心理发展与教育 ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (4): 502-512.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2020.04.14

• 理论探讨与进展 • 上一篇    

“触电”时代的儿童:触屏媒体与幼儿发展

高春颍1, 王福兴1, 童钰1, 李卉2   

  1. 1. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079;
    2. 华中师范大学教育学院, 武汉 430079
  • 发布日期:2020-07-21
  • 通讯作者: 王福兴, 李卉 E-mail:fxwang@mail.ccun.edu.cn;huilipsy@mail.ccnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(31771236);国家自然科学基金青年项目(31700968);中央高校基本科研业务费项目(CCNU19TS040);中央高校基本科研业务费创新资助项目(2019CX22110)。

Children in the Digital Age: Touchscreen and Child Development

GAO Chunying1, WANG Fuxing1, TONG Yu1, LI Hui2   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
    2. School of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079
  • Published:2020-07-21

摘要: 数字媒体的飞速发展使得越来越多的研究者开始关注触屏媒体对幼儿发展的影响。综述从触屏媒体的特征、触屏学习、幼儿发展、触屏媒体能否作为测量工具及其在家庭和学校中推广使用的有效性方面进行探讨。综述发现:触屏媒体具有交互性、即时反馈性、渐进性和便携性。41项涉及触屏的研究在STEM学习(d与基线比较=1.06,d与其它方法比较=0.30)、词汇学习(d与基线比较=0.51,d与其它方法比较=0.47)和学习迁移(d=0.78)上发现了触屏的促进作用。触屏媒体对幼儿执行功能与亲子关系发展有促进作用,但是对精细运动的影响尚不明确。触屏可以作为测量工具或干预方式用于其它领域,推广使用时存在挑战。未来研究应该继续关注触屏媒体特征对学习效果及不同年龄阶段儿童的影响,探讨真实触屏媒体环境中儿童的学习与发展。

关键词: 触屏, 幼儿发展, 学习, 交互性

Abstract: Children are increasingly exposed to touchscreen devices, such as iPad and smartphones in their early life. This article reviewed studies regarding the touchscreen use and children’s development. It was found that touchscreen devices had the feature of interactive, immediate feedback, progressive and portable. Using touchscreen devices could promote children’s learning in STEM (dcompare with baseline=1.06, dcompare with other methods=0.30) and vocabulary (dcompare with baseline=0.51, dcompare with other methods=0.47). Moreover, children could transfer what they had learned on touchscreen to other situations (d=0.78). Using touchscreen device had positive effect on children’s executive function and parent-child relationship, but its influences on children’s fine movement skills is still mixed. Touchscreen device could also be used as a new measurement instrument or interventions in other areas, and there are challenges in popularizing. Future studies might focus on the touchscreen device’s characteristics and learning outcomes among children of different age, and extend these results in real-world situations.

