家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2021.05.14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨家庭功能、父母教养方式与初中生欺负行为之间的关系及其作用机制，研究采用家庭功能量表、父母教养方式量表和欺负量表对429名初中生进行施测。结果显示：（1）家庭功能与父母教养方式中的父母拒绝均能显著预测欺负行为；（2）父母拒绝在家庭功能与欺负行为之间起中介作用；（3）“家庭功能→父母拒绝→欺负行为”这一中介效应的后半路径受到性别的调节，即该中介效应仅在男生群体中显著。

关键词: 家庭功能, 父母教养方式, 欺负行为, 初中生, 性别

Abstract: To examine the effect of family functioning and parenting style on the mechanism of bullying in junior middle school students, 429 junior high school students were assessed with the Family Cohesion and Adaptability of Scale-Chinese Version, the s-EMBU, and the Olweus Bully Questionnaire. The results showed that family functioning and parental rejection negatively predicted bullying respectively, that parental rejection mediated the relationship between family functioning and bullying, and that the latter half path of the mediating effect of "family function → parental rejection → bullying" was moderated by gender. More specifically, this mediating effect was only observed in male students.

Key words: family functioning, parenting style, bullying, junior middle school students, gender

中图分类号:

B844

赖燕群, 连榕, 杨琪, 牛更枫. 家庭功能与初中生欺负行为:有调节的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.

LAI Yanqun, LIAN Rong, YANG Qi, NIU Gengfeng. The Effect of Family Functioning on Junior Middle School Students' Bullying: A Moderated Mediation Effect[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2021, 37(5): 727-734.

参考文献

Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M.,… Kállai, J. (1999). The development of a short form of the EMBU:Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 613-628.
Atik, G., & Güneri, O. Y. (2013). Bullying and victimization:Predictive role of individual, parental, and academic factors. School Psychology International, 34(6), 658-673.
Austin, S., & Joseph, S. (1996). Assessment of bully/victim problems in 8 to 11 year-olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(4), 447-456.
Beavers, R., & Hampson, R. B. (2000). The Beavers systems model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 128-143.
Bibou-Nakou, I., Tsiantis, J., Assimopoulos, H., & Chatzilambou, P. (2013). Bullying/victimization from a family perspective:A qualitative study of secondary school students' views. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28(1), 53-71.
Boe, T., Sivertsen, B., Heiervang, E., Goodman, R., Lundervold, A. J., & Hysing, M. (2014). Socioeconomic status and child mental health:The role of parental emotional well-being and parenting practices. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42(5), 705-715.
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Ceci, S. J. (1994). Nature-nuture reconceptualized in developmental perspective:A bioecological model. Psychological Review, 101(4), 568-586.
Buist, K. L., Deković, M., Meeus, W., & van Aken, M. A. (2002). Developmental patterns in adolescent attachment to mother, father and sibling. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 31(3), 167-176.
Chen, J. L., & Kennedy, C. (2004). Family functioning, parenting style, and Chinese children's weight status. Journal of Family Nursing, 10(2), 262-279.
Craig, W., Harel-Fisch, Y., Fogel-Grinvald, H., Dostaler, S., Hetland, J., Simons-Morton, B., & Pickett, W. (2009). A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54(2), 216-224.
Dotterer, A. M., Iruka, I. U., & Pungello, E. (2012). Parenting, race, and socioeconomic status:Links to school readiness. Family Relations, 61(4), 657-670.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Reporting Sex Differences. American Psychologist, 42(7), 756-757.
Gauze, C., Bukowski, W. M., Aquan-Assee, J., & Sippola, L. K. (1996). Interactions between family environment and friendship and associations with self-perceived well-being during early adolescence. Child Development, 67(5), 2201-2216.
Georgiou, S. N., Ioannou, M., & Stavrinides, P. (2017). Parenting styles and bullying at school:The mediating role of locus of control. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 5(4), 226-242.
Hayes, A.F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis:A regression-based approach. New York:Guilford Press.
Lau, W. W., & Yuen, A. H. (2013). Adolescents' risky online behaviours:The influence of gender, religion, and parenting style. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2690-2696.
Magnusson, D., & Stattin, H. (1998). Person context interaction theory. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology:Theoretical Models of Human Development(pp.685-759). New York:Wiley.
Nocentini, A., Fiorentini, G., Di Paola, L., & Menesini, E. (2019). Parents, family characteristics and bullying behavior:A systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 41-50.
Olson, D. H., & DeFrain, J. (2000). Marriage and the family:Diversity and strengths. CA:Mayfield.
Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school:Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(7), 1171-1190.
Rohner, R. P., Khaleque, A., & Cournoyer, D. E. (2005). Parental acceptance-rejection:Theory, methods, cross-cultural evidence, and implications. Ethos, 33(3), 299-334.
Skinner, H., Steinhauer, P., & Sitarenios, G. (2010). Family assessment measure (FAM) and process model of family functioning. Journal of Family Therapy, 22(2), 190-210.
Skrzypiec, G., Askell-Williams, H., Slee, P. T., & Lawson, M. J. (2018). Involvement in bullying during high school:A survival analysis approach. Violence and Victims, 33(3), 563-582.
Steinberg, L., & Morris, A. S. (2001). Adolescent development. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 83-110.
Troop-Gordon, W. (2017). Peer victimization in adolescence:The nature, progression, and consequences of being bullied within a developmental context. Journal of Adolescence, 100(55), 116-128.
Xing, X., & Wang, M. (2017). Gender differences in the moderating effects of parental warmth and hostility on the association between corporal punishment and child externalizing behaviors in China. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 928-938.
安伯欣. (2004). 父母教养方式、亲子沟通与青少年社会适应的关系研究(硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学, 西安.
常若松, 马锦飞, 田峰溶 (2015). 家庭功能对小学生欺负行为的影响研究. 教育科学, 31(05), 29-33.
常淑敏, 宋育珊, 郭惠. (2016). 家庭环境纷杂度对流动儿童安全感的影响:儿童性别的调节作用. 中国特殊教育,190(4), 66-70.
邓林园, 方晓义, 伍明明, 张锦涛, 刘勤学. (2013). 家庭环境、亲子依恋与青少年网络成瘾. 心理发展与教育, 29(3), 305-311.
费立鹏, 沈其杰, 郑延平, 赵靖平, 蒋少艾, 王立伟,汪向东. (1991). "家庭亲密度和适应性量表"和"家庭环境量表"的初步评价——正常家庭与精神分裂症家庭成员对照研究. 中国心理卫生杂志,5(5), 198-202.
韩仁生, 王倩. (2010). 中小学生欺负者归因特点的研究. 心理科学, 33(1), 228-230.
何丹, 范翠英, 牛更枫, 连帅磊, 陈武. (2016). 父母教养方式与青少年网络欺负:隐性自恋的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(1), 41-44.
胡宁, 邓林园, 张锦涛, 方晓义, 陈蕾, 梅海燕. (2009). 家庭功能与青少年问题行为关系的追踪研究. 心理发展与教育, 25(4), 93-100.
黄平, 孙圣涛, 李燕. (2017). 夫妻冲突对幼儿社会技能的影响:父母教养方式的中介作用. 心理技术与应用, 5(2), 108-114.
蒋奖, 鲁峥嵘, 蒋苾菁, 许燕. (2010). 简式父母教养方式问卷中文版的初步修订. 心理发展与教育, 26(1), 94-99.
刘玉路, 李新影. (2015). 父母教养方式对青少年问题行为及性别差异影响. 中国公共卫生, 31(12), 1655-1657.
牛更枫, 郝恩河, 孙晓军, 周宗奎. (2013). 负性生活事件对大学生抑郁的影响:应对方式的中介作用和性别的调节作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(6), 1022-1025.
桑标, 席居哲. (2005). 家庭生态系统对儿童心理健康发展影响机制的研究. 心理发展与教育, 21(1), 80-86.
汪玲,谭晖. (2010). 青春期心理行为的危机干预. 中国学校卫生, 31(8), 897-898.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册. 中国心理卫生杂志, 13(1), 31-35.
王绍瑜, 王华栋. (2008). 中学生父母教养方式与简易应对方式的关系. 中国健康心理学杂志, 16(11), 1235-1237.
王玉龙, 汪瑶, 唐卓, 张曼琪. (2017). 家庭功能与青少年情绪健康的关系:母子依恋的中介及性别差异. 中国临床心理学杂志, 25(6), 1160-1163.
温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补. 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.
席居哲, 桑标, 邓赐平. (2004). 儿童心理健康发展的家庭生态系统特点研究. 心理科学, 27(1), 72-76.
张茜洋, 冷露, 陈红君, 方晓义, 舒曾, 蔺秀云.(2017). 家庭社会经济地位对流动儿童认知能力的影响:父母教养方式的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 33(2), 153-162.
张文新, 武建芬. (1999). Olweus儿童欺负问卷中文版的修订. 心理发展与教育, 15(2), 7-11.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004). 共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, 12(6), 942-950.

