心理发展与教育 ›› 2026, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 295-304.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2026.02.15

• 理论探讨与进展 • 上一篇    

触手可得:追踪手势对学习的促进作用

匡子翌1, 冷晓雪2, 王福兴2, 胡祥恩2,3   

  1. 1. 陕西师范大学心理学院, 西安 710061;
    2. 华中师范大学心理学院, 武汉 430079;
    3. 香港理工大学应用社会科学系, 香港 999077
  • 发布日期:2026-03-14
  • 通讯作者: 匡子翌, 王福兴
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(#62277025);陕西省博士后科研项目(#25010201644)。

Graspable: The Promoting Effect of Tracing Gesture on Learning

KUANG Ziyi1, LENG Xiaoxue2, WANG Fuxing2, HU Xiangen2,3   

  1. 1. School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710061;
    2. School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079;
    3. Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hongkong 999077
  • Published:2026-03-14

摘要: 追踪手势(tracing gesture)是指手指基于学习内容进行有意义的动态移动。以往研究主要通过具身认知理论,信号原则和认知负荷理论解释追踪手势的有效性。基于对以往追踪手势的实证研究汇总发现:在学习效果上,追踪手势提高了学习者的保持成绩(d = 0.41)和迁移成绩(d = 0.52);在主观评定上,追踪手势降低了学习者感知的内在认知负荷(d = 0.22),提高了学习者的学习动机(d = 0.22)。未来研究应进一步探讨追踪手势的有效属性和调节因素,并通过更加更多客观的方法验证其有效性。

关键词: 追踪手势, 手势, 具身认知, 信号原则, 认知负荷

Abstract: Tracing gestures are defined as dynamic finger movements that correspond to the learning content. Previous studies have mainly explained the effectiveness of tracing gestures through embodied cognition theory, signaling principles, and cognitive load theory. This study found that tracing gestures significantly enhanced learners’ retention scores (d = 0.41) and transfer scores (d = 0.52) in terms of learning outcomes. Additionally, in terms of subjective experience, tracing gestures reduced learners’ perceived intrinsic cognitive load (d = 0.22) and increased learning motivation (d = 0.22). Future research should further explore the moderating factors of tracing gestures and verify their effectiveness within more objective methodologies.

Key words: tracing gesture, gesture, embodied cognition, signaling principle, cognitive load

中图分类号: 