Key words: touchscreen, child development, learning, interactivity

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Ginns, P., Howard, S. J., Leahy, W., & Paas, F. (2015). Giving learning a helping hand: Finger tracing of temperature graphs on an iPad. Educational Psychology Review, 27(3), 427-443.
Aladé, F., Lauricella, A. R., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Wartella, E. (2016). Measuring with Murray: Touchscreen technology and preschoolers' STEM learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 433-441.
Aladé, F., & Nathanson, A. I. (2016). What preschoolers bring to the show: The relation between viewer characteristics and children’s learning from educational television. Media Psychology, 19(3), 406-430.
American Academy of Pediatrics. (2011). Media use by children younger than 2 years. Pediatrics, 128(5), 1-6.
Apple (2019). Apps for education. Available at: https://www.apple.com/education/products/ [Accessed April 28th 2019].
Barr, R. (2010). Transfer of learning between 2D and 3D sources during infancy: Informing theory and practice. Developmental Review, 30(2), 128-154.
Bedford, R., Urabain, I. R. S. d., Cheung, C. H. M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Smith, T. J. (2016). Toddlers' fine motor milestone achievement is associated with early touchscreen scrolling. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1108.
Cheung, C. H. M., Bedford, R., Urabain, I. R. S. D., Karmiloff-Smith, A., & Smith, T. J. (2017). Daily touchscreen use in infants and toddlers is associated with reduced sleep and delayed sleep onset. Scientific Reports, 7, 46104.
Christakis, D. A. (2014). Interactive media use at younger than the age of 2 years: Time to rethink the American Academy of Pediatrics guideline? JAMA Pediatrics, 168(5), 399-400.
Clément, F., Koenig, M., & Harris, P. (2004). The ontogenesis of trust. Mind and Language, 19(4), 360-379.
Cristia, A., & Seidl, A. (2015). Parental reports on touch screen use in early childhood. PLoS One, 10(6), e0128338.
Eisen, S., & Lillard, A. S. (2018). The digital dilemma: Why limit young children’s use of interactive media? In Ferguson C. (Ed.), Video Game Influences on Aggression, Cognition, and Attention (pp. 71-82). Springer, Cham.
Foglia, L., & A.Wilson, R. (2013). Embodied cognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(3), 319-325.
Frank, M. C., Sugarman, E., Horowitz, A. C., Lewis, M. L., & Yurovsky, D. (2016). Using tablets to collect data from young children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17(1), 1-17.
Furman, M., Angelis, S. D., Prost, E. D., & Taylor, I. (2018). Tablets as an educational tool for enhancing preschool science. International Journal of Early Years Education, 27(1), 6-19.
Hermes, J., Rakoczy, H., & Behne, T. (2018). Making sense of conflicting information: A touchscreen paradigm to measure young children's selective trust. Infant and Child Development, 28(1), e2119.
Herodotou, C. (2018). Mobile games and science learning: A comparative study of 4 and 5 years old playing the game Angry Birds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 6-16.
Hintsanen, M., Gluschkoff, K., Dobewall, H., Cloninger, C. R., Keltner, D., Saarinen, A., et al. (2019). Supplemental material for parent-child-relationship quality predicts offspring dispositional compassion in adulthood: A prospective follow-up study over three decades. Developmental Psychology, 55(1), 216-225.
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Zosh, J. M., Golinkoff, R. M., Gray, J. H., Robb, M. B., & Kaufman, J. (2015). Putting education in "educational" apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3-34.
Hourcade, J. P., Bullock-Rest, N. E., & Hansen, T. E. (2011). Multitouch tablet applications and activities to enhance the social skills of children with autism spectrum disorders. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 16(2), 157-168.
Hubber, P. J., Outhwaite, L. A., Chigeda, A., McGrath, S., Hodgen, J., & Pitchford, N. J. (2016). Should touch screen tablets be used to improve educational outcomes in primary school children in developing countries? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 839.
Huber, B., Tarasuik, J., Antoniou, M. N., Garrett, C., Bowe, S. J., Kaufman, J., et al. (2016). Young children's transfer of learning from a touchscreen device. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 56-64.
Huber, B., Yeates, M., Meyer, D., Fleckhammer, L., & Kaufman, J. (2018). The effects of screen media content on young children's executive functioning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 170, 72-85.
Kirkorian, H. L., Anderson, D. R., & Keen, R. (2012). Age differences in online processing of video: An eye movement study. Child Development, 83(2), 497-507.
Kirkorian, H. L., Choi, K., & Pempek, T. A. (2016). Toddlers' word learning from contingent and noncontingent video on touch screens. Child Development, 87(2), 405-413.
Kuhl, P. K. (2007). Is speech learning ‘gated’ by the social brain? Developmental Science, 10(1), 110-120.
