父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以491名初中生为研究对象，对其网络受欺负行为进行为期2年的4次追踪测试，同时测试其父母教养方式。采用潜变量混合增长模型探讨初中生网络受欺负行为的多种发展轨迹，并分析父母教养方式的影响。结果发现：（1）在2年时间内，初中生网络受欺负行为呈显著下降趋势；（2）初中生网络受欺负行为存在两种下降趋势，即快速下降与慢速下降；（3）父亲拒绝、父亲过度保护与母亲拒绝这三种教养方式可增加两组初中生的网络受欺负行为，同时也可降低其网络受欺负行为的下降速度；（4）父亲情感温暖可显著预测快速下降组的初始水平和发展速度，母亲过度保护可显著预测慢速下降组的初始水平和发展速度，母亲情感温暖可显著负向预测慢速下降组的发展速度。上述结果证实父母教养方式对初中生网络受欺负行为发展轨迹的预测作用，支持了Kowalski网络欺负模型。

关键词: 网络受欺负行为, 父母教养方式, 追踪研究, 潜变量混合增长模型, 初中生

Abstract: School victimization is an important and prevalent problem in society. In recent years, with the high-speed development of information technology and network, a new form of victimization has emerged, that is, cyber victimization. With the increasing number of adolescents using the Internet, cyber bullying may cause more harm than traditional bullying. So the junior high school students' cyber victimization is an important part of the research on adolescent problem behavior intervention. To provide theoretical guidance for intervention programs, researchers are required to obtain the results of longitudinal studies. The present research examined the developmental trajectories of cyber victimization by employing a longitudinal, four-wave design. Moreover, the current research also examined the impacts of parental style. The sample consisted of 491 adolescents (51.56% boys) in grade eight, who was followed up for two years from grade eight to grade nine. Using latent growth mixture modeling, various developmental trajectories of cyber victimization were examined. To explore the effect of parental style on the developmental trajectories of cyber victimization, logistic regression and latent growth modeling were utilized to analyze the data. The results indicated that:(1) the junior high school students' cyber victimization presented a decreasing trend significantly in the period of 2 years; (2) there were two downward trends, namely, rapid decline and slow decline; (3) among the parenting styles, father rejection, father over protection and mother rejection increased the incidence of cyber victimization of both groups. At the same time, it also reduced the decline rate of the cyber victimization; (4) the father emotional warmth had a significantly prediction on the initial level and the speed of development of the rapid decline group, and the mother emotional warmth had a significantly prediction on the speed of development of the slow decline group. Overall, these findings have some important implications for the prevention and intervention of the adolescent Internet victimization and support the Kowalski's Cyberbullying Model.

Key words: cyber victimization, parental style, developmental trajectories, latent growth mixture model, junior high school students

中图分类号:

B844

吴鹏, 张琪, 王杨春子. 父母教养方式与初中生网络受欺负行为的关系:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.

WU Peng, ZHANG Qi, WANGYANG Chunzi. The Relationship between Parental Style and Cyber Victimization of Junior High School Students: A Longitudinal Study[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 719-726.