  • B844
*为纳入分析的文献
*Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Ginns, P., Howard, S. J., Leahy, W., & Paas, F. (2015). Giving learning a helping hand: Finger tracing of temperature graphs on an iPad. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 427-443.
Barsalou, L.W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
Dai, L., Jung, M. M., Postma, M., & Louwerse, M. M. (2022). A systematic review of pedagogical agent research: Similarities, differences and unexplored aspects. Computers & Education, 104607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2 022.104607
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Deci, E. L.,Nezlek, J., & Sheinman, L. (1981). Characteristics of the rewarder and intrinsic motivation of the rewardee. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.40.1.1
Dargue, N., Sweller, N., & Jones, M. P. (2019). When our hands help us understand: A meta-analysis into the effects of gesture on comprehension. Psychological Bulletin, 145(8), 765-784.
*Du, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Tracing worked examples: Effects on learning in geometry. Educational Psychology, 39, 169-187.
Duijzer, C., Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., Veldhuis, M., Doorman, M., & Leseman, P. (2019). Embodied learning environments for graphing motion: A systematic literature review. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 597-629.
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2022). Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity, and temporal contiguity principles. In R. E. Mayer, & L. Fiorella (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 185-198). Cambridge University Press.
Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science.Educational Psychologist, 43, 179-195.
*Ginns, P., Hu, F. T., & Bobis, J. (2020). Tracing enhances problem-solving transfer, but without effects on intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 1522-1529.
*Ginns, P., Hu, F. T., Byrne, E., & Bobis, J. (2016). Learning by tracing worked examples. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 160-169.
*Ginns, P., & King, V.L. (2021). Pointing and tracing enhance computer-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69, 1387-1403.
*Ginns, P., & Kydd, A. (2019). Learning human physiology by pointing and tracing: A cognitive load theory. In S. Tindall-Ford, S. Agostinho, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in cognitive load theory: Rethinking teaching (pp. 119-129). Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney.
Hostetter, A. B.(2011). When do gestures communicate? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 297-315.
*Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2014). Does tracing worked examples enhance geometry learning? Australian Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 14, 45-49.
*Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point: Tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85-93.
Hsee, C. K., & Zhang, J. (2010). General evaluability theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 343-355.
Hyönä, J. (2010). The use of eye movements in the study of multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 172-176.
Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D. A., Tolentino, L., & Koziupa, T. (2014). Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: Two science studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 86-104.
Klatzky, R. L., & Lederman, S. J. (2003).Touch. In B. Weiner, A. F. Healy, & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 4. Experimental psychology (pp.147-176). New York: Wiley.
Klepsch, M., Schmitz, F., & Seufert, T. (2017).Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1997. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997
*Korbach, A., Ginns, P., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2019). Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 102-113.
Krieglstein, F., Beege, M., Rey, G.D., Ginns, P., Krell, M., & Schneider, S. (2022). A systematic meta-analysis of the reliability and validity of subjective cognitive load questionnaires in experimental multimedia learning research. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 2485-2541.
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1058-1072.
Li, W.,Kuang, Z., Leng, X., Mayer, R. E., & Wang, F. (2024). Role of gesturing onscreen instructors in video lectures: A set of three-level meta-analyses on the embodiment effect. Educational Psychology Review, 36, 67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09910-0
*Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36(7), 596-601.
Mayer, R. E. (2021).Multimedia learning (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Montessori, M. (1964).The Montessori Method, Rome 1912. Bentley, Inc.
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 27-45.
Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking aboutnonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34, 602-619.
Sarailoo, R., Latifzadeh, K., Amiri, S. H., Bosaghzadeh, A., & Ebrahimpour, R. (2022). Assessment of instantaneous cognitive load imposed by educational multimedia using electroencephalography signals. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 16, 744737. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.744737
*Schueler, A., & Wesslein, A. K. (2022). Investigating the effect of deictic tracing on multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 77, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101525
Skulmowski, A., & Rey, G. D. (2018). Embodied learning: introducing a taxonomy based on bodily engagement and task integration. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-018-0092-9
Smyrnis, E., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2022). Mimicking tracing actions enhances young children's mathematical learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 36(6), 1356-1364.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G. & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 Years Later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292.
*Tang, M., Ginns, P., & Jacobson, M. J. (2019). Tracing enhances recall and transfer of knowledge of the water cycle. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 439-455.
van Gog, T. (2022). The signaling (or cueing) principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer, & L. Fiorella (Eds.),The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (3rd ed., pp. 221-230). Cambridge University Press.
*van Wermeskerken, M., Fijan, N., Eielts, C., & Pouw, W. T. (2016). Observation of depictive versus tracing gestures selectively aids verbal versus visual-spatial learning in primary school children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 806-814.
van Gog, T., & Scheiter, K. (2010). Eye tracking as a tool to study and enhance multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 95-99.
*Wang, B., Ginns, P., & Mockler, N. (2022). Sequencing tracing with imagination. Educational Psychology Review, 34, 421 -449.
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636.
*Yeo, L. M., & Tzeng, Y. T. (2020). Cognitive effect of tracing gesture in the learning from mathematics worked examples. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(4), 733-751.
叶浩生. (2010). 具身认知:认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18(5), 705-710.
叶浩生. (2014). “具身”涵义的理论辨析. 心理学报, 46(7), 1032-1042.
*左跟梅. (2022). 手势追踪在多媒体学习中的效应研究(硕士学位论文), 华东师范大学, 上海.
[1] 张攀, 杨娟, 王小英. 象似性手势对3~4岁儿童汉语动作动词记忆和泛化的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 153-161.
[2] 王娟, 刘天碧, 范小月. 象似性手势和指示性手势对自闭症儿童动作相关词汇学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2024, 40(3): 367-374.
[3] 于晓, 张和颐, 戚玥, 陈英和, 刘浩宁, 赵煜燨, 乔学文. 抑制控制在类比映射发展中的作用:认知负荷的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2023, 39(1): 1-11.
[4] 王燕青, 杨晓梦, 赵婷婷, 高春颍, 张洋, 赵庆柏, 王福兴, 胡祥恩. 分段是视频学习的有效方式吗?[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2022, 38(4): 600-608.
[5] 陈丽君, 刘丽敏, 林岳阳, 张玲燕. 虚拟学习环境下图形加工的认知负荷研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(5): 619-627.
[6] 袁娟娟, 杨炀, 郑志伟, 刘萍萍. 图文横排促进低熟悉词汇再认:基于8岁儿童和成人证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(4): 525-538.
[7] 刘勤学, 张聚媛, 林悦. 大学生智能手机成瘾与抑制控制能力的关系:手机位置和认知负荷的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2021, 37(2): 257-265.
[8] 王舒, 殷悦, 王婷, 刘国芳, 罗俊龙. 教学设计中的成绩表现和心流体验:基于认知负荷视角[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2019, 35(3): 329-337.
[9] 陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音. 具身道德:道德心理学研究的新取向[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2014, 30(6): 664-672.
[10] 谢久书, 王瑞明, 张昆, 张常青. 不同类型的知觉刺激对语言理解的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2012, 28(5): 502-509.
[11] 龚德英, 刘电芝, 张大均. 概述和音乐对认知负荷和多媒体学习的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2008, 24(1): 83-87.
[12] 曹宝龙, 刘慧娟, 林崇德. 认知负荷对小学生工作记忆资源分配策略的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2005, 21(1): 36-42.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!