Kwok, K., Ghrear, S., Li, V., Haddock, T., Coleman, P., & Birch, S. A. J. (2016). Children can learn new facts equally well from interactive media versus face to face instruction. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1603.
Lai, K. W., Khaddage, F., & Knezek, G. (2013). Blending student technology experiences in formal and informal learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(5), 414-425.
Lee, S., & Lang, A. (2013). Redefining media content and structure in terms of available resources:Toward a Dynamic Human-Centric Theory of communication. Communication Research, 42(5), 599-625.
Li, H., Hsueh, Y., Wang, F., Bai, X., Liu, T., & Zhou, L. (2017). Do young chinese children gain anthropomorphism after exposure to personified touch-screen and board games? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 55.
Li, H., Subrahmanyam, K., Bai, X., Xie, X., & Liu, T. (2017). Viewing fantastical events versus touching fantastical events: Short-term effects on children's inhibitory control. Child Development, 89(1), 48-57.
Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2014). A look at research on mobile learning in K-12 education from 2007 to the present. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(4), 325-372.
LoBue, V. (2014). Measuring attentional biases for threat in children and adults. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 92, e52190.
Marsh, J., Plowman, L., Yamada-Rice, D., Bishop, J. C., Lahmar, J., Scott, F., et al. (2015). Exploring play and creativity in pre-schoolers’ use of apps: Final project report. Technology and Play.
Mattoon, C., Bates, A., Shifflet, R., Latham, N., & Ennis, S. (2015). Examining computational skills in prekindergarteners: The effects of traditional and digital manipulatives in a prekindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 17(1), n1.
McLean, K. J. (2016). The implementation of Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) in primary [elementary] schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1739.
Moyer-Packenham, P. S., Shumway, J. F., Bullock, E., Tucker, S. I., Anderson-Pence, K. L., Westenskow, A., et al. (2015). Young children’s learning performance and efficiency when using virtual manipulative mathematics iPad apps. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 34(1), 41-69.
Neumann, M. M. (2018). Using tablets and apps to enhance emergent literacy skills in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42, 239-246.
O’Connell, T., Freed, G., & Rothberg, M. (2010). Using Apple technology to support learning for students with sensory and learning disabilities. WGBH Educational Foundation, 19-21.
Papadakis, S., Kalogiannakis, M., & Zaranis, N. (2018). The effectiveness of computer and tablet assisted intervention in early childhood students’ understanding of numbers. An empirical study conducted in Greece. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1849-1871.
Pila, S., Aladé, F., Sheehan, K. J., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. A. (2019). Learning to code via tablet applications: An evaluation of Daisy the Dinosaur and Kodable as learning tools for young children. Computers & Education, 128, 52-62.
Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Finding orchids in a field of dandelions: Understanding children's differential susceptibility to media effects. American Behavioral Scientist, 59(14), 1776-1789.
Pitchford, N. J., & Outhwaite, L. A. (2016). Can touch screen tablets be used to assess cognitive and motor skills in early years primary school children? A cross-cultural study. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1666.
Radesky, J. S., Schumacher, J., & Zuckerman, B. (2015). Mobile and interactive media use by young children: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Pediatrics, 135(1), 1-3.
Rattanasone, N. X., Davies, B., Schembri, T., Andronos, F., & Demuth, K. (2016). The iPad as a research tool for the understanding of English plurals by English, Chinese, and other L1 speaking 3-and 4-year-olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1773.
Rideout. (2017). The common sense census: Media use by kids age zero to eight. Common Sense Media.
Russo-Johnson, C., Troseth, G., Duncan, C., & Mesghina, A. (2017). All tapped out: Touchscreen interactivity and young children's word learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 578.
Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2016). Improving low-income preschoolers mathematics achievement with Math Shelf, a preschool tablet computer curriculum. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 223-229.
Schacter, J., & Jo, B. (2017). Improving preschoolers’ mathematics achievement with tablets: A randomized controlled trial. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(3), 313-327.
Schroeder, E. L., & Kirkorian, H. L. (2016). When seeing is better than doing: Preschoolers' transfer of STEM skills using touchscreen games. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1377.
Sheehan, K. J., & Uttal, D. H. (2016). Children's learning from touch screens: A dual representation perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1220.
