN Xiang2, CHEN Chen1
摘要: 本研究将移情作为影响个体暴力态度的情境变量,通过对移情的启动来考察状态移情对暴力态度的影响。实验1在启动被试的移情感后,采用暴力IAT的方法考察被试内隐暴力态度的变化;实验2则在移情启动之后,用FMMU变态人格危险性评估问卷中的冲动倾向(VIO)考察被试的外显暴力的变化。实验结果显示,在启动被试的移情感后,我们没有发现被试的内隐和外显暴力态度发生显著变化,但经移情和性别的交互作用检验后发现,移情的启动减弱了男性被试的外显暴力态度,而对女性被试没有影响。研究结果表明,移情与暴力态度之间不存在内隐联结关系。根据以往的研究结果,移情对暴力态度的影响一是取决于意识层面的认知加工过程,二是与个体的特质性移情水平的高低有关。
中图分类号:
Anderson, C. A., Shibuya, A., Ihoriet, N., Swing, E. L, Bushman, B. J., Sakamoto, A., et al. (2010). Violent video game effects on aggression, empathy, and prosocial behavior in eastern and western countries: A meta-analytic review, Psychological Bulletin, 136, 151-173. Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768-781. Baron, R. A. (1974). Aggression as a function of victim's pain cues, level of prior anger arousal, and exposure to an aggressive model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 117-124. Barrett, L., Henzi, P., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Primate cognition: From‘what now' to‘what if'. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 7, 494-497. Batson, C.D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W.J. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3-15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A.Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 183-187. Davis, Mark, H., Jay, G., Hull, & Richard, D. Young, and Gregory G. Warren (1987). Emotional reactions to dramatic film stimuli: The influence of cognitive and emotional empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 126-133. Decety, J. (2006). Human empathy. Japanese Journal of Neuropsychology, 22, 11-33. Decety, J., & Jackson, P.L. (2004) The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavior Cognition Neuroscience Review. 3, 71-100. Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience. The Scientific World Journal, 6, 1146-1163. Giancola, P. R. (2003). The moderating effects of dispositional empathy on alcohol-related aggression in men and women. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 275-281. Gray, N. S., MacCulloch, M. J., Smith, J., Morris, M., & Snowden, R. J. (2003). Violence viewed by psychopathic murderers. Nature, 423, 497-498. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216. Harris, S. T., & Picchioni, M. M. (2013). A review of the role of empathy in violence risk in mental disorders. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 18, 335-342. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2004). Empathy and offending: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 441-476. Kaukiainen, A., et al. (1999). The relationships between social intelligence, empathy, and three types of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 25, 81-89. Lammers, J., & Stapel, D.A. (2009). How power influences moral thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 279-289. Lane, K. A., Banaji, M. R., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV. What we know (so far) about the method. In B. Wittenbrink & N. S. Schwarz (Eds.). Implicit Measures of Attitudes: Procedures and Controversies(pp. 59-102). New York: Guilford. Miller, P. A., & Eisenberg, N. (1988). The relation of empathy to aggressive and externalizing/antisocial behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 324-344. Ozkan, Y., & Cifci, E. G. (2009). The effect of empathy lever on peer bullying in schools. Humanity & Social Sciences Journal, 4, 31-38. Perner, J., & Lang, B. (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 337-344. Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., Cheng, B. H., & Keltne, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771-784. Richardson, D. R., Hammock, G. S., Smith, S. M., Gardner, W., & Signo, M. (1994). Empathy as a cognitive inhibitor of interpersonal aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 20, 275-289. Richetin, J., & Richardson, D. S. (2008). Automatic processes and individual differences in aggressive behavior. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 423-430. Snowden, R. J., & Gray, N. S. (2010). Implicit social cognition in forensic settings. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds). Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York: Guilford. pp522-534. Snowden, R. J., Gray, N. S., Smith, J., Morris, M., & MacCulloch, M. J. (2004). Implicit affective associations to violence in psychopathic murderers. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 15, 620-641. Sprinkle, J. E. (2008). Animals, empathy, and violence: Can animals be used to convey principles of prosocial behavior to children? Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice January, 6, 47-58. Strayer, J., & Roberts, W. (2004). Empathy and observed anger and aggression in five-year-olds. Social Development, 13, 1-13. Williams, L. E., Hennessey, S. R. & Bargh, J. A. (2011). Finding pleasure in the unpleasant: Social context moderates the enjoyment of aversive Media. Unpublished manuscript. Invited revision at Journal of Consumer Research. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101-126. 戴春林, 杨治良, 吴明证. (2005). 内隐攻击性的实验研究. 心理科学, 28, 96-98. 关慕桢, 刘旭峰, 苗丹民, 吕静, 洪霞, 杨海. (2010). 激情犯和累惯犯暴力态度的比较. 心理学报, 42, 599-606. 李小平, 杨晟宇, 李梦遥. (2012). 权威人格与权力感对道德思维方式的影响. 心理学报, 44, 964-971. 徐德淼, 唐日新, 解军. (2007).外显和内隐攻击性表现方式的性别差异实验研究.心理科学, 30, 1342-1344. 肖利军, 刘旭峰, 苗丹民. (2010). 青少年暴力犯罪人格问卷的编制. 实用预防医学, 17, 2140-2142. 杨治良. (2008). 内隐攻击性与同情的关系研究. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 21, 94-98. 杨治良, 刘素珍, 高桦. (1996). 内隐与外显社会认知(攻击性)的性别差异之实验研究. 湖北大学学报, 3, 80-83. 应贤慧, 戴春林. (2008). 中学生移情与攻击行为:攻击情绪与认知的中介作用.心理发展与教育, 2, 73-78. 云祥, 李小平, 杨建伟. (2009). 暴力犯内隐攻击性研究. 心理学探新, 29, 62-65. |
[1] | 陈朝阳, 马兵兵, 马婷, 张锋. 亲社会视频游戏对玩家人性化知觉水平的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 561-569. |
[2] | 陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊:主观社会地位的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 594-600. |
[3] | 李晓彤, 王雪玲, 王大华, 燕磊. 青年子女的传统孝观念及其与早期父母教养行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 601-608. |
[4] | 刘兆敏, 张琼林. 青少年脑发育的神经法学研究与应用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 656-663. |
[5] | 侯珂, 刘艳, 屈智勇, 蒋索. 留守对农村儿童青少年社会适应的影响:倾向值匹配的比较分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 646-655. |
[6] | 陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音. 具身道德:道德心理学研究的新取向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 664-672. |
[7] | 姬旺华, 张兰鸽, 寇彧. 公正世界信念对大学生助人意愿的影响:责任归因和帮助代价的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 496-503. |
[8] | 张豹, 黄赛, 侯秋霞. 网络游戏成瘾者注意焦点转换功能的特异性损伤研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 533-539. |
[9] | 姜永志, 白晓丽. 大学生手机互联网依赖对疏离感的影响:社会支持系统的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 540-549. |
[10] | 康勇军, 王霄, 屈正良. 职业院校教师情感承诺与职业倦怠的关系:情感承诺的中介作用和职称的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(5): 550-560. |
[11] | 陈浩彬, 汪凤炎. 大学生智慧内隐认知的实验研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 363-370. |
[12] | 邢学玮, 伍新春, 侯建芳, 刘畅, 陈玲玲. 父亲的角色态度对其教养投入的影响:母亲态度类型的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 387-395. |
[13] | 王岩, 王大华, 付琳, 姜薇, 翟晓艳. 老年人夫妻依恋稳定性及其与配偶支持的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 396-402. |
[14] | 项紫霓, 张兴慧, 黎亚军, 王耘, 李燕芳. 3~5岁儿童母亲抚养压力类型特点及其影响因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 427-434. |
[15] | 陈禹, 任国防, 李海江, 杨瑜, 关丽丽, 胡新雨, 杨娟. 自尊与心理性应激反应的关系:社会认可需求的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 435-441. |
|