认知抑制对艺术创造力的影响:认知风格的调节作用

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.03.05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以114名大学生为被试, 采用Mittenecker指向测验和粘贴画任务考察了认知抑制能力与艺术创造力的关系, 并采用镶嵌图形测验考察了认知风格在其中所起的调节作用。研究结果表明:(1)认知抑制能力与艺术创造力之间呈现负相关, 认知抑制对于个体的创造程度、沟通传播水平和艺术创造综合印象可以起到显著的负向预测作用, 对于个体艺术创造的可爱程度和想象水平可以起到边缘显著的负向预测作用;(2)认知风格在认知抑制能力与艺术创造力的关系中起着调节作用, 主要表现为认知抑制能力对于场依存个体的创造程度、想象水平和沟通传播水平具有显著的预测作用, 对于场独立个体的艺术创造力则不具有预测作用。

关键词: 认知抑制, 艺术创造力, 认知风格, 调节作用

Abstract: 114 undergraduates were recruited to complete the Mittenecker Pointing Test, Embedded Figure Test and the collage design as the measure of cognitive inhibition, cognitive style and artistic creativity respectively. The results showed that (1) Cognitive inhibition showed significant negative relationship with artistic creativity and it can predict individuals' creativity, communicative level and general impression significantly, likeability and imagination marginally significantly. (2) Cognitive style moderated the relationship between cognitive inhibition and artistic creativity, which showed that cognitive inhibition predicted creativity, imagination and communicative level of individuals who were inclined to field independence, whereas it can't predict artistic creativity of those inclined to field dependence.

Key words: cognitive inhibition, artistic creativity, cognitive style, the moderating effect

中图分类号:

B844

程丽芳, 胡卫平, 贾小娟. 认知抑制对艺术创造力的影响:认知风格的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(3): 287-295.

CHENG Lifang, HU Weiping, JIA Xiaojuan. Cognitive Inhibition and Artistic Creativity: The Moderating Effect of Cognitive Style[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2015, 31(3): 287-295.