Skaug, S., Englund, K. T., Saksvik-Lehouillier, I., Lydersen, S., & Wichstrom, L. (2018). Parent-child interactions during traditional and interactive media settings: A pilot randomized control study. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(2), 135-145.
Smeets, D. J. H., & Bus, A. G. (2014). The interactive animated e-book as a word learning device for kindergartners. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36(4), 899-920.
Stacy, S. T., Cartwright, M., Arwood, Z., Canfiel, J. P., & Kloos, H. (2017). Addressing the math-practice gap in elementary school: Are tablets a feasible tool for informal math practice? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 179.
Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. M. (1973). Effects of time and memory factors on response in surveys. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 68(344), 805-815.
Sutton, J. E. (2006). The development of landmark and beacon use in young children: Evidence from a touchscreen search task. Developmental Science, 9(1), 108-123.
Tarasuik, J., Demaria, A., & Kaufman, J. (2017). Transfer of problem solving skills from touchscreen to 3D model by 3- to 6-year-olds. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1586.
Teepe, R. C., Molenaar, I., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Technology-enhanced storytelling stimulating parent-child interaction and preschool children's vocabulary knowledge. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(2), 123-136.
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221-243.
Walter-Laager, C., Brandenberg, K., Tinguely, L., Schwarz, J., Pfiffner, M. R., & Moschner, B. (2017). Media-assisted language learning for young children: Effects of a word-learning app on the vocabulary acquisition of two-year-olds. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 1062-1072.
Wang, F., Xie, H., Wang, Y., Hao, Y., & An, J. (2016). Using touchscreen tablets to help young children learn to tell time. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1800.
Webster, E. K., Martin, C. K., & Staiano, A. E. (2018). Fundamental motor skills, screen-time, and physical activity in preschoolers. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 8(2), 114-121.
Willoughby, D., Evans, M. A., & Nowak, S. (2015). Do ABC eBooks boost engagement and learning in preschoolers? An experimental study comparing eBooks with paper ABC and storybook controls. Computers & Education, 82, 107-117.
Wood, E., Petkovski, M., Pasquale, D. D., Gottardo, A., Evans, M. A., & Savage, R. S. (2016). Parent scaffolding of young children when engaged with mobile technology. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 690.
Yan, J., Feng, X., & Schoppe-Sullivan, S. J. (2018). Longitudinal associations between parent-child relationships in middle childhood and child-perceived loneliness. Journal of Family Psychology, 32(6), 841-847.
Zack, E., Barr, R., Gerhardstein, P., Dickerson, K., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2009). Infant imitation from television using novel touch screen technology. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 13-26.
Zipke, M. (2016). Preschoolers explore interactive storybook apps: The effect on word recognition and story comprehension. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1695-1712.
李卉, 王福兴, 范颖平, 周宗奎. (2012). 媒体与婴儿的认知发展. 心理科学, 35(5), 1113-1118.
[1] 高斌, 张丹丹, 朱根, 蔡艳香, 郭羽希. 高中生主动性人格与网络学习投入:网络学习自我效能和学业期望的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 224-230.
[2] 杨宝琰, 马熙凤, 臧鸿瑜, 毛海燕. 经济收入和父亲受教育程度对农村初中生学习投入的影响:家庭义务感和依赖教育性未来身份的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 83-92.
[3] 辛钊阳, 王庆林, 王明辉, 杜静, 赵国祥. 师生关系与硕士研究生学习适应:科研自我效能和专业承诺的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 825-832.
[4] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[5] 丛佩瑶, 贾宁. 元认知监测中容易度判断与学习判断的分离:来自行为与近红外脑成像的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 522-531.
[6] 李其容, 杨艳宇, 李春萱. 父母冲突、青少年日常自我效能和学习投入:日常消极情绪与日常沉思在父母冲突调节效应中的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 236-246.
[7] 李奕萱, 王泽宇, 周铭扬, 杨玉川, 赵敏翔, 董妍. 高中生物理和化学学科中同伴学业支持与学业情绪的关系:学习效能感的中介作用和性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 58-67.
[8] 张洋, 张婉莹, 王燕青, 赵婷婷, 王福兴. 生成性绘图与合作对高中生科学知识学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 830-838.
[9] 李明, 尚新华, 方晓义, 姬文广. 从父母教育卷入到学业成就:自主支持与自主学习力的链式中介[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 839-847.
[10] 张彩, 江伊茹, 朱成伟, 邵婷婷, 王海涛, 陈福美. 学校归属感与青少年手机依赖的关系:学习焦虑的中介效应与同伴关系的调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(6): 848-858.
[11] 郎悦茹, 龚少英, 曹阳, 吴亚男. 网络学习中师生交互与大学生学习投入的关系:自主动机与学业情绪的序列中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 530-537.
[12] 陈建文, 刘艳, 谭千保. 累积生态风险与高职生学习倦怠:消极自我图式和网络成瘾的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 576-583.
[13] 王燕青, 杨晓梦, 赵婷婷, 高春颍, 张洋, 赵庆柏, 王福兴, 胡祥恩. 分段是视频学习的有效方式吗?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 600-608.
[14] 仝宇光, 李亚平, 刘志国, 宋耀武. 不同情境转换对重复学习条件下类别-例词回忆的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(3): 305-314.
[15] 张和颐, 洪秀敏. 家庭认知环境与0~3岁婴幼儿发展的关系:有调节的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 178-185.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!