社交网站使用与青少年生活满意度的关系:一个有调节的中介模型

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2017.03.06

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨社交网站使用、线上社会资本、自尊与青少年生活满意度的关系，本研究在社会资本理论及自尊的社会计量器理论的基础上，构建了一个有调节的中介模型。采用社交网站使用强度问卷、线上社会资本问卷、自尊量表以及生活满意度问卷对初（1）到高（3）六个年级的1368名中学生（M=14.63岁，SD=1.75）进行调查研究，结果显示：（1）社交网站使用强度与线上黏接/桥接型社会资本和生活满意度均呈显著正相关；线上黏接型社会资本与自尊、生活满意度均呈显著正相关；线上桥接型社会资本与自尊呈显著正相关，与生活满意度的相关不显著；自尊与生活满意度呈显著正相关。（2）线上黏接型社会资本能够在社交网站使用强度与生活满意度的关系中起部分中介作用。（3）社交网站使用对生活满意度的直接预测作用及线上黏接型社会资本的中介效应会受到自尊的调节，相对于自尊水平低的青少年，社交网站使用更有利于高自尊个体获得线上黏接型社会资本、提升生活满意度。研究结果不仅有利于从社会资本理论及自尊的社会计量器理论视角理解社交网站使用与青少年生活满意度的关系，而且对引导青少年获取社会资本、提升生活满意度具有启示意义。

关键词: 社交网站, 生活满意度, 线上社会资本, 自尊, 青少年

Abstract: In order to investigate the impact of social network site use on adolescents' life satisfaction as well as the effect of online social capital and self-esteem, a sample of 1368 middle and high school students (mean age=14.63 years, SD=1.75) completed Questionnaire of Social Network Site Intensity Scale, Internet Social Capital Scales, Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale and Satisfaction with life scale. All the measures have good reliability and validity. Data were collected and analyzed with SPSS 23.0 and SPSS PROCESS written by Hayes. Results revealed that:(1) The intensity of social network sites use was positively correlated with online bonding/bridging social capital and life satisfaction; online bonding social capital was positively correlated with self-esteem and life satisfaction; online bridging social capital was positively correlated with self-esteem, but does not show significant correlation with life satisfaction; self-esteem was positively correlated with life satisfaction. (2) The intensity of social network sites use could not only affect adolescents' life satisfaction directly, but also affect life satisfaction through the mediation of online bonding social capital, while the mediating role of online bridging social capital was not significant. (3) The direct effect of intensity of social network sites use on life satisfaction and the mediation of online bonding social capital were moderated by self-esteem, and they were much stronger among adolescents with high self-esteem. These findings contribute to our understanding of how and when social network sites use impacts adolescents' life satisfaction from the social capital theory and sociometer theory.

Key words: social network sites, life satisfaction, online social capital, self-esteem, adolescents

中图分类号:

B844

周宗奎, 连帅磊, 田媛, 牛更枫, 孙晓军. 社交网站使用与青少年生活满意度的关系:一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 297-305.

ZHOU Zongkui, LIAN Shuailei, TIAN Yuan, NIU Gengfeng, SUN Xiaojun. The Relationship between Social Network Sites Use and Life Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Model[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2017, 33(3): 297-305.

参考文献

Ahn, J. (2012). Teenagers' experiences with social network sites:Relationships to bridging and bonding social capital. The Information Society, 28(2), 99-109.

Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression testing:Testing interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE.

Akpan, U., Akwaowo, E., Senam, N. (2013). Uses and gratifications of social networking websites among youths in uyo, nigeria. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(2), 353-369.

Apaolaza, V., Hartmann, P., Medina, E., Barrutia, J. M., Echebarria, C. (2013). The relationship between socializing on the Spanish online networking site Tuenti and teenagers' subjective wellbeing:The roles of self-esteem and loneliness. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(4), 1282-1289.