参考文献

Ahmed, S. P., Bittencourt-Hewitt, A., & Sebastian, C. L. (2015). Neurocognitive bases of emotion regulation development in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 11-25.
Aka, B. T., & Gencoz, T. (2014). Perceived parenting styles, emotion recognition and regulation in relation to psychological well-being. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159(1), 529-533.
álvarez-García, D., Pérez, J. C. N., González, A. D., & Pérez, C. R. (2015). Risk factors associated with cybervictimization in adolescence. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(3), 226-235
Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemamm, M., …van der Ende, J. (1999). The development of a short form of the EMBU:It's appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 613-628.
Athanasiou K., Melegkovits E., Andrie, E. K., Magoulas C., Tzavara, C. K., Clive, R., …Tsitsika, A. K. (2018). Cross-national aspects of cyberbullying victimization among 14-17-year-old adolescents across seven European countries. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 800-814.
Barker, E. D., Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., Fontaine, N., Arseneault, L., Vitaro, F., … Tremblay, R. E. (2008). Predictive validity and early predictors of peer-victimization trajectories in preschool. Archives of General Psychiatry, 65(10), 1185-1192.
Boniel-Nissim, M., & Sasson, H. (2018). Bullying victimization and poor relationships with parents as risk factors of problematic internet use in adolescence. Computers in Human Behavior, 88(1), 176-183.
Burke, T., Sticca, F., & Perren, S. (2017). Everything's gonna be alright! The longitudinal interplay among social support, peer victimization, and depressive symptoms.Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(9), 1999-2014.
Charalampous, K., Demetriou, C., Tricha, L., Ioannou, M., & Stavrinides, P. (2018). The effect of parental style on bullying and cyber bullying behaviors and the mediating role of peer attachment relationships:A longitudinal study. Journal of Adolescence, 64(1), 109-123.
Cross, D., Lester, L., & Barnes, A. (2015). A longitudinal study of the social and emotional predictors and consequences of cyber and traditional bullying victimisation. International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 207-217.
Delprato, M., Akyeampong, K., & Dunne, M. (2017). The impact of bullying on students' learning in Latin America:A matching approach for 15 countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 52(1), 37-57.
Elsaesser, C., Russell, B., Ohannessian, M. C., & Patton, D. (2017). Parenting in a digital age:A review of parents' role in preventing adolescent cyberbullying. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35(1), 62-72.
Erdur-Baker, O., & Kavsut, F. (2007). Cyberbullying:A new face of peer bullying. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 27(1), 31-42.
Espelage, D. L. (2014). Ecological theory:Preventing youth bullying, aggression, and victimization. Theory Into Practice, 53(4), 257-264.
Gámez-Guadix, M., Gini, G., & Calvete, E. (2015). Stability of cyberbullying victimization among adolescents:Prevalence and association with bully-victim status and psychosocial adjustment. Computers in Human Behavior, 53(1), 140-148.
Georgiou, S. N. (2008). Parental style and child bullying and victimization experiences at school. Social Psychology of Education, 11(3), 213-227.
Griese, E. R., Buhs, E. S., & Lester, H. F. (2016). Peer victimization and prosocial behavior trajectories:Exploring sources of resilience for victims. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 44(1), 1-11.
Gross, D., Lester, L., & Barnes, A. (2015). A longitudinal study of the social and emotional predictors and consequences of cyber and traditional bullying victimization. International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 207-217.
Gül, H., FIrat, S., Sertçelik, M., Gül, A., Gürel, Y., & KIlIç, B. G. (2019). Cyberbullying among a clinical adolescent sample in Turkey:Effects of problematic smartphone use, psychiatric symptoms, and emotion regulation difficulties. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(4), 547-557.
Hart, D., & Carlo, G. (2005). Moral development in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 223-233.
Johnson, V. K. (2010). Marital interaction, family organization, and differences in parenting behavior:Explaining variations across family interaction contexts. Family Process, 40(3), 333-342.
Kokkinos, C. M., Antoniadou, N., Asdre, A., & Voulgaridou, K. (2016). Parenting and internet behavior predictors of cyber-bullying and cyber-victimization among preadolescents. Deviant Behavior, 37(4), 439-455.
Kowalski, R. M., Giumetti, G. W., Schroeder, A. N., & Lattanner, M. R. (2014). Bullying in the digital age:A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1073-1137.