参考文献

Amabile, T.M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.
Benedek, M., Franz, F., Heene, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and individual differences, 53, 480-485.
Brugger, P. (1997). Variables that influences the generation of random sequences: An update. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 627-661.
Burch, G. S., Hemsley, D. R., Pavelis, C., & Corr, P. J. (2006). Personality, creativity and latent inhibition. European Journal of Personality, 20, 107-122.
Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1011-1026.
Dorfman, L., Martindale, C., Gassimova, V., & Vartanian, O. (2008). Creativity and speed of information processing: A double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1382-1390.
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290-309.
Fink, A., Slamar-Halbedl, M., Unterrainer, H. F., & Weiss, E. (2012). Creativity: Genius, madness, or a combination of both? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(1), 11-18.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent - variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 101-135.
Furnham, A., & Crump, J. (2013). The sensitive, imaginative, articulate art student and conservative, cool, numerate science student: individual differences in art and science students. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 150-155.
Garcia-Sedeno, M., Mavarro, J., & Menacho, I. (2009). Relationship between personality traits and vocational choices. Psychological Reports, 105, 633-642.
Gilhooly, K. J., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S. H., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 611-625.
Groborz, M., & Necka, E. (2003). Creativity and cognitive control: Explorations of generation and evaluation skills. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 183-197.
Iyer, L. R., Doboli, S., Minai, A. A., Brown, V. R., Levine, D. S., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Neural dynamics of idea generation and the effects of priming. Neural Networks, 22, 674-686.
Jia, S., Zhang, Q., & Li, S. (2014). Field dependence-independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task. Neuroscience, 278, 136-143.
Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Differences in gender and ethnicity as measured by ratings of three writing tasks, Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 56-69.
Lin, W. L., Hsu, K. Y., Chen, H. C., & Wang, J. W. (2012). The relations of gender and personality traits on different creativities: a dual-process theory account. Psychology of Aesthetics, 6(2), 112-123.
Miller, G.F., & Tal, I.R. (2007). Schizotypy versus openness and intelligence as predictors of creativity. Schizophrenia Research, 93, 317-324.
Mittenecker, E. (1958). Die Analyse "Iufälliger" Reaktionsfolgen (The analysis of "random" action sequences). Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 5, 45-60.
Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49-100.
Morrens, M., Hulstijn, W., Lewi, P. J., & Sabbe, B. G. C. (2008). Bleuler revisited: Psychomotor slowing in schizophrenia as part of a catatonic symptom cluster. Psychiatry Research, 161, 121-125.
Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186-213.
Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225-241.
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence, 39, 36-45.
Peterson, J. B., Smith, K. W., & Carson, S. H. (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: replication and commentary. Personality and individual differences, 33, 1137-1147.
Schulter, G., Mittenecker, E., & Papousek, I. (2010). A computer program for testing and analyzing random generation behavior in normal and clinical samples: The Mittenecker Pointing Test. Behavior Research Methods, 42(1), 333-341.
Simonton, D. K. (2007). Creativity: Specialized expertise or general cognitive processes? In M. J. Roberts (Ed.), Integrating the mind: Domain general versus domain specific processes in higher cognition (pp. 351-367). Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
Stent, G. S. (2001). Meaning in art and science. In K. H. Pfenninger & V. R. Shubik (Eds.), The origins of creativity (pp. 31-42). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The domain generality versus specificity debate: How should it be posed? In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 299-306). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist, 51(7), 677-688.
Towse, J. N., & Neil, D. (1998). Analyzing human random generation behavior: A review of methods used and a computer program for describing performance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 30, 583-591.
Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Kwiatkowski, J. (2007). Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1470-1480.
Vartanian, O., Martindale, C., & Matthews, J. (2009). Divergent thinking ability is related to faster relatedness judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 99-103.
Zeki, S. (2001). Artistic creativity and the brain. Science, 293(5527), 51-52.
白学军, 巩彦斌, 胡卫平, 韩琴, 姚海娟. (2014). 不同科学创造力个体干扰抑制机制的比较.心理与行为研究, 12(2), 151-155.
赖丁, 雷纳. (2003).认知风格与学习策略-理解学习和行为中的风格差异. 上海: 华东师范大学出版社.
刘正奎, 程黎, 施建农. (2007). 创造力与注意模式之间的关系. 心理科学, 30(7), 387-390.
沈汪兵, 刘昌, 王永娟. (2010). 艺术创造力的脑神经生理基础. 心理科学进展,18(10), 1520-1528.
宋广文, 韩树杰. (2007). 场依存-独立认知方式干扰抑制的比较. 心理与行为研究,5(2), 100-104.
宋合义, 谢斯骏, 张厚粲. (1988). 认知方式图形测验的编制与修订说明. 北京:北京师范大学出版社.
陶沙. (2006). 乐观、悲观倾向与抑郁的关系及压力、性别的调节作用. 心理学报, 38(6). 886-901.
温忠麟, 侯杰泰, 张雷. (2005). 调节效应与中介效应的比较和应用. 心理学报,37(2), 278-274.
武欣, 张厚粲. (1997). 创造力研究的新进展. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),139(1), 13-18.
徐夫真, 张文新, 张玲玲. (2009). 家庭功能对青少年疏离感的影响:有调节的中介效应. 心理学报,41(12), 1165-1174.
杨小洋, 李歆瑶, 周晖. (2012). 中学生个人认识论对创造性思维的影响:自我提问的调节作用分析. 心理发展与教育, 6,603-610.
姚海娟, 白学军. (2014). 创造性思维与认知抑制的关系. 心理科学,37(2), 316-321.
衣新发, 胡卫平. (2013). 科学创造力与艺术创造力:启动效应及领域影响. 心理科学进展, 21(1), 22-30.
衣新发, 林崇德, 蔡曙山, 黄四林, 陈桄, 罗良, 唐敏. 留学经验与艺术创造力. (2011). 心理科学, 34(1), 190-195.
俞国良, 侯瑞鹤. (2004). 问题提出、认知风格与学校教育中的创造力培养. 教育科学,20(4), 54-58.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	姚海娟, 仝娜, 张珊珊, 巩彦斌. 认知抑制对科学创造力和艺术创造力的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(3): 353-362.
[2]	陈琼, 赵俊峰, 谷璜, 邢小莉, 李晓铭. 听障儿童认知抑制控制的脑电特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(3): 275-282.
[3]	官冬晓, 艾继如, 黄碧娟, 崔爽, 司继伟. 数学焦虑影响儿童的数量表征:认知抑制的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(1): 10-18.
[4]	张宇迪, 贾晓明. 自传体记忆功能对失独者延长哀伤的影响:家族主义情感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(5): 540-548.
[5]	张青, 刘婷婷, 刘斯漫, 王争艳. 婴儿期母亲将心比心对儿童5岁共情的预测:母亲陪伴总时间的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(2): 157-166.
[6]	胡卫平, 赵晓媚, 贾培媛, 陈英和. 学思维网络活动对小学生创造性的影响:认知风格的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(3): 257-264.
[7]	王玥, 赵丽娟, 许志星. 课业负担对学校生活满意度的影响:学校氛围的多水平调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 205-213.
[8]	马军朋, 叶卓尔, 林依, 高宏巍, 黄平, 林慧妍, 许欢, 杨楠, 金花. 认知风格影响归类过程中的神经活动-来自fMRI研究的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 139-148.
[9]	邢学玮, 伍新春, 侯建芳, 刘畅, 陈玲玲. 父亲的角色态度对其教养投入的影响：母亲态度类型的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(4): 387-395.
[10]	聂晋文, 芦咏莉. 父亲参与对儿童延迟满足能力的影响：儿童性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(2): 121-128.
[11]	戴艳, 雷鸣, 周宵, 姚梅, 蒋林洁, 陈希, 刘瑶. 创伤暴露程度对中学生创伤后应激障碍的影响：复原力的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(1): 61-67.
[12]	伍新春, 张宇迪, 林崇德, 臧伟伟. 中小学生的灾难暴露程度对创伤后应激障碍的影响：中介和调节效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(6): 641-648.
[13]	丁小利, 张光珍, 梁宗保, 邓慧华, 唐鑫, 刘亚鹏. 行为抑制性、母亲养育方式和学步儿问题行为的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(2): 174-182.
[14]	郑显亮. 现实利他行为与网络利他行为：网络社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2013, 29(1): 31-37.
[15]	杨小洋, 李歆瑶, 周晖. 中学生个人认识论对创造性思维的影响:自我提问的调节作用分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(6): 603-610.