Basilisco, R., Jin, K. (2015). Uses and Gratification Motivation for Using Facebook and the Impact of Facebook Usage on Social Capital and Life Satisfaction among Filipino Users. International Journal of Software Engineering & Its Applications, 9(4), 181-194.

Burke, M., Kraut, R., & Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook:differentiating uses and users. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, Vancouver, Bc, Canada, May (pp.571-580).

Burke, M., Marlow, C., & Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vol.93, pp.144-153). ACM.

Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., Day, R. D., Harper, J., Stockdale, L. (2014). A Friend Request from Dear Old Dad:Associations between Parent-Child Social Networking and Adolescent Outcomes. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(1), 8-13.

Davis, K. (2012). Friendship 2.0:Adolescents' experiences of belonging and self-disclosure online. Journal of adolescence, 35(6), 1527-1536.

Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of personality assessment, 49(1), 71-75.

Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social network sites:Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.

Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.

Feinstein, B. A., Hershenberg, R., Bhatia, V., Latack, J. A., Meuwly, N., Davila, J. (2013). Negative social comparison on Facebook and depressive symptoms:Rumination as a mechanism. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2(3), 161-170.

Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2012). When Social Networking Is Not Working Individuals With Low Self-Esteem Recognize but Do Not Reap the Benefits of Self-Disclosure on Facebook. Psychological Science, 23(3), 295-302.

Frison, E., & Eggermont, S. (2016). Exploring the relationships between different types of Facebook use, perceived online social support, and adolescents' depressed mood. Social Science Computer Review, 34(2), 153-171.

Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS:A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling. Manuscript submitted for publication. Retrieved September 1, 2013, from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf

Kalpidou, M. D. J. (2011). The Relationship between Facebook and the Well-Being of Undergraduate College Students. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 14(4), 183-189.

Klein, C. (2013). Social capital or social cohesion:what matters for subjective well-being? Social indicators research, 110(3), 891-911.

Ko, H. C., Wang, L. L., & Xu, Y. T. (2013). Understanding the different types of social support offered by audience to a-list diary-like and informative bloggers. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 16(3), 194-199.

Ko, H., Kuo, F. (2009). Can blogging enhance subjective well-being through self-disclosure? CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(1), 75-79.

Kraut, R., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of social issues, 58(1), 49-74.

Kuss, D. J., Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online social networking and addiction-a review of the psychological literature. International journal of environmental research and public health, 8(9), 3528-3552.

Leary, M. R. (2003). lndividual Differences in Self-Esteem:A Review and Theoretical integration. Handbook of self and identity, 401.

Leary, M. R. (2005). Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value:Getting to the root of self-esteem. European review of social psychology, 16(1), 75-111.

Lee, E., Kim, Y. J., & Ahn, J. (2014). How do people use Facebook features to manage social capital?. Computers in Human Behavior, 36(2), 440-445.

Lee, G., Lee, J., Kwon, S. (2011). Use of social-networking sites and subjective well-being:A study in South Korea. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(3), 151-155.

Lee, J. R., Moore, D. C., Park, E., Park, S. G. (2012). Who wants to be "friend-rich"? Social compensatory friending on Facebook and the moderating role of public self-consciousness. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1036-1043.

Lee, K., Noh, M., Koo, D. (2013). Lonely People Are No Longer Lonely on Social Networking Sites:The Mediating Role of Self-Disclosure and Social Support. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(6), 413-418.

Liu, C., Yu, C. (2013). Can Facebook Use Induce Well-Being? CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 16(9), 674-678.

Liu, D., & Brown, B. B. (2014). Self-disclosure on social networking sites, positive feedback, and social capital among Chinese college students. Computers in Human Behavior, 38(3), 213-219.

Nabi, R. L., Prestin, A., & So, J. (2013). Facebook friends with (health) benefits? Exploring social network site use and perceptions of social support, stress, and well-being. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 721-727.

Oh, H. J., Ozkaya, E., Larose, R. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 30(1), 69-78.

Park, N., Kee, K. F., Valenzuela, S. (2009). Being immersed in social networking environment:Facebook groups, uses and gratifications, and social outcomes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 729-733.

