抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响

doi:10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2023.01.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究采用负启动范式,设置不同的认知负荷任务,探究抑制控制在儿童和成人类比映射中的作用。实验一中,31名7岁儿童、33名10岁儿童和34名成人完成高认知负荷的相对大小类比映射的负启动任务。结果表明,所有群体均出现负启动效应,且负启动效应随年龄增长而减小。实验二中,30名7岁儿童、30名10岁儿童和32名成人完成低认知负荷的相对大小类比映射的负启动任务。结果表明,所有群体均出现负启动效应,但负启动效应无显著年龄差异。本研究的结果揭示了抑制控制和认知负荷在类比映射发展中的重要作用。

关键词: 类比映射, 儿童, 抑制控制, 负启动, 认知负荷

Abstract: The negative priming (i.e., hereafter referred to as NP) paradigm was designed to provide evidence that inhibitory control is important in situations that contain conflicting information. This study aimed to investigate the role of inhibitory control and cognitive load in analogical mapping with the NP paradigm among children at different ages and adults. In Experiment 1, thirty-one 7-year-olds, thirty-three 10-year-olds, and thirty-four adults were administered with a high-cognitive-load NP analogical size-mapping task. Findings demonstrated that the NP effects in all participants and the effects decreased with age. In Experiment 2, thirty 7-year-olds, thirty 10-year-olds, and thirty-two adults completed a similar task of which the cognitive load was lower than the task in Experiment 1.Results showed the NP effects across all age groups, while there was no age difference in Experiment 2.The current study suggests the importance of inhibitory control and cognitive load in the development of analogical mapping.

Key words: analogical mapping, children, inhibitory control, negative priming, cognitive load

中图分类号:

B844

于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.

YU Xiao, ZHANG Heyi, QI Yue, CHEN Yinghe, LIU Haoning, ZHAO Yuxi, QIAO Xuewen. The Role of Inhibitory Control in the Development of Analogical Mapping: Cognitive Load Matters[J]. Psychological Development and Education, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.

参考文献

Aïte, A., Berthoz, A., Vidal, J., Roëll, M., Zaoui, M., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Taking a third-person perspective requires inhibitory control:Evidence from a developmental negative priming study.Child Development, 87(6), 1825-1840.
Borst, G., Poirel, N., Pineau, A., Cassotti, M., & Houdé, O. (2013). Inhibitory control efficiency in a Piaget-like class-inclusion task in school-age children and adults:A developmental negative priming study. Developmental Psychology, 49(7), 1366-1374.
Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition & Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
Chuderska, A., & Chuderski, A. (2014). Two facets of cognitive control in analogical mapping:The role of semantic interference resolution and goal-driven structure selection. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(3), 352-371.
Clement, C. A., Harris, R. C., Burns, B. M., & Weatherholt, T. N. (2010). An eye-tracking analysis of the effect of prior comparison on analogical mapping.Current Psychology, 29(4), 273-287.
Doumas, L. A., Morrison, R. G., & Richland, L. E. (2010). Differences in development of analogy across cultures:A computational account. In S. Ohlsson (Ed.),Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp.2338-2343). Cognitive Science Society.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3:A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.
Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D., Markman, A. B., & Ferguson, R. W. (1998). Analogy just looks like high level perception:Why a domain-general approach to analogical mapping is right. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 10(2), 231-257.
Forster,S., & Lavie, N. (2008). Failures to ignore entirely irrelevant distractors:The role of load. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Applied, 14(1), 73-83.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping:A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.
Glady, Y., French, R. M., & Thibaut, J. P. (2017). Children's failure in analogical reasoning tasks:A problem of focus of attention and information integration?Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 707.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00707
Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., … Thompson, P. (2004). Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(21), 8174-8179.
Gotseva-Balgaranova, K., & Mutafchieva, M. (2018). Does training in inhibition and working memory influence analogical reasoning and theory of mind in young children? In T. T. Rogers, M. Rau, X. Zhu, & C. W. Kalish (Eds.), Proceeding of the 40th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society(pp.1735-1740).Austin, TX:Cogntive Science Society.
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013).Surfaces and essence:Analogy as the fuel and fire of thinking. New York:Basic Books.
Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2014). Measuring inhibitory control in children and adults:Brain imaging and mental chronometry. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(7), Article 616.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00616
Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). Evidence for an inhibitory-control theory of the reasoning brain.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 148.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00148
Houdé, O., Pineau, A., Leroux, G., Poirel, N., Perchey, G., Lanoë, C., … Mazoyer, B. (2011). Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of Piaget's conservation-of-number task in preschool and school-age children:A neo-Piagetian approach. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110(3), 332-346.
Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., & Chen, Y. (2019). Inhibiting intuitive rules in a geometry comparison task:Do age level and math achievement matter?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 186, 1-16.
Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., & Lei, Y. (2020). Do teachers need to inhibit heuristic Bias in mathematics problem-solving? Evidence from a negative-priming study. Current Psychology.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01209-x
Jiang, R., Li, X., Xu, P., Zhong, L., & Lei, Y. (2019). The role of inhibitory control in overcoming English written-verb inflection errors:Evidence from Chinese ESL learners. Current Psychology, 40, 5256-5266.
Keane, M. T. (1997). What makes an analogy difficult? The effects of order and causal structure on analogical mapping.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23(4), 946-967.
Knowlton, B. J., Morrison, R. G., Hummel, J. E., & Holyoak, K. J. (2012). A neurocomputational system for relational reasoning.Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(7), 373-381.
Krawczyk, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Hummel, J. E. (2004). Structural constraints and object similarity in analogical mapping and inference.Thinking & Reasoning, 10(1), 85-104.
Lanoë, C., Vidal, J., Lubin, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2016). Inhibitory control is needed to overcome written verb inflection errors:Evidence from a developmental negative priming study. Cognitive Development, 37, 18-27.
Lavie, N., & Fox, E. (2000).The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 1038-1052.
Lavie, N., & Tsal, Y. (1994). Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention.Perception & Psychophysics, 56(2), 183-197.
Linzarini, A., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2015). When Stroop helps Piaget:An inter-task positive priming paradigm in 9-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 71-82.
Lubin, A., Vidal, J., Lanoë, C., Houdé, O., & Borst, G. (2013). Inhibitory control is needed for the resolution of arithmetic word problems:A developmental negative priming study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 701-708.
Luna, B., Padmanabhan, A., & O'Hearn, K. (2010). What has fMRI told us about the development of cognitive control through adolescence? Brain and Cognition, 72(1), 101-113.
Megías, M., Ortells, J. J., Noguera, C., Carmona, I., & Marí-Beffa, P. (2020). Semantic negative priming from an ignored single-prime depends critically on prime-mask inter-stimulus interval and working memory capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1227.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01227
Mix, K. S. (2008). Children's numerical equivalence judgments:crossmapping effects.Cognitive Development, 23(1), 191-203.
Murphy, G., Groeger, J. A., & Greene, C. M. (2016). Twenty years of load theory:Where are we now, and where should we go next? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1316-1340.
Ortells, J. J., Carmen, N., Dolores, A., Encarna, C., & George, H. (2016).Individual differences in working memory capacity modulates semantic negative priming from single prime words. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 1286.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01286
Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2004). Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks:Evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.Developmental Psychology, 40(2), 191-203.
Pritchard, V. E., & Neumann, E. (2009). Avoiding the potential pitfalls of using negative priming tasks in developmental studies:Assessing inhibitory control in children, adolescents, and adults.Developmental Psychology, 45(1), 272-283.
Rattermann, M. J., & Gentner, D. (1998). The effect of language on similarity:The use of relational labels improves young children's performance in a mapping task. In K. Holyoak, D. Gentner, & B. Kokinov (Eds.),Advances in analogy research:Integration of theory and data from the cognitive, computational, and neural sciences (pp. 274-282). Sophia:New Bulgarian University.
Rattermann, M. J., Gentner, D., DeLoache, J. (1987, April).Young children's use of relational similarity in a transfer task. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Baltimore.
Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children's development of analogical reasoning:Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(3), 249-273.
Schumacher, R. M., & Gentner, D. (1988).Transfer of training as analogical mapping. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics, 18(4), 592-600.
Siegler, R. S. (2007). Cognitive variability.Developmental Science, 10, 104-109.
Simms, N. K., Frausel, R. R., & Richland, L. E. (2018). Working memory predicts children's analogical reasoning. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 160-177.
Sternberg, R. J. (1977).Component processes in analogical reasoning. Psychological Review, 84(4), 353-378.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design.Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295-312.
Thibaut, J. P., & French, R. M. (2016). Analogical reasoning, control and executive functions:A developmental investigation with eye-tracking. Cognitive Development, 38, 10-26.
Thibaut, J. P., French, R., & Vezneva, M. (2010). Cognitive load and semantic analogies:Searching semantic space. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(4), 569-574.
Vuilleumier, P., Schwartz, S., Duhoux, S., Dolan, R. J., & Driver, J. (2005). Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory:Suppressions and enhancements revealed by fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 1245-60.
Waltz, J. A., Lau, A., Grewal, S. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2000). The role of working memory in analogical mapping. Memory & Cognition, 28(7), 1205-1212.
陈丽君, 刘丽敏, 林岳阳, 张玲燕. (2021). 虚拟学习环境下图形加工的认知负荷研究. 心理发展与教育, 37(5), 619-627.
费广洪, 王淑娟. (2014). 3~11岁儿童类比推理发展的研究. 心理学探新, 34(6), 493-498.
付馨晨, 李晓东. (2017). 认知抑制——问题解决研究的新视角. 心理科学, 40(1), 58-63.
江荣焕, 李晓东. (2017). 比例推理的过度使用及其认知机制:一项发展性的负启动研究. 心理学报, 49(6), 745-758.
李梦文, 王登, 贺雯. (2021). 消极元刻板印象激活对老年人认知表现的影响. 心理科学, 44(2), 384-490.
魏萍, 周晓林. (2005). 从知觉负载理论来理解选择性注意. 心理科学进展, 13(4), 413-420.
谢和平, 安婧, 王福兴. (2017). 多媒体学习中的图文整合:同步化线索和学习者经验的作用. 心理科学, 40(5), 82-88.
于晓, 王红梅, 陈英和, 刘瑞曙, 韩瑽瑽, 韩敏,…刘静. (2020). 分心抑制和关系整合对学前儿童类比推理的影响. 心理发展与教育, 36(4), 385-393.
于晓. (2021). 执行功能对个体类比推理的影响:发展的视角 (博士学位论文). 北京师范大学.

多维度评价

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

[1]	王堃炎, 黄英航, 邓珏, 王璇, 张向葵. 从善念到善行:4~7岁儿童社会善念与亲社会行为的发展关联[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 457-466.
[2]	于晓, 张雅欣, 戚玥, 常尚钺, 何雯惺, 陈英和. 学龄儿童自然联结的发展轨迹及其与创造力倾向的关系:累加效应还是交互效应？[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 467-477.
[3]	陈紫薇, 黄潇潇, 俞国良. 父母教养行为与儿童心理健康关系的三水平元分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 563-576.
[4]	吴旻, 张杰, 叶攀琴, 龚茜, 袁柯曼. 留守儿童非自杀性自伤行为的发展轨迹:同伴侵害模式的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 586-595.
[5]	舒展, 彭申立, 赵纤, 黎志华. 累积家庭风险对低收入家庭儿童外化问题影响的即时与延时效应:有调节的中介模型[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(4): 596-608.
[6]	韩燕, 郭筱琳, 杨文静, 张恒, 王腾飞. 阅读困难儿童的执行功能结构分化滞后于正常发展儿童[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 326-336.
[7]	范兴华, 靳嘉宁, 燕利飞, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪. 留守困境对初中儿童个人成长主动性发展的影响:社会支持的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 427-436.
[8]	张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[9]	袁雯, 张旭然, 郭惠, 李燕芳. 儿童欺凌网络的结构特征与变化特点：基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 234-244.
[10]	匡子翌, 冷晓雪, 王福兴, 胡祥恩. 触手可得：追踪手势对学习的促进作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 295-304.
[11]	谢宇, 贺荟中, 王磊, 戴惟熙. 孤独症儿童与典型发展儿童内隐学习物品情景线索的比较研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 761-769.
[12]	范兴华, 燕利飞, 靳嘉宁, 李潇潼, 邓汇溪, 余思. 父母关爱对4~6年级留守儿童幸福感发展的影响:积极诠释生活的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(6): 859-868.
[13]	辛聪, 程平, 郑远霞, 刘国雄. 拼图能力与幼儿抑制控制的关系:持续性注意和言语能力的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 626-638.
[14]	刘畅, 蒋柳青, 郑天鹏, 边玉芳. 父母情绪调节困难与父母情绪社会化行为的关系:基于主客体互倚模型的交叉滞后研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 652-662.
[15]	王宇轩, 刘梦连, 杨滢晖, 毕鸿燕. 学龄儿童与成人形音整合的比较研究:字形与字音的相互影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 457-464.