维度改变卡片分类任务中的负启动效应及其发生的条件

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探讨负启动效应在学前儿童规则灵活转换中的作用, 用几个不同负启动版本的维度改变卡片分类任务(DCCS)研究了DCCS中的负启动效应及其在3、4岁儿童中的发展。实验一验证了儿童在负启动版本DCCS任务中的年龄发展趋势, 发现与标准版本一样, 大多数3、4岁儿童都不能通过, 但随着年龄增长负启动会逐渐减少, 更多的儿童能够顺利通过任务。实验二考察了DCCS中负启动发生的条件, 发现在任务的转换前阶段, 无论分类规则间存在冲突还是目标卡片与测试卡片间无关维度值上存在冲突, 负启动都会发生, 由此揭示出能引起选择性注意和主动抑制的冲突是负启动发生的关键。实验三探讨了负启动时主动抑制发生的层面, 发现儿童主动抑制的并非是无关维度中一个或某几个特定的值, 而是整个无关的维度, 表明抑制发生在维度这一更抽象的上位水平上。说明由抑制而产生的负启动或许也应成为儿童认知灵活性发展中需要克服的一个问题。

关键词: 规则灵活转换, 负启动, 抑制, 冲突

Abstract: In order to study the role of negative priming in the flexible rule use of children, three experiments were used to examine the negative priming effect and its development in 3-4 years old children.Experiment 1 clarif ied that most 3 and 4 years old children had surprising difficulties in passing the standard negative priming version of DCCS and their performance followed the same developmental trend as in the standard version..Experiment 2 explored the conditions under which NP was elicited in the DCCS.It indicated that where there was a conflict in the pre-switch phrase, there was NP.No matter they were conflicting rules or conflicting values.We thought selective at ention together with active inhibition which were both elicited by conflict were critical to NP.The last experiment examined what children inhibited when they act ively inhibited in the NP version of DCCS.It showed that children actually inhibited the irrelevant dimension which was an upper level instead of one or several specific values.In all, we thought negative priming may also be a problem for children to overcome in the development of cognitive flexibility.

Key words: flexible rule use, negative priming, inhibition, conflict

中图分类号:

G442

蒋秋蓉, 李红. 维度改变卡片分类任务中的负启动效应及其发生的条件[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2009, 25(3): 68-76.

JIANG Qiu-rong, LI Hong. The Negative Priming Effect and the Conditions under Which It Is Elicited in the Dimensional Change Card Sort Task[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2009, 25(3): 68-76.

