心理发展与教育 ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 488-498.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2024.04.04

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

主观社会地位对青少年亲社会冒险行为的影响:有调节的链式中介模型

张慧如1, 朱海东1,2, 贾晓珊1, 麻超1   

  1. 1. 石河子大学师范学院, 石河子 832003;
    2. 石河子大学心理应用研究中心, 石河子 832003
  • 发布日期:2024-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 朱海东 E-mail:86775709@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    全国少先队研究课题一般课题(2022YB16);石河子大学创新发展专项项目(KX01130406)。

The Influence of Subjective Social Status on Adolescents’ Prosocial Risk-taking Behavior: A Regulated Chain Mediation Model

ZHANG Huiru1, ZHU Haidong1,2, JIA Xiaoshan1, MA Chao1   

  1. 1. Normal College of Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003;
    2. Center for Psychological Application of Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003
  • Published:2024-08-27

摘要: 为探讨主观社会地位对青少年亲社会冒险行为的影响,采用青少年主观社会地位量表、亲社会冒险行为量表、公正世界信念量表以及自尊量表,对1106名高中生进行调查。结果发现:(1)主观社会地位可以显著正向预测青少年亲社会冒险行为;(2)公正世界信念和自尊不仅在主观社会地位和亲社会冒险行为之间分别起部分中介作用,而且在两者间发挥着链式中介作用;(3)上述链式中介模型存在显著的性别差异,性别调节了模型中“主观社会地位—亲社会冒险行为”这一路径。研究为青少年亲社会冒险行为的引导和干预提供了理论指导和实证依据。

关键词: 亲社会冒险行为, 主观社会地位, 公正世界信念, 自尊

Abstract: In order to explore the influence of subjective social status on adolescents’ prosocial risk-taking behavior, 1106 adolescents from 3 high schools were investigated by using the adolescents’ subjective social status scale, the prosocial risk-taking behavior scale, the belief in a just world scale and self-esteem scale. The results showed that: (1) Subjective social status positively predicted prosocial risk-taking behavior of adolescents; (2) Belief in a just world and self-esteem not only played partial mediating roles between subjective social status and prosocial risk-taking behavior, but also played chain mediating roles between them; (3) There were significant gender differences in the above chain mediation model, and gender moderated the pathway of “subjective social status-pro-social risk-taking behavior” in the above chain mediation model. This study reveals the influence of subjective social status on adolescents’ prosocial risk-taking behavior and its mechanism, providing theoretical guidance and empirical evidence for the intervention and guidance of adolescents’ prosocial risk-taking behavior.

Key words: prosocial risk-taking behavior, subjective social status, belief in a just world, self-esteem

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bartholomaeus, J., & Strelan, P. (2019). The adaptive, approach-oriented correlates of belief in a just world for the self: A review of the research. Personality and Individual Differences, 151, 109485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.06.028
Beer, J. S. (2014). Exaggerated positivity in self-evaluation: A social neuroscience approach to reconciling the role of self-esteem protection and cognitive bias. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(10), 583-594.
Blankenstein, N. E., Telzer, E. H., Do, K. T., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., & Crone, E. A. (2020). Behavioral and neural pathways supporting the development of prosocial and risk-taking behavior across adolescence. Child Development, 91(3), e665-e681.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R.F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 371-399.
Brandt, M. J., Wetherell, G., & Henry, P. J. (2014). Changes in income predict change in social trust: A longitudinal analysis.Political Psychology, 36(6), 761-768.
Cavallo, J. V., Holmes, J. G., Fitzsimons, G. M., Murray, S. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). Managing motivational conflict: How self-esteem and executive resources influence self-regulatory responses to risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 430-451.
Cheng, Y., Nudelman, G., Otto, K., & Ma, J. (2020). Belief in a just world and employee voice behavior: The mediating roles of perceived efficacy and risk. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 154(2), 129-143.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233-255.
Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2015). Self-affirmations provide a broader perspective on self-threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(1), 3-18.
Crone, E. A., van Duijvenvoorde, A. C. K., & Peper, J. S. (2016). Annual research review: Neural contributions to risk-taking in adolescence—Developmental changes and individual differences. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 57, 353-368.
Coopersmith. (1967).The antecedents of self-esteem. W.H. Freeman.
Corbett, B., Feeney, A., & McCormack, T. (2021). Interpersonal regret and prosocial risk taking in children. Cognitive Development, 58, 101036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101036
Dalbert, C. (1999). The world is more just for me than generally:About the personal belief in a just world scale's validity. Social Justice Research, 12(2), 79-98.
Danielsson, M., & Bengtsson, H. (2016). Global self-esteem and the processing of positive information about the self. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 325-330.
Duell, N., & Steinberg, L. (2019). Positive risk taking in adolescence. Child Development Perspectives, 13(1), 48-52.
Duell, N., & Steinberg, L. (2020). Differential correlates of positive and negative risk taking in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 49, 1162-1178.
Do, K. T., Guassi Moreira, J. F., & Telzer, E. H. (2017). But is helping you worth the risk? Defining prosocial risk taking in adolescence. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 260-271.
Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A., & Penner, L. (2006). The social psychology of prosocial behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.
Eagly, A. H. (1987).Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Erikson, E. H. (1950).Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.
Evans, C. B., & Smokowski, P. R. (2015). Prosocial bystander behavior in bullying dynamics: Assessing the impact of social capital. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 44(12), 2289-2307.
Fryt, J., & Szczygiel, M. (2021). Predictors of positive and negative risk-taking in adolescents and young adults: Similarities and differences. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 17(1), 17-30.
Gardner, W. L., & Gabriel, S. (2004). Gender differences in relational and collective interdependence: Implications for self-views, social behavior, and subjective well-being. In A. H. Eagly, A. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 169-191). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
Gibbons, F. X., Eggleston, T. J., & Benthin, A. C. (1997). Cognitive reactions to smoking relapse: The reciprocal relation between dissonance and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 184-195.
Goma-I-Freixanet, M. (1995). Prosocial andantisocial aspects of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(2), 125-134.
Gorrese, A., & Ruggieri, R. (2013). Peer attachment and self-esteem: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(5), 559-568.
Hayes, A. F. (2013).Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press, New York, NY.
Hou, Y., Jiang, T., & Wang, Q. (2017). Socioeconomic status and online shaming: The mediating role of belief in a just world. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 19-25.
Igou, E. R., Blake, A. A., & Bless, H. (2021). Just-world beliefs increase helping intentions via meaning and affect. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 2235-2253.
Isen, A. M. (1970). Success, failure, attention, and reaction toothers: The warm glow of success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(4), 294-301.
Jenkins, L. N., & Nickerson, A. B. (2017). Bullying participant roles and gender as predictors of bystander intervention. Aggressive Behavior, 43(3), 281-290.
Jenkins, L. N., & Fredrick, S. S. (2017). Social capital and bystander behavior in bullying: Internalizing problems as a barrier to prosocial intervention. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(4), 757-771.
Jiang, F., Yue, X., Lu, S., Yu, G., & Zhu, F. (2015). How belief in a just world benefits mental health: The effects of optimism and gratitude. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 411-423.
Joffer, J, Flacking, R., Bergström, E., Randell, E., & Jerdén, L. (2019). Self-rated health, subjective social status in school and socioeconomic status in adolescents: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 19(1), 785. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7140-3
Jordan, C. H., Logel, C., Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., Wood, J. V., & Holmes, J. G. (2013). Responsive low self-esteem: Low explicit self-esteem, implicit self-esteem, and reactions to performance outcomes. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 32(7), 703-732.
Josephs,R. A., Larrick, R. P., Steele, C. M., & Nisbett, R. E. (1992). Protecting the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 26-37.
Kim, E., & Park, H. (2018). Perceived gender discrimination, belief in a just world, self-esteem, and depression in Korean working women: A moderated mediation model. Women's Studies International Forum, 69, 143-150.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119(3), 546-572.
Leary, M. R., & MacDonald, G. (2003). Individual differences in self-esteem: A review and theoretical integration. In M. R. Leary, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 401-418, Chapter XV, 703 Pages). The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
Lerner, M. J. (1970). The desire for justice and reactions to victims. In J. Macaulay & L. Berkowitz (Eds.),Altruism and helping behavior. New York: Academic Press.
Lerner, M. J. (1997). What does the belief in a just world protect us from: The dread of death or the fear of understanding suffering? Psychological Inquiry, 8(1), 29-32.
Lim, S. C., & Ju, H. P. (2020). The effect of beliefs in a just world on defending behavior against bullying among upper elementary students and the moderating role of classroom climate. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 41(2), 41-55.
Liu, G., D Zhang, D., Pan, Y., Hu,T., He, N., Chen, W., & Wang, Z. (2017). Self-concept clarity and subjective social status as mediators between psychological suzhi and social anxiety in chinese adolescents. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 40-44.
Malti, T., Averdijk, M., Zuffianò, A., Ribeaud, D., Betts, L. R., Rotenberg, K. J., & Eisner, M. P. (2016). Children’s trust and the development of prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 40(3), 262-270.
McElroy, T., Seta, J. J., & Waring, D. A. (2007). Reflections of the self: How self-esteem determines decision framing and increases risk taking. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(3), 223-240.
Miyamoto, Y., Yoo, J., Levine, C., Park, J., Boylan, J. M., Sims,… Coe, C. L. (2018). Culture and social hierarchy: Self-and other-oriented correlates of socioeconomic status a cross cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 427-445.
Moscardino, U., Miconi, D., & Carraro, L. (2020). Implicit and explicit self-construals in Chinese-heritage and Italian nonimmigrant early adolescents: Associations with self-esteem and prosocial behavior. Developmental Psychology, 56(7), 1397-1412.
Ngai, S. S., Xie, L., Ng, Y., & Ngai, H. (2018). The effects of parenting behavior on prosocial behavior of Chinese adolescents in Hong Kong. Children and Youth Services Review, 87, 154-162.
Nudelman, G., & Otto, K. (2021). Personal Belief in a Just World and Conscientiousness: A meta-analysis, facet-level examination, and mediation model. British Journal of Psychology, 112(1), 92-119.
Ostrove, J. M., Adler, N. E., Kuppermann, M., & Washington, A. E. (2000). Objective and subjective assessments of socioeconomic status and their relationship to self-rated health in an ethnically diverse sample of pregnant women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 613-618.
Pimentel, C. E., Silva, F. M. D. S. M. D., Santos, J. L. F. D., Oliveira, K. G., Freitas, N. B. C., Couto, R. N., & Brito, T. R. D. S. (2018). Single-item self-esteem scale: Brazilian adaptation and relationship with personality and prosocial behavior. Psico-USF, 23, 1-11.
Quan, S. (2021). Socioeconomic status and prosocial behaviors among Chinese emerging adults: Sequential mediators of parental warmth and personal belief in a just world. Children and Youth Services Review, 120, 10568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.10568
Rotenberg K. J. (2010). Introduction. In Rotenberg K. J. (Ed). Interpersonal trust during childhood and adolescence (pp. 3-7). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Rueger, S. Y., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2008). Gender differences in the relationship between perceived social support and student adjustment during early adolescence. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(4), 496-514.
Salas-Rodríguez, J., Gómez-Jacinto, L., & Hombrados-Mendieta, I. (2022). A life history approach on risk-taking behaviors moderated by gender in young adult spaniards. Deviant Behavior, 43(6), 666-676.
Schindler, S., Wenzel, K., Dobiosch, S., & Reinhard, M. (2019). The role of belief in a just world for (dis)honest behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 142, 72-78.
Shukla, P., & Kang, T. K. (2017). Self-esteem among adolescents: A study of gender and locale differences. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 8(9), 981-984.
Skaar, N. R., Christ, T. J., & Jacobucci, R. (2014). Measuring adolescent prosocial and health risk behavior in schools: Initial development of a screening measure. School Mental Health, 6(2), 137-149.
Tan, J. J., Kraus, M. W., Carpenter, N. C., & Adler, N. E. (2020). The association between objective and subjective socioeconomic status and subjective well-being: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 146(11), 970-1020.
Telzer, E. H. (2016). Dopaminergic reward sensitivity can promote adolescent health: A new perspective on the mechanism of ventral striatum activation. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 57-67.
Thomas, K. J., & Napolitano, P. H. (2017). Educational privilege: The role of school context in the development just world beliefs among Brazilian adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 52, 106-113.
Wang, M., Wang, H., Guang, S., Yan, Y., Zhao, Y., & Wang, J. (2019). Perceived parental disfavoritism and life satisfaction in chinese adolescents: Belief in a just world as the mediator and child gender as the moderator. Children and Youth Services Review, 99, 279-285.
Weinberg, D., Stevens, G. W., Peeters, M., Visser, K., Tigchelaar, J., & Finkenauer, C. (2021). The social gradient in adolescent mental health: Mediated or moderated by belief in a just world? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 773-782.
Wood, A. P., Dawe, S., & Gullo, M. J. (2013). The role of personality, family influences, and prosocial risk-taking behavior on substance use in early adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 36(5), 871-881.
Yu, G., Zhao, F., Wang, H., & Li, S. (2020). Subjective social class and distrust among Chinese college students: The mediating roles of relative deprivation and belief in a just world. Current Psychology, 39(6), 2221-2230.
