心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (5): 513-519.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.05.01

• 认知与社会性发展 •    下一篇

儿童和青少年的空间—时间隐喻图式

杜萱1,2, 林嘉懿1, 陈黎静1   

  1. 1. 福建师范大学心理学系, 福州 350117;
    2. 泉州市惠安广海中学, 泉州 362100
  • 发布日期:2020-09-11
  • 通讯作者: 陈黎静 E-mail:chenlj@fjnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    全国教育科学“十二五”规划教育部青年课题(EBA140359)。

The Space-time Metaphor of the Children and Teenagers

DU Xuan1,2, LIN Jiayi1, CHEN Lijing1   

  1. 1. Department of Psychology, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117;
    2. Hui'an Guanghai Middle School, Quanzhou 362100
  • Published:2020-09-11

摘要: 研究考察儿童和青少年是否具有“左-右”空间-时间隐喻图式。以泉州市惠安县4所学校小学三年级、小学六年级、初中三年级和高中三年级共100名学生为被试,完成时态-按键匹配任务。结果发现,各年级被试均对“左-过去,右-将来”的按键匹配比对“左-将来,右-过去”的按键匹配反应更快,准确率更高,表明自小学三年级起,儿童和青少年在时间隐喻图式上表现出和成人一致的模式,未发现年龄发展效应。该发现支持隐喻结构观。

关键词: 时间隐喻, 认知发展, 语言发展, 儿童, 青少年

Abstract: The present study investigated the “left-past, right-future” space-time metaphor for the children and teenagers. This study recruited 100 elementary, junior and senior high school students (Grades 3,6,9 and 12) from 4 schools in Hui'an, Quanzhou, China. Participants categorized a series of phrases as referring to the past or to the future by pressing a left or a right key. Results showed that the “past-left, future-right” time-space match was responded faster and more accurate than the mismatch condition, supporting the psychological reality of the “left-past, right-future” space-time metaphor for the children and teenagers. In Summary, the children and teenagers from Grade 3 to Grade 12 have a space-time metaphor similar to the adults. This finding supports the Metaphoric-Structuring View.

Key words: time metaphor, cognitive development, language development, children, teenagers

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2014). Mapping spatial frames of reference onto time:A review of theoretical accounts and empirical findings. Cognition, 132(3), 342-382.
Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring:Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1), 1-28.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?:Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1-22.
Boroditsky, L., Fuhrman, O., & McCormick, K. (2011). Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? Cognition, 118(1), 123-129.
Bottini, R., Crepaldi, D., Casasanto, D., Crollen, V., & Collignon, O. (2015). Space and time in the sighted and blind. Cognition, 141, 67-72.
Casasanto, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2008). Time in the mind:Using space to think about time. Cognition, 106(2), 579-593.
Casasanto, D., Fotakopoulou, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Space and time in the child's mind:Evidence for a cross-dimensional asymmetry. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 387-405.
Chan, T. T., & Bergen, B. (2005). Writing direction influences spatial cognition. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 27th annual conference of the cognitive science society.
Chen, J. Y. (2007). Do Chinese and English speakers think about time differently? Failure of replicating Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104(2), 427-436.
Ding, X., Feng, N., Cheng, X., Liu, H., & Fan, Z. (2015). Are past and future symmetric in mental time line? Frontiers in Psychology, 6(208).
Giora R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings:Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 919-929.
Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2007). Mental time-lines follow writing direction:Comparing English and Hebrew speakers. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Fuhrman, O., & Boroditsky, L. (2010). Cross-cultural differences in mental representations of time:Evidence from an implicit nonlinguistic task. Cognitive Science, 34(8), 1430-1451.
Li, H. (2017). Time on hands:deliberate and spontaneous temporal gestures by speakers of mandarin. Gesture, 16(3), 396-415.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago:University of Chicago press, 77-90.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago:University of Chicago press.
Mashal, N., Faust, M., Hendler, T., (2005). The role of the right hemispherein processing nonsalient metaphorical meanings:application ofprincipal components analysis to fMRI data. Neuropsychologia, 43, 2084-2100.
Nava, E., Rinaldi, L., Bulf, H., & Macchi Cassia, V. (2017). Visual and proprioceptive feedback differently modulate the spatial representation of number and time in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 161, 161-177.
Saj, A., Fuhrman, O., Vuilleumier, P., & Boroditsky, L. (2014). Patients with left spatial neglect also neglect the "left side" of time. Psychological Science, 25(1), 207-214.
Santiago, J., Lupáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 512-516.
Sell, A. J., & Kaschak, M. P. (2011). Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses. Brain and language, 117(1), 39-44.
Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30(4), 745-757.
Ulirich, R., Eikmeier, V., de la Vega, I., Fernández, S.R., Alex-Ruf, S., & Maienborn, C.(2012). With the past behind and the future ahead:Back-to front representation of past and future sentences. Memory & Cognition, 40(3), 483-495.
Vallesi, A., Weisblatt, Y., Semenza, C., & Shaki, S. (2014). Cultural modulations of space-time compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(3), 666-669.
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2016). English and mandarin speakers' mental representations of time. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 14(2), 385-415.
陈栩茜, 张积家. (2011). 时间隐喻在汉语时间量词语义加工中的作用. 心理学报, 43(8), 863-877.
董奇. (1985). 小学儿童思维规则发展的实验研究. 心理发展与教育, 2 (3), 8-25.
郭晶晶, 赵婧超. (2017). 熟悉性对汉语隐喻义与本义加工机制的影响.心理科学, 40(6), 1302-1308.
金泓, 黄希庭. (2012). 时空隐喻研究的新问题:时间表征的左右方向性. 心理科学进展, 20(9), 1364-1371.
林崇德. (2008). 发展心理学. 北京:人民教育出版社, 271-272, 330-331.
王希杰. (1983). 汉语修辞学. 北京:北京出版社, 282-297.
周榕. (2003). 儿童时间隐喻能力发展趋势初探. 现代外语, 26(3),221-231.
朱智贤. (2003). 儿童心理学. 北京:人民教育出版社, 399-400.
朱智贤, 钱曼君, 吴凤岗, 林崇德. (1982). 小学生字词概念发展的研究. 心理科学通讯, 6(3), 23-29.
[1] 储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2] 刘艳春, 邓玉婷, 张曦. 智力障碍儿童对不同对象的分享行为:心理理论的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 160-168.
[3] 梁丹丹, 闫晓民, 葛志林. 4~8岁汉语高功能自闭症儿童基于语言线索的情绪识别能力发展研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 169-175.
[4] 史梦梦, 任桂琴, 孙军红, 张鑫星. 词汇类型和阅读水平对小学一年级儿童阅读理解监控的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 207-214.
[5] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[6] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[7] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[8] 冷欣怡, 苏萌萌, 李文玲, 杨秀杰, 邢爱玲, 张湘琳, 舒华. 家庭环境与农村儿童早期语言发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 8-18.
[9] 赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[10] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[11] 朱娜平, 刘雁伶, 熊红梅, 赵攀. “公无远近”有早晚:不同资源分配情境中儿童公平规范执行行为发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 772-780.
[12] 颜志强, 周可, 曾晓, 徐惠, 朱晓倩, 张娟. 学前期儿童执行功能与攻击性行为的关系:认知共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 788-797.
[13] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[14] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[15] 任立文, 马原驰, 张清瑶, 张玲玲, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与儿童学校适应的关系:基于交叉滞后的分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 635-644.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!