参考文献

[1] Hongwanishkul D, Happaney K R, Lee W S.Assessment of hotand cool executive function in young children:age related changes and individual differences.Developmental Neuropsychology, 2005, 28(2):617-644
[2] Zelazo P D, Mller U.Executive function in typical and atypi cal development.In.Goswami U, Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development.Oxford:Blackwell, 2002:445-469
[3] Zelazo P D, Craik F M.EF across the life span.Acta Psychologia, 2004, 115(3):167-183
[4] Zelazo P D.The dimensional change card sort task(DCCS):a method of assessing executive function in children.N at Protocols, 2006, 3 (1):297-301
[5] Zelazo P D, Frye D.Cognitive complexity and cont rol:Ⅱ. Development of executive function.Current Directions in Psychologi cal Science, 1998, 7(3):121-126
[6] Bialystok E, Martin M M.Attention and inhibition in bilingual children:evidence from the dimensional change card sort task. Developmental Science, 2004, 7(3):325-339
[7] Zelazo P D, Muller U, Frye D.The development of executive function in early childhood:IV.what do children perseverate on when they perseverate.Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development. 2003, 2(1):65-72
[8] Zelazo P D, Frye D, Rapus T.An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them.Cognitive Development, 1996, 11(3):37-63
[9] Jacques S, K irkham N Z, Semcesen T K.Rule selection versus rule execution in preschoolers:an error-detection approach.Developmental Psychology, 1999, 35(3):770-780
[10] Graeme S H, Bunc K.Problem decomposability as a factor in complexity of the dimensional change card sort task.Cognitive Development, 2007, 22(3):384-391
[11] Diamond A, K irkham N, Amso D.Conditions under which young children can hold two rules in mind and inhibita preponderate response. Developmental Psychology, 2002, 38(3):352-362
[12] Rennie D A, Bull R, Diamond A.Executive functioning in preschoolers:reducing the inhibitory demands of the dimensional change card sort task.Developmental Neuropsychology, 2004, 26(1):423-443.
[13] Towse J, Redbond J.Understanding the dimensional change card sort perspectives from task success and failure.Cognitive Development, 2000, 15:347-365
[14] Bohlmann N L, Fenson L.The effect's of feedback on preservative errors in preschool aged children.Journal of Cognition and Development, 2005, 6(1):119-131
[15] Kirkham N Z, Cruess L, Diamond A.Helping children apply their knowledge to their behavior on a dimension-switching task.Developmental Science, 2003, 6(5):449-476
[16] M llera U, Zelazo P D, Luryec L E.The effect of labeling on preschool children's performance in the D imensional Change Card Sort Task. Cognitive Development, 2008, 23(3):395-408
[17] Lang B.What causes 3-year olds difficulty on the dimensional change card sorting task.Infant&Child Development, 2001, 7(3):21-25
[18] Kloo D, Perner J.Disentangling dimensions in the dimensional change card-sorting task.Developmental Science, 2005, 8(1):44-56
[19] Kloo D, Pernera J, K erschhubera A.Sorting between dimensions: conditions of cognitive flexibility in preschoolers.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2008, 100(2):115-134
[20] Mack W.Improving post-switch performance in the dimensional change card-sorting task:the importance of the switch and of pertaining by r-e describing the test cards.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2007, 98(4):243-251
[21] Towse J N, Lewisa C, Knowles M.When knowledge is notenough the phenomenon of goal neglectin preschool children.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2007, 96(4):320-332
[22] Paulitzki J R, Riskoa E F, Oakmana J M.Doing the unpleasant: how the emotional nature of a threat-relevant task aff ects task-swit ching. Personality and Individual Dif ferences, 2008, 45(5):350-355
[23] Qu L, Zelazo P D.The facilitative effect of positive stimulion 3-year-olds flexible rule use.Cognitive Development.2007, 22(4):456-473
[24] Ravizzaa S M, Carter C S.Shifting setabout task swit ching: behavioral and neural evidence for distinct forms of cognitive flexibility. Neuropsychologia, 2008, 46(12):2924-2935
[25] Zelazo P D, Muller U, Frye D.The development of executive function in early childhood:V.negative priming and executive function. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 2003, 2(1): 73-92
[26] Grison S, Tipper S P, Hewitt O.Long-term negative priming: support for retrieval of prior attention processes.The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2005, 58(7):1199-1224.
[27] Zelazo P D, Muller U, Frye D.The development of executive function in early childhood:.The development of executive function: Cognitive complexity and contro-l revised.Monographs of the society for research in child development, 2003, 3(1):93-119
[28] Bestgen Y, Dupont V.Is negative priming a reliable measure for studying individual differences in inhibition?Current Psychology of Cognition, 2002, 19(2):287-305
[29] Amso D, Johnson S P.Selection and inhibition in infancy: evidence from the spatial negative priming paradigm.Cognition, 2005, 95 (B):27-36
[30] Carlson S M.Developmentally sensitive measures of executive function in preschool children.Developmental Neuropsychology, 2005, 28 (2):595-616
[31] Simone P M, Ahrens K, Foerde K E G.Influence of attended repetition trials on negative priming in younger and older adult s.Memory& Cognition, 2006, 34(1):187-195
[32] Muller U, Dick A S, Zelazo P D.The role of negative priming in preschoolers flexible rule use on the dimensional change card sort task. Child Development, 2006, 77(2):395-412
[33] McArthur A D.Inhibitory mechanisms, interference, and the attritional blink in younger and older adults.1996.
[34] Espy K A Using developmental, cognitive, and neuroscience approaches to understand executive control in young children.Developmental Neuropsychology, 2004, 26(1):379-384
[35] Bugg J M.Mechanisms of executive control:behavioral investigations of the confl ictadaptation effect.2001.
[36] Waszak F, Hommel B, Allport A.Interaction of task readiness and automatic retrieval in task switching:negative priming and competit or priming.Memory&Cognition, 2005, 33(4):595-610
[37] Engle R W, Conway A R, Tuholski S W.A resource account of inhibition.Psychological Science, 1995, 6(2):31-40.

相关文章 15

[1]	储月, 刘希平, 徐慧, 唐卫海. 儿童社会分享型提取诱发遗忘的发展特点[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 153-159.
[2]	陆信哲, 王智, 李勇, 王玢莹. 父母暴力暴露对中学生问题行为的纵向影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(2): 231-239.
[3]	赵京伟, 陈晓旭, 任立文, 耿喆, 徐夫真. 父母心理控制与小学儿童焦虑：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(1): 93-102.
[4]	彭越, 张和颐, 陈英和, 雷秀雅, 戚玥, 于晓, 乔学文, 刘沫漩, 颜露懿. 类比推理策略与工作记忆、抑制控制关系的年龄差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 761-771.
[5]	邹盛奇, 伍新春. 父母冲突与青少年同伴依恋的关系:亲子依恋的中介作用及性别差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(6): 798-807.
[6]	王英杰, 栾金鑫, 李燕. 母亲养育压力与幼儿焦虑的关系:亲子冲突的中介作用和母亲正念的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 702-709.
[7]	洪新伟, 苗灵童, 范航, 宋明华, 朱婷婷, 刘燊, 张林. 父母婚姻冲突与青少年攻击行为的关系:情绪安全感和学校联结的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(5): 726-734.
[8]	王丽娟, 马嘉琳. 美术生和非美术生的动作记忆表象编码[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 457-464.
[9]	李甜甜, 董会芹. 父母冲突知觉与儿童焦虑情绪:正负性信息注意偏向的中介作用及性别的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(4): 488-496.
[10]	李其容, 杨艳宇, 李春萱. 父母冲突、青少年日常自我效能和学习投入:日常消极情绪与日常沉思在父母冲突调节效应中的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(2): 236-246.
[11]	于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.
[12]	邓林园, 高诗晴, 王婧怡, 李蓓蕾. 新冠疫情期间中小学教师工作-家庭冲突和抑郁:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 121-131.
[13]	刘晓洁, 李燕. 母亲感知的共同教养对幼儿行为问题的影响：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(5): 626-634.
[14]	吴国婧, 程雪林, 李叶, 白荣, 邢淑芬, 李玉华. 学前期儿童执行功能和语言的双向关系:社会经济地位的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 186-194.
[15]	孙俊才, 孙亚茹, 张文海. 人际情绪调节与内隐/外显积极情绪的关系:情绪调节困难的调节效应与表达抑制的中介效应[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(2): 279-286.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed