心理发展与教育 ›› 2012, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 225-230.

• 论文 •    下一篇

青少年反思自我评价的记忆效应

岳彩镇, 黄希庭, 岳童   

  1. 西南大学心理学院, 重庆 400715
  • 出版日期:2012-05-15 发布日期:2012-05-15
  • 通讯作者: 黄希庭,E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn E-mail:xthuang@swu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点学科西南大学基础心理学211工程建设项目(NSKD11001)

The Memory Effect of Adolescents’ Reflected Self-appraisals

YUE Cai-zhen, HUANG Xi-ting, YUE Tong   

  1. School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715
  • Online:2012-05-15 Published:2012-05-15

摘要: 采用R/K判断任务,探讨来自母亲、好朋友、不熟悉同学反思自我评价的记忆效应.结果发现:33名12~14岁青少年在总再认率和"记得"指标上,母亲加工条件和好朋友加工条件差异不显著,两者显著高于不熟悉同学加工条件(实验一);32名15~17岁青少年,在总再认率上,母亲加工条件和好朋友加工条件差异不显著,两者显著高于不熟悉同学加工条件,但在"记得"指标上,好朋友、母亲、不熟悉同学加工条件呈显著递减趋势(实验二).两项实验表明来自亲疏关系不同他人反思自我评价存在记忆优势效应;青少年处于不同发展阶段,不同他人反思自我评价的记忆优势效应也存在差异.

关键词: 青少年, 反思自我评价, 记忆优势效应, R/K判断

Abstract: Using R/K response task,this study was to explore the memory effects of reflected self-appraisals from mother,good friends and unfamiliar schoolmates.The result from Experiment 1 revealed that among youngsters aged from 12 to 14,the memory performance of reflected self-appraisals from mother and good friends were better than that of unfamiliar schoolmates.In experiment 2,youngsters aged from 15 to 17 were used as subjects,it was found that the memory performance of reflected self-appraisals from good friends,mother,unfamiliar schoolmates showed a tendency of progressive decrease.The two experiments indicated that memory superiority effects of reflected self-appraisals exist with the level of intimate relationship.These memory superiority effects differ among different age stages.

Key words: Adolescent, reflected self-appraisals, memory effect, R/K response

中图分类号: 

  • B844.2
[1] Amorose,A.J.(2003).Reflected appraisals and perceived importance of significant others‘appraisals as predictors of ollege athletes'self-perceptions of competence.Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport,74,60-70.
[2] Aron,A.,Aron,E.N.,& Smollan,D.(1992).Inclusion of others in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,63,596-612.
[3] Bouchey,H.A.,& Harter,S.(2005).Reflected appraisals,academic self-perceptions,and math/science achievement during early adolescence.Journal of Educational Psychology,97,673-686.
[4] Brownfield,D.,& Thompson,K.(2005).Self-Concept and Delinquency:The Effects of Reflected Appraisals by Parent and Peers.Western Criminology Review,6,22-29.
[5] D' Argembeau,A.,Ruby,P.,Collette,F.,Degueldre,C.,Balteau,E.,Luxen,A.,Maquet,P.,& Salmon,E.(2007).Distinct Regions of the Medial Prefrontal Cortex Are Associated with Self-referential Processing and Perspective Taking.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,19,935-944.
[6] Jie Sui,& Ying Zhu.(2005).Five year-olds can show the self-reference advantage.International Journal of Behavioral Development,29,382-387.
[7] Jowett,S.,& Cramer,D.(2010).The prediction of young athletes‘physical self from perceptions of relationships with parents and coaches.Psychology of Sport and Exercise,11,140-147.
[8] Khanna,N.(2004).The role of reflected appraisals in racial identity:The case of multiracial Asians.Social Psychology Quarterly,67,115-131.
[9] Khanna,N.(2010)."If You' re Half Black,You' re Just Black":Reflected Appraisals and the Persistence of the One-Drop Rule.Sociological Quarterly,51,96-121.
[10] Markus,H.R.,& Kitayama,S.(1991).Culture and the self:implication for cognition,emotion and motivation.Psychological Review,98,224-253.
[11] Ochsner,K.N.,Beer,J.S.,Robertson,E.R.,Cooper,J.C.,Gabrieli,J.D.E.,Kihsltrom,J.F.,& D' Esposito,M.(2005).The neural correlates of direct and reflected self-knowledge.Neuroimage,28,797-814.
[12] Pfeifer,J.H.,Masten,C.L.,Borofsky,L.A.,Dapretto,M.,Fuligni,A.J.,& Lieberman,M.D.(2009).Neural Correlates of Direct and Reflected Self-Appraisals in Adolescents and Adults:When Social Perspective-Taking Informs Self-Perception.Child Development,80,1016-1038.
[13] Shrauger,J.S.,& Schoeneman,T.J.(1979).Symbolic Interactionist View of Self-Concept:Through the Looking Glass Darkly.Psychological Bulletin,86,549-573.
[14] Tice,D.M.,& Wallace,H.W.(2003).The Reflected Self:Creating Yourself as(You Think) Others See You.In Leary,M.R.,& Tangney,J.P.(Eds).Handbook of Self and Identity.New York:Guilford Press,91-105.
[15] Willian,D.,Richard,M.L.林崇德,李其维,董奇等译.(2007).儿童心理学手册(第六版),第三卷(上),社会、情绪与人格发展.上海:华东师范大学出版社.
[16] 管延华,迟毓凯.(2006).自我参照与朋友参照对人格特质记忆的影响.心理科学,29(2),448-450.
[17] 林崇德.(2002).发展心理学.杭州:浙江教育出版社.
[18] 辛自强,池丽萍.(2008).社会变迁中的青少年.北京:北京师范大学出版社.
[19] 王登峰,崔红.(2005).解读中国人的人格.北京:社会科学文献出版社.
[20] 杨国枢,陆洛.(2009).中国人的自我.重庆:重庆大学出版社.
[21] 杨红升,朱滢.(2004).老年中国人自我记忆效应的研究.心理科学,27(1),43-45.
[22] 岳彩镇,黄希庭,彭玉,廖翌凯.(2008).投射自我研究述评.西南大学学报(社会科学版),34(6),16-21.
[23] 张洪,王登峰,杨烨.(2006).亲密关系的外显与内隐测量及其相互关系.心理学报,38(6),910-915.
[24] 周丽,苏彦捷.(2008).实际亲密度对恋人参照效应的影响.心理学报,40(4),487-495.
[25] 朱滢,张力.(2001).自我记忆效应的实验研究.中国科学,31(6),538-543.
[1] 王玉龙, 赵婧斐, 蔺秀云. 家庭风险因素对青少年自伤的累积效应及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 240-247.
[2] 王艳辉, 沈梓锋, 赖雪芬. 父母心理控制与青少年外化问题行为的关系:意志控制和越轨同伴交往的链式中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 248-256.
[3] 肖嘉林, 梁凯欣, 黄柳玥, 王恩娜, 黄巧敏, 何韵涵, 卢宝琳, 迟新丽. 积极发展资源在减少青少年抑郁水平中的累积效应、关系模式及特定资源的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 257-269.
[4] 魏华, 丁慧敏, 陈武, 郝兴风, 熊婕. 父母低头行为与青少年网络欺负的关系:压力的中介作用与年龄的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 114-121.
[5] 邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6] 彭海云, 盛靓, 邱凡硕, 周姿言, 辛素飞. 青少年心理减负从“无聊”开始——无聊倾向对青少年主观幸福感的影响机制[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 895-902.
[7] 刘庆, 冯兰. 父母婚姻质量和青少年同胞关系:教养方式的中介作用及其性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 654-662.
[8] 刘思含, 伍新春, 王歆逸. 父母教养方式的潜在类别及其与青少年学习投入和焦虑症状的关系[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 673-682.
[9] 沙晶莹, 张向葵, 刘千冬. 人以群分?学业动机比较对青少年同伴选择的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 683-690.
[10] 张雯, 王振宏. 负性生活事件与青少年内化问题的关系:社会支持的中介作用和亲子亲和的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 718-725.
[11] 洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[12] 王玉龙, 苏慧娟, 蔺秀云. 青少年自伤的分类:基于潜在剖面分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 735-742.
[13] 胡义豪, 徐璐妍, 卞小华, 周颖, 刘俊升. 同伴侵害与青少年抑郁的关系:班级攻击规范凸显性的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 542-549.
[14] 辛国刚, 张李斌, 常睿生, 张云运. 青少年早期受欺凌发展轨迹:抑郁、自尊和学业成就的预测作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 568-579.
[15] 郑显亮, 陈慧萍, 王雪, 鲍振宙. 青少年网络利他行为的发展趋势及社会阶层的影响:一项追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(3): 333-341.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!