Kretschmer, T., Vollebergh, W., & Oldehinkel, A. J. (2017). Parent-child positivity and romantic relationships in emerging adulthood:Congruence, compensation, and the role of social skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 41(2), 198-210.
Ladd, G. W., Ettekal, I., & Kochenderfer-ladd, B. (2017). Peer victimization trajectories from kindergarten through high school:Differential pathways for children's school engagement and achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 826-841.
Lereya, S. T., Samara, M., & Wolke, D. (2013). Parenting behavior and the risk of becoming a victim and a bully/victim:A meta-analysis study. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37(12), 1091-1108.
Martínez, I., Sergio, M., Garcia, O. F., & Fernando, G. (2019). Parenting in the digital era:Protective and risk parenting styles for traditional bullying and cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 90(1), 84-92.
Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior:A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21(1), 61-72.
Orpinas, P., McNicholas, C., & Nahapetyan, L. (2014). Gender differences in trajectories of relational aggression perpetration and victimization from middle to high school. Aggressive Behavior, 41(5), 401-412.
Raskauskas, J., Rubiano, S., Offen, I., & Wayland, A. K. (2015). Do social self-efficacy and self-esteem moderate the relationship between peer victimization and academic performance? Social Psychology of Education, 18(2), 297-314.
Shell, M. D., Gazelle, H., & Faldowski, R. A. (2014). Anxious solitude and the middle school transition:A diathesis×stress model of peer exclusion and victimization trajectories. Developmental Psychology, 50(5), 1569-1583.
Sheppard, C. S. (2014). Demonstrating the importance of multi-wave assessment of peer victimization. Dissertations & Theses-Gradworks, 3(1), 271-282.
Sumter, S. R., Baumgartner, S. E., Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2012). Developmental trajectories of peer victimization:Off-line and online experiences during adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(6), 607-613.
Tsitsika, A., Janikian, M., Wójcik, S., Makaruk, K., Tzavela, E., Tzavara, C., … Richardson, C. (2015). Cyberbullying victimization prevalence and associations with internalizing and externalizing problems among adolescents in six European countries. Computers in Human Behavior, 51(1), 1-7.
van den Eijnden, R., Vermulst, A., van Rooij, A. J., Scholte, R., & van de Mheen, D. (2014). The bidirectional relationships between online victimization and psychosocial problems in adolescents:A comparison with real-life victimization. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 790-802.
Wigderson, S., & Lynch, M. (2013). Cyber-and traditional peer victimization:Unique relationships with adolescent well-being. Psychology of Violence, 3(4), 297-309.
Yao, M. Z., He, J., Ko, D. M., & Pang, K. (2014). The influence of personality, parental behaviors, and self-esteem on internet addiction:A study of Chinese college students. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 17(2), 104-110.
蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕. (2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 94-99.
李白璐, 边玉芳. (2016). 初中生生活满意度的发展趋势及社会支持、自尊的影响:一项3年追踪研究. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(5), 900-904.
黎亚军. (2015). 青少年网络受欺负与传统受欺负的共发性. 中国临床心理学杂志, 23(2), 346-349.
刘俊升, 赵燕. (2013). 童年中期受欺负与问题行为之关系:一项两年纵向研究. 心理科学, 36(3), 122-127.
田微微, 杨晨晨, 孙丽萍, 边玉芳. (2018). 父母冲突对初中生外显问题行为的影响:亲子关系和友谊质量的作用. 中国临床心理学杂志,26(3), 116-121.
钟萍, 邓慧华, 张光珍, 梁宗保, 陆祖宏. (2017). 青少年友谊关系质量与社交焦虑的相互影响:一项交叉滞后分析. 心理发展与教育, 33(6), 89-95.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[2]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[3]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[4]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[5]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[6]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[7]	郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
[8]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[9]	张玉平, 董琼, 宋爽, 舒华. 小学低年级儿童的阅读发展轨迹:早期语言认知技能的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 210-218.
[10]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.
[11]	高峰, 白学军, 章鹏, 曹海波. 中国青少年父母教养方式与自杀意念的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 97-108.
[12]	肖雪, 郭磊, 赵永萍, 陈富国. 累积生态风险与初中生受欺凌的关系模式：心理弹性的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 648-657.
[13]	严益霞, 刘颜蓥, 丁芳. 心理理论与社会互动方式对初中生社会善念发展的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 485-494.
[14]	李蓓蕾, 高婷, 张莉莉, 周楠, 邓林园. 学生感知的教师欺凌态度与学生欺凌行为的关系——学生欺凌态度的中介作用及其性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 348-357.
[15]	谢云天, 史滋福, 尹霖, 兰洛. 中国父母教养方式与儿童学业成绩关系的元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 366-379.