心理发展与教育 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 475-484.doi: 10.16187/j.cnki.issn1001-4918.2022.04.03
蔺姝玮1, 孙炳海1,2, 黄嘉昕1, 肖威龙1, 李伟健1,2
LIN Shuwei1, SUN Binghai1,2, HUANG Jiaxin1, XIAO Weilong1, LI Weijian1,2
摘要: 与“我帮你,你帮我”的直接互惠相比,“我帮你,你帮他”的积极广义互惠,促使受助者转变为助人者帮助更多的人。与之相反,“我伤你,你伤他”的消极广义互惠,易导致受害者转变为伤害者波及无辜他人。以往研究未探寻到既能促进积极广义互惠,又能抑制消极广义互惠的因素。采用两阶段独裁者博弈任务范式,通过两项实验发现,共情是一个能够起到扩大积极广义互惠传递效应并削弱消极广义互惠传递效应双重作用的特殊变量,其机制在于自我-他人重叠,支持了自我扩张模型。这一研究为营造良好社会道德氛围,加强公民道德建设,保障公正和谐的社会环境提供了思路。
中图分类号:
| Aron, A., Aron, E. N., & Smollan, D. (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612. Alves, H., Koch, A.,& Unkelbach, C. (2016). My friends are all alike-the relation between liking and perceived similarity in person perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62(1), 103-117. Batson, C. D., Lishner, D. A., Carpenter, A., Dulin, L., Harjusola-Webb, S., Stocks, E. L., … Sampat, B. (2003). "... As you would have them do unto you":Does imagining yourself in the other's place stimulate moral action? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(9), 1190-1201. Bernstein, R. E., Laurent, S. M., Nelson, B. W.,& Laurent, H. K. (2015). Perspective-taking induction mitigates the effect of partner attachment avoidance on self-partner overlap. Personal Relationships, 22(2), 356-367. Bartlett, M. Y., & De Steno, D. (2006). Gratitude and prosocial behavior:Helping when it costs you. Psychological Science, 17(4), 319-325. Carnes, N. C., & Winer, J. P. (2017). Do unto others:How cognitive fusion shapes the transmission of moral behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 146(4), 472-484. Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S. L., Lewis, B. P., Luce, C., & Neuberg, S. L. (1997). Reinterpreting the empathy-altruism relationship:When one into one equals oneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(3), 481-494. Davis, M.H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons:A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 713-726. Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience.The Scientific World Journal, 6(1), 1146-1163. De Steno, D., Bartlett, M. Y., Baumann, J., Williams, L. A., & Dickens, L. (2010). Gratitude as moral sentiment:Emotion-guided cooperation in economic exchange. Emotion, 10(2), 289-293. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation:A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22. Edele, A., Dziobek, I., & Keller, M. (2013). Explaining altruistic sharing in the dictator game:The role of affective empathy, cognitive empathy, and justice sensitivity.Learning and Individual Differences, 24(2), 96-102. Gaesser, B., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). Episodic simulation and episodic memory can increase intentions to help others.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(12), 4415-4420. Galinsky, A. D., & Ku, G. (2004). The effects of perspective-taking on prejudice:The moderating role of self-evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(5), 594-604. Gray, K., Ward, A. F., & Norton, M. I. (2014). Paying it forward:Generalized reciprocity and the limits of generosity.Journal of Experimental Psychology:General, 143(1), 247-254. Goldstein, N. J., & Cialdini, R. B. (2007). The spyglass self:A model of vicarious self-perception.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 402-417. Hayes, A. F. (2017).Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis:A Regression-based Approach. Guilford publications. Horita, Y., Takezawa, M., Kinjo, T., Nakawake, Y., & Masuda, N. (2016). Transient nature of cooperation by pay-it-forward reciprocity.Scientific Reports, 6, 19471. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19471 Hu, Y., He, L., Zhang, L., Wölk, T., Dreher, J. C., & Weber, B. (2018). Spreading inequality:Neural computations underlying paying-it-forward reciprocity.Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(6), 578-589. Kini, P., Wong, J., McInnis, S., Gabana, N., & Brown, J. W. (2016). The effects of gratitude expression on neural activity.NeuroImage, 128, 1-10. Klimecki, O. M., Mayer, S. V., Jusyte, A., Scheeff, J., & Schönenberg, M. (2016). Empathy promotes altruistic behavior in economic interactions. Scientific Reports, 6,31961.https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31961 Lamm, C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2010). How do we empathize with someone who is not like us? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(2), 362-376. Lockwood, P. L., Seara-Cardoso, A., & Viding, E. (2014). Emotion regulation moderates the association between empathy and prosocial behavior.PLoS ONE, 9(5), e96555.