心理发展与教育 ›› 2015, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 296-302.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2015.03.06

• 认知与社会性发展 • 上一篇    下一篇

儿童青少年协作促进的发展

唐卫海1, 安延佩1, 王向梅1, 梁福成3, 刘希平1   

  1. 1. 天津师范大学教育科学学院, 天津 300387;
    2. 献县第一中学, 沧州 062250;
    3. 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院, 天津 300074
  • 出版日期:2015-05-15 发布日期:2015-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 刘希平,E-mail:lxp3771@sina.com E-mail:lxp3771@sina.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社科研究基金项目(14YJA190007);天津市哲学社科规划重点课题(TJJX13-002);天津市十二五教育科学规划重点课题(CE2016);天津市高等学校创新团队培养计划.

The Development of Children and Young People's Collaborative Facilitation

TANG Weihai1, AN Yanpei1, WANG Xiangmei1, LIANG Fucheng3, LIU Xiping1   

  1. 1. Educational College, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387;
    2. Xianxian No.1 High School, Cangzhou 062250;
    3. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074
  • Online:2015-05-15 Published:2015-05-15

PDF (PC)

摘要： 旨在考察不同年龄的个体, 在不同回忆序列和学习材料上协作促进的发展情况。采用3(回忆序列:协作—个人—个人〔CII〕、个人—协作—个人〔ICI〕、个人—个人—个人〔III〕)× 5(年龄:9、11、14、17、20)× 2(材料:图片、文字)的被试间设计。结果发现:(1)各年龄个体在CII和ICI两种回忆序列上均出现了协作促进, 且两种序列条件下被试的最终个人回忆成绩无差异;(2)另外, 17岁个体的协作促进量显著高于9岁、11岁、14岁和20岁, 其他各年龄之间无差异;(3)图片和文字的协作促进量无差异。这说明小组协作回忆的顺序对协作促进没有太大影响, 17岁个体协作促进的效果最好。

关键词: 协作促进, 回忆序列, 图片优势效应, 儿童青少年

Abstract: This research explored the development of individuals' collaborative facilitation of different ages in different retrieve sequences and learning materials. The design was a 5 (age: 9 years old, 11 years old, 14 years old, 17 years old and 20 years old) × 3 (recall sequence: CII、ICI、III) × 2 (learning materials: pictures or texts) between-subjects design. The results showed that collaborative facilitation appeared in all ages of both CII and II recall sequences, and the final memory performance in these two sequences had no difference. What's more, the amount of collaborative facilitation of 17 years old participants was higher than 9, 11, 14 and 20 years old. There was no difference among other age. No matter how old the participant was, there was no difference between picture and texts on the collaborative facilitation amount. These suggest that the order of collaborative memory has little impact on collaborative facilitation. The effects of collaborative facilitation in 17-year-old individuals are the best.

Key words: Collaborative Facilitation, Recall Sequence, Picture Superiority Effect, Children and Young people

中图分类号: 

  • B844
Andersson, J. (2001). Net effect of memory collaboration: How is collaboration affected by factors such as friendship, gender and age? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 367-375.
Barber, S. J., & Rajaram, S. (2011). Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall. Memory, 19, 462-469.
Barber, S. J., Rajaram, S., & Aron, A. (2010). When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory. Memory & Cognition, 38, 255-264.
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., Bryner, S., & Thomas III, R. L. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 1176-1189.
Basden, B. H., Basden, D. R., & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and promotion of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 497-507.
Blumen, H. M. (2010). Short-term and long-term collaboration promotion on individual recall in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 100, 739-742.
Blumen, H. M., & Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. Memory, 16, 231-244.
Blumen, H. M., & Rajaram, S. (2009). Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks. Memory, 17, 840-846.
Congleton A, Rajaram S. (2011). The influence of learning methods on collaboration: Prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 535-551.
Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J., & Meudell, P. R. (2000). Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1556-1567.
Hirst, W., & Echterhoff, G. (2012). Remembering in conversations : The social sharing and reshaping of memories. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 55-79.
Johansson, O., Andersson, J., & Rönnberg, J. (2000). Do elderly couples have a better prospective memory than other elderly people when they collaborate? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 121-133.
Leman, P.J., & Oldham, Z. (2005). Do children need to learn to collaborate? The effect of age and age differences on collaborative recall. Cognitive Development, 20, 33-48.
Rajaram, S., & Pereira-Pasarin, L. P. (2010). Collaborative Memory: Cognitive Research and Theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 649.
Thorley, C., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2007). Collaborative false recall in the DRM procedure: Effects of group size and group pressure. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 867-881.
Thorley, C., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2009). False and veridical collaborative recognition. Memory, 17, 17-25.
Weldon, M. S., & Bellinger, K. D. (1997). Collective memory: Collaborative and individual processes in remembering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1160-1175.
Wright, D. B., & Klumpp, A. (2004). Collaborative inhibition is due to the product, not the process, of recalling in groups. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1080-1083.
唐卫海, 刘湍丽, 石英,冯虹,刘希平.(2014). 图片部分线索效应的学习时间分配的发展. 心理学报, 46, 621-638.
[1] 纪林芹, 张蒙, 董美慧, 潘斌, 张文新. 童年晚期至青少年早期攻击和同伴侵害的关系:交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 701-709.
[2] 韩燕, 徐芬. 儿童青少年时期加工速度和执行功能在流体智力发展中的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2020, 36(4): 394-405.
[3] 张羽, 李玮玮, 罗玉晗, 华销嫣, 王耘. 家庭社会经济地位与父母教养方式对儿童青少年公正世界信念的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2017, 33(5): 513-523.
[4] 邓林园, 赵鑫钰, 方晓义. 离婚对儿童青少年心理发展的影响:父母冲突的重要作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2016, 32(2): 246-256.
[5] 张向葵, 祖静, 赵悦彤. 儿童青少年自尊发展理论建构与实证研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2015, 31(1): 15-20.
[6] 李红. 工欲善其事,必先利其器——评“中国儿童青少年心理发育特征调查”项目成果[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2011, 27(6): 670-672.
[7] 任学柱, 钱颖技, 李春花, 徐芬. 注意、工作记忆与推理能力发展的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2010, 26(4): 337-343.
[8] 周晖. 儿童青少年人格的“小五”结构[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1998, 14(2): 50-54.
[9] 刘凤瑜. 儿童抑郁量表的结构及儿童青少年抑郁发展的特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1997, 13(2): 57-61.
[10] 《非智力因素及其培养》全国协作组. 我国儿童青少年非智力因素发展的研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 1995, 11(4): 1-6.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 2018 《心理发展与教育》编辑部
地址：北京新街口外大街19号北京师范大学院内　 邮政编码：100875
联系电话：010-58807700 E-mail:pdae@bnu.edu.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发