Zuffianò, A., Alessandri, G., Kanacri, B. P. L., Pastorelli, C., Milioni, M., Ceravolo, R., … Caprara, G. V. (2014). The relation between prosociality and self-esteem from middle-adolescence to young adulthood. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 24-29.
陈艳红, 程刚, 关雨生, 张大均. (2014). 大学生客观社会经济地位与自尊: 主观社会地位的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 30(6), 594-600.
程刚, 陈艳红, 关雨生, 张大均. (2015). 大学生主观社会地位的指标构成及特点. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 37(06), 156-162.
陈利涛, 李彪, 陈玉发, 宋宇婷. (2022). 主观社会经济地位对高中生亲社会冒险行为的影响: 一个有调节的中介. 中小学心理健康教育, (01), 17-21.
窦凯, 黄义婷, 李菁菁, 聂衍刚. (2020). 青少年亲社会冒险行为量表的修订及信效度检验. 中国健康心理学杂志, 28(10), 1538-1542.
龚娇, 李伟强, 陈铭, 汤明, 袁博. (2019). 社会阶层与信任之间的关系: 来自元分析的证据. 心理技术与应用, 7(06), 346-357.
郭成, 张琳雅, 杨营凯. (2019). 青少年主观社会经济地位与心理韧性的关系: 公正世界信念的作用. 西南大学学报(社会科学版), 45(04), 109-117+199.
方杰, 张敏强, 邱皓政. (2012). 中介效应的检验方法和效果量测量:回顾与展望. 心理发展与教育, 28(1), 107-113.
方勇. (校点). (2013). 庄子(p.132). 上海: 上海古籍出版社.
贾晓珊, 朱海东. (2021). 家庭社会经济地位与青少年积极冒险行为: 心理资本和自我控制的链式中介作用. 见第二十三届全国心理学学术会议摘要集(下)(pp.562-563).中国心理学会.
宋友志, 田媛, 周宗奎, 连帅磊, 牛更枫. (2018). 青少年公正世界信念对抑郁的影响: 感恩和自尊的序列中介作用. 心理科学, 41(04), 828-834.
李海江, 贾磊, 罗俊龙, 杨娟, 张庆林, 李冰冰. (2013). 低自尊个体注意偏向的ERP研究. 心理发展与教育, 29(1), 2-9.
李雪平, 李双双. (2016). 公正世界信念对青少年主观幸福感的影响: 心理韧性和自尊的链式中介效应. 中国特殊教育, 189(03), 71-76.
刘广增, 张大均, 朱政光, 李佳佳, 陈旭. (2020). 家庭社会经济地位对青少年问题行为的影响: 父母情感温暖和公正世界信念的链式中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 36(2), 240-248.
刘啸莳. (2021). 母亲受教育水平和青少年学业自尊的关系: 母亲教养方式的中介作用和性别的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 19(01), 59-65.
陆学艺. (2002). 当代中国社会十大阶层分析. 学习与实践, (03), 55-63.
毛晋平, 倪鑫庭, 孙姣. (2021). 学校认同与青少年领导力的关系: 自尊的中介作用及其性别差异. 中国临床心理学杂志, 29(02), 263-266+271.
苏志强, 张大均, 王鑫强. (2012). 公正世界信念量表的修订及在大学生应用的信效度研究. 中华行为医学与脑科学杂志, 21(06), 561-563.
田录梅, 袁竞驰, 李永梅. (2018). 同伴在场和自尊水平对青少年冒险行为的影响: 来自ERPs的证据. 心理学报, 50(01), 47-57.
汪向东, 王希林, 马弘. (1999). 心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)(pp.142-149). 北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社.
夏良伟, 姚树桥, 胡牡丽. (2012). 青少年主观社会经济地位与吸烟行为: 生活事件的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 20(04), 556-558.
胥兴春, 李欢, 刘雅丽. (2021). 自尊与亲社会行为的关系: 来自元分析的证据. 心理技术与应用, 9(08), 449-460.
颜学新. (2018). 人际亲密度对青少年亲社会冒险行为的影响: 中介与调节作用分析(硕士学位论文). 陕西师范大学, 西安.
占盛丽. (2009). 从个人和学校视角看家庭社会经济地位对学生学业成绩的影响——国际学生评估项目(PISA)的启示. 上海教育科研, (12),10-13.
张亚利, 李森, 俞国良. (2019). 自尊与社交焦虑的关系: 基于中国学生群体的元分析. 心理科学进展, 27(06), 1005-1018.
郑晓莹, 彭泗清, 彭璐珞. (2015). “达”则兼济天下? 社会比较对亲社会行为的影响及心理机制. 心理学报, 47(02), 243-250.
郑庆友, 卢宁. (2016).幼儿父母陪伴自尊和亲社会行为的关系. 中国学校卫生, 37(01),71-73+77.
郑显亮, 谢方威, 丁亮, 王雪. (2021). 社会阶层与大学生网络利他行为: 一个有调节的中介模型. 心理发展与教育, 37(2), 182-189.
周春燕, 郭永玉. (2013). 家庭社会阶层对大学生心理健康的影响: 公正世界信念的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 21(04),636-640.
周浩, 龙立荣. (2004).共同方法偏差的统计检验与控制方法. 心理科学进展, (06),942-950.
[1] 黄垣成, 袁湫嵋, 辛婷, 李彩娜. 青少年早期学业成就对主观幸福感的影响:自尊和流动性的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 384-392.
[2] 王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响:择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[3] 路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”?高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[4] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[5] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[6] 喻昊雪, 李卉, 王福兴. 大学生公正世界信念与学业倦怠的关系:应对方式与无聊倾向的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 391-401.
[7] 高玲, 孟文慧, 刘介地, 杨继平, 王兴超. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负行为:自尊和基本共情的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 439-448.
[8] 鲁明辉, 王融, 张丽敏. 父母心理弹性与自闭症谱系障碍儿童情绪行为问题的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 247-254.
[9] 张陆, 黄雪芳, 游志麒, 叶娜. 儿童期虐待对大学生公正世界信念的影响:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 804-812.
[10] 田玮宜, 徐健捷, 吕广林, 王轶楠. 父母自尊与青少年主观幸福感间的关系:亲子信任与青少年自尊的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 331-338.
[11] 张小敏, 陈欣, 务凯, 赵国祥. 学校联结和学业能力对高中生自尊的影响:一个多层线性模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 358-365.
[12] 姜永志, 白晓丽, 张璐, 赵思琦. 青少年线上积极自我呈现与幸福感的关系:线上积极反馈与自尊的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 45-53.
[13] 袁言云, 王志航, 孙庆, 王东方, 尹霞云, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险与贫困儿童情绪问题的关系:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(1): 100-108.
[14] 关文军, 胡梦娟, 刘晨. 自闭症儿童父母歧视知觉对群际关系的影响:一个有调节的中介作用模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 854-863.
[15] 周宗奎, 曹敏, 田媛, 黄淳, 杨秀娟, 宋友志. 初中生亲子关系与抑郁:自尊和情绪弹性的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(6): 864-872.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!