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096555 Molm, L. D. (2010). The structure of reciprocity.Social Psychology Quarterly, 73(2), 119-131. Pfeiffer, T., Rutte, C., Killingback, T., Taborsky, M., & Bonhoeffer, S. (2005). Evolution of cooperation by generalized reciprocity.Proceedings of the Royal Society B:Biological Sciences, 272(1568), 1115-1120. Preston, S. D., & Hofelich, A. J. (2012). The many faces of empathy:Parsing empathic phenomena through a proximate, dynamic-systems view of representing the other in the self. Emotion Review, 4(1), 24-33. Rankin, D. J., & Taborsky, M. (2009). Assortment and the evolution of generalized reciprocity. Evolution:International Journal of Organic Evolution, 63(7), 1913-1922. Rumble, A. C., Van Lange, P. A., & Parks, C. D. (2010). The benefits of empathy:When empathy may sustain cooperation in social dilemmas. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(5), 856-866. Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners:The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523-528. Sahlins, M. (1965).On the sociology of primitive exchange:The relevance of models for social anthropology. Routledge Strang, S., Grote, X., Kuss, K., Park, S. Q., & Weber, B. (2016). Generalized negative reciprocity in the dictator game-how to interrupt the chain of unfairness. Scientific Reports, 6,22316.https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22316 Tesser, A., & Smith, J. (1980). Some effects of task relevance and friendship on helping:You don't always help the one you like. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16(6), 582-590. Thai, S., & Lockwood, P. (2015). Comparing you=comparing me:Social comparisons of the expanded self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(7), 989-1004. Van Lange, P. A. (2008). Does empathy trigger only altruistic motivation? How about selflessness or justice? Emotion, 8(6), 766-774. Van Lissa, C. J., Hawk, S. T., & Meeus, W. H. (2017). The effects of affective and cognitive empathy on adolescents' behavior and outcomes in conflicts with mothers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 158, 32-45. Wang, C. S., Galinsky, A. D., & Murnighan, J. K. (2009). Bad drives psychological reactions, but good propel behavior:Responses to honesty and deception. Psychological Science, 20(5), 634-644. Watanabe, T., Takezawa, M., Nakawake, Y., Kunimatsu, A., Yamasue, H., Nakamura, M., … Masuda, N. (2014). Two distinct neural mechanisms underlying indirect reciprocity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(11), 3990-3995. 丁凤琴, 宋有明. (2017). 感恩与大学生助人行为:共情反应的中介作用及其性别差异. 心理发展与教育, 33(3), 289-296. 黄嘉昕, 孙炳海, 李伟健. (2020). 广义互惠:一种可以让受助者帮助更多人的道德传递. 中国德育, (6), 19-23. 李伟健, 丁菀, 孙炳海, 俞丽莉. (2015).教师共情对学生学业成绩的促进:基于动画叙述模拟测量的多层线性分析. 心理发展与教育, 31(6), 719-727. 刘聪慧, 王永梅, 俞国良, 王拥军. (2009). 共情的相关理论评述及动态模型探新. 心理科学进展, 17(5), 964-972. 孙炳海, 苗德露, 李伟健, 张海形, 徐静逸. (2011). 大学生的观点采择与助人行为:群体关系与共情反应的不同作用. 心理发展与教育, 27(5), 491-497. 孙忠强, 李月娇, 薛盼盼, 尹锡杨, 郁雯珺. (2018). 行为意图信息对广义互惠行为的影响. 应用心理学, 25(1), 59-68. 谢东杰, 路浩, 苏彦捷. (2018). 学龄前儿童分配模式的传递效应:心理理论和共情的作用. 心理学报, 50(9), 1018-1028. 颜志强, 苏彦捷. (2018). 共情的性别差异:来自元分析的证据. 心理发展与教育, 34(2), 129-136. 余俊宣, 寇彧. (2015). 自私行为的传递效应. 心理科学进展, 23(6), 1061-1069. 钟毅平, 杨子鹿, 范伟. (2015). 自我-他人重叠对助人行为的影响:观点采择的调节作用. 心理学报, 47(8), 1050-1057. |
| [1] | 刘颖, 刘儒德, 毛晨莹, 林静敏, 刘佳彬. 在线视频学习中教师反馈时间和反馈复杂性对大学生学习投入的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 408-417. |
| [2] | 万欢兰, 牛宇洁, 王博晨, 金灿灿. 大学生人生目标、自我控制和学业倦怠间的关系:一项纵向研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(3): 418-426. |
| [3] | 张梅, 黄扬, 于嘉雯, 黄四林. 媒体多任务对大学生阅读绩效的影响:任务难度和类型的调节[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(2): 222-233. |
| [4] | 赵笑梅, 赵昕睿, 王珂珂. 大学生图文信息知识整合的加工:来自ERP的证据[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 18-27. |
| [5] | 丁越, 刘力嘉, 寇彧. 互联网时代的大学生人际关系满意度:线上积极反馈与感知社会支持的作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 39-49. |
| [6] | 王祯, 史保莹, 赵好莉, 郭云飞, 王恩国. 情感教学代理的情绪表达和角色对视频学习的影响:学习者经验的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2026, 42(1): 60-69. |
| [7] | 魏军, 羿聪, 周溪亭. 大学生基于学业表现的自我价值感与学业内卷行为的关联:基于潜变量增长模型分析[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 692-700. |
| [8] | 焦姣, 牡丹, 史璐. 亲密关系满意度对大学生主观幸福感的影响:一项日记追踪研究[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(5): 720-729. |
| [9] | 宋晓凡, 曹衍淼, 林小楠, 纪林芹, 张文新. HPA轴系统基因、同伴侵害与青少年攻击行为:共情的中介作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 550-560. |
| [10] | 范萌, 刘欣怡, 岳佳莹, 陈旭. 不同依恋类型在情绪共情过程中的个体差异[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(4): 598-608. |
| [11] | 胡心怡, 陈英和. 大学生新目标投入能力、自我损耗与幸福感的关系:生命意义感的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 348-356. |
| [12] | 谢莉, 金辉, 王志英, 胡宇飞, 杨喜兰, 席娟. 脱贫内生动力对贫困大学生学习投入的影响:自我控制的中介作用和社会支持的调节作用[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(3): 386-397. |
| [13] | 赵笑梅, 程释, 刘子涵, 刘红. 不同语言条件和执行功能对大学生记忆整合的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 153-162. |
| [14] | 廖晨曦, 王大华. 大学生依恋对自尊和人际适应的影响[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(2): 196-205. |
| [15] | 郭滢, 陈晓丹, 刘文志, 刘雨彤, 朱皕. 青少年语义错误记忆发展:学习测验因素[J]. 心理发展与教育, 2025, 41(1): 12-21. |
|
||