Phua, J., Jin, S. A. (2011). ‘Finding a home away from home’:the use of social networking sites by Asia-Pacific students in the United States for bridging and bonding social capital. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(5), 504-519.

Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures package, 61.

Saylag, R. (2013). Facebook as a Tool in Fostering EFL Teachers' Establishment of Interpersonal Relations with Students through Self-disclosure. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 680-685.

Skoog, T., Sorbring, E., Bohlin, M. (2015). Facebook as a means to make new peers among early maturing girls. Computers in Human Behavior, 48(C), 500-505.

Steinfield, C., Ellison, N. B., & Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites:A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445.

Utz, S., Tanis, M., Vermeulen, I. (2012). It is all about being popular:the effects of need for popularity on social network site use. Cyberpsychology Behavior & Social Networking, 15(1), 37-42.

Valenzuela, S., Park, N., Kee, K. F. (2009). Is There Social Capital in a Social Network Site?:Facebook Use and College Students' Life Satisfaction, Trust, and Participation1. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.

Xie, W., & Xie, W. (2014). Social network site use, mobile personal talk and social capital among teenagers. Computers in Human Behavior, 41(41), 228-235.

Yang, C. C., & Brown, B. B. (2016). Online self-presentation on Facebook and self development during the college transition. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(2), 402-416.

刘庆奇, 孙晓军, 周宗奎, 牛更枫, 孔繁昌, 连帅磊. (2016). 社交网站真实自我呈现对生活满意度的影响:线上积极反馈和一般自我概念的链式中介作用. 心理科学, 39(2), 406-411.

刘斯漫, 刘柯廷, 李田田, 卢莉. (2015). 大学生正念对主观幸福感的影响:情绪调节及心理弹性的中介作用. 心理科学,38(4), 889-895.

孙晓军, 连帅磊, 牛更枫, 闫景蕾, 童媛添, 周宗奎. (2016). 社交网站使用对青少年抑郁的影响:上行社会比较的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(1), 32-35.

温忠麟, 叶宝娟. (2014). 有调节的中介模型检验方法:竞争还是替补? 心理学报, 46(5), 714-726.

熊红星, 张璟, 叶宝娟, 郑雪, 孙配贞. (2012). 共同方法变异的影响及其统计控制途径的模型分析. 心理科学进展,20(5), 757-769.

闫景蕾, 武俐, 孙萌, 崔娟, 梁清. (2016). 社交网站使用对抑郁的影响:线上社会资本的中介作用. 中国临床心理学杂志, 24(2), 317-320.

姚琦, 马华维, 阎欢, 陈琦. (2014). 心理学视角下社交网络用户个体行为分析.心理科学进展, 22(10), 1647-1659.

张林, 李元元. (2009). 自尊社会计量器理论的研究述评. 心理科学进展, 17(4), 852-856.

张永欣, 热娜古丽·艾赛提, 魏华, 张笑容, 陈洁, 谷传华. (2010). 自尊的毕生发展. 心理科学进展, 18(7), 1128-1135.

中国互联网络信息中心. (2016). 《第38次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》. 来自http://www.cnnic.cn/gywm/xwzx/rdxw/2016/201608/W020160803204144417902.pdf

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2]	王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系：意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3]	肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4]	王鑫强, 李金文, 卢红燕, 赖正伟, 李佳源. 择偶优劣势对师范大学生教师职业认同的影响：择偶价值感的中介及自尊的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 64-73.
[5]	魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系：压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[6]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[7]	路翠萍, 郑希付. 低自尊还是高“他尊”？高、低社交焦虑者的不同内隐自尊特性——来自EAST的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 808-816.
[8]	彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[9]	刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[10]	刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[11]	沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分？学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[12]	周晓慧, 刘妍希, 陈欣, 王一集. 父母教育卷入对初中生生活满意度的影响:校内人际关系和学业自我效能感的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 691-701.
[13]	张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[14]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[15]	王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.