相关文章 15

[1]	郭嘉程, 董柔纯, 许放, 徐旋, 牛更枫, 周宗奎. 社会临场感与大学生网络过激行为的关系：双自我意识的并行中介及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 176-186.
[2]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[3]	秦瑶, 彭运石. 父母教养方式对初中生社交焦虑的影响：同伴接纳和反刍思维的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 103-113.
[4]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[5]	吴晓靓, 盖笑松, 李晓天, 顾婷玉, 王宏. 家庭经济压力与初中生幸福感的关系:歧视知觉的中介作用和控制感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 877-886.
[6]	陈颖, 张野, 韩娜, 王凯. 校园排斥对初中生网络偏差行为的影响:相对剥夺感与自我控制的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 887-894.
[7]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[8]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[9]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[10]	赵纤, 王志航, 王东方, 袁言云, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 贫困家庭儿童在青少年早期的亲社会行为发展轨迹:性别及父母教养方式异质性的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 323-332.
[11]	汪悦, 熊昱可, 任萍, 杨柳, 苗薇. 受欺负对初中生主动性和反应性攻击的影响:道德推脱和性别的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 410-418.
[12]	冯全升, 周宗奎, 孙晓军, 张艳红, 连帅磊. 负性生活事件与初中生内化问题:反刍思维的中介作用与同伴依恋的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 419-428.
[13]	高玲, 孟文慧, 刘介地, 杨继平, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负行为:自尊和基本共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 439-448.
[14]	李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 杨玉川, 赵敏翔, 董妍. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
[15]	刘志国, 齐冰, 李亚平, 王润洲, 崔佳, 宋耀武. 成就目标定向在学业自我概念与学业成绩关系中的调节作用:基于内/外参照模